reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We were both part of a secret society at Yale, but there's not much we can reveal about it. We don't have a secret handshake or code. I wish there was something secret I could share. There are different kinds of secrets. One thing that's not a secret is my disagreement with the president's direction. The society included founders of Morgan Stanley, Brown Brothers and Herriman Bank, Pan American Airways, Pittsburgh Penguins, and the New York Mets. It also had 26 US congressmen, 18 US senators, and 15...

The conversation centers on a shared focus on “deep state traders” and a distrust of the current political establishment. Speaker 0 insists that they are “focused on higher IQ conversations here” and that they want to “go after the deep state traders,” asking who is paying them and noting that the “Washington field office is one block away” from their location, implying proximity to the FBI in Washington, D.C. The exchange riffs on anti-establishment themes, with Speaker 1 adding that they have “gone dragged into forever wars on behalf of Israel,” questioning why the U.S. has been involved for “generations and decades” and asserting that Americans “will not allow” it, calling for white Christians to unite around “America First, America Only” and that there can be “competing interests.” The dialogue shifts to support for domestic groups and figures perceived as aligned with their cause. Speaker 0 says their priority is to gain reinforcements and to “pardon all the oath keepers.” Speaker 1 references the idea of aiding “the J sixers,” while Speaker 0 states they are focused on “the destruction of the world” and asks why they aren’t advocating for those groups. The conversation then explicitly identifies a racialized fear about the future, with Speaker 1 stating that “your children are gonna be black and Muslim,” and “your children’s children are gonna be black and Muslim,” attributing this not to genetic or demographic inevitability but to “the weak, feckless men that are allowing APAC to buy out our politicians and open up our borders.” Speaker 0 counters by describing “weak, tackless toxic, feckless men” in the country and reiterates that their priority is to “go after the traitors based on their actions and actions alone,” stressing that they have a “laundry list” of targets and that they do not care about appearances or which hair follicles or eye colors these people have. The two converge on the idea of targeting treasonous individuals, with Speaker 0 insisting that the focus is on those who have committed treason and that those who fund them come from all stripes. The overall thrust is an uncompromising approach to identifying and pursuing perceived traitors, tying together anti-war, nationalist, and white-identity rhetoric, while calling for pardons for controversial domestic groups and framing the fight as one against treason and influence from abroad.

Speaker 0 claims to have been in a meeting at a well-known estate owned by an African president. They were asked to be part of a new agenda for 2020 but declined. Speaker 1 agrees that it doesn't seem like a coincidence. Speaker 0 mentions that some members of the shadow government are not in America, including Bill Gates, who has been involved behind the scenes with his finances and the WHO. Speaker 0 addresses a personal message to Bill Gates and questions the impact of his supposed work in Africa.

Speaker 0: Michael and I are not easily scared, except when Michelle is angry. Speaker 1: They fooled the country and the world. Speaker 0: They had us all fooled. Speaker 1: Will we see the first gay or woman president? Let's not jump to conclusions. Speaker 0: Michelle is a transgender. We all know.

Both speakers were asked about their membership in the secret society Skull and Bones. They couldn't reveal much about it, including any secret handshake or code. The number 322 was mentioned, but it wasn't clear what it meant. One speaker emphasized their disagreement with the current president's direction and their intention to do a better job. The interview ended with a farewell and a promise to keep an eye on the campaign.

The speaker discusses the alleged connections between George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and their families. They claim that Bush and Obama had a relationship due to business ties between their families. They also mention the involvement of Lolo Soetoro, Obama's stepfather, in the oil business and as an alleged CIA operative. The speaker suggests that Obama's grandmother facilitated CIA money transfers and introduced her daughter to Soetoro, who then adopted Obama. They mention Obama's high school tuition and his reported income, implying that he has access to a significant trust fund. The speaker concludes by stating that there is a secretive elite group to which Bush, Obama, and others belong, while the general public is excluded.

Speaker 1 says that the real information about the Epstein files has not come out and that “there were only four Republicans, four of us that’s really fought to get them released,” who “signed the discharge petition, went against the White House,” and were “threatened,” with Donald Trump calling him a traitor and saying his friends would be hurt. He questions why anyone would vote for Republicans if the administration doesn’t release all the information, framing it as a line in the sand for many people. Speaker 0 asks why they think the Epstein files are being hidden. Speaker 1 responds that it’s because the hidden information would protect “some of the most rich, powerful people,” arguing that Epstein was “definitely some sort of part of the intelligence state” who was “working with Israel” and with the “former prime minister of Israel.” He asserts that these are “the dirty parts of government and the powers that be that they don’t want the American people to know about.” He concludes that, sadly, he doesn’t think the files will come out. Speaker 0 presses on whether Trump is in the Epstein files. Speaker 1 speculates that if someone is “living under blackmail” or “living under threat” and told not to release information, that fear could influence actions. He suggests that someone might be warned by threats to prevent disclosure, giving a hypothetical example: after standing on a rally stage, you could be shot in the ear and warned that “next time we won’t miss,” or that the bullet might be for someone you care about. He says he is “speculating,” but notes he has “a strong enough reason to speculate like that.”

Speaker 0 expresses that they wanted to meet face to face to get admission of what “they” were doing. Speaker 1 identifies “they” as someone in the office of the Trilateral Commission. Speaker 0 asks what the Trilateral Commission is. Speaker 1 explains that it is “an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations.” Speaker 0 counters that this is what they’d like people to believe, but claims that “what they’re really up to is a scheme to plant their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots.” Speaker 0 asks if they’re pressing charges; agrees that a globe was broken and UNICEF artwork damaged, and adds that “they’re in on it too.” Speaker 0 asks for a Mister Klein, who replies that he has documented evidence and “the magazines here” are Conspiracy Review and Suppressed Truth Roundup, asserting that “the whole master plan is exposed.” Speaker 0 notes that Klein remains unconvinced and asks if he’d like to hear a few names of people who have been on the Trilateral Commission. Klein is not particularly enthusiastic. Speaker 1 lists names: James O’Carter (likely a misreference or fictionalized name), Henry Kissinger, Walter Mondale, and Mister Klein, then John Anderson, George Bush. Speaker 0 recalls the convention where it seemed Ford would be the VP candidate, but says David Rockefeller “just picked up a phone, put in a call,” saying, “Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It’s George. Bye.” He concludes that “no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House.” Speaker 0 asks if they are through. The response is implied as yes.

I was a member of a secret society with you. We can't talk about it. What does this mean for America? Conspiracy theorists will have a field day. I see the numbers 3 and 22. Sadly, Tim Russert, the moderator of Meet the Press, collapsed and passed away this afternoon. Network.

Speaker 0 urges movement and questions Speaker 1 about a car accident involving their van. Speaker 1 avoids the topic, hinting at a traumatic event. They deflect questions about being JFK and praise America. Speaker 2 mentions a task force at the Department of Defense and Trump's decision not to reveal certain information to prevent civil unrest. Speaker 1 cryptically mentions communism. The video ends with a mysterious statement about the president's strength.

Speaker 0 describes symbols allegedly connected to the Teutonic Knights and pharaonic associations: in the middle of the war on 03/01/1940, Deutch Ritter Ardens, the Teutonic cross, and a “healing day” phrase tied to final solutions; claims Hitler forbade the order of the Teutonic Knights in 1938, though a picture from 1940 supposedly shows the same with a black cross; asserts the Nazis called themselves Das Haerenfalk or the master race, and that this “master race” concept actually targets the Teutonic Order rather than being purely German in origin. He states the phrase is mis-translated but that Hitler and others meant the Teutonic Order. Speaker 1 discusses Ulmer Schacht (Hjalmar Schacht), Hitler’s Reichsbank president (1933–1939) and economics minister (1934–1937). He notes Schacht’s prominent role in implementing Nazi policies and his nickname “the old wizard.” He claims Schacht, a known Freemason, joined the Masonic Johannes Lodge Urania for immortality in 1908 and cites Schacht’s autobiography Confessions of the Old Wizard to support Freemasonry in his family background, including his father’s Freemasonry and connections to American lodges and Enlightenment-era Masonic notables. Speaker 0 repeats a claim that Adolf Switler (Hitler) was a liar and that the Teutonic Order was outlawed in 1938, with reestablishment in 1945; he contrasts what he saw in 1940 with the idea that the Teutonic Knights and the Nazis share symbols (black cross) and that the Nazis believed in the “master race,” asserting this is not truly German in origin but tied to the Teutonic Order. He asserts that what the Nazis meant by “master race” was the Teutonic Order. Speaker 2 says “and here is the proof.” Speaker 3 mentions a Templars bank in German in Palestine before the State of Israel, showing a flag tied to the Templars; claims the bank of the Templars existed in the region that is now Israel. Speaker 4 mentions several Templar-related myths: Knights Templar had one of the largest fleets; skull and bones as a symbol on Templar graves; after the Pope and King of France destroyed the Templars, their fleet supposedly escaped and became pirates; asks why pirates were called “brotherhood” and links the skull and crossbones to the Russell Trust at Yale ( Skull and Bones), naming George Bush as a member. He asserts Yale’s Skull and Bones tomb decorations were Nazi-like (Maltese crosses, swastikas) and claims lodge numbers (322) tie to Nazism; alleges control by German secret societies such as the Illuminati, OTO, and Thule, and accuses Bush of CIA involvement since his college days, as a Skull and Bones member. Speaker 0 ties Isis to the SS and Freemasonry as “pharaonic Freemasonry” unrelated to European white supremacy, labeling it occult. Speaker 5 notes the OASS (Order of the Ancient and Secret) was founded by Knights of Malta members, describing it as a Roman secret society of Freemasons with deep European roots; connects Knights Templars to international bankers in Switzerland, claiming Switzerland avoids war because the Templars “call home.” He laments public unawareness of Nazism’s symbols in institutions, including hospitals and government buildings. Speaker 0 explains the hexagon as headshed and the six-point diagram representing those who give orders; octagon as the executional Nazi Templar army’s “universal blue army,” with eight representing the octagon and the base in Switzerland, not the eighth letter; asserts Nazism is an organization against the white race, citing the murder of non-Jewish Germans and Germans in camps, and claims 18 and 88 numerology (Adolf Hitler and Heil Hitler) feed mystical powers to a dark pharaonic organization, the Octagon of the Nazi Templars, while SS stands for Isis, implying occult invocation.

A: The conversation opens with references to the Epstein files and a sense that people are ignoring shocking information, including an incident at the Atlanta Airport involving a well-dressed Black man who freaks out, which they say they saw on social media. B: They discuss reading the Upstate files and criticize others for going on with their lives as if nothing is happening, describing the public as “zombies” and likening society to invasion of the body snatchers. They mention revelations such as a global pandemic and aliens, and claim that “Miles have been released,” yet people act normal. C: They express a belief that a small group of about 8,500 people is manipulating events, including media such as the Colbert show, and that reality as they know it is fake. They discuss the idea of predictive programming and insist that by presenting certain material or jokes, the public becomes desensitized and complicit. A: They argue there is a grand design behind these phenomena to desensitize the public to the idea of demons or occult wrongdoing, including references to Luciferian influence and spells cast on the world. They discuss a Colbert skit in which a baby is handed to Moloch and a dramatic red furnace, claiming the audience’s laughter signals hypnosis or conditioning. B: They claim there is a coded language in the Epstein emails, where references to “pizza” and “beef jerky” are used as code, and that such codes exist even if others dismiss them as paranoia. They note that some language is cryptic and argue that there is a recognizable code, contrasting it with the public’s dismissal of such interpretations. A: They mention the Epstein indictment and a claim about sulfuric acid: right after he was indicted, he allegedly ordered large quantities of sulfuric acid (six hundred and fifty-five-gallon containers, with figures like 8,000 or 50,000 gallons discussed) to process bodies. They repeat the claim that “they’re eating babies,” underscoring a belief in extreme horrors behind coded communications. B: They expand the discussion to alleged ongoing sacrifices in Los Angeles, suggesting high-level musicians are involved in daily sacrifices, including claims about killing chickens as part of those activities. They hedge about naming individuals, expressing concern about legal risk and safety, and reaffirm their position that such activities occur at a high level. A: The conversation repeats the sense of omnipresent manipulation and secrecy, emphasizing that a hidden group is controlling information and that people are afraid to confront it, with ongoing claims about decoding messages and real-world horrors behind public narratives.

Speaker 0 explains that the people who are very powerful on the scene are included in “the files,” and if you’re powerful and not in those files, it would be an insult because it means you’re a loser. Speaker 1 asks who isn’t in the files, and Speaker 0 confirms that those not in the files are losing. When asked if the speakers are in the files, Speaker 0 answers yes, noting that it’s any journalist who wrote about it that’s in the files.

The speaker asserts that others "didn't know what they were talking about." They claim a distinction, stating "we're different from the presidential." They describe themselves as "very discreet, reptilian, cold blooded." The speaker concludes by stating, "These are the races we have to win. Others are winning the whole country."

The speakers discuss powerful individuals who want to keep Speaker 0 out. Speaker 0 believes they should want him because he is a great candidate, but Speaker 1 suggests it's about control and being on their team. Speaker 0 refuses to make a deal with these people and sees it as a battle worth fighting. Speaker 1 mentions the importance of raising money to win and suggests pausing rather than going away. Speaker 0 disagrees and vows to be the biggest pain for these people, even if it means they might try to kill him. Speaker 1 understands but advises caution.

Speaker 0 questions if the theory of secretly saving the world from a satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals is something Speaker 1 supports. Speaker 1 responds by saying they haven't heard of it, but they are open to the idea of helping to save the world and are willing to put themselves out there.

Speaker 0 admits to never believing that the CIA killed Kennedy. Speaker 1 claims to have read the entire JFK file, including the secret information and the 7 pages of the 911 report. Speaker 0 warns against sharing what they have seen, as they could be bribed. Speaker 1 mentions being bribed in Texas. Speaker 0 introduces themselves as Cash and mentions JFK and UFOs.

Speaker 0: We have a problem with the CIA and FBI in Washington. Speaker 1: What's your plan to start over and fix them? Speaker 0: They've gotten out of control, with weaponization and other issues. The people need to bring about change. We were making progress, but more needs to be done.

Society is sick, but we can't talk about it. Conspiracy theorists will have a field day. The web Number 322? Not the nominee. Are you ready to lose? No, I won't lose. Secret society at Yale, but it's a secret. Secret handshake? Secret code? I wish there was something secret. Disagree with the president's direction. We can do better. Be safe on the campaign trail. Translation: Society is sick, but we can't discuss it openly. Conspiracy theorists will likely have opinions. The web Number 322? Not the nominee. Are you prepared to lose? No, I won't lose. Secret society at Yale, but it's secretive. Secret handshake? Secret code? I wish there was something secretive. Disagree with the president's direction. We can do better. Stay safe on the campaign trail.

It's alleged that there is a "super secret CMP" and that "Influencers play dumb and it's not on TV." A "council of political technocracy" is invoked, with the claim that "If they won't tell the truth then you're really free." The speaker asserts that humanity is "on the brink of the end of humanity" and advises to "trust the AI science, blackmail scheme." There is mention of "a real big club you're not allowed to see," and the idea that "The plans for your life is a work and be." Further, the transcript references "Root and hive" and a "Secret society," describing it as "the secret CNP telling you what you ought to believe" and calling it "the great deception sustainability." It asks, "Don't you remember the end of slavery?" and attributes it to a "crafted by way, Rick the modern culture war." It mentions "The Delphi charts always dictate the score" and a "Heritage mall, a majority store" where "the souls come cheaper than a Vegas Romney Rhine is the racing way." The speaker talks about "Legion a leader" and "shadows in the light," with "United fronts hide in plain sight." Individuals named include "Neil Patel" who "always keeps it tight," and "Dick Carlson" described as an operative who was "right and we're candid." It notes "Some ratings match only by Tucker." It states that the "CIA won't cover heritage mother." The closing lines assert that "This is really happening" and reference "Satanic pedophiles really" as part of the asserted reality.

The speakers discuss Spelling Bones, a secret society at Yale, but admit that not much is known about it. They ponder if there is a secret handshake or code, expressing a desire for something secret to manifest. Speaker 1 disagrees with the president's direction for the country and believes they can do a better job. They express their intention to improve and assure that they will be watching. Speaker 0 thanks John Kerry for joining and wishes him safety on the campaign trail.

The conversation centers on whether political opponents or powerful interests would buy off or influence a candidate, and what that would mean for a political race and the country. Speaker 0 questions if a price exists to “be bought,” and both eventually reject money as the primary issue, insisting the matter is about the country itself. They discuss the idea that fresh faces are needed because no one in a federal race has ever lost and then won, though Speaker 0 contests that notion as a possibility. They reference powerful people in the East who want to keep the candidate out and are willing to spend heavily, making the conversation forbidden and not to be repeated. A fear is expressed that someone might be offered financial incentives, such as being placed on a payroll to be kept out of the race. They acknowledge the presence of entities willing to “put their money where their mouth is” and the risk that they would “murder” or eliminate opponents to stop certain candidates, describing a dangerous political landscape. The dialogue shifts to the cartel and corruption, with mentions that “the cartel is operating in 50 states,” though details about who knows what are avoided. They discuss the strategy of staying on “the team” of those who want to influence the race, suggesting creditors or backers aim to control the candidate’s actions and align them with a globalist agenda. There is insistence that the person should not “scratch their back” for others in Washington, viewing DC as a “back scratching club.” Speaker 1 argues that defeating Trump is a central aim, claiming that DeSantis is not America first and that removing Trump would be a dangerous outcome for the country. Speaker 0 expresses support for Trump but questions whether he can win again, suggesting the real issue is money and the ability to raise funds to win. They note that consultants benefit from a continuing cycle of money and that those consultants do not want their payday to end. A key sentiment is resistance to being controlled or owned, with Speaker 1 declaring he will not accept backroom deals and will be “the biggest pain” to those trying to control him. They discuss public support and the importance of defending their movement and the people of Arizona, stressing a commitment to carry their torch and voice. The dialogue ends with a defiant vow to continue, even if it risks dangerous retaliation, and a readiness to persevere rather than pause on the battlefield.

The speaker asserts that others "didn't know what they were talking about." They claim a distinction, stating "we're different from the presidential." The speaker identifies as "very discreet, reptilian, cold blooded." They conclude by stating, "These are the races we have to win. Others are winning the whole country."

Speaker 0 argues that conspiracy theories have been made to look like lunacy, noting that the Kennedy assassination popularized the term “conspiracy theorist.” He says it wasn’t widely used before Kennedy, but afterward it became a label for “kooks,” and he’s repeatedly been called that. Speaker 1 acknowledges this dynamic. He and Speaker 0 discuss what a conspiracy is—“more people working together to do something nefarious?”—and Speaker 0 asserts that conspiracies have always happened. He disputes the view that most conspiracies are due to ineptitude, insisting that when there is profit, power, control, and resources involved, most conspiracies, in fact, turn out to be true. He adds that the deeper you dig, the more you realize there’s a concerted effort to make conspiracies seem ridiculous so people won’t be seen as fools. Speaker 1 remarks on the ridicule as well, and Speaker 0 reiterates his own self-description: “I am a conspiracy theorist,” a “foolish person,” and “a professional clown.” He mocks the idea that being labeled foolish is a barrier, and reflects on how others perceive him. Speaker 0 then provides specific, provocative examples of conspiracies he believes are real: Gulf of Tonkin was faked to justify U.S. entry into Vietnam; production of heroin ramped up to 94% of the world’s supply once the U.S. occupied Afghanistan; and the CIA, in the United States, allegedly sold heroin or cocaine in Los Angeles ghettos to fund the Contras versus the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. He states clearly that these claims are real and asserts that there are conspiracy theorists who are “fucking real.” Speaker 1 pushes back on reputation and judgment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms his self-identification as a conspiracy theorist who faces mockery. Speaker 1 suggests that this stance might give him a “superpower.”

You were both in the secret society, Skull and Bones. What does that imply for America? Conspiracy theorists will likely speculate. I haven't seen the web surrounding 322. First, he's not the nominee, but I look forward to the future. Are you ready to lose? No, I won't lose. Skull and Bones is a secret society at Yale, but it doesn't reveal much since it's secretive. Is there a handshake or code? I wish there were something to share. While many secrets exist, one thing is clear: I disagree with the current president's direction for the country. We can do better, and I intend to. Stay safe on the campaign trail. Thanks for joining us. We'll be right back.