TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The US military is now allegedly authorized to kill Americans on US soil, according to a headline from Zero Hedge and Armageddon Pros. This claim stems from a reissued Department of Defense (DOD) directive, specifically DOD directive 5240.01, reissued on September 27, 2024. The directive governs Department of Defense intelligence activities and now includes provisions authorizing lethal force in certain circumstances, supplanting the 2016 version, which did not mention that. Section 3.3 addresses assistance to law enforcement agencies and other civil authorities. It states that defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist law enforcement when lives are in danger. Approval is granted for responding with assets with the potential for lethality or any situation where the use of force is likely to result in death or serious bodily injury.

The Department of Defense recently approved the use of lethal force against civilians by military and local law enforcement. According to the speaker, a DOD directive was edited in September, with the Secretary of Defense approving assistance that has the potential for lethality. This includes any situation where providing assistance may involve the use of force likely to result in death or serious bodily injury. It also encompasses all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated. The speaker states that this is what they have been trying to warn people about.

The announcement introduces new immigration categories aimed at addressing critical labor needs and strengthening national capacity. First, a category is being added for candidates with work experience in transport occupations, specifically including pilots, aircraft mechanics, and inspectors. These sectors have been identified as areas in critical need. The intent behind strengthening these categories is to help move goods across the country and to new markets, thereby supporting trade, supply chains, and economic resilience. In addition, a new category is being created to attract highly skilled foreign military applicants by focusing on skilled military recruits. Eligible recruits who have a job offer from the Canadian Armed Forces, including doctors, nurses, pilots, can be invited to apply for permanent residence. These recruits will be subject to the same security and all military requirements as other applicants. The new category is framed as part of a broader effort to support the government’s commitment to strengthen the armed forces, defend sovereignty, and keep Canadians safe. This category, along with other priority categories, is said to support Canada’s defense industrial strategy. The defense industrial strategy was announced yesterday by Prime Minister Kearney.

The US military is now allegedly authorized to kill Americans on US soil, according to a headline from Zero Edge, which cited Armageddon Pros. This claim is based on a reissued DOD directive from September 27, 2024, concerning Department of Defense Intelligence activities. The directive purportedly includes provisions authorizing lethal force in certain circumstances, superseding the 2016 version. DOD Directive 5240.01, Section 3, addresses assistance to law enforcement agencies and other civil authorities. Section 3.3 outlines levels of authority, stating that defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist law enforcement when lives are in danger. It highlights "responding with assets with potential for lethality" or any situation where the use of force is likely to result in death or serious bodily injury.

Canadians demand transparency in investigating potential traitors. The government is cooperating with the Hogg Commission and providing necessary documents. The National Security Committee of Parliamentarians will also be involved. The opposition should refrain from making baseless claims in parliament.

The committee asked for information on how many of these so‑called police stations are operating currently in Canada, and whether any have been shut down. Response: There is deep concern about allegations and reports of foreign interference, including public reports of these so‑called police stations. The details of the investigation are the subject of ongoing initiatives by the RCMP, and questions about those details should be directed to the commissioner. The subsequent question specifically asked the commissioner to provide information to Canadians on how many of these alleged stations are operating in Canada, have operated previously, and if any have been shut down. Answer: Currently, we’re looking at three of the police stations in Toronto and one in Vancouver. We’re working with our police jurisdictions as well as with other Government of Canada national security agencies. An investigation has been initiated and is led by the Greater Toronto Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET). So far, elements of the investigation have been very overt—there have been marked police cars and uniformed members to cause disruption to the allegations. We’ve released that visible presence, and that’s mostly so that people will see the actions, for two reasons: first, because we need more information, and second, so that when police are in the area dealing with the allegations, people will come forward. The investigation is ongoing, and while the details can’t be discussed publicly, a statement in October/November indicated that an investigation was underway into reports of possible activities at those locations. The committee member then asked for clarification: Can you confirm that you know the locations of these supposed police stations, and that RCMP in uniform have been at those locations causing disruption? Response: No. In the initial instances, instead of disruption by going in uniform with marked police cars, the approach was to speak with the people involved at those police stations or locations because those locations are a legitimate business in the front. The committee then asked for a timeline on when the investigation would conclude and whether the allegations are true. The conversation moved to indicate the inquiry would continue, but no specific conclusion timeline was provided in the exchanged statements.

Speaker Hegseth raised a memo circulating on social media about the establishment of a National Guard Response Force trained in crowd control and civil unrest, deployed in all 50 states by April 2026, and asked to verify the memo’s authenticity and provide more information on operations. Speaker 1 declined to answer particulars about something that may be in the planning process, but stated that there are multiple layers of National Guard Response Forces, including in each state, regionally, and through Title 10 active duty and Washington DC. They noted that there are a lot of different ways they can be employed constitutionally and legally, using Title 10 and Title 32 forces, and they will do so when necessary.

If Alberta decides to implement a lockdown, federal support for businesses and individuals will be reinstated to ensure assistance is available. The focus is on facilitating provinces in adhering to the best public health guidance. Canadians expect the federal government to provide support rather than engage in conflicts or blame.

There are some places that are never for sale, like Buckingham Palace. Canada is not for sale and won't ever be, but there is opportunity in partnership and what can be built together. This includes security. The Canadian government is committed to a step change in investment in Canadian security. The President has revitalized international security and NATO. Canada is stepping up military participation.

There has been a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada US border. Two people have died and one is injured. The prime minister is asked for an update on the situation and the action plan to ensure the security of the people. The prime minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that the NSIA, Minister of Public Safety, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada are all providing support. Four border crossings are currently closed and additional measures are being considered at all border crossings. The prime minister will continue to work closely with US officials and provide updates. They excuse themselves to gather further information.

The Canadian Armed Forces can assist domestic law enforcement in Canada as needed under the National Defence Act. This is part of their responsibility to support civil authority when required. It is essential to have this capacity in place for future threats.

A Department of Defense directive has expanded domestic military authority to include lethal force, allowing the military to use lethal force within US borders, even against citizens, with the Secretary of Defense's approval. The directive, DOD Directive 5240.01, which took effect September 27, expands the circumstances under which the DOD can assist law enforcement, including the use of lethal force. The directive states that defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist law enforcement agencies when lives are in danger, with the use of lethal force requiring Secretary of Defense approval. This expanded authority has raised concerns, especially before the election, with some politicians predicting civil unrest regardless of the election outcome. Representative Jamie Raskin stated that if Trump wins, "we will need civil war conditions." The speaker suggests that politicians are preparing for civil unrest whether Trump wins or loses, potentially instigated by three-letter agencies.

There are two types of forces: domestic soil and the National Guard. The president deploys the National Guard in DC, but governors deploy them in other states unless the president invokes the Insurrectionary Act. The speaker suggests a campaign urging Democratic governors to commit to deploying the National Guard only to protect people from white supremacists and rogue police, not against the people. The speaker, who has been anti-military, believes this is preferable to civilians facing armed conflict. Drawing on a past success in the 80s where a governor refused to send the National Guard to Central America, the speaker suggests engaging with National Guard members, who are often working-class, and believes they may be less entrenched than the police. The goal is to consider how the National Guard might be deployed on behalf of the people instead of against them.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

Canada's top lab collaborated with a Chinese Army Major General, allowing access to Chinese students and a scientist from the PLA. Concerns were raised about national security and potential espionage. The Minister of Health defended the collaboration as part of efforts to combat Ebola. Accusations of reckless behavior and cover-ups were exchanged between the Minister and opposition members. The Minister emphasized the importance of maintaining national security and avoiding political interference in public health agencies.

The NDP has called for a public inquiry into allegations of foreign interference, specifically from the Indian government. The Minister agrees that the inquiry should investigate interference from the Modi government. The safety of Canadians and the integrity of the rule of law are of utmost importance. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are actively investigating in collaboration with their US counterparts. The government expects full cooperation from India in this investigation. No further comments will be made due to the ongoing nature of the investigation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The speaker discusses a significant increase in military spending and changes in the National Defense Act. They mention potential use of the military against Canadian citizens in case of emergencies like a trucker convoy. The document also hints at Canadian Armed Forces assisting domestic law enforcement, which raises concerns. Minister Blair explains the role of the military in supporting civil authority. This raises questions and prompts viewers to share their thoughts in the comments.

The secretary was asked to justify using the military for civilian law enforcement in Los Angeles. The secretary stated every American deserves to live in a safe community, and ICE agents need to be able to do their job of deporting illegal criminals. He said President Trump believes in law and order and has the authority to mobilize the National Guard or active duty troops to protect federal agents. When asked which authority justifies the use, the secretary stated it sounds like all three, citing millions of illegals waving flags from foreign countries and assaulting officers. He said the governor of California has failed to protect his people, along with the mayor of Los Angeles, so President Trump will protect the agents. When told orders for these purposes should be issued through governors, the secretary stated President Trump has all the authorities necessary.

Speaker 0 asked Secretary Hagsteth about a memo circulating on social media detailing the establishment of a National Guard Response Force trained in crowd control and civil unrest and deployed in all 50 states by April 2026, requesting verification of authenticity and more information on operations. Speaker 1 responded that they will not answer particulars on something that may be in the planning process, but noted that there are multiple layers of National Guard Response Forces, including in each state, regionally, and across Title 10 active duty and Washington DC. He stated there are a lot of different ways constitutionally and legally to employ Title X and Title 32 forces, and they will do so when necessary.

There has been a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada U.S. Border. Two people have died and one is injured. The Prime Minister is asked about the government's plan to ensure the security of the people. The Prime Minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that the NSIA, Minister of Public Safety, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada are all involved in providing support. Four border crossings, including the Rainbow Bridge, are currently closed, and additional measures are being implemented at all border crossings. The Prime Minister assures that they are in close contact with U.S. officials and will continue to provide updates. The Prime Minister excuses themselves to gather further information on the situation.

A Canadian military veteran served twenty years in the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Their last role was as the senior domestic intelligence analyst for the West Coast Of North America. They were a diplomatic defense attache in The Middle East and completed the initial tour in Afghanistan in 02/2006.

Support will be provided at the southern border through various military statuses, including state active duty, Title 32, or Title 10. This marks a shift in how operations are typically conducted. The Department of Defense is committed to protecting the territorial integrity of the United States, involving reservists, the National Guard, and active duty personnel, all in accordance with the Constitution and directives from the commander in chief. Discussions about invoking the Insurrection Act will be determined by the White House. We are prepared to take necessary actions to secure the southern border.

Trudeau announced that the Canadian Armed Forces can now be deployed against civilians, a move criticized by some. This action would not be accepted in the United States. Spread the word about this concerning decision.

Governor Newsom did not request federal assistance from the National Guard in California, which has 9,000 local law enforcement officers. The National Guard operates under the governor's supervision. However, during the Iraq War, the Bush administration requested National Guard troops, resources, equipment, weapons, and vehicles. Coordination is key, and it's important to work together to solve problems, regardless of who initiates the request.

The National Guard and Marines are being stationed at federal buildings across the country where riots are taking place, not deployed against US citizens. They remain on federal property to provide security for those buildings. If people do not storm the federal building or attack the National Guard, they will not be attacked. As an investigative journalist who covers protests, the speaker says they stood two inches from the National Guard, who did nothing. The National Guard is not allowed to operate in a law enforcement capacity because the cities will not allow it.