TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the concept of fake shares in the stock market and how they are created through naked short selling. They mention high-profile businesses like Blockbuster and Toys R Us that have failed due to short selling. The speaker explains that short selling is betting on a stock's price going down, but it can be risky as the price can go up indefinitely. They discuss the GameStop situation in 2021, where short sellers were caught in a short squeeze by the GameStop community. The speaker suggests that short sellers may still be trapped and unable to buy back the stock. They also mention the interconnectedness of the market through leverage and swaps.

The speaker says, “You are going to see a crack in the bond market. Okay? It is going to happen. And I tell this to my regulators, some of whom are in this room, I'm telling you what's gonna happen, and you're gonna panic. I'm not gonna panic. We'll be fine. We'll probably make more money, and then some of my friends will tell me that we're that we cause we like crises because it's good for JPMorgan Chase.”

Their figurehead is George Soros. The speculation process goes like this: an investor deposits a security of 1,000,000,000 US dollars with a bank somewhere in the world. Then he goes to a bank in Thailand and takes out a loan for 25,000,000,000 baht. This is the official equivalent of $1,000,000,000. He sells the baht on the open market. Immediately, other money traders follow suit because they now fear that the price of the baht will fall. When the exchange rate of the bot to the dollar has fallen, for example, by 30%, the investor then buys back the 25,000,000,000 baht with only 700,000,000 US dollars, thereby redeeming his loan. He has made a $300,000,000 profit and then hightails it out of the country.

There is a pool of $50,000,000 in subprime loans. The market for insuring mortgage bonds is 20 times bigger than actual mortgages. If the mortgage bonds were the match, CDOs were kerosene soaked rags, then synthetic CDOs were the atomic bomb. Mark Baum realized the world economy might collapse at that moment in a restaurant.

This video explains how short selling works in the stock market, focusing on GameStop as an example. It discusses how big players manipulate failing companies for profit, leading to a risky situation with derivatives and leveraged bets. The recent GameStop situation involves short sellers facing losses as the stock price rises, causing a ripple effect in the market. Retail investors have held onto their shares, refusing to sell and forcing short sellers to cover their positions. This has disrupted the market and highlighted the power of collective action against financial manipulation.

Speaker 0 explains that initially, when the idea of imposing tariffs on foreign imports is proposed, it can be seen as a patriotic move aimed at protecting American products and preserving American jobs. The speaker notes that in some cases this approach may appear to yield a temporary benefit. However, this benefit is short-lived. Over time, the dynamics shift in a way that undermines the initial reasoning. The first consequence highlighted is that homegrown industries begin to depend on government protection through high tariffs. This reliance on protection causes these industries to stop competing on their own and to refrain from pursuing the kinds of innovative management practices and technological advancements that are necessary to compete successfully in global markets. In other words, the presence of high tariffs discourages internal drive for efficiency and innovation, leading to a complacent domestic sector that relies on artificial shelter rather than real competitiveness. As the reliance on tariffs grows, an even more troubling development unfolds: foreign governments retaliate. The speaker emphasizes that tariffs tend to trigger retaliatory moves in international trade, setting off a cycle of escalating protectionism. This retaliatory stance leads to a broader trade war characterized by increasingly stringent trade barriers and a reduction in global competition. The result is a less dynamic and less efficient international marketplace, with fewer competitive pressures. Following these retaliations and the intensification of trade barriers, prices become artificially inflated due to the protective measures that shield inefficiency and poor management from market discipline. Consumers respond to these higher prices, causing a decrease in purchasing. The speaker identifies this shift as the point at which markets begin to shrink and eventually collapse, marking a significant downturn in economic activity. Ultimately, the consequence of this sequence is severe: industries and markets contract to the point where many businesses fail or shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs. The overall trajectory described is one in which an initial move perceived as patriotic and protective leads to reduced competition, retaliatory trade actions, higher prices, a shrinking market, and widespread unemployment.

The video explains how short selling works in the stock market, focusing on GameStop. Wealthy individuals manipulate failing companies like GameStop to profit from their downfall. They use derivatives and leverage to make large bets, creating a risky interconnected market. When GameStop's stock unexpectedly rose, short sellers faced massive losses. Redditors capitalized on this by holding onto their shares, causing short sellers to scramble. This led to a showdown between individual investors and Wall Street, with the former refusing to sell their shares. Ultimately, the video highlights the power of collective action against financial manipulation.

GameStop's situation stems from short selling, where investors borrow shares to sell, hoping to buy them back at a lower price. This practice can lead to significant losses if the stock price rises instead. Some firms, like Bain Capital, have exploited this by mismanaging companies to profit from their decline. GameStop was targeted for years, but a savvy new leader began turning it around, causing the stock price to rise unexpectedly. Short sellers, who had heavily bet against GameStop, found themselves in trouble as they needed to buy back shares at higher prices. The more they bought, the higher the price went, creating a cycle that pressured them further. Retail investors recognized this and decided to hold their shares, realizing they had leverage over the short sellers who needed to close their positions.

Real estate is very slow in Des Moines, Iowa, and agents can't explain why. The speaker says people in trucking and other industries report it's the slowest they've ever been. After posting a video about this, the speaker received many messages from people across the country saying the same thing: business is extremely slow. The speaker questions how this aligns with the stock market hitting records. Despite high prices, high rates, and the declining value of money, the stock market is thriving. The speaker is considering pulling all their money out of stocks, fearing a major crash is coming soon due to the current chaos and record stock market highs.

The speaker notes a recent news story claiming the stock market was experiencing its worst April since the Great Depression. However, ten days later, the Nasdaq is reportedly up for the month. The speaker finds it notable that there hasn't been a corresponding story highlighting the market's rebound. The speaker believes the media is driving market perceptions.

A thousand years after the death of Christ, money changers, those who loan out and manipulate the quantity of money, were active in medieval England. They were not bankers per se; the money changers generally were the goldsmiths. They were the first bankers because they started keeping other people's gold for safekeeping in their vaults. The first paper money was merely a receipt for gold left at the goldsmith. Paper money caught on because it was more convenient than carrying around a lot of heavy gold and silver coins. Eventually, goldsmiths noticed that only a small fraction of the depositors ever came in and demanded their gold at any one time. Goldsmiths started cheating on the system. They discovered that they could print more money than they had gold, and usually, no one would be the wiser. Then they could loan out this extra money and collect interest on it. This was the birth of fractional reserve banking, that is, loaning out many times more money than you have assets on deposit. So, if a thousand dollars in gold were deposited with them, they could loan out about $10,000 in paper money and draw interest payments on it, and no one would ever discover the deception. By this means, goldsmiths gradually accumulated more and more wealth and used this wealth to accumulate more and more gold. Today, this practice of loaning out more money than there are reserves is known as fractional reserve banking. Every bank in The United States is allowed to loan out at least 10 times more money than they actually have. That's why they get rich on charging, let's say, 8% interest. It's not really 8% per year, which is their income. It's 80%. That's why bank buildings are always the largest in town. But does that mean that all interest or all banking should be illegal? Hardly. In the Middle Ages, canon law, the law of the Catholic Church, forbade charging interest on loans. This concept followed the teachings of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. They taught that the purpose of money was to serve the members of society to facilitate the exchange of goods needed to lead a virtuous life. Interest, in their belief, hindered this purpose by putting an unnecessary burden on the use of money. In other words, interest was contrary to reason and justice. Reflecting Church law in the Middle Ages, Europe forbade charging interest on loans and made it a crime called usury. As commerce grew, and therefore opportunities for investment arose in the late Middle Ages, it came to be recognized that to loan money had a cost for the lender, both in risk and in lost opportunity. So some charges were allowed, but not interest per se. But all moralists, no matter what religion, condemn fraud, oppression of the poor, and injustice is clearly immoral. As we will see, fractional reserve lending is rooted in a fraud, results in widespread poverty, and reduces the value of everyone else's money. The ancient goldsmiths discovered that extra profits could be made by rowing the economy between easy money and tight money. When they made money easier to borrow, then the amount of money in circulation expanded. Money was plentiful. People took out more loans to expand their businesses. But then, the money changers would tighten the money supply. They would make loans more difficult to get. What would happen? Just what happens today. A certain percentage of people could not repay their previous loans and could not take out new loans to repay the old ones. Therefore, they went bankrupt and had to sell their assets to the goldsmiths for pennies on the dollar. The same thing is still going on today. Only today, we call this rowing of the economy up and down the business cycle. Like Julius Caesar, King Henry the first

BlackRock is a risky company focused on making money, selling high-risk bonds without investors fully understanding the risks. The speaker warns of a looming economic crisis, likening it to past financial collapses. They criticize the actions of CEOs and politicians, predicting a repeat of the 2008 financial crisis if lessons from history are not heeded.

If a store of wealth is in jeopardy due to excessive supply and demand, and monetary inflation occurs, severe disruptions will result. These disruptions could resemble the breakdown of the monetary system in 1971 or the 2008 financial crisis, but could be even more severe if other factors occur simultaneously. The worst-case scenario involves a political downturn, internal conflict that deviates from normal democratic processes, and international conflict that significantly disrupts the world, all impacting the value of money.

In the early 20th century, powerful banking families like the Rockefellers, Morgans, Warburgs, and Rothschilds sought to create a central bank in the US. To sway public opinion, JP Morgan spread rumors of a bank's insolvency, causing mass withdrawals and a chain reaction of bankruptcies. This pattern repeated in 1920, leading to the collapse of over 54 competitive banks. From 1921 to 1929, the Federal Reserve increased the money supply, resulting in extensive loans and the popularity of margin loans in the stock market. In October 1929, financiers called in margin loans, triggering a massive sell-off and bank runs, collapsing over 16,000 banks. The Federal Reserve's contraction of the money supply worsened the depression. Central banks control interest rates and the money supply, and the Federal Reserve bankers aimed to remove the gold standard. Additionally, the video includes anti-Semitic remarks blaming Jews for financial crashes and cultural decadence in Germany.

Speaker 0: So who are the people that actually get to be inflation? Well, they're the ones that are climbing up the network. They're the compromised ones. Why? What do they get? They get 0% money. The most corrupt money in the world is quantitative easing. Right? You essentially get the banks to buy the government's debt, and then central banks, put it on their balance sheet. So this is just pure corruption. This is below interest money. What about the banks? They get to create it for free. You know, they actually get to create it. They get a thousand decks on you you're paying 10%. They get they get to lever that up a 100 times. They get a thousand percent. And remember, this is all a debt based Ponzi scheme. The money to pay the interest doesn't exist, so you gotta find another person to take on the debt. You're either if you have a positive money in your in your bank balance, it's because somebody else is in debt. The money doesn't exist unless somebody else is in debt, and the money to pay the interest doesn't exist. So we create this economic environment where your money is continually being debased, and then you need to speculate in order to beat inflation. Now if you do a bit of speculation and you just invest some of your money in stocks, what happens? You're suddenly like, I don't know what stock to buy. I'm I'm not a professional trader. So there's a company out there, BlackRock, that will just buy all the stocks for me, and I just can give them a £100 a month or something. And, now I don't need to figure out what stock to buy. Okay. So now BlackRock is taking everyone's investment money that can't be bothered to figure out what stock through ETFs and index ones. Then they're taking everyone's pension. Then they're taking everyone's insurance contributions because you're trying to hedge some of the risk. And then when you get your house, you have to have insurance. And so where did BlackRock and all the asset managers in this financial industrial complex get all the money? It's your money. You paid for it. So then what do they do? Well, the banks create all of these. They they create new money every time they issue a mortgage. And then they say, do you know what? I don't even wanna take the risk of these mortgages anymore. What if can I just package it up and give it to someone else? So Larry Fink says, yeah. I've got all this money. All these people are putting these pension money in. Why don't we create something called a mortgage backed security? Let's package up all of these mortgages. Just put them into one product. And then what I can do is we can slap a credit rating on it. And if everyone complies, then they get this credit rating. Credit rating is not it's about compliance with the network. So now you've got all the banks are creating the money, and then they create these mortgage backed securities that allows them to control effectively all the real estate and transfer it. But who do they sell it to? They sell it to you. And so they created the money. They created the mortgage backed security, and then they sold it to your pension. So you paid for the very system for them to get the 0% money in the first place, and they're charging a fee for it. And what else do they get? They get a board seat on every company.

Evergrande, the world's largest property developer, has gone bankrupt, causing an 8% drop in indexes. This is part of a larger issue in China, where all public or listed property developers are facing default bankruptcy. China's economy heavily relied on real estate for growth, but now the sector is collapsing after an unregulated climb. The situation is comparable to the US financial crisis, but with three and a half times more banking leverage. China's regulators are trying to protect individuals from short sellers, but the situation is expected to worsen.

When people stop believing in the economy, they usually stop spending, and that's exactly what's beginning to happen. In March, the conference board's expectations index fell to 65.2, well below the recession warning threshold of 80. Meanwhile, the University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index kicked off April with a reading of 50.8, just barely above the all time low of 50 that hit in June 2022. Translation, people are nervous about what's next, and that matters. Sentiment drives behavior. And in an economy that relies heavily on consumer spending, fear alone can slow everything down.

Bayer employees were shocked to learn that JPMorgan had bought their company for only $2 per share. Some even cried, unable to believe the low price. Bear Stearns, which had bet heavily on the housing market, collapsed in just seven days. The entire country had been encouraged to invest in housing, leading to people taking mortgages they couldn't afford. The government blamed homeowners for their situation but believed Wall Street would be fine. Despite mounting evidence of a toxic housing market, Paulson and Bernanke insisted everything was well and that the subprime crisis would be contained. However, the impact was far-reaching, contrary to their claims.

The speaker is focused on the long-term ability of the U.S. and world economy to recover, not daily stock market fluctuations. The stock market is compared to a tracking poll, with daily changes obscuring the long-term strategy. The banking system suffered due to lax regulation, overleverage, and systemic risks taken by both regulated and unregulated institutions. Losses are working their way through the system, and people are absorbing the depth of the banking problem and its international impact. Profit and earning ratios are reaching levels where buying stocks could be a good long-term investment.

Speaker 0 argues that it won’t be that everybody starts selling, but that new buyers stop buying. As the price falls, the true believers—hardcore Bitcoiners—won’t be phased by moves from 60,000 to 40,000 because they’ve seen it before and Bitcoin always comes back. The people who bought into the Bitcoin ETF, however, may be the first to exit; they were the last in and will likely be the first out. They aren’t long-term HODLers but traders, and if they were real Bitcoin people, they would have bought years ago rather than waiting for an ETF. The hype around the ETF could become a problem when it starts to sell off. When price declines occur historically, there’s often a large influx of Tether, whether counterfeit or not, and Tether buys Bitcoin, helping to form a bottom. But with ETFs liquidating, the ETF holders must take Bitcoin they own into the spot market and sell it, and buyers must pay with real dollars rather than Tether. If there aren’t enough buyers, a large drop could occur. The speaker envisions the next Bitcoin crash starting with the ETFs selling, driving Bitcoin down with market orders to get out by the end of the day—no limits, no waiting, just exit. If the ETF selling drives Bitcoin down to 10,000 (not 20,000), charts would show Bitcoin below previous lows, with the trend broken. This could shake the confidence of hodlers, who might question whether it will come back and consider selling. As the price falls, fear could rise with pleas like “Oh my God, I better get out before it’s worthless,” leading even diehards to contemplate salvage rather than sinking with the ship. Some holders entered at much lower prices and could still sell at 5,000 to realize profits, though fewer people exist with such low cost bases. They may choose to turn a profit or cut losses. The speaker notes that the current dynamic shows high confidence, with people convinced they’ll get rich and dismissing FUD. They criticize public figures like Peter Schiff or Warren Buffett as boomer misperceptions about Bitcoin, expressing annoyance that some people see them as not understanding, while others claim the speaker has studied Bitcoin and chosen not to believe it, insisting they didn’t drink the Kool Aid.