reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Many people believe that staying quiet or voting Democrat will protect them from those who want to take away their rights and freedoms. However, history shows that this is not the case. The speaker warns that we should learn from the history of communism, particularly the Bolsheviks, who sought to control every aspect of people's lives. They emphasize that these individuals are coming for us, and we must take action to resist them. It is already happening in some parts of the world, where people are forced to live off bugs and have their currency controlled based on their speech. The speaker urges everyone, not just a select few, to resist and stand up against this threat.

Speaker 1 leads a march against the Russian consulate, claiming that the Russians are fighting the Kazarian mafia and a subterranean war to exterminate vermin from the planet. They believe that COVID mandates are part of a larger plan to depopulate the planet. Speaker 1 dismisses criticism from former colleagues and urges people to do their own research. They believe their messages have broad appeal and that major political parties are falling apart. Speaker 1 hopes to get into parliament to expose evidence of crime committed by the government and demand a clean electoral system. They aim to achieve change within 6 months.

In this video, the speaker discusses the social and cultural changes happening in the West, particularly in the United States and Western Europe. They compare these changes to what happened in Russia after the 1917 revolution. The speaker criticizes the elimination of historical figures and the rejection of traditional values, such as gender roles and family structures. They argue that the fight against discrimination has turned into reverse discrimination, and that the emphasis on race is dividing people further. The speaker also mentions the controversial teaching of gender identity to young children and criticizes it as a crime against humanity. They advocate for a healthy conservatism in shaping approaches to these issues. The speaker concludes by stating that woke ideology is drawing Western civilization towards its darkest days, comparing it to the Bolshevik Communist Revolution in Russia.

The speaker argues that Western societies are plagued by "degeneracy and evil," perpetuated by those who control money, media, and politics, citing examples like the alleged rape of Palestinians. Speaking out against this system is difficult, as individuals risk losing fame, fortune, and glory. Drawing parallels to the American Revolution, the speaker emphasizes the need for selflessness and a rejection of materialism, like the Boston Tea Party. The speaker notes that revolutionaries shared ideas and principles, even under pen names, fearing oppression. The speaker claims that people are awakening to the problems, noticing patterns, and seeking solutions. They highlight the increasing awareness of a particular group's influence, alleging their involvement in mass murder and cultural genocide. The speaker anticipates a rejection of mainstream narratives and encourages public conversations, even if controversial. The speaker concludes by expressing hope for a shift in national discourse, drawing parallels to the conversations in beer halls with an Austrian painter.

Speaker 0 urges people to study and discover where things came from. Speaker 1 asks what happens when that discovery occurs, especially for those whose entire life has been built around the Bible. Speaker 0 replies by proposing a real-world example: in Russia today, what is it like when you find out that you’ve been hoodwinked, that your government was not the most powerful and most wonderful government on earth, and now it has totally collapsed? And then asks what you will do, since you trusted, raised your children, and went along to get along. You may have wasted your entire life, and now your world is collapsing around you. The cause, Speaker 0 asserts, is that you didn’t do your homework and you didn’t stand up for what was right when you could have. The consequence of going along to get along is a very uncomfortable present. Speaker 0 further clarifies the broader case: the notion that nothing on earth is permanent, and the discomfort that comes with facing uncomfortable facts. He expresses a desire for a spiritual revolution in this country in which people will simply say no—no to organized religion, no to organized government, no to tyranny, and no to forms of bigotry, ignorance, and ill-informed stupidity, regardless of color or place. The core message is that people should resist coercive structures and rigid dogmas. The overarching point emphasized by Speaker 0 is that, above all, people must do their homework. He ties the argument to the need for critical examination and personal responsibility in evaluating beliefs, authorities, and systems, using the Russian example to illustrate the potential personal and societal costs of remaining complacent or ignorant.

In Canada, communists rallied in major cities to build a revolutionary party. They aim to overthrow Canadian imperialism and unite communists nationwide. In the US, calls for revolution are growing, especially on college campuses. The speaker warns of the dangers of history repeating itself, citing Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution as an example of how college students can be manipulated into committing atrocities. The speaker emphasizes the vulnerability of young adults to extremist ideologies.

The speaker discusses the similarities between the reactions of citizens living under totalitarianism and those of schizophrenic individuals. They argue that totalitarian societies are built upon delusions, where people regress to a childlike state and surrender control to politicians and bureaucrats. The ruling class, driven by delusions of power, believes they can control society from the top down. The speaker explains that the mass psychosis of totalitarianism begins with the ruling class, who infect the population with this mindset. This is achieved through a method called menticide, which involves manipulating and reorganizing people's emotions. Menticide is described as an old crime against the human mind and spirit, but now systematized.

The speaker argues that the Bolsheviks were as brutal as the Nazis in at least two key ways: they made Christianity illegal and religion illegal, and they also criminalized criticizing the regime. They claim the Bolsheviks destroyed 40,000 churches and tens of millions of Christians, and note that “that’s who we sided with.” They critique how history is framed, saying narratives always start after the most horrific actions and focus on the response to those actions, such as events around October 7, the Warsaw Ghetto, or Russia’s expulsions, rather than addressing why those actions occurred. The speaker contends this approach skews the overall picture. They acknowledge that “The Bolsheviks were unequivocally horrible,” but they argue that people don’t learn about that history. The speaker mentions denial of the Armenian genocide and the Holodomor, suggesting there is a double standard: it is “okay for them to deny the Armenian [Holodomor],” but now, in about 30 countries, people can be arrested or imprisoned over related claims.

The speaker presents a question about arrests for speech violations in the United Kingdom in 2023, noting that police handcuffed and brought people to jail for such offenses. The stated answer is that there were more than 12,000 arrests in the UK, i.e., “More than 12,000.” The speaker then contemplates whether this number is large and proceeds to compare it to Russia, described with highly negative terms. Russia is labeled “the most totalitarian country in the world,” “lacking in basic freedom,” “run by a madman,” and “so evil we’re literally at war with that country right now just on principle.” The speaker provides the arrest figure for Russia: 3,319 arrests, in a country with twice the population of the UK. From these figures, the speaker poses the conclusion that the idea of totalitarianism not appearing in the Anglosphere is challenged by the comparison. The speaker ends with the assertion that totalitarianism has already arrived in the Anglosphere.

Speaker 0 argues that the crooked foundation of the public school system makes university indoctrination possible, asserting that everything in school is filtered through a Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors. The speaker claims schools introduce gender ideology, with opponents framed as intolerant; introduce critical race theory, with opponents framed as racist; introduce feminism, with opponents labeled misogynist or part of the patriarchy; and introduce socialism, with opponents described as privileged. The speaker contends that this influence is often subtle rather than overt, embedded in curriculum. An example given is how slavery is taught in elementary school. The speaker acknowledges general agreement that slavery was bad but argues that curricula omit broader historical context. Specifically, they state that The United States banned slavery in seven states while the rest of the world had bans in seven countries; in seventeen seventy six, 92–95% of the world was actively practicing slavery and it was the norm on every continent. The speaker also notes that Thomas Jefferson tried to get slavery abolished in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, that England abolished slavery in 1833, the United States in 1865, and that the rest of the world followed that example in Africa and Asia. The claim is that within proper historical context, the American story is one of liberation. The speaker asserts that the Marxist lens requires the oppressed versus the oppressors, and that if these arguments were made in school, a student would be failed, shamed in front of the class, and possibly sent to the principal’s office. The claim is that the system is designed to keep America divided so it could be easily conquered. Addressing critics, the speaker mentions the Frankfurt School, stating it expanded the ideas of Marxism, developed the oppressed-versus-oppressor framework, and aimed to use race, gender, and sexuality to usher in cultural Marxism. The speaker contends this infiltration began in academia in the nineteen-sixties, and attributes today’s situation to those developments. Note: Promotional content at the end has been omitted.

The speaker describes human trafficking as an absolutely horrific practice and is prepared to bring full force to solve this problem. The speaker says they were taught that if they worked hard, they could become like "them" one day. They state that sometimes they were taught to believe that heroes were villains and villains were heroes. As they started waking up, they were labeled conspiracy theorists and deplorables. They say they are digital soldiers fighting in the greatest war the world has never seen. The speaker claims their weapon is truth, while their opponent's weapon is censorship. They move from battlefield to battlefield, doing what they can to wake the rest of the world up, and they will never give up.

The speaker criticizes the woke revolution, comparing it to past revolutions that spiraled out of control. They argue that communism and recent ideologies fail to understand human nature and attempt to change reality through shouting. The speaker draws parallels between today's woke revolution and Mao's cultural revolution in China, highlighting the purging of old customs and the use of shame and reeducation. They also discuss an incident involving a law professor who was punished for using taboo words in an exam. The speaker mentions the existence of a "red guard" on Twitter and gives an example of a banjo player who had to apologize for endorsing an unapproved book. They conclude by criticizing the arrogance of thinking one's revolution is superior and mention controversial beliefs about gender, obesity, and biology.

The speaker discusses the biography of Peter Rangel, a Baltic German general during the Russian revolution. After the war, he returns to a chaotic Saint Petersburg where the Bolsheviks are inciting discontent within the army. The speaker draws parallels between this historical event and the current Black Lives Matter movement, emphasizing the importance of free speech and the distinction between citizens and slaves. They argue that if someone threatens their children or tries to sexualize them, they believe in using force to protect them. The speaker calls for the application of natural law in American society and warns of the increasing aggression if it is not upheld.

The speaker confronts the audience, claiming to have proof and challenging them to acknowledge it. They accuse the audience of emotionally and mentally abusing children by teaching them communist values. The speaker vows to continue fighting against this and threatens legal action. They argue that schools should not teach certain topics and should respect their religious beliefs. The speaker also mentions the children of police officers and claims that their voices are being silenced. They question the definition of racism and challenge others' assumptions about their own race.

The speaker argues that there is ongoing lying and distortion of historical facts, along with constant attacks on Russian culture, the Russian Orthodox Church, and other traditional religious groups. They claim Western elites are destroying family structures, cultural and national identities, and normalizing perversions and child abuse, including pedophilia, as part of the social order. They allege that clergy are being forced to bless same-sex marriages. The speaker downplays private life interference, stating that adults have the right to live as they wish and that Russia has always respected this, and will continue to do so without intruding on private life. They urge a reminder from sacred texts, asserting that family is defined as a union of a man and a woman, and claim these core religious texts are being questioned. The speaker notes that the Anglican Church plans, at least for now, to consider the idea of a gender-neutral God, and questions what such a change would mean, suggesting that many in the West understand they are being led toward a spiritual catastrophe. The speaker characterizes Western elites as "going insane," describing it as an unfixable problem, while refraining from judging their mental state as a solution. The central message is a duty to protect children from what is described as degeneration and degeneracy, with a firm commitment to defend and safeguard the younger generation from these influences.

This transcript threads together personal reflections, historical events, and the human cost of political upheaval across Russia and Ukraine in the early 20th century. Key points include: - A meditation on evil and destruction: questions about the source of great evil, whether darkness exists in us, and whether ruin benefits the earth. - Personal life and engagement: Speaker 1 describes seeing Alex for one hour, the sadness that work imposes on time with Alex, and being indescribably happy with her; Speaker 3 speaks of utter happiness and unity between two mortals; Speaker 1 recalls an engagement day as a hazy, unforgettable moment. - The 1905–1917 revolutionary context and violence: despite peaceful marchers, authorities panicked, backed Cossacks with whips and infantry; a second volley killed hundreds of marchers; radical press attacked the czar’s reputation; a telegram arrives at the palace leading to mourning; January 9 and March 15 dated entries note troops firing in the city, casualties, and political resolve. - Abdication and immediate reactions: Speaker 5’s grandfather reacts to the czar’s abdication for himself and his son Alexis, declaring “Russia is finished.” - Civil war and anti-Bolshevik movements: In the South, a White army forms against Bolsheviks. - The assassination of Nicholas II and family: It is asserted that Goloshokin, head of the Yakaterinburg Soviet, met with Lenin and others in Moscow; the killings were preplanned, with orders from Lenin to hide details; Dzerzhinsky allegedly directed suppression of information in Berlin via Alexander Joffe. The family is moved to a basement, confronted by 11 armed men; accounts describe the executions and the bloodshed. - Brest-Litovsk and territorial losses: The Bolshevik regime signs the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Germany, renouncing territories gained over three centuries. - Family dislocation and exile: A family member recalls the abdication and exile, the shock and tears, and the sense that “Russia is finished.” - Famine in Ukraine (1931): Survivors recount eviction from homes by activists, resulting seizures and removal of families; women and children forced outside, with pleas to stay; survivors describe slave labor, loss of cultural and religious leaders, and relief efforts by international organizations and churches, though relief was hampered by the Soviet border. - Famine reporting and international response: Duranty, a prominent journalist, is criticized for lying about the famine; despite internal British discussions showing estimates of up to ten million deaths, the New York Times published favorable reports, influencing recognition debates of the Soviet Union. - Personal losses during famine: A spring scene of a dead little sister, mortuary practices with no coffins, and the struggle to bury her; survivors describe eating rotten cabbage, beets, and scraps; some rely on parishioners, railroad workers, neighbors, and even Soviet officials for food; the famine’s human toll includes starving children and widespread death. - Enduring memories of hunger: Descriptions of children with swollen limbs, convulsions, and the grim daily reality of hunger; the narrative closes with a bleak portrait of famine-stricken Ukraine and the resilience of those who endured.

The speaker discusses the impact of historical facts on Russian culture, particularly on traditional religious organizations. They highlight the destruction of family, culture, and national identity, as well as the influence on children's lives. The speaker mentions priests allowing various marriages and emphasizes that adults have the right to live as they choose. However, they point out that sacred scriptures of all religions define family as a union between a man and a woman, which is now being questioned. The speaker expresses concern about the church's plans and the spiritual decline it may lead to. They assert the need to protect children from degradation and ensure their well-being.

The speaker criticizes the woke revolution, comparing it to past revolutions that spiraled out of control. They argue that attempting to change human nature and reality through shouting and holding one's breath is futile. The speaker draws parallels between today's woke revolution and Mao's Cultural Revolution, highlighting the purging of old customs and the attack on those who resisted. They also mention a law professor who faced consequences for using taboo words in an exam, and a banjo player who had to apologize for endorsing an unapproved book. The speaker concludes by criticizing the arrogance of thinking that a revolution can create a new kind of human and dismissing the idea that obesity doesn't affect health. They also mention the irony of people questioning biology as "just a theory" after mocking Republicans for denying climate change.

Speaker 1 leads a march against the Russian consulate, claiming that the Russians are fighting the Khazarian mafia and trying to eradicate those who have been destroying the planet. They believe that the Russians, along with other nations, are engaged in a secret war to exterminate vermin. They argue that COVID mandates are part of a larger plan to depopulate the planet. Speaker 1 dismisses criticism from former colleagues and urges people to do their own research. They believe their messages have broad appeal and that major political parties are falling apart. They express hope to be proven wrong about the dire consequences they predict.

Speaker 1 leads a march against the Russian consulate, claiming that the Russians are fighting the Khazarian mafia and trying to eradicate those who have been destroying the planet. They believe that the Russians, along with other nations, are engaged in a secret war to exterminate vermin. They connect this to the anti-mandate movement, stating that COVID mandates are part of a larger plan to depopulate the planet. Speaker 1 dismisses criticism from former colleagues and urges people to do their own research. They believe their messages have broad appeal and that the current political parties are falling apart. They express concern about declining birth rates and hope to be proven wrong.

Speaker 1: "a couple thousand people." The country was "Millions. 25, 50,000,000." How could a couple thousand take over? "People didn't respond"—they thought it would blow over. "One building" housed the entire Bolshevik party; "one building could have saved all of Russia, all of the people. No gulags, no Solzhenitsyn, none of it. No Red Terror, etcetera." The czars faced "Equal parts pride and fear." They believed "There's no way that these rebel rousers are going to provide an actual threat," and then "blood" followed. The pattern: "operational preparation of the environment" (OPE). First stage: "separation"—oppressed and oppressors; Lenin and the "coalition of the fringes" building. Then "Soviet" to Soviet—"councils of workers and factories"—not millions. Then "messaging"—"peace, land, bread" and "mass formation hypnosis" to unite; "infiltrate" key institutions; stage of revolution. "September '17."

The speaker claims current tactics resemble the McCarthy era, including the red and lavender scares. During that time, thousands of educators were fired for being accused of being communists or homosexual. Teaching about inequality or race was considered communist activity, leading to blacklisting. Florida had rampant firings of teachers labeled homosexual, which the speaker sees echoed in Florida's "don't say gay, don't say trans" laws. The speaker calls for a new liberation movement, similar to the civil rights movement that sidelined McCarthyism, to challenge those in power.

The speaker expresses concern about the distortion of historical facts and attacks on Russian culture and the Russian Orthodox Church. They criticize the destruction of family values, cultural and national identity, and the normalization of pedophilia in other countries. The speaker emphasizes that adults have the right to live as they choose, but culture should be respected. They mention that sacred texts are being questioned, such as the idea of a gender-neutral God in the Anglican Church. The speaker believes that millions of people in the West understand the spiritual catastrophe they are being led into. They state that while elites seem to be going mad, it is their problem, and they are determined to protect their children from degradation and degeneration.

They use their influence to suppress books and ideas they don't like, controlling what you get to read and think. They stifle any opposing views, pushing only their narratives. I'm here to expose this and face the consequences for speaking out. In World War II, we were taught to hate the enemy to defeat them. Now, the enemy is communism, but they preach love to deceive us while they are winning. I've shown you how communists are often Jewish, not to condemn all Jews, but to point out the truth. Once you see this pattern, you can't unsee it. They are working to disarm and undermine the police, who are the only thing standing between you and this growing communist terrorism. The same people who said Mao and Castro were not communists are lying to you now.

The speaker discusses the fear people have when confronted with facts about Jews, particularly their involvement in Bolshevism. They reference Winston Churchill's article on Jews in communism, which states that many leading figures in Bolshevism were Jewish. The speaker also mentions quotes from various Jewish sources that confirm Jewish involvement in the Russian revolution. They argue that discussing these facts openly is met with hostility and censorship, and that Americans have been programmed to view any criticism of Jews as evil. The speaker calls for breaking these taboos and promoting openness and transparency.