TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Critics raised concerns about the lack of testing before the COVID-19 vaccine was rolled out. Katie Lees, a fit and healthy 34-year-old, decided to get the AstraZeneca vaccine after the guidelines changed. Unfortunately, she suffered a fatal blood clotting disorder and passed away. Her parents faced backlash for speaking out about her death. The panel discusses the rushed vaccine rollout and the need for acknowledgment and compensation for vaccine injuries. Professor Kieran Phelps and her wife, Jacqui, share their own adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. They highlight the lack of medical curiosity and the need for better support and compensation for those who experience vaccine injuries.

My son loved hockey and got vaccinated despite his fear of needles. He experienced severe symptoms after the shot and passed away shortly after. The doctor failed to properly diagnose him. I want the truth about vaccine deaths and closure for my son. Another doctor confirmed that the vaccine caused his death. Many others have similar stories, and we need to address the issue of vaccine injuries.

Speaker 0: Because there was such a mass vaccination campaign with a product that, you know, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were injured in this process, what work is the NIH doing in terms of research to somehow help these people? Because just from my own experience, my wife and I made a film about this, right? These people were, even though in some cases they were supported a bit by, but mostly just completely gaslit and just, no, your issue doesn't exist. Right? So how are you approaching this? Speaker 1: Well, you're absolutely right. There were absolutely like, lot patients of who were vaccine injured were gaslit, pretending as if they didn't get injured or that somehow their symptoms are all Speaker 1: in their head or something. Actually, this is part of a broader phenomenon, where, you have patients with conditions that are poorly understood, where the medical system will gaslight them leave. They can they're telling you it's a a psychological issue rather than a physical issue. It should make you think that you're crazy because you you you have symptoms that you just, you know you have, but you can't convince anyone else to do anything about it. Injury is one of them, long COVID, MECFS, Lyme chronic Lyme disease, a whole host of these conditions where it just fits a very similar pattern. Speaker 1: The key underlying thing is that there isn't excellent science to guide decision making for clinicians or anybody else, for patients. And I've made sure that people know at the NIH that I'm very interested in investing in answers for patients for all of those. Vaccine injury, long COVID, MECFS, chronic Lyme. We need to get better answers. The the gaslighting happens because the, if you're let's say you're a doctor and you see a patient and you have no idea what's causing their condition. Speaker 1: Right? Because the scientific literature doesn't have an answer. You're gonna be unless you're an amazing doctor who's really good at, you know, sort of being honest and compassionate, you're going to be wanting to, like, move on to the next patient. And, it's really, really unfortunate. The answer is to get good answers, right? Speaker 1: So invest in, research on treatments, on underlying physiology, physiological causes, you know, basic biological knowledge, so that those patients actually can can the doctors and the caregivers for those patients can will treat them correctly. Speaker 0: So but is is NIH doing this for people that are that have been COVID vaccine injures against a huge number of people relatively. Speaker 1: We have investments in that, and we're going have more investments in that at the start, you know, this year. For all of those conditions, I think patients deserve an answer, and I'm definitely, interested in finding I would love to know myself.

Hello Pfizer and Moderna. We need help. Our lives have been altered and we are desperate for answers. We want to share our stories and have our voices heard. We want to bring the medical community together to receive the help we desperately need. We are real and we want our lives back.

There is a lack of medical curiosity in investigating vaccine side effects. The number of adverse reactions reported is small compared to the actual cases. Patients with vaccine injuries struggle to be heard and compensated. Medical practitioners need to engage with affected individuals, conduct research, and provide safe healthcare. The compensation scheme is inadequate, requiring extensive documentation for claims. Many young people are experiencing serious health issues post-vaccination. More support and follow-up are needed for those suffering from vaccine injuries.

People received the COVID vaccine for various reasons, including vulnerability, protecting loved ones and patients, and traveling. Afterward, they experienced injuries and were often dismissed by doctors who didn't know how to help or attributed the symptoms to other causes. Some were told not to share their stories. Many faced disbelief and bullying, with some receiving death threats. They have been injured for months. No one seems to know how to help, research the injuries, or believe them. Experiences shared on social media were labeled as misinformation, leading to warnings, bans, and the silencing of support groups. Reports to VAERS often went unanswered or were incorrectly recorded. Despite being told their experiences are rare and the vaccines are safe, their reality is unchanged. They feel abandoned, marginalized, and silenced, and seek help, research, and recognition. They emphasize they are real people, not misinformation, and are not rare.

I urge the British, Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, and US governments to recognize the global health crisis linked to the mRNA vaccine platform, which has been used for COVID-19, RSV, flu, and tetanus. During the pandemic, we were constantly updated on COVID cases, yet now we face a significant health crisis affecting potentially hundreds of millions due to this mRNA technology. While it is known to be cost-effective and profitable, it is also causing injuries to millions, with potential generational effects. Governments must acknowledge this serious issue, as ignoring it raises concerns.

You need to know the risk profile for products like the COVID vaccine. Many discuss adverse effects, but we lack sufficient data, which is unacceptable. Our surveillance system doesn't work. In 2010, the CDC had the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, meant to detect injuries. However, a CDC study revealed it captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is inexcusable. Congress, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly directed the CDC to develop a better vaccine surveillance system. We will require it and address it immediately.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention others with amputations and heart conditions, and question why support is lacking. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and highlight over 30,000 adverse reactions in Scotland. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka do the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by stating that decisions during the pandemic were based on medical advice from experts, guiding vaccine rollout and eligibility.

The inquiry will investigate if the right to life was protected in care homes, including potential pressure for "do not resuscitate" notices, lack of resuscitation, and neglect. Evidence may point to systemic failures in care delivery, regulation, and inspection in Scotland. The bereaved want to know how the virus entered locked-down care homes and spread. The inquiry will hear that people were transferred from hospitals to care homes without testing, potentially ignoring local capacity and patient interests. Blanket bans on visits exacerbated the situation, denying families contact with loved ones. Some staff risked their jobs to inform families, while some management prioritized reputation over resident care. Families faced unanswered calls, were treated with disdain, and witnessed deterioration in health, suspecting neglect. Records were sometimes missing or incomplete. The inquiry must investigate potential violations of the prohibition on torture and inhuman and degrading treatment. The inquiry should consider whether inspection and regulatory regimes were fit for purpose and the impact of restrictions on family life. The group wants to ensure that no family member, no care home resident and no care worker in the future has to go through what they and their loved ones suffered during Covid-nineteen.

John Watt, a COVID vaccine-injured individual, expresses his pain and frustration, highlighting the lack of support for those affected by the vaccine. He questions why he had to establish a support group in Scotland for vaccine victims and criticizes the inadequate vaccine damaged payment scheme. The Prime Minister acknowledges John's concerns and promises to address them, mentioning the existence of a compensation scheme. He emphasizes that decisions regarding the vaccine rollout were based on medical advice and encourages John to provide his details for further investigation. The Prime Minister expresses surprise at John's claim of being silenced and assures him that his case will be looked into.

We are not a hate group or anti-vaxxers. We respect your knowledge and credentials. We don't want our children to get sick, but we have concerns about the vaccine program due to misinformation. We believe there is a small subset of children prone to vaccine injuries beyond just a swollen arm or fever. We want you to understand our side and address the issues raised by the CDC, World Health Organization, and Institute of Medicine. We want reassurance that our children won't be the one in a million affected. We have vaccine-injured children and believe it is our right to be protected. Please read the book for more information.

John, an NHS pharmacist, experienced significant issues following his vaccination. His family is angry that he had to endure bureaucratic trauma on top of his illness and recovery. The family's lawyer states that 350 people have been rejected from the vaccine damage payment scheme (VDPS) because they didn't meet the 60% disability threshold, which was originally designed for industrial injuries, not the complex impacts suffered by John. The family believes the system needs to be overhauled to be fair and transparent. They cite a two-year delay in John's case, during which he wasn't examined or consulted, and his rejection broke him psychologically. John believed in vaccination and saw the VDPS as vital for public confidence. The Department of Health stated that the COVID inquiry will consider VDPS reform in hearings next year and that qualified independent medical assessors undertake claim assessments. John's family feels the system failed him and wants accountability. They urge the government to take action.

We are not a hate group or anti-vaxxers. We respect your knowledge and credentials. We don't want our children to get sick, but we have concerns about the vaccine program due to misinformation. We believe there is a small subset of children prone to vaccine injuries beyond just a swollen arm or fever. We want you to understand our side and address the issues raised by the CDC, World Health Organization, and Institute of Medicine. We want reassurance that our children won't be the one in a million affected. We have vaccine-injured children and believe it is our right to be protected. Please read the book for more information.

COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention people with amputations and heart conditions, and question why they had to set up a support group in Scotland. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and state that over 30,000 people in Scotland have had adverse reactions to the vaccine. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka start doing the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by saying that decisions regarding the vaccine were made based on medical advice from experts.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

Summary 3: The video highlights the experiences of individuals who have suffered adverse effects from the Covid-19 vaccine, expressing frustration with the lack of recognition and support from healthcare providers and the government. Concerns are raised about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, emphasizing the need for further investigation and transparency. The vaccination of children and the changing guidelines surrounding it are also discussed. The speakers stress the importance of sharing their stories and supporting one another in the face of indifference and suffering. Additionally, the video addresses the challenges faced by individuals who advocate for honest debate and informed choices about vaccines, as they receive abuse from both pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine sides. The role of government advisory groups and the media in creating a culture of fear and stifling democratic discussion is highlighted. Overall, the video calls for open dialogue and informed decision-making to prevent further harm.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which may have been changed during production or transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The Vice President of Pfizer admitted to building the plane while flying, and we have shown that one wing has fallen off. There is a safety issue that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and national institutions should have addressed and informed the public about. Our study also suggests a potential link between certain cancers and different vaccine batches. We have observed increased mortality rates in European countries since May 21st. The EMA should have reacted to these findings and halted vaccinations or at least withdrawn the problematic batches. As a concerned citizen and doctor, I expected more action from the EMA. Thank you.

The vaccine rollout in the UK effectively placed everyone in a Phase IV post-authorization trial, serving as real-world data. The government pre-paid AstraZeneca for vaccine supplies and indemnified pharmaceutical companies like Moderna and Pfizer against certain claims. Public messaging emphasized the necessity of vaccination, linking it to personal freedoms, travel, work, and family visits. Financial incentives were provided to healthcare providers to boost vaccination rates, potentially fostering a mindset that prioritized delivery at all costs. Urgent reform is needed, as the current system has failed to adequately support those injured or bereaved. Despite promises from past and present governments to review the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, no action has been taken four years after the initial vaccinations.

There is overwhelming evidence of a pandemic of vaccine injuries, with millions harmed or killed. Urgent action is needed to find solutions for those affected. Serious harms, especially cardiovascular issues, may persist for years post-vaccination. Boosters and immunosuppression may increase cancer risk. Transparency and collaboration among scientists are crucial to address these issues and identify vulnerable populations. Lifestyle changes can help reduce risks. This crisis is likely a major contributor to excess deaths worldwide.

A physician who experienced an adverse reaction to the Moderna COVID shot states that the COVID shots should never have been authorized for children and pregnant women. After receiving the Moderna shot, the speaker developed transverse myelitis, autonomic dysfunction, and an unspecified immune disorder, leading to medical retirement. The speaker is now co-chair of React19, representing Americans injured by the COVID shots. The speaker claims that the clinical trials were rushed, safety data was withheld or altered, and reporting systems like VAERS and V-Safe have failed. The speaker questions whether regulatory agencies have a conflict of interest. The speaker alleges that instead of proving safety and efficacy, the COVID-19 shots were assumed to be safe and effective, with short follow-up data, and were given to pregnant/lactating women and children without long-term safety data. The speaker is appreciative that the COVID-19 shots have been removed from the childhood vaccination schedule for healthy children, but much damage has already been done. The speaker advocates for recognition, research, medical care, and compensation for those injured by the COVID-19 shots.

They told us it was safe and effective, that everyone was doing it, and that it was the only way to live. We trusted them, so we got it. But ever since, it's been unrelenting agony, exhaustion, and regret. Now, we're constantly questioning, searching, and fretting. They tell us we're faking, lying, or imagining it, even when diagnosed with severe damage like blood clots or cardiac arrest. We research endlessly because our lives depend on it. But we're just a statistic to some, or nonexistent to others. They refuse to see, hear, or help us. We fight the gaslighting, seek relief, and delay the inevitable. They tell us to shut up, that it's rare, and that it was worth it, while no one takes responsibility. We were jabbed, we believed them, and we trusted the science. Now we're alone, without support or recourse, having lost jobs, insurance, babies, and lives. We must live, survive, and fight for justice. We are living proof of their fraud, cruelty, and tyranny. See us, hear us, feel us, help us.

We have found more adverse effects than officially reported from the COVID vaccine. Serious harms and deaths are at unprecedented levels. We are committed to compensating those affected, but the financial burden should not fall on taxpayers. Our goal is to fight for justice for vaccinated individuals, expose discrimination against the unvaccinated, and reveal the truth about the COVID pandemic and vaccine safety.

Speaker 0: No compensation is available for people with legitimate vaccine injuries, as there is already a system in place through ACC for managing such cases. Speaker 1: However, many vaccine-injured individuals have been denied by ACC and are facing personal financial burdens for their treatment. The requirement of proving the injury is a high bar to meet. Speaker 2: It is not a high bar if a proper examination system is in place. If someone was fine before receiving the vaccine and experienced severe consequences afterward, it is likely caused by the vaccine. We should let an independent commissioner investigate the truth instead of arguing about it.

The speaker received a letter from the officer's office requesting a report on the COVID response. The government accepted a certain amount of risk regarding the long-term efficacy and side effects of vaccines. There was a discussion about vaccine injuries and compensation, with one person mentioning that there is a system in place through ACC for managing such cases. The conversation then shifted to personal experiences and frustrations with the lack of acknowledgement and compensation for vaccine injuries. The speaker expressed their emotions and mentioned their involvement in the Vaccine Impact Support Network. They thanked someone for being there and admitted to rarely crying about anything.