reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Hi. My name's John. And despite how upset I seem sometimes, I have no intention or desire to take my own life. So a plane a private jet took off about twenty minutes, maybe less, after Charlie Kirk was shot yesterday. This is the jet, N888KG. Do you notice how it's only made literally one flight this entire year? One flight. That's the only listed flight. Here's the website for the company it's registered under. Looks like they're scrubbing that shit. Here's the building where the company is registered. There's all the companies associated with it. Here's proof that the registration is real. Here's the distance between the airport where the private jet took off and where Charlie was shot. It's walking distance. And here's the guy who owns the jet.

The speaker was asked if Jeffrey Epstein worked for an intelligence agency and why a minute was missing from the jailhouse tape on the night of his death. Regarding the client list, the speaker stated the file is sitting on their desk to be reviewed, along with the JFK and MLK files. The tens of thousands of videos turned out to be child porn downloaded by Epstein and will never be released. The speaker has no knowledge of Epstein being an agent. Evidence showed he committed suicide. The missing minute from the video was due to the Bureau of Prisons resetting the video every night, and every night should have the same minute missing. They are looking for that video to release.

There is speculation about Maxwell Yurek from Arizona being connected to a white van at the Trump rally. The speaker visited Yurek's residence and questioned a family member, who denied knowing anything about Yurek's whereabouts or the van. The family member refused to provide any information and ended the conversation abruptly.

Hi, I'm James O'Keefe, an investigative reporter. I want to discuss your views on the deep state. Can you elaborate? I'm not interested in this conversation. But you've already spoken on it, and I have it recorded. What is your role at the White House? I advise on research and development policy. Are we done here? Have a nice night. You too. Have a good evening, Byron. There he goes, shuffling along.

The video centers on Candace and a claim about Egyptian private military contractors being flown to America on a top-secret mission and landing at a private military base in Utah on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. The presenters show photos of private military subcontractors and describe them as the “baddest, hardest, most battle trained” soldiers, implying their involvement is significant to the Charlie Kirk case. They question why Egyptian military contractors would be in Provo, Utah, and why they did not return to Cairo, asking who they were planning to “take out next.” One speaker states that, according to a person close to someone who was aboard the flight, the aircraft did not simply stop in Utah for routine servicing. They claim the plane carried military subcontractors and that these individuals were dropped off in Provo, yet did not reboard for Cairo. They assert the flight departed Provo on September 10 and returned to Cairo on September 11, with allegedly missing people from the plane. The speaker emphasizes that the flight radar investigation shows a Cairo-to-Paris-to-France-to-Bannat, North Dakota route around that period, and notes that on September 10 the plane departed Provo at 07:14 AM local time. They insist the people aboard the plane were not the same individuals who later appeared on the flight’s return. The speaker contends this information was provided by a female source who knows an Egyptian military subcontractor personally. They acknowledge she did not claim the mission was related to Charlie Kirk, only that it was a top-secret operation, possibly a discreet joint military exercise, so hidden that people were urged to ignore it. The speaker describes the revelation as terrifying yet galvanizing, claiming it prompted bravery and a push to root out perceived evil in society. The discussion then shifts to Kash Patel, referencing a Daily Mail article about him shutting down a Charlie Kirk foreign intelligence probe in a feud with Trump’s counterterror chief. The speaker suggests Patel’s stance raises questions and asserts that Patel’s approach contrasts with what they would expect if there were genuine efforts to investigate Charlie Kirk’s murder, noting that Trump and Trump family members would presumably be involved in questioning the narrative. They criticize Patel for discouraging further inquiry, comparing him to Dr. Fauci in his alleged resistance to investigation. The speaker challenges Kash Patel to dispute the claims, asking him to confirm whether the plane truly came for routine servicing or for a discreet mission, and to disclose the truth about who was aboard and why they were in Provo, Utah.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

"Candice is now saying that she believes that there is most likely some Ukrainian ties, some intelligence agencies that are involved in this assassination." "it's a military operation." "None of this shit is adding up, and it fucking stinks, guys." "a person going by the name Robbie Hild, who was allegedly from Washington." "No one is saying they went to school with him." "stronger than a theory and more of a hunch that this was a military operation, and people that executed this are actually from overseas." "They have a direct pipeline from Russia to America." "What we're talking about are terrorist cells." "Charlie was on a hit list. I also was on the hit list. Tucker was on the hit list." "release the gosh damn CCTV footage." "What the hell are you guys doing covering this shit up?"

"Viewer Andrew asked, 'do you believe the New Jersey drone incursions and the recent Denmark incursions all related or connected?' ... 'because the drones are still flying over my house in New Jersey.' 'Where is the evidence? As the president has said, they don't know what it is.' In Copenhagen, 'September 22 through to twenty third this year, there were sightings of two to three large unidentified objects near the Copenhagen Airport in Denmark.' It 'shut down that airport for four hours and about a 100 flights were disrupted.' The Danish authorities 'immediately referred to it as an attack and they're pointing the finger at Russia.' 'There was a bulk Russian carrier crewed by Russian crewmen about 80 kilometers away.' 'This strains credibility.' 'There’s the beginning of the disinformation.' The scene near Copenhagen was 'hysterical' — 'The police and military response was hysterical.' 'There are people that have described to me seeing orb like objects coming into airspace, and then in some way morphing into shapes of aircraft.' 'Where is your bloody evidence?' 'These incursions, whatever they are, may not necessarily be drones.' 'My friends, John and Jerry Tadesco are still seeing these anomalous objects, including in the flight paths on the approach to Kennedy Airport at New York.'

Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the secret testing on election machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. He asks about discrepancies in signatures on mail-in ballots. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw elections in the area. Jordan expresses frustration and asks for a break while at the gym.

The speaker asks if the FBI had communication with their agents during the Capitol attack, to which Speaker 1 denies any involvement. Speaker 0 then asks about "ghost vehicles," but Speaker 1 is unfamiliar with the term. Speaker 0 claims to have evidence of two buses used by FBI informants disguised as Trump supporters during the attack. There is a brief interruption from Speaker 2, who reminds everyone to stay within their allotted time. Speaker 0 objects to his question being cut off, stating that the buses were nefarious and filled with FBI informants. The transcript ends with Speaker 2 attempting to move on to the next speaker.

The speakers discuss Thomas Crooks, the drone pilot, questioning how he executed the act, citing his training at a gun range with federal agents and the use of encrypted communication platforms. They speculate about Crooks having a handler, possibly with terrorist ties or driven by left-leaning ideologies, and criticize the media for potentially radicalizing individuals by associating conservative views with threats to democracy. They ponder whether a foreign nation was involved in an assassination plot. Speaker 1 suggests the news cycle is attempting to move on from the story and accuses Democrats of weaponizing the situation, likening it to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. Speaker 0 expresses concern about the lack of independent verification regarding Crooks' medications and suggests he may have been drugged. Speaker 1 hopes a future, Trump-aligned FBI director will conduct a thorough investigation and declassify the findings for the public.

The speaker discusses speculation about the attempted assassination of Donald Trump at Butler Farm Show. They point out a water tower with a clear angle towards Trump, suggesting it as a potential sniper spot. The speaker highlights Gematria connections between "water tower" and "Donald J Trump." They express doubt about the official narrative and urge viewers to consider alternative theories. The speaker hints at upcoming revelations and asks for opinions on the matter.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not a lone shooter, citing messages they've received. The speaker questions why many Americans find the situation "doesn't add up," listing details such as the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone use, and being spotted with a rangefinder. The speaker, identifying as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. They ask if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt, imprison, and depict the target as "a modern day Hitler." The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, and if they received reports of anything "fishy" there, such as silverware or trash. They ask if the home was extremely clean, "almost like a medical lab," stating that's what they are hearing.

Discussion centers on drones and Jason Goodman's analysis, with speculation of "speculating maybe three, maybe four unmanned drones." While reviewing livestream footage, "I saw a drone just go right by in the footage." Speaker 1 says he "set on this inform" and "known about the drone since the weekend," trying to reach out to people "to bring it to their attention and say, hey." "We've got something here. Let me show you." He adds, "No one would give me the time of day." He references "one flyby that he, he's got referenced there" and notes "the drone comes crazy, crazy just right out in front of the crowd." He concludes, "just today, I found two new drones, and I just put them up on my Twitter page, about maybe two hours ago."

The speakers discuss the attempted assassination of Trump, questioning why the would-be assassin had no social media footprint and a professionally scrubbed house. They find it suspicious that CNN streamed the rally live and that the Secret Service deemed the roof he was on unsafe, while snipers occupied a steeper roof. They speculate it could have been a coordinated assassination attempt, with the shooter intended to be killed afterward. They highlight the suspect's young age and the possibility of radicalization or manipulation. The speakers are concerned about the lack of information released and the absence of a formal report. They mention leaked cell phone records showing a phone traveling from outside the FBI offices in DC to where the suspect lived. They find it odd that the suspect had multiple phones and no cutlery in his house. They suggest the suspect could have been under the influence of psychotropic drugs or hypnosis, referencing MK Ultra and Jolly West's experiments.

The speaker repeatedly questions why the FBI is always referenced for information. They press the other speaker, who claims to have communicated with the FBI, about details of an investigation. Despite being asked about shell casings and explosives, the speaker deflects, insisting on referring to the FBI for answers. The questioning becomes more intense, with accusations of withholding information and covering up. The speaker continues to evade direct answers, emphasizing the ongoing criminal investigation.

Speaker 0 from Fox News asks Senator Durbin why he won't subpoena Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs. Senator Durbin claims to have no knowledge or interest in the issue, stating that it has never been raised to him. Speaker 0 mentions that Senator Blackburn has wanted to subpoena the flight logs but there hasn't been a vote in the committee. Speaker 0 questions if Senator Durbin is curious about high-profile individuals potentially involved in illegal activities, but Senator Durbin dismisses the question and thanks Fox News for their time. Speaker 0 persists in asking if Senator Durbin will take action, but the conversation abruptly ends with Speaker 1 calling Durbin a liar.

There are drones flying around New Jersey ports, and the government is aware of their origins. The military knows where they launched from and can trace them back to their source. However, there's a lack of communication about this situation, leaving people in suspense. It's unlikely that these drones are a threat, as any enemy activity would have been more aggressive. The public deserves transparency, especially since these drones have been spotted over areas like Bedminster. The truth should be shared with the people.

A person asks John if he was at the Capitol. The person then asks John if he is with Black Lives Matter or right-wing people. John is on the phone during this exchange. The person asks again, "Are you Black Lives Matter?" Someone says John stated on the phone that he is not being charged with anything. The person repeats the question, "Are you Black Lives Matter, John?" John answers, "No."

The transcript presents a video analysis centered on Frank Turek during an event with Charlie, focusing on whether Frank was FaceTiming his wife and son/daughter-in-law or viewing drone surveillance footage. The speaker asserts that Frank, initially seen on the left of Charlie and later to Charlie’s right, was FaceTiming someone but then shifted to viewing surveillance footage, likely from a drone, rather than the FaceTime call. Key claims and sequence: - The narrator describes Frank standing to Charlie’s right behind him, holding a phone, and initially FaceTiming someone while Charlie sits and asks questions. The claim is that Frank’s FaceTime feed shows a woman and a picture-in-picture frame, suggesting FaceTiming with someone. - The speaker contends that the phone Frank is using for the FaceTime appears different from the phone he uses to view drone footage, noting discrepancies in phone appearance (dimensions, front/back features, button color). - The analysis shifts to allegedly showing that Frank’s phone screen is displaying drone surveillance footage rather than faces. The speaker points to frames where objects on the screen resemble a car, trees, a building with a spire or fountain, and a golf cart, arguing these are not faces or reflections. - A key part of the argument is a claimed cross-angle discrepancy: Dan Flood’s tattooed arm appears on Frank’s phone screen at angles inconsistent with the real arm’s orientation, implying the feed is from a different camera angle than Frank’s own position. The speaker argues this mismatch indicates a surveillance feed, possibly from a drone, rather than a direct FaceTime view of a person. - The footage sequence allegedly shows movement synchronized between Frank’s phone screen and what’s happening off-screen, including observations of an arm, two legs, and later a moment that might depict Charlie tipping over after an incident. - The presenter points out a potential visual link between a tire/hubcap and a vehicle seen earlier on Frank’s phone, inviting viewers to compare frames and decide if they are the same. - The speaker invites the audience to review the footage themselves, proposes that Frank was not FaceTiming anyone, and suggests that he may have switched to drone footage. They emphasize that this is a theory that should be investigated and encourage downloading the footage to form a conclusion. - Acknowledgment is given to Indi Rose of the Let Me Stop You There podcast, whose analysis influenced the video, with an invitation to followers to review her work and compare viewpoints. Overall, the transcript details a contested interpretation: whether Frank used FaceTime as claimed or was viewing drone surveillance footage, with emphasis on frame-by-frame inconsistencies, angle mismatches, and the appearance of drone imagery on Frank’s screen, culminating in a call for independent review of the footage.

- I recognized an individual and 'have taken down the cameras minute four after Charlie was shot? The back camera of all the ones when you take the front camera.' - 'I've never seen that. He's never been behind me at an event. He's never been lingering around me at an event.' - I asked about 'his presence behind Charlie' and 'the mysterious phone call ... minute three after Charlie was assassinated.' - He told me explicitly that 'they were trying something new that day. Like, it was something new. Charlie's super ambitious. And on the AV thing, they were trying something new, and they wanted to be able to feed it back instantly to Arizona.' - 'None of it makes sense to me because these events are typically livestreamed. But again, something new. Okay?'

Speaker 0 from Fox News asks Senator Durbin why he won't subpoena Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs. Senator Durbin claims to know nothing about the issue and says it has never been raised with him. Speaker 0 mentions that Senator Blackburn has wanted to subpoena the flight logs but there hasn't been a vote in the committee. Speaker 0 questions if Senator Durbin is curious about high-profile individuals who may be involved in illegal activities, but Senator Durbin dismisses the topic, stating it's the first time anyone has brought it up. Speaker 0 asks if Senator Durbin is interested in pursuing the matter, but there is no clear response.

Pierre Falcone had a partner named Arcady Gademach involved in Angola Gate, described as global trafficking at the highest levels of government. Arcady Gatomach didn’t show up for his court hearing and was sentenced in absence for trafficking weapons, etc. He was born in Russia, spent time in Israel, and was described as a French intelligence agent. Following yesterday’s episode, there were emails suggesting Gatimack (referenced as the same person) is living in Nashville and moved here in June, using the name Jonathan Schmidt. Seven people, mostly men, were certain that he is from Israel and is working for a company known as Root Brands under the guise of being a technology officer. They allege he has brought in Ukrainians and is working with them; Ukrainians are said to be running from the war. The claim is he was brought in by a Nashville businessman named Clay Thomas, and one of the Ukrainians mentioned is Alex Smirnoff. The informer stated that Gatimack is in Nashville since June and that he is using the name Jonathan Schmidt. The speaker expresses fear and says they do not know who to contact regarding an assassination attempt and coordination, mentioning Israel and France, and notes receiving more credible information via emails. They contacted Clay Thomas and Root Brands and requested more information about this Russian-Israeli employee using the name Jonathan Schmidt who is bringing in Ukrainians. The plan is to publicize the information to Tennesseans in Franklin and Nashville who are familiar with Root Brands or have seen this man. They request efforts to find a photo or aged photo. The speaker urges contacting authorities, stating they will do so, and notes that Tulsi Gabbard’s office has been involved. They stress the seriousness of the situation and advise Tennesseans to report sightings of the individual, including reports from real estate agents who say he was shopping for a home in the Brentwood area. They request tips at Candace Owens dot com and encourage contacting authorities if any sob stories are heard from Ukrainians fleeing the war. They claim there is a major influx of Ukrainians fleeing to Washington, and warn that wars can allow dangerous people into other countries under refugee guise. They reiterate that there should be no Israeli or French intelligence officers in Nashville, and ask anyone who knows something to email them. They say if you work for the local FBI or apartment authorities, you should have heard from them; otherwise, contact via email. The speaker promises to provide more information in the coming days, describing the situation as very scary and noting that Root Brands purportedly hired the individual as a technology officer and that he is supposed to be a billionaire, which raises questions about why he would be employed. They dispute the name Jonathan Schmidt and suggest the person might be Israeli who should be living in Tel Aviv and may not be legally allowed in the United States. They also appeal to ICE agents or border patrol agents to get involved.

An individual confronted Jason about a call he made to Mike, which apparently upset Mike. The caller supports Donald Trump and opposes election theft and communists becoming president. The call concerned Mary Fanning and Dennis Montgomery. Jason said he hadn't heard the talk. An unidentified person instructed security to keep the caller away from Jason. An argument ensued, with the unidentified person demanding the caller leave. The caller questioned why he had to leave and accused the person of working for the hotel. Later, the caller stated the reason for the confrontation was a "bullshit question" about a conversation with Mike Lindell. The caller told someone not to trust Jason. The caller then argued with hotel security, demanding their names and accusing them of threatening and pushing him. The caller requested security assistance and demanded the security personnel back away.