reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I sold all my Bitcoin because I don't trust it anymore. The mainstream adoption is a red flag. When whales start selling, it will crash, freezing retail trading. The system is rigged, and big investors control it. I made money and left. It's sketchy. Get out unless you can afford to lose. Don't gamble with essential money. Stay safe. Peace.

SBF's success at FTX highlights the inadequacy of the current framework. Many individuals in group 1 perceive miracles and hold onto hope, believing that assistance will be available when needed. It is disappointing that Gary Gensler, the SEC leader, couldn't confirm if Ethereum is a regulated security. Are coincidences non-existent?

SBF's success at FTX highlights the inadequacy of the current framework. Many individuals in group 1 view miracles as a source of hope. It's disappointing that SEC leader Gary Gensler couldn't confirm if Ethereum is a regulated security. Are you the type who believes in signs and miracles, or do you think luck plays a role? Consider this: could coincidences simply not exist?

People are saying Elon is going to steal everyone's money, but that's not what he's doing. He's a super genius who's been messed with by three-letter agencies. Because he helped Donald Trump get into office, he started looking into corruption. These agencies messed with the wrong guy because Elon is going to hunt them down and find out what's going on. This is a good thing for everyone. We have a brilliant mind examining these corrupt systems and bringing in a bunch of smart people to help.

The SEC is currently grappling with a significant decision regarding Ethereum. While it may take some time to reach a conclusion, my intuition suggests that they will determine that Ethereum was initially considered a security during its ICO but has now transitioned into a utility token. As a result, they are likely to let it go.

It's uncertain whether this will fail or not. There's a possibility that someone from Silicon Valley could create a new alt layer one and bribe everyone to join, going against the original intentions. However, despite potential social failures, it has been surprisingly successful so far, exceeding expectations.

Regulators have already made their stance clear on Ethereum. The SEC and CFTC in the US have both stated that Ethereum is not a security but rather a commodity. This conclusion is widely accepted, although there may be a few regulators who still refuse to acknowledge it. However, their opinion doesn't hold much significance.

Speaker 0: If you knew who was really behind Bitcoin, you would run as fast as you fucking could to sell it. I know. 100%. And when the real founder of Bitcoin comes out, it is my humble opinion and there's nothing humble about me. Bitcoin will go to fucking zero. One day. And microsecond.

Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, expressed skepticism about cryptocurrencies in the past, associating them with money laundering. However, BlackRock, managing trillions of dollars in assets, has now embraced Bitcoin. They have filed for a Bitcoin ETF with the SEC, recognizing Bitcoin as a global asset and a digital form of gold.

The SEC and Gary Gensler believe most cryptocurrencies are unregistered securities. However, I have previously stated that Ethereum is a commodity, as confirmed by the FCC and CFTC on multiple occasions. While Gary has expressed his belief that many tokens are securities, he acknowledges the need for proper demonstration. Despite being offered opportunities to publicly share his views, I don't think he is comfortable declaring Ether not a security. Therefore, I maintain my conviction that Ether is indeed a commodity.

The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of an ETF for Bitcoin in the past, believing it could have created significant wealth for Americans. They argue that regulators prevented the American people from benefiting, as the wealth ended up in the hands of international entities. While supporting sensible regulation, the speaker believes that the current situation is not in America's best interest. They highlight America's history of innovation and entrepreneurialism and express concern that regulators are stifling innovation by enforcing regulations instead of creating them. The speaker hopes that regulators will focus on enforcing existing laws rather than creating new ones.

There is a lot of optimism and political naivete surrounding Bitcoin, but it's important to understand the challenges it faces. The financial government complex will try to keep the technology at bay, but they won't completely kill it. They want people to see what they've done without causing too much disturbance. Their strategy is to throw little bits of sand in the engine of Bitcoin until it becomes too difficult and cumbersome for most people to use. Then they can dismiss it as an interesting idea that didn't work out as people wanted.

There have been discussions between ETF issuers and the SEC regarding a spot ETF. The level of involvement of the commissioner is unclear, but it seems to be happening at the staff level. The commissioner cannot comment on this matter. However, the commissioner has previously expressed the belief that there is no reason to prevent a spot Bitcoin exchange traded product.

The SEC has sent Wells notices to PayPal and Coinbase, warning that the cryptocurrencies they deal with may have broken the law as unregistered securities. These companies have been asking the SEC for guidance on which coins are problematic, but the SEC has been unhelpful. There are concerns that the SEC and the Biden administration are trying to destroy crypto to make way for a CBDC surveillance coin. Recent attacks on crypto-engaged banks support this theory. The goal seems to be to eliminate alternatives and force the crypto industry to develop on a CBDC base. This is referred to as Operation Choke Point 2.0. Bitcoiners are enjoying the show as shit coins suffer, but the pattern suggests that Bitcoin and other blockchain-based entities may be targeted next. The aim is to cut off escape routes from fiat and strangle businesses building an economy based on Bitcoin.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have allowed individuals to take the lead in the industry, particularly in front-running hedge funds. However, there is a belief that the recent criticism of crypto by Gensler is a ploy to enable hedge funds and Wall Street to enter the market and manipulate it. This strategy has been observed in the stock market as well.

It's uncertain whether this will succeed or not. There's a possibility that someone from Silicon Valley could create a similar product and lure away the team with large bribes, going against their initial intentions. There are many ways this could fail socially. However, it has been surprisingly successful so far, surpassing expectations.

Mario and Jeff discuss what the current geopolitical and monetary environment means for gold, the US dollar, and the broader system that underpins global finance. - Gold and asset roles - Gold is a portfolio asset that does not compete with the dollar; it competes with the stock market and tends to rise when people are concerned about risky assets. It is a “safe haven store value” rather than a monetary instrument aimed at replacing the dollar. - Historically, gold did not reliably hedge inflation in 2021–2022 when the economy seemed to be recovering; in downturns, gold becomes more attractive as a store of value. Recent moves up in gold price over the last two months are viewed as pricing in multiple factors, including potential economic downturn and questionable macro conditions. - The dollar and de-dollarization - The eurodollar system is a vast, largely ledger-based network of US-dollar balances held offshore, allowing near-instantaneous movement of funds. It is not simply “the euro,” and it predates and outlived any single country’s policy. Replacing it would be like recreating the Internet from scratch. - De-dollarization discussions are driven more by political narratives than monetary mechanics. Central banks selling dollar assets during shortages is a liquidity management response, not a repudiation of the dollar. - The dollar’s dominance remains intact because there is no ready substitute meeting all its functions. Replacing the dollar would require replacing the entire set of dollar functions across global settlement, payments, and liquidity provisioning. - Bank reserves, reserves composition, and the size of the eurodollar market - The share of US dollars in foreign reserves has declined, but this is not seen as a meaningful signal about the system’s functionality or dominance; the real issue is the level of settlement and liquidity, which remains heavily dollar-based. - The eurodollar market is enormous and largely offshore, with little public reporting. It is described as a “black hole” that drives movements in the system and is extremely hard to measure precisely. - Current dynamics: debt, safety, and liquidity - The debt ceiling and growing US debt are acknowledged as concerns, but the view presented is that debt dynamics do not destabilize the Treasury market as long as demand for safety and liquidity remains high. In a depression-like environment, US Treasuries are still viewed as the safest and most liquid form of debt, which sustains their price and keeps yields relatively contained. - Gold is safe but not highly liquid as collateral; Treasuries provide liquidity. Central banks use gold to diversify reserves and stabilize currencies (e.g., yuan), but Treasuries remain central to collateral needs in a broad financial system. - China, the US, and global growth - China’s economy faces deflationary pressures, with ten consecutive quarters of deflation in the Chinese GDP deflator, raising questions about domestic demand. Attempts to stimulate have had limited success; overproduction and rebalancing efforts aim to reduce supply to match demand, potentially increasing unemployment and lowering investment. - The US faces a weakening labor market; recent job shedding and rising delinquencies in consumer and corporate credit markets heighten uncertainty about the credit system. This underpins gold’s appeal as a store of value. - China remains heavily dependent on the US consumer; despite decoupling rhetoric, demand for Chinese goods and the global supply chain ties keep the US-China relationship central to global dynamics. The prospect of a Chinese-led fourth industrial revolution (AI, quantum computing) is viewed skeptically as unlikely to overcome structural inefficiencies of a centralized planning model. - Gold, Bitcoin, and alternative systems - Bitcoin is described as a Nasdaq-stock-like store of value tied to tech equities; it is not seen as a robust currency or a wide-scale payment system based on liquidity. It could, in theory, be a superior version of gold someday, but today it behaves like other speculative assets. - The conversation weighs the potential for a shift away from the eurodollar toward private digital currencies or a mix of public-private digital currencies. The idea that a completely decentralized system could replace the eurodollar is acknowledged as a long-term possibility, but currently, stablecoins are evolving toward stand-alone viability rather than a wholesale replacement. - The broader arc and forecast - The trade war is seen as a redistribution of productive capacity rather than a definitive win for either side; macroeconomic outcomes in the 2020s are shaped by monetary conditions and the eurodollar system’s functioning more than by policy interventions alone. - The speakers foresee a future with multipolarity and a gradually evolving monetary regime, possibly moving from the eurodollar toward a suite of digital currencies—some private, some public—while gold remains a key store of value in times of systemic risk. - Argentina, Russia, and Europe - Argentina’s crisis is framed as an outcome of eurodollar malfunctioning; IMF interventions offer only temporary stabilization in the face of ongoing liquidity and deflationary pressures. - Russia remains integrated with global finance through channels like the eurodollar system, even after sanctions; the resilience of energy sectors and external support from partners like China helps it endure. - Europe is acknowledged as facing a difficult, depressing outlook, reinforcing the broader narrative of a challenging global macro environment. Overall, gold is framed as a prudent hedge within a complex, interconnected, and evolving eurodollar system, with no imminent replacement of the dollar in sight, while the path toward a multi-currency or digital-currency future remains uncertain and gradual.

The speaker acknowledges that Bitcoin is not a security and that there is demand from both retail and institutional investors for access to it. They believe that approval of a Bitcoin ETF is inevitable, as the dichotomy between futures and cash products cannot continue indefinitely. The SEC has been given time to reassess and find reasons to reject the applications, but the speaker does not see any strong grounds for rejection. They mention that Chair Gensler is being scrutinized for potentially looking for ways to reject the applications despite the existence of a futures ETF. However, they also note that there is a 45-day time period for progress to be made on this issue.

Speaker 0 argues that it won’t be that everybody starts selling, but that new buyers stop buying. As the price falls, the true believers—hardcore Bitcoiners—won’t be phased by moves from 60,000 to 40,000 because they’ve seen it before and Bitcoin always comes back. The people who bought into the Bitcoin ETF, however, may be the first to exit; they were the last in and will likely be the first out. They aren’t long-term HODLers but traders, and if they were real Bitcoin people, they would have bought years ago rather than waiting for an ETF. The hype around the ETF could become a problem when it starts to sell off. When price declines occur historically, there’s often a large influx of Tether, whether counterfeit or not, and Tether buys Bitcoin, helping to form a bottom. But with ETFs liquidating, the ETF holders must take Bitcoin they own into the spot market and sell it, and buyers must pay with real dollars rather than Tether. If there aren’t enough buyers, a large drop could occur. The speaker envisions the next Bitcoin crash starting with the ETFs selling, driving Bitcoin down with market orders to get out by the end of the day—no limits, no waiting, just exit. If the ETF selling drives Bitcoin down to 10,000 (not 20,000), charts would show Bitcoin below previous lows, with the trend broken. This could shake the confidence of hodlers, who might question whether it will come back and consider selling. As the price falls, fear could rise with pleas like “Oh my God, I better get out before it’s worthless,” leading even diehards to contemplate salvage rather than sinking with the ship. Some holders entered at much lower prices and could still sell at 5,000 to realize profits, though fewer people exist with such low cost bases. They may choose to turn a profit or cut losses. The speaker notes that the current dynamic shows high confidence, with people convinced they’ll get rich and dismissing FUD. They criticize public figures like Peter Schiff or Warren Buffett as boomer misperceptions about Bitcoin, expressing annoyance that some people see them as not understanding, while others claim the speaker has studied Bitcoin and chosen not to believe it, insisting they didn’t drink the Kool Aid.

Looking back at the previous administration, there were many positive statements made that differed from the current stance of regulators. Now, the key is to see what actually happens. Understandably, changes take time. Financial regulators are large government entities, and they have been hindering crypto for years. The US accounts for a significant portion of global finance, yet only a small percentage of global crypto. This disparity is primarily due to regulatory challenges. The US has been uniquely difficult to work with. The critical question is whether the administration will take the necessary actions and find effective solutions.