reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Daniel Cox discusses the significant ideological divide between young men and women, particularly noting that young women have become increasingly liberal since around 2014-2015, with 42-43% identifying as liberal, while young men's views have remained relatively stable. This divide is evident in issues like abortion, where 61% of young women prioritize it compared to only 30% of young men. Social media plays a crucial role in shaping perceptions and interactions, contributing to a decline in dating and social engagement among young people. Cox highlights the impact of the Me Too movement, noting that young women feel a shared sense of vulnerability, while many young men perceive it as irrelevant to their experiences. He points out that women’s satisfaction with their treatment in society has decreased significantly since 2016-2017, despite improvements in education and economic success. The conversation also touches on the political socialization of young women, with only 44% of those raised by Republican parents identifying as Republican, compared to 77% of those raised by Democrats. The rise of LGBTQ identities among young women is noted, with one in three identifying as such. Cox emphasizes the importance of fostering social connections and experiences among young people, as many are increasingly isolated and disengaged. He warns against the dangers of online interactions and AI relationships, which may distort young men's understanding of real-life connections. The discussion concludes with a call for a renewed focus on community and interpersonal relationships to address the challenges facing both genders.

In this episode of The Megyn Kelly Show, Megyn Kelly interviews Dr. Leonard Sax, a physician and psychologist known for his books, including *Why Gender Matters*. They discuss the inherent differences between boys and girls, emphasizing that these differences extend beyond physical traits to aspects like brain wiring, sensory perception, and learning styles. Dr. Sax cites recent research showing distinct brain connectivity patterns in boys and girls during the third trimester of pregnancy, suggesting that gender differences are hardwired. Dr. Sax shares anecdotes from his practice illustrating how these differences manifest in everyday situations, such as a boy's inability to detect odors compared to a girl’s heightened sensitivity. He argues that educational approaches often fail to recognize these differences, leading to a growing gender gap in academic achievement, with boys increasingly disengaged from school. The conversation shifts to the impact of societal changes on gender identity, particularly regarding transgender issues. Dr. Sax criticizes the American Academy of Pediatrics for endorsing guidelines that he believes lack evidence and harm children. He discusses the phenomenon of rapid onset gender dysphoria, suggesting that many young people who transition may later regret it, emphasizing the importance of a cautious approach to gender identity issues. Dr. Sax advocates for parental involvement in children's lives, stressing the need for strong family relationships and limiting screen time. He encourages parents to prioritize family meals and create supportive environments for their children, particularly in the face of societal pressures and the influence of social media. The episode concludes with a call for parents to assert their authority and guide their children through the complexities of modern life, reinforcing the idea that understanding gender differences can help break down stereotypes and foster healthier development.

Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti discuss a controversial crypto stunt that involved throwing neon green dildos at WNBA games, a move that drew attention when Don Jr. shared a meme of his father on the White House roof tossing a dildo onto the court. They note a betting angle, with sportsbooks offering wagers on dildo color, and argue the incident degrades professional athletes and taints perceptions of sports integrity while boosting WNBA visibility. They observe that the Republican claim to champion women’s sports clashes with the derisive treatment reflected in the meme and public discourse, and they link it to broader gender dynamics on the right. The WNBA’s demographics—predominantly Black and LGBTQ women—are highlighted as part of the targeting, and they note the president’s son’s embrace of the debasement. The hosts critique Trump’s defense of women’s sports and contrast it with his stance on transgender issues, while also highlighting a CNN segment reposted by Pete Hegseth arguing against women’s suffrage. They cite surveys showing a decline in support for equal opportunity and pay among younger boys since 2018, suggesting economic anxiety fuels zero-sum scapegoating of women, trans people, and immigrants, and they discuss potential broader cultural shifts toward restricting women’s rights, closing with a plug for premium content.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the media's fascination with Donald Trump's mug shot and the recent mass shooting in Jacksonville, Florida, which has garnered significant attention due to its racial implications and the political context involving Governor Ron DeSantis. She introduces guests Stu Burguiere and Dave Marcus to share their insights. The conversation shifts to Trump's mug shot, with Kelly noting its political absurdity and the serious implications of his legal troubles. Burguiere highlights the fundraising success Trump experienced following the mug shot, while Marcus emphasizes the seriousness of the situation, expressing concern that the left is profiting from it. They discuss the political ramifications of Trump's legal battles, particularly the timing of trial dates set just before key voting events. Kelly mentions polling data indicating that a majority of Americans, including independents, believe Trump is guilty of the charges against him and want the trials to occur before the 2024 election. Burguiere and Marcus analyze the implications of these numbers for Trump's campaign, noting that while many Republicans see the prosecutions as politically motivated, independents may not view them the same way. The discussion then transitions to the Jacksonville shooting, where a white shooter killed three Black victims. DeSantis faced backlash during a vigil for the victims, with some attendees booing him. The guests reflect on the political exploitation of such tragedies and the media's selective coverage of racially motivated violence. They criticize the narrative that seeks to blame DeSantis for the shooting due to his policies. Kelly and her guests express concern over the increasing politicization of education and the influence of radical ideologies in schools, particularly regarding gender identity and race. They share personal anecdotes about the challenges of raising children in an environment where these issues are prevalent, emphasizing the need for parents to protect their children from inappropriate content and ideologies. The segment concludes with a discussion on the broader implications of these cultural issues, including the normalization of radical views and the importance of maintaining a dialogue about truth and reality. Kelly expresses gratitude for her guests' insights and announces Victor Davis Hanson as the next guest for further discussion on current events.

Richard V. Reeves discusses the unexpected widening gender gap in higher education, where women now outperform men significantly. He critiques the term "toxic masculinity," arguing it lacks specificity and alienates men from discussions about masculinity. This term, originally used in academic contexts, has expanded to label various male behaviors negatively, which he believes is counterproductive. Reeves highlights the structural disadvantages boys face in education, noting that the system favors behaviors typically associated with girls, such as organization and commitment. He emphasizes that boys are falling behind not due to individual failings but because of these systemic issues. The lack of male teachers in early education is also a concern, as male role models can positively influence boys' academic performance. He argues that societal changes have left many men feeling redundant, particularly in family dynamics where traditional roles have shifted. The economic independence of women has altered the perception of fatherhood, leading to a crisis of identity for many men. Reeves suggests that to address these issues, society must recognize the structural barriers boys face and implement reforms, such as starting boys in school a year later than girls and increasing male representation in teaching. Reeves also points out the need for targeted programs to develop skills like impulse control in boys, which can help them succeed academically. He advocates for a cultural shift that values male participation in caregiving roles and emphasizes that improving outcomes for boys and men ultimately benefits society as a whole. The conversation should not be framed as a zero-sum game between genders but rather as a collective effort to address inequalities affecting both men and women.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the upcoming Iowa caucus and Donald Trump's significant lead in the polls despite ongoing legal battles. She highlights a civil case in New York led by Attorney General Letitia James, which is focused on allegations of business fraud against Trump. This case, unlike the criminal cases, is seen as more concerning by Trump's team, as it threatens to shut down his business operations in New York. The judge has already ruled in favor of James, stating that Trump overstated asset values when applying for loans, although no banks have complained about any harm. Dave Rubin joins the discussion, emphasizing the absurdity of the legal standards being applied to Trump, where intent to defraud does not need to be proven. He argues that the case is politically motivated and that the optics of the courtroom are beneficial for Trump, as they reinforce his narrative of being persecuted. Rubin also points out that Trump's supporters are unlikely to turn against him due to these legal challenges. Kelly and Rubin then shift to Merrick Garland's recent appearance on 60 Minutes, where he expressed his commitment to impartiality in the Trump investigations. They criticize Garland's emotional appeal and question the sincerity of his statements, particularly regarding the treatment of parents protesting at school board meetings, which he labeled as domestic terrorists. The conversation transitions to the broader implications of these legal battles on political participation, with Rubin expressing concern that such actions deter good people from entering politics. They discuss the impact of the Me Too movement on perceptions of masculinity, with Owen Strachan later joining to address the war on men in society. Strachan argues that young men are being taught to view traditional masculine traits as toxic, leading to a crisis of identity and purpose. Strachan highlights the alarming statistics surrounding male suicide rates and workforce participation, asserting that societal narratives are pushing boys away from embracing their masculinity. He calls for a cultural shift that recognizes the value of strong men and the need for positive male role models. The discussion emphasizes the importance of fathers in guiding boys and the detrimental effects of a culture that vilifies masculinity. As the show concludes, Kelly shares a personal note about the unexpected death of a friend, reflecting on the importance of cherishing loved ones and living authentically. She expresses gratitude for her audience and the support they provide.

Olivia Juliana describes her Substack, 'a new perspective, Olivia Juliana,' and notes nearly 100,000 subscribers. She argues Democrats misread young men and that economic anxiety—not morality or culture—is driving the shift to the right. In her piece 'the politics of getting laid and preachy females,' she explores how messaging to young men often misses the real concerns. She says: 'the real problems we're having with young men shifting to the right... it's all economic anxiety.' She critiques stereotypes about masculinity, noting that framing abortion as 'protecting women' may not address the lived realities young men face, and that Republicans also frame narratives that alienate or insult them. She emphasizes understanding the actual struggles instead of blaming them. This conversation turns to why young men drift right, and how messaging an audience that feels unheard shapes politics. The speakers argue we don't message to men, and that many Republicans resonate because 'men want to have sex and like own women, right?' Yet many conservatives overlook lived experiences: 'the path that the left offers includes chopping off your penis' and the broader sense of scarcity. They note polling that immigration is a top issue for young men, while the underlying driver is a promise of opportunity or blame for not meeting expectations—that 'if you don't do that, then you're a failure because you are the man and you are the provider.'

In this discussion, Jordan Peterson speaks with Greg Lukianoff and Rikki Schlott, co-authors of *The Canceling of the American Mind*, about the impact of cancel culture on American universities and society. They highlight the alarming trend where many college graduates earn less than high school graduates, exacerbating the struggles of Millennials and Gen Z. The book aims to address the realities of cancel culture, emphasizing that it is not only real but historically unprecedented, with a significant increase in professor firings since 2014. Lukianoff and Schlott discuss their generational perspectives, with Schlott identifying as a right-leaning libertarian and Lukianoff as left of center. They express concern over the growing divide in political beliefs among young people, particularly women, who are increasingly leaning left and experiencing mental health crises. Schlott shares her personal experiences at NYU, where she observed a pervasive culture of self-harm among her peers, leading her to drop out due to the stifling environment. The conversation touches on the psychological aspects of cancel culture, particularly the role of toxic femininity and the different ways men and women express aggression. Peterson raises concerns about the feminization of institutions and how it may contribute to a culture that prioritizes emotional responses over rational discourse. They discuss the implications of social media in amplifying cancel culture and the need for a cultural shift towards free speech and rationality. Lukianoff emphasizes the importance of courage in combating cancel culture, noting that many people feel isolated in their beliefs. He argues that the current educational system is failing to prepare students for real-world challenges, leading to a generation that is demoralized and struggling with identity. Schlott adds that the rise of alternative educational methods post-COVID could provide a counterbalance to the current system. The discussion concludes with a call for reform in higher education, advocating for a return to principles of free speech and open dialogue. They express hope that the younger generation can reclaim these values and foster a more constructive cultural environment, ultimately aiming to revitalize the American mind.

Tucker Carlson discusses the challenges faced by young boys in the U.S. today, highlighting a societal shift that discourages traditional masculine traits while promoting a more feminized perspective. He critiques the removal of urinals from boys' bathrooms and suggests that this reflects a broader attempt to suppress male identity, likening it to mass conversion therapy. Carlson points to Andrew Tate, a controversial figure who has gained popularity for advocating traditional masculinity, as a response to this societal shift. Tate emphasizes the importance of respect and self-improvement for men, advocating for hard work, sobriety, and physical fitness. Tate's legal troubles began when he and his brother were arrested in Romania on charges of human trafficking. He claims the charges stem from a misunderstanding of his business practices, which involve recruiting women for social media content. Tate argues that the women involved have stated they are not victims, yet the state has labeled them as such, ignoring their consent. He expresses frustration with the media's portrayal of him and the legal system's handling of his case, suggesting that accusations of sex crimes are often used to discredit individuals with unpopular views. Carlson and Tate discuss the broader implications of societal changes, including the decline of traditional gender roles and the impact of digital currencies on personal freedom. Tate warns that central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) could lead to increased government control over individual finances, allowing authorities to dictate how and when money can be spent. He argues that financial independence is crucial for resisting government overreach and maintaining personal autonomy. The conversation shifts to the state of masculinity and femininity in contemporary society. Tate asserts that the decline of strong male figures has led to increased unhappiness among women, as they seek stability and protection that is often lacking. He believes that traditional gender roles are essential for a functioning society and that the current push for gender fluidity undermines these roles. Tate expresses concern about the influence of ideologies that target children, arguing that children are impressionable and should be protected from radical ideas. He criticizes the normalization of gender transition among minors, suggesting that it is a form of psychological manipulation. The discussion touches on the hypocrisy of societal leaders who advocate for progressive values while failing to address the consequences of those values on family structures and individual well-being. Throughout the conversation, Tate emphasizes the importance of self-respect, accountability, and the need for men to reclaim their roles in society. He believes that the current societal trends are leading to a breakdown of traditional family structures and that a return to masculine virtues is necessary for the well-being of future generations.

Megyn Kelly discusses radical transgender ideology with guests, focusing on the implications for women in sports and the experiences of individuals affected by gender transition. April Hutchinson, a Canadian powerlifter, shares her journey into the sport and her confrontation with a biological male competitor, referred to as "An," who transitioned to female. Hutchinson highlights the unfairness of allowing biological males to compete in women's sports without hormone therapy or surgical requirements, leading her to advocate for policy changes in her federation. Hutchinson recounts her experience of being threatened with suspension for calling An a biological male, emphasizing the censorship surrounding discussions of gender identity in sports. She expresses concern over the mental health implications for women athletes and the lack of support from her federation, despite her efforts to protect women's rights in sports. The conversation shifts to Isabelle Ayala, a 21-year-old who detransitioned after taking testosterone at a young age. Ayala shares her traumatic experiences, including being pressured into transitioning due to mental health struggles and the influence of social media. She discusses her lawsuit against the medical professionals who facilitated her transition, highlighting the lack of informed consent and the long-term health consequences she now faces. Jordan Campbell, Ayala's attorney, explains the legal actions being taken against the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical professionals for their roles in promoting gender-affirming care without adequate evidence. He emphasizes the need for accountability in the medical community regarding the treatment of minors with gender dysphoria. Robbie Starbuck introduces his documentary, "The War on Children," which explores the left's efforts to indoctrinate children through gender ideology and critical race theory. The film features testimonies from individuals affected by these ideologies, including Riley Gaines, who discusses her experiences competing against a biological male in swimming. Starbuck stresses the importance of raising awareness about these issues and the need for parents to be vigilant against the indoctrination of their children. The discussion concludes with a call to action for viewers to support efforts to protect children from radical ideologies and to engage in conversations about the implications of gender transition and social justice movements in education.

Megan Kelly welcomes Jordan B. Peterson back to her show after nearly three years. Peterson, a prominent intellectual, discusses his recent book "We Who Wrestle with God: Perceptions of the Divine," and his educational platform, Peterson Academy, which aims to provide high-quality university education at a lower cost. He emphasizes the need for better educational resources and critiques the current state of universities, claiming they have become ineffective and overly influenced by progressive ideologies. The conversation shifts to the plight of boys and men, referencing a recent NBC News article about Democratic governors initiating programs to support young men. Peterson argues that these efforts are too little, too late, given decades of societal demoralization of young men. He highlights issues in the education system that discriminate against boys and the negative impact of progressive narratives on their ambitions. Peterson critiques the lack of focus on fatherlessness in discussions about helping boys, noting that many boys, particularly in minority communities, lack strong male role models. He asserts that the decline of traditional family structures has detrimental effects on both boys and girls, leading to increased mental health issues among young women as well. He discusses the political landscape, noting a shift in young men's voting patterns towards conservatism, driven by feelings of alienation from progressive policies. Peterson believes that the left's failure to address the needs of young men has contributed to this shift, and he warns that weak men may turn to harmful ideologies. The discussion also touches on the portrayal of masculinity in media and the backlash Peterson has faced for his views, including criticism from figures like Olivia Wilde. He emphasizes the importance of responsibility over power in defining masculinity and critiques the left's understanding of male identity. Ultimately, Peterson advocates for a return to traditional values, emphasizing the importance of marriage and family as stabilizing forces in society. He encourages young men to adopt responsibility and strive for personal growth, rather than succumbing to nihilism or hedonism.