TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker cites a rapid rise in autism: "one in ten thousand children had autism" in the distant past, then "one in twenty thousand," then "one in ten thousand," and now "one in thirty one" overall, with boys at "one in twelve" in some areas, notably California. "Since February, autism rates have surged by much more than four hundred percent." He questions why and argues researchers should be appreciated rather than attacked for seeking answers. On stage were doctors, and he said, "this is what we gotta we have to find out." He adds, "Because when you go from 20,000 to 10,000 and then you go to 12, you know there's something artificial. They're taking something."

In 2016, the autism rate was one in fifty-four, and in 2000, it was one in one hundred and fifty. A study in Wisconsin looked at 900,000 kids and found the rate to be point seven out of 10,000, which is less than one in 10,000.

About 25% of kids with autism are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors, and this population is growing. While many individuals with autism are doing well, the speaker focuses on this specific group with severe disabilities. The media promotes the idea that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria, but studies disprove this. In 2013, the California legislature asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to investigate whether the rise in autism is real or due to increased awareness. The Mind Institute concluded it is a real epidemic. The speaker argues that this epidemic is unique to children, as full-blown autism (nonverbal, non-toilet trained) is rarely seen in older adults. While the speaker has encountered people with Asperger's or on the spectrum who are their age, they have never seen an older individual with full-blown autism, despite its prevalence in children, affecting one in twenty boys, and in California, one in 12.5 boys.

"autism is such a tremendous, horror show what's happening in our country and some other countries, but mostly our country." "We will have announcements as promised in September." "We're finding interventions certain interventions now that are clearly almost certainly causing autism." "In 1970, the biggest epidemiological study in history was done in Wisconsin." "They looked at 900,000 children and they were looking for autism." "incident rate of point seven." "Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids." "California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen children American children as autism, one in every twelve point five boys." "So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys." "We will."

In 1987, 330 out of every million children were diagnosed with autism. Today, that number is 27,777 per million. To deny an autism epidemic, one must believe that researchers in North Dakota missed 98.8% of autistic children, including thousands with profound disabilities who were somehow invisible to doctors, teachers, parents, and their own study. The same researchers followed the original group for 12 years and, upon double-checking, found they had missed only one child. Doctors and therapists in the past were not missing all these cases, therefore the epidemic is real.

Autism rates have significantly increased over the past 25 years, from 1 in 100,000 to 1 in 100. Some attribute this rise to improved identification methods, but concerns about childhood vaccines persist. There are various theories about potential causes, including environmental factors like chlorine in the water. Many people are exploring different possibilities to understand this trend.

The speaker states that autism is a preventable disease caused by environmental exposure, not genes, though genes can provide vulnerability. A study by Blacksell et al. estimates the cost of treating autism in the US will be a trillion dollars a year by 2035, adding to already astronomical healthcare costs. According to Irva Herzbachoda, research into genetic causes of autism receives 10 to 20 times more funding than research into environmental factors, which is where the answer lies. Autism destroys families and children, many of whom were fully functional before regressing around age two due to environmental exposure. These children may never hold a job, pay taxes, or live independently. The speaker believes "we are doing this to our children" and it needs to end.

- an estimated a hundred and fifteen thousand children develop autism every year in The United States. - And if doctor Sally Ozanoff's work is correct, and she's at UC Davis, she shows that eighty eight percent of autism cases are characterized by regression. - Now regression suggests an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, an acute toxic exposure, which means that most cases of autism are preventable. - Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery. - We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants, are causing autism. - If we repeal the 1980 Bayh Dole Act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and the 2005 PREP Act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country.

- The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history. There's never been anything like this. - And now it's one in thirty one, but in some areas, it's much worse than that, if you can believe it. One in thirty one. - For boys, it's one in twelve. - And by the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. - They're pumping it looks like they're pumping into a horse. - You have a little child, little fragile child, and he get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess. - 80 different blends, and they pump it in.

More than 40% of American children have at least one chronic health condition. Since the 1970s, rates of childhood cancer have soared, in some cases by nearly 50%. In the 1960s, less than 5% of children were obese; now, over 20% are obese. A few decades ago, one in 10,000 children had autism; today, it's one in 31. The speaker states they will not stop until they defeat the chronic disease epidemic in America.

"My job, I know my job, my job is to wake up humanity to the microbiome and the fact that humanity is going extinct." "look in 1970, the rate of autism was one in ten thousand." "Now it's one in thirty in some areas of the country. California, one in twelve point five boys have autism." "twenty five percent of newborns are born with adequate levels of good bacteria." "out of 4,000 stool samples, less than five percent have bifidobacteria, which is an important microbe that helps us break down sugars." "So, you know, what happens when one in one kid has autism? What happens when there's no more bifidobacteria on the planet because we've destroyed it all? We stop living. That's it."

Speaker 0 notes anecdotal data and studies suggesting improvement of Parkinson’s disease with fecal microbiota transplant, mentioning China studies and that Johns Hopkins will start a study on it. They say we’re at the beginning of all this and, in the future, people may look back and see how archaic some early practices were, such as operating on a kidney instead of changing the microbiome. They reference data showing a signature microbiome in anxiety, noting that during COVID people were very anxious, and that this could be related to the media, the disease itself, or treatments. Speaker 1 observes there is open-minded thinking around health, especially preventative medicine, and a strong focus on autism at the moment. They ask for recommendations on approaching autism through the biome or more broadly. Speaker 0 responds that they would love to work with this government and governments worldwide to address autism, which affects every country and its children. They propose that COVID eroded trust in agencies, government, and pharmaceutical companies, and position themselves as someone who could rebuild that trust by driving proper research, focusing on the microbiome, and understanding diseases thoroughly. They advocate for international collaboration among clinicians and researchers, recounting experiences with colleagues in Italy and Germany who were conducting clinical trials. They express a willingness to coordinate with international colleagues to apply successful approaches to patients in the United States. Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of global collaboration among clinicians to understand and fix autism in children, arguing that with one in twelve and a half boys in California affected, the issue demands attention. They ask, when is the right time to act—if not now, when? They conclude that the only way to fix this is for humanity to come together for the sake of children and future generations.

My son, born in 1991, has Asperger's, and I've heard from many parents of children with similar conditions. Since 1989, the vaccine schedule increased significantly, exposing children to much higher levels of mercury than deemed safe. For instance, newborns receive a hepatitis B shot that would require a child weighing 275 pounds to safely absorb under EPA guidelines. In 1988, 1 in 2,500 American children had autism; now it's 1 in 166, with many also facing learning and neurological disorders. Despite the alarming trends, the federal government claims there's no solid science linking vaccines to these issues. While we can't definitively prove a connection now, I believe future research will reveal a link between vaccines and autism.

In 1989, the vaccine schedule increased from 10 to 24 vaccines, all containing thimerosal with mercury. Children are injected with 400 times the amount of mercury considered safe by the FDA or EPA. A newborn receives a hepatitis B shot, but under EPA guidelines, would have to be 275 pounds to safely absorb it. In 1988, autism affected 1 in 2,500 children; now it affects 1 in 166. Additionally, 1 in 6 children have learning, neurological, speech, or language disorders, ADD, or hyperactivity, all connected to autism. The federal government claims there's no good science linking vaccines to autism, but science is often diluted in politics. While it can't be proven now, intuitively, the speaker believes that thimerosal causes autism.

In 1988, the movie Rain Man introduced the public to autism. It explained that autistic savants, previously called idiot savants, have certain abilities and deficiencies. Autism was rarely discussed until recently when the number of children diagnosed with autism started increasing rapidly. By the end of the news cast, one more person would be diagnosed with autism. The numbers are alarming, and there is a lot of fear and misinformation about autism. The CDC reported that 1 in 68 children in the United States, approximately 1 million, have autism. This is a global epidemic that requires a cure.

As a long-term autism researcher and director of the New Jersey Autism Study, the speaker discusses the dramatic increase in autism prevalence. When the study began with the CDC, it was expected that autism prevalence would remain stable, unlike other neurological disorders. However, autism rates have increased significantly, from a rare disability affecting 1 in 10,000 to being present in every community. The speaker asserts that this increase is real and not solely due to better awareness. In New Jersey, rates have increased by 300% in 20 years, a trend confirmed by CDC reports and other data sources. The speaker believes future reports will show even higher rates, suggesting an urgent public health crisis. The speaker urges a focus on understanding the environmental or risk factors triggering autism, claiming that despite data collection, there has been a lack of real progress in understanding the causes, prevention, or effective treatment of autism. The speaker encourages a careful review of the CDC report and its supplemental tables to recognize autism as a true phenomenon requiring investigation into its root causes.

There is nothing more profitable than a sick child because insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies profit from them. The earlier a child is sick, the more profitable they are. When the speaker's uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease; today, it's 60%. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was zero then, but now it's about $4.3 trillion, and none of it is necessary. In 1960, the autism rate was between one in 1,500 and one in 10,000. Today, according to the CDC, it's one in every 34 kids, and in some states, like California, Utah, and New Jersey, it's one in 22. These children should be healthy and high-performing, but instead, they have an extraordinary disability. Full-blown autism can result in nonverbal, non-toilet-trained children who will never graduate high school or live independently.

Autism rates have skyrocketed, with 1 in 10,070 men over 70 affected compared to 1 in 34 kids today. The speaker questions why allergies and autism were rare in their generation but prevalent now, costing the country $1 trillion annually. They emphasize the need to address this issue that is impacting so many children.

The ADDM report indicates an alarming increase in autism prevalence. The ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is now 1 in 31, with a higher risk for boys, 1 in 20 overall, and 1 in 12.5 in California. Since the first report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8. About 25% of diagnosed children are nonverbal and have severe symptoms. The speaker disputes the idea that increased prevalence is solely due to better diagnoses. Referencing table three of the ADDM report, they claim the rates are genuinely increasing year by year. They cite a Wisconsin study of 900,000 children that found autism in less than 1 in 10,000, compared to today's 1 in 31. A 1987 North Dakota study found a rate of 3.3 per 10,000. A national collaborative perinatal project between 1959 and 1965 found 4.7 cases per 10,000. A UC Davis MIND Institute study concluded that the autism epidemic is real.

In 1988, the movie Rain Man introduced the public to autism. It explained that autistic savants, previously called idiot savants, have certain abilities and deficiencies. Autism was rarely discussed until recently when the number of diagnoses started increasing rapidly. The news reported a 57% increase in pediatric cases, surpassing AIDS, diabetes, and cancer combined. The CDC revealed that 1 in 68 children in the United States, approximately 1 million, are diagnosed with autism. This global epidemic requires a cure.

If the autism epidemic is due to better diagnostics, it should be seen in older people, but it is not. Where are the 71-year-olds with full-blown autism? They are not seen in malls, homes, or institutions. The speaker claims this absence indicates a falsehood, likely perpetuated by industries profiting from an environmental toxin in air, water, medicines, or food. These industries benefit from normalizing autism and claiming it has always existed. The speaker asserts it is not good for the country or the press to not be skeptical. New studies will soon be announced to identify the specific environmental toxins causing autism, which the speaker claims has not been done before. The speaker anticipates providing answers to the American people quickly.

In 2016, the autism rate was 1 in 54, and in 2000, it was 1 in 150. One speaker asks what the rate was in the past and what is causing the change. Another speaker cites a peer-reviewed study in Wisconsin that looked at 900,000 children and found the rate to be 0.7 out of 10,000, which is less than 1 in 10,000.

The speaker claims the media propagates a false narrative that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria. They cite studies and a 2013 California legislature request to the UC Davis Mind Institute, which allegedly concluded that a real autism epidemic exists. The speaker argues that the epidemic is specific to children, not older generations. They state that while they've encountered people their age with Asperger's or autism spectrum traits, they've never seen older individuals with "full blown autism" (nonverbal, non-toilet trained), implying such cases are absent in older populations.

At one time, not too long ago, one out of a hundred thousand children were diagnosed with autism. Now it's one in thirty one. The speaker calls that "ridiculous" and describes it as a "'massive spike in autism'." The opposition claims the rise is due to better ways of diagnosing it. The speaker counters that if that were true, then you would look into every single nursing home and they would be filled with autistic people, and you don't see that. If you personally had a child with autism, wouldn't you want someone to look deeply and widely at every possibility? I mean, that's just common sense.