reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kamala's campaign is facing serious issues, having spent $1 million on celebrity endorsements and concerts without gaining any votes, leading to a $20 million debt. Donors were misled about the campaign's viability, believing it was competitive. Internal staff felt mistreated and were hesitant to voice concerns. Despite missing fundraising goals, Kamala remained unaware of the campaign's financial troubles. She spent lavishly on events, including $500,000 for a stunt in Vegas, while losing significantly in key states. Now in debt and seeking funds for a recount after losing by 3 million votes, the party is hesitant to contribute more. Donald Trump has offered assistance, suggesting party unity and leveraging remaining campaign funds effectively.

The Democratic Party is in turmoil, with factions vying for control and distancing themselves from Biden. Many believe he should step aside, as his actions have led to this situation. Meanwhile, Obama’s camp is also critical, highlighting Biden's last-minute pardons as cowardly. With Biden sidelined and Kamala Harris quiet, the party lacks a clear leader. The left is searching for a new figure but seems to be struggling. Traditional Democratic leaders have been notably absent since Trump's return, with Nancy Pelosi reportedly focused on her investments. CNN is facing significant layoffs and internal strife, while former Politico staff reveal censorship regarding the Hunter Biden laptop story. Politico denies these claims, calling them false.

In politics, money raised is crucial. A group found suspicious donations to Democrats totaling over $200 million through ActBlue, mostly from older, liberal, lower-income individuals. Many donors seem unaware of these contributions made in their name, suggesting identity theft. Examples include a woman making 1400 donations in 7 years and another making 52,501 donations in 700 days. These irregularities raise concerns about potential election law violations and national security risks. Despite 52 complaints filed, Democrats are reluctant to investigate. The magnitude of these questionable donations far exceeds previous concerns over foreign influence, warranting a thorough investigation.

Another batch of subpoenas has been issued by special counsel Jack Smith. It's frustrating, but we need to stay focused. Every contribution counts, whether it's pennies, nickels, dimes, or quarters. We truly appreciate your support. If you see someone in the middle who hasn't donated yet, encourage them to pitch in. Let's keep the momentum going!

We just received more subpoenas from the special counsel, Jack Smith. Every contribution counts, from pennies to quarters. We appreciate your support. Encourage others to donate if they haven't already. Get creative, like selling gas from your car for $8 a gallon. Let's keep the momentum going.

ActBlue changed its donation process in September to require CVV numbers to prevent foreign donations. However, there hasn't been a noticeable drop-off in donations since this change. The information provided by ActBlue was misleading; they only require CVV numbers for new accounts opened after the change. This means that hundreds of thousands of existing donors are still not subject to this requirement, which was not clearly communicated.

FEC discovered suspicious donation patterns from unemployed individuals, with large sums donated through multiple transactions to ActBlue and Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found 400,000 new ActBlue accounts in 30 days. Harris campaign emails requested small donations using fear tactics, including fake names in their lists. The goal appears to be creating a facade of grassroots support while potentially funneling larger sums through these transactions.

There is a lot of money pouring into Kamala Harris' campaign, with a Swiss billionaire named Hans Georg Weiss contributing $20 million through 1.6 million individual donations from 400,000 donors. Allegations of fraud are now surfacing due to the scale of these donations.

Kamala Harris didn't receive support from various groups, not just Black men. Many voters, including women, didn't back her campaign. It’s disappointing to see that even a comedian like Cat Williams garnered more votes. There were expectations for her to show up and engage, but she seemed absent and disconnected from her own supporters.

Kamala Harris raised suspiciously large amounts of money in a short time, sparking concerns about fraudulent donations. An investigation revealed potential money laundering through ActBlue, a democratic fundraising platform. Ordinary citizens' names and addresses were used for large donations they did not make. The source of the money remains unclear, but past reports suggest further scrutiny is needed.

Democratic leaders serve the donor class, prioritizing fundraising over genuine representation. Politicians like Kamala Harris present a facade of joy, but voters crave authentic reactions and representation. The mainstream media often protects these politicians, misrepresenting their ties to donors and failing to address their shortcomings. To create change, voters must challenge and replace these leaders, as they will not self-correct. The consistent losses for Democrats stem from corruption and reliance on donor money. If voters do not take action to fire these ineffective leaders, they will continue to face defeats against figures like Donald Trump. It's time to wake up and recognize the lies perpetuated by the establishment.

Kamala Harris is allegedly paying people to attend rallies. The speaker claims to have proof of this through a Casting Network billboard. The billboard sought nonunion actors for a Democratic event, offering payment, a per diem for meals and transportation, and coverage of flight and other expenses. The submissions were due the day before the speaker discussed it. The speaker believes this shows that the Harris campaign's ground game is a facade, as they are willing to pay for people to attend rallies.

Kamala Harris's campaign is facing scrutiny after a $1,000,000 loss and allegations of money laundering. Just before an interview with Al Sharpton, her campaign donated $500,000 to his nonprofit, raising questions about the motives behind the donation. Critics argue that this appears to be a bribe, as Sharpton's organization has a history of questionable financial practices, including spending on private jets and limousines. The situation suggests a troubling connection between Harris's campaign and Sharpton's nonprofit, leading to concerns about transparency and integrity in political funding.

Discoveries on fec.gov revealed suspicious donation patterns from supposedly unemployed individuals. Four unemployed donors made nearly $198,000 in donations through thousands of transactions. They donated to various Democrat campaigns and PACs, raising questions about the source of their funds. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with Harris campaign emails urging small donations. Fake names were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing up in official emails, suggesting a potential scam to create a facade of grassroots support while funneling larger sums.

Mike Benz outlines a conspiracy tied to the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) and a June 2020 war game that purportedly sought “a way to use riots, nationwide riots, and do favors to the Black Lives Matter movement so that they would owe them favors back to take to the streets against Trump if Trump won the election fair and square,” while also needing “a robust, intentional, and specific strategy to go after the networks that enabled Trump's rise to power” so they could be jailed after Trump left office. Bubba Boyd, who has written about the event since August 2020, explains that the discussion will cover the key players in TIP, the plan to subvert the 2020 election, how rigging the election and four prosecutions of Trump flow from the June 2020 conspirators’ meeting, and excerpts from a January 2020 Donald Trump speech to the World Economic Forum that allegedly signals why Trump and Trumpism had to be eliminated. The publicly named sponsors of the war game are Rosa Brooks and Niles Gilman of the Berggruen Institute in Los Angeles, described as the “globalist home of Silicon Valley’s anti-Trump billionaires,” with branches in Venice and Beijing and a China branch in direct dialogue with Xi Jinping. Michael Anton is cited as the author of a Trump national security document who criticized TIP’s war game, stating they were planning a coup against the election and publicizing the war game to normalize the idea. Brooks’s background is summarized as a lawyer for George Shullis at the Open Society Institute, then a State Department attorney for regime change, then a Pentagon policy lawyer under Obama, while teaching at Georgetown Law. The narrative asserts she advocated impeaching Trump and a potential 25th Amendment move, and even a military coup, in a 2017 Foreign Policy piece titled “three ways to get rid of president Trump before 2020,” including the sentence: “For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officers might simply tell the president, no, sir. We’re not doing that.” The claim is that she “couldn’t wait to launch a coup against Trump,” a portrayal attributed to a New York Times editorial response. In June 2020, Brooks and Gilman allegedly convened TIP’s war game about the 2020 election and its possible aftermath, with over 100 participants and 76 role players drawn from former Pentagon officials, the intelligence community, Silicon Valley, Wall Street, the media, and Republican and Democratic institutions. Names publicly associated with anti-Trump activity are listed, including John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Bill Kristol, Michael Steele, Jennifer Granholm, and other unnamed figures, all described as major players in attempts to nullify the 2016 election and overthrow the government. Benz is said to detail the TIP war games and concludes that to prevent a second Trump term, Biden would need a large victory margin to overcome fraud perceptions, with the insurrectionist scenario calling for control of the military, Black Lives Matter, and other street rioters. The narrative asserts that BLM raised about 90 million in 2020 with donors like the Democracy Alliance and the Ford Foundation, and that Mark Elias led financial filings associated with the effort. The discussion further cites Defense One articles from August 2020 that reportedly called for a military coup and a subsequent open debate within the military about accepting orders, and claims that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley “was not about to obey any order from the president.” The appendix to TIP’s report allegedly debated criminally proceeding against Trump after leaving office and wiping out his “white supremacist and extremist base,” with a quote describing the need for a strategy to challenge networks that enabled Trump’s rise and remained “imbecible to the kind of pluralist democracy the founders intended,” implying a path toward removing Trump’s influence even after his presidency. The transcript also notes contemporary references to Arctic Frost, an FBI investigation linked to 2022 midterms, and alleged targeting of Republican election operations and other figures by the FBI. Excerpts from Trump’s World Economic Forum address and a January 2020 speech are presented to illustrate a moral and strategic framing against globalism and “radical socialists.” The presentation ends by inviting audience support and promoting further engagement, including a free newsletter.

Merry Christmas! This has been a long time coming. I realized my disillusionment when I saw $2.5 billion wasted, with no accountability. Oprah received $2.5 million for production costs she could have covered herself, and $450,000 was spent on Kamala Harris' face on a sphere, which was pointless. Donors feel burned, and I'm not alone in this sentiment. Since my announcement, the response has been intense, with excommunication and public shaming from those who claim they're not a cult. It's overwhelming, so I've disabled comments on social media. As for my future, it's all happening quickly. I might attend the inauguration, and I've been contacted by someone from Team Trump, who has been kinder than the DNC ever was. That speaks volumes.

Democrats in Philadelphia are expressing concerns that the Harris campaign is not adequately engaging with local party members about improving voter margins. Despite losing Pennsylvania in 2020, Donald Trump increased his vote count in Philadelphia from 2016 to 2020, and it appears he is on track to do so again.

Democrats are becoming increasingly anxious, believing Trump has the upper hand and could win. Even Kamala Harris's campaign is showing signs of distress, as evidenced by the surge of emails I receive—at least 20 a day. The subject lines are growing more frantic, with messages urging potential donors to act quickly to avoid a loss.

Kamala received a $1,000,000 payment for an interview in September, raising questions about her motives. She previously labeled Trump a dictator, which helped her secure $1,000,000,000 in donations, but much of that was allegedly mismanaged. In a podcast appearance, she insisted the host travel to DC and used campaign funds to create an elaborate fake set in a hotel room, costing over $100,000 for just two chairs and a table. The actual cost could have been around $6, leaving uncertainty about the remaining funds. Following the election loss, her campaign sent out urgent donation requests, prompting skepticism about how donor money is being utilized.

The video reveals suspicious donation patterns on fec.gov, with unemployed individuals making numerous small donations totaling tens of thousands of dollars to ActBlue and various Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with the Harris campaign sending emails asking for $1 donations using fear tactics. Fake donors were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing the campaign's desperation for small donations to potentially facilitate a larger scam.

Kamala Harris reportedly received $1,000,000 for an interview in September, raising questions about her commitment to democracy. After calling Trump a dictator, she secured $1,000,000,000 in donations but allegedly mismanaged the funds, spending lavishly. During a podcast appearance, she insisted the host travel to DC and used campaign funds to create an elaborate set in a hotel room, which cost significantly more than necessary. Following the election loss, her campaign sent out urgent donation requests, prompting skepticism about how donor money is being utilized.

One hundred invited Harris supporters are leaving and boarding shuttle buses. Kamala Harris is departing from toss-up states to come to new locations.