reSee.it - Related Video Feed

- The speaker asks Madam Secretary two questions: (1) Have you ever received an invitation like this from the FBI? (2) Do you plan on attending this meeting? The responses are: No and Yes. - The speaker notes that they’ve worked with the FBI before, citing past instances such as being swatted and white powder mailings in 2024. - They describe the current invitation as highly unusual and express concern, citing the president’s recent rhetoric about nationalizing elections.

Michelle Obama's real name is Michael, and she is transgender. Speaker 1 claims they would have thought people noticed "the dick in her pants." Speaker 1 also states that Obama is a homosexual and that they had the country and the whole world fooled. Speaker 1 believes Michelle Obama is a transgender. Speaker 0 asks if the country will see the first gay president or a woman president, but Speaker 1 insists Michelle is a transgender.

The speaker was asked what office they were elected to and if they needed support. The speaker responded that they are not the one to ask and that the person should speak with a man. The speaker then stated that they speak to over a million people.

The speaker asks if the other person has received any emails from colleagues, but the other person wants to know the question. The speaker then mentions that the State Department's internal email system has added pronouns to the "from" line without people's choice. They question why this decision was made and who made it. The other person says they haven't seen this phenomenon and offers to look into it. The speaker insists that it should be a choice and not imposed by the State Department, especially if the pronouns are incorrect. The other person agrees to investigate and thanks everyone.

This message is directed at Congresswoman Nancy Mace, expressing a desire to confront her violently in a women's bathroom, with graphic details of the intended attack. The speaker concludes with a hope that she receives the message positively.

Someone who snuck into that chat that was not a part of that was not an employee there. And they screenshotted what they saw and leaked it out on x. This is a chat group that was created and administered by the NSA, one of the premier intelligence collection entities that we have. It was obscene. It was talking about sex toys and sex tricks for people who had gone through, you know, some kind of transgender surgery. During the workday on an intelligence hosted work chat group. The supervisors said anybody who's involved with this is getting fired and getting their security clearance revoked. Imagine you're in any office and you're having these kinds of sexually explicit conversations in the workplace. This cannot be happening in the workplace, and it must not be happening in our premier intelligence agency that has people who have the highest clearances that that anyone can hold. This chat group had existed for over two years. Because of president Biden's DEI initiatives, they were essentially told, shut up. It's none of your business.

Trans students on this campus feel victimized by your presence. You mentioned this man's transition, but earlier you dismissed their concerns. Life's tough, get a helmet. I can't handle this, next question.

Head of LGBTQ DEMS in Maryland since fall, volunteer position. Mentioned receiving inappropriate messages, including graphic sexual content. Expresses discomfort and lack of consent. Inappropriate messages continued despite lack of response.

I could be a dog catcher and was voted for president twice. But someone interrupts, asking to talk about Jeffrey Epstein and the Lolita Express. The conversation gets interrupted again, but the speaker mentions feeling sad about Arkansas.

The speaker briefly mentions Ukraine and Russia, suggesting that a nuclear war would be worth it to support democracy and get vaccinated. They then mention shopping at Target in the pride section, looking for a shirt for their openly gay 6-year-old. The speaker abruptly ends their statement, expressing self-hatred and mentioning something about a vaccine for white supremacy. The moderator interrupts and thanks the speaker, asking them to move aside for the next person. The video ends with the moderator announcing a 5-minute break.

The speaker expresses dislike for both Trump and Biden, with a stronger dislike for Trump. When asked for reasons, the speaker mentions being gay and implies that Trump's actions have negatively affected the LGBTQ+ community. When asked for specific examples, the speaker becomes frustrated and refuses to answer.

The speaker questions someone about their involvement in questionable donations made through ActBlue. They mention talking to people in Maryland who denied making the donations listed on ActBlue's website. The speaker is asked to leave and threatened with arrest for trespassing at a location in Massachusetts.

Shane is repeatedly called upon by the speaker, who asks if it's wrong to touch oneself in the private area. The speaker then asks Shane a personal question and inquires about the meaning of a certain term. Another person suggests the speaker touch themselves, but the speaker misunderstands and asks if they should touch their face. The conversation takes a hostile turn when someone named Millie questions the presence of another person and threatens violence. The speaker tries to calm the situation and calls for Shane's attention. The transcript abruptly ends.

The speaker delivers a series of provocative attributions and assertions about sexuality and gender, framing them in a religious and confrontational context. Key points include: - The central claim that sexual orientation is not inherent but influenced by demonic possession: “You're not gay. It's a demon that's inside of you. You ain't born that way. Don't let it try to lie to you. Rebuke demons up by faith.” - A stated purpose of exposing what the speaker identifies as demons hiding in people: “Hope you find the truth. I'm exposing these demons that try to hide in you.” - An insistence on rejecting homosexuality and transforming beliefs about sexual identity into a spiritual warfare narrative: “I just speak the truth and I don't care about gay rights.” - A stark denigration of LGBTQ identities, including a controversial assertion about Pride: “Pride stands for the land of the pigs, where they like to be trans and start playing with some kids.” - A critical stance toward inclusive policies some communities advocate for, specifically bathrooms for girls: “Got bathrooms for girls so we can't let you in.” - A direct challenge and accusatory tone toward a person named Steve, asserting that the person is not fooling anyone: “Steve, you ain't fooling no one.” - A claim that the person being addressed is not truly gay but “more like insane,” with a dismissive framing of being gay as something trivialized or ridiculed: “You're not gay, more like insane. Being gay is funny and dandy till you get a…” - An expression of personal, perhaps generational, motivation: “My candle alert is mad because my dad raised me.” - A rhetorical question hinting at confusion or debate about gender identity: “Right? You think you a woman because…” - The overall tone is confrontational, aiming to discredit LGBTQ identities and present a binary, faith-based interpretation of sexuality, with intermittent personal remarks about the speaker’s background and beliefs. The transcript centers on a confrontational, faith-driven denunciation of homosexuality and transgender identities, presenting them as demonic forcers to rebuke, while contrasting this stance with a claimed commitment to “speaking the truth” and opposing gay rights. The language interweaves spiritual warfare rhetoric with personal admonitions toward named individuals and general policy critiques, culminating in an unresolved line about gender identity.

Speaker 0 mentions feeling like a dog catcher and going to formation for president twice. Speaker 1 interrupts, wanting to discuss Jeffrey Epstein, but Speaker 0 refuses, saying they are walking and feeling sad about it.

I am alarmed, harassed, and distressed because of your presence, but I'm afraid to confront you. It is not pleasant being investigated. You should investigate the individual responsible for the communication, specifically point one two seven. This addresses instances where posts cause significant distress or are of a menacing nature, resulting in anxiety for the recipient. You're going to be wearing a mask next. Do not call us a Jewish president. He's dominant to the right, do not call the right. Don't do that.

The speaker asks the other person if they are gay and criticizes them for being weak and electing Justin Trudeau. They express anger towards the trans community and claim that being trans is a mental illness. They also mention not wanting their kids to be taught about different genders or sexual preferences. The speaker sees the other person as an enemy to the world.

The speakers discuss the possibility of the United States having its first gay or woman president. Speaker 2 mentions that this has already happened with Obama, so there is no need to get worked up about it. Speaker 0 then brings up Michelle, but Speaker 2 clarifies that Michelle is transgender. Speaker 1 reacts with surprise.

The speaker is asked about a previous statement regarding having a gay son. The speaker deflects the question and insults the interviewer. The interviewer then brings up the speaker's comments about the trans community and asks if they will continue to address it. The speaker goes on a rant, calling the trans community an infection and expressing opposition to teaching about gender diversity. The speaker concludes by labeling the interviewer as the enemy.

Speaker 0 interrupts and apologizes repeatedly before mentioning a story about men dressed as prostitutes reading inappropriate material to children. They point out the presence of a large crowd and express discomfort with someone touching them.

Speaker 0 asks about the other person’s jobs, saying, “I sold my solar home, and I work from the charity. You work for a defense contractor? Wow. That is not who I thought you were.” They request pronouns: “Can I get some pronouns going? Sheer. Okay. Got it.” They ask, “Are you a trans woman?” They continue, “May I ask that as every You're a trans woman.” They then inquire, “Are you the only trans woman working at the defense company?” The response given is, “No. There’s just a defense contractor full of trans women just dropping bombs on brown people.” They prompt again, “How about those pronouns?” The conversation shifts to job specifics: “Okay, so you make motors for what exactly? Rocket.” The answer: “Rocket motors.” They clarify, “Oh, oh rocket for rockets. So like when that school in Iran.” They remark, “Dude, that’s a pickle for a liberal, don’t you think?” They add, “Dude, like technically the motors were made by trans women so So were you on the side of liberals? But are you a liberal? Yes.” They conclude, “Okay. You’re very leftist.” They prompt for further understanding: “But then help me understand the logic. But that’s a lot. Isn’t that a lot of money? I feel like feel like there’s a middle ground somewhere in there. Are you like pro capitalism?” The other person responds with, “No, you hate capitalism. You just build rocket motors for our military.” The interviewer asks about career history: “Have you had other jobs? What were those?” The other person responds, “I don’t understand you one little bit.” The topic shifts to therapy: “You go to therapy. Did you talk about building the rocket motors in therapy? Okay. Tell me what your trauma is. Your dad is your trauma?” They conclude with a remark about trauma: “Yeah. You know what some people’s trauma is? Getting hit by a high people trauma.”

The speakers discuss various topics including LGBTQ+ issues in the military, finding LGBTQ+ friendly units, the Russian threat, corruption in the government, and the challenges faced by the Ukrainian army. They express disappointment in the current president and discuss the possibility of the speaker becoming a deputy in the future. The conversation also touches on the murder of an English soldier by his partner and the presence of foreign fighters in the Ukrainian army. The speakers express concerns about security risks and morale issues. The conversation ends with the offer for the speaker to become a deputy.

Speaker 0 officiated a wedding in New York, which made a lot of news. They are excited about this new career move. When asked about the possibility of the first gay president or nominee, Speaker 0 mentions that it has already happened with Obama. There is a moment of confusion when Speaker 0 mistakenly refers to Michelle as transgender, but quickly corrects themselves.

Speaker 0 officiated a wedding in New York and is excited about it. When asked about the possibility of the first gay president or nominee, Speaker 0 mentions that it has already happened with Obama. There is a moment of confusion when Speaker 0 mistakenly refers to Michelle as transgender, but quickly corrects themselves.

I need the city to protect me because the federal government won't. If you're afraid of Trump, prepare for trans people to make this a very unsafe space. How many of my friends need to die before you do anything? Remember Black History Month and that you are a guest in my house. My name in drag is Didi Delight, and out of drag is Dewey Cosgrove Batienza. I'm Laddie LaRouge. My legal name is Olivia D'Ambrosio, and public name is Libby Scanlon. I'm always misgendered and afraid to use public toilets. Imagine fearing our marriage rights being stripped away. Does covering legal fees for police brutality matter more than protecting queer lives? If federal money relies on dehumanizing trans people, we don't want it. I'm here to impart my sour grapes. Trump is threatening the trans community. Make Westborough a sanctuary city for trans people, and don't call someone "it." The kids are watching, and we're ready to vote you out.