reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Jean-Marc Sabatier, a research director at CNRS, discusses the lack of scientific debate and censorship surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. He explains that there is a silence and taboo within the scientific community regarding the adverse effects of vaccines. Despite evidence showing the deleterious effects of current vaccine platforms, there is a favoritism towards the narrative promoted by Big Pharma and those who follow it. Sabatier highlights the explosion of adverse reactions and the increased risk of infection among vaccinated individuals. He attributes the lack of scientific consensus to administrative and political influences within research organizations like CNRS. Despite facing marginalization and potential repercussions, Sabatier remains committed to conducting research based on scientific evidence and protecting public health.

The speaker discusses the lies surrounding the COVID vaccine, questioning the safety and effectiveness. They mention CDC director Rochelle Walensky's claim that vaccinated individuals can't spread the virus, which turned out to be false. The speaker interviews Steve Kirsch, who highlights the alarming number of adverse events and deaths linked to the vaccine. Kirsch criticizes the lack of transparency from the CDC regarding safety signals. The discussion emphasizes the importance of free speech and the need for honest dialogue about vaccine risks.

The speaker urges their colleagues in the medical field to do the right thing and speak out against the problems they have observed with the COVID-19 vaccines. They share examples of adverse reactions they have witnessed, including strokes, cancer in fully vaccinated individuals, heart problems, blood clots, and fertility issues. The speaker emphasizes the need for more doctors to join the movement and speak up, despite the potential consequences. They highlight the importance of using facts and clinical experience to support their claims. The speaker concludes by encouraging others to continue fighting for the truth and not retire, as they are backed by evidence and personal experiences.

We are discussing a major medical mistake and corporate crime with vaccines causing serious harm like heart attacks and strokes. Research shows the risk of harm from the vaccine is higher than being hospitalized with COVID. This suggests the vaccine should never have been given. It's a scandal that many are unaware of, leading to a pandemic of vaccine injuries.

A chemist discusses the presence of graphene oxide in COVID-19 vaccines and its potential dangers. He explains that graphene hydroxide, which is present in the vaccines, acts like nanoscale razor blades that can cut blood vessels and cause internal bleeding. The chemist criticizes the lack of understanding among doctors and toxicologists about the presence and effects of graphene oxide. He argues that the Austrian government, including the president of the Austrian Medical Association and the Austrian Chancellor, should be held accountable for implementing vaccine mandates without fully understanding the risks. He urges people to spread awareness and demand answers from their leaders.

Jean-Marc Sabatier, a research director at CNRS, discusses the lack of scientific debate and censorship surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. He explains that there is a silence and taboo within the scientific community regarding the adverse effects of vaccines. Despite evidence showing the deleterious effects of current vaccine platforms, there is a lack of scientific consensus due to administrative and political pressures. Sabatier emphasizes the importance of independent research and the need to prioritize scientific evidence over beliefs. He acknowledges the risks and marginalization he faces but remains committed to his role in protecting public health.

Jean-Marc Sabatier, a research director at CNRS, discusses the lack of scientific debate and censorship surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. He explains that there is a silence and taboo within the scientific community regarding the adverse effects of vaccines. Despite evidence showing the deleterious effects of current mRNA vaccines, there is a favoritism towards the narrative promoted by Big Pharma and those who follow it. Sabatier highlights the explosion of side effects and the increased risk of infection after vaccination. He attributes the lack of scientific consensus to administrative and political influences within research organizations like CNRS. Despite facing marginalization and potential repercussions, Sabatier remains committed to conducting research based on scientific evidence and protecting public health.

Tijdens een speciale RTL-uitzending over verkeerde informatie stond de premier tegenover jongeren en zei: "Ik controleerde het dezelfde avond nog. Het federaal geneesmiddelenbureau had al meer dan 14000 meldingen van bijwerkingen geregistreerd, waarvan 9800 ernstig. Van de 227 gerapporteerde sterfgevallen erkent het agentschap dat er in totaal 4 geacht worden waarschijnlijk verband te houden met het vaccin." Er is een probleem met het melden van bijwerkingen. "Kijk, dit is de Europese database van meldingen van bijwerkingen." Nederland heeft 0.7 bijwerkingen na vaccinatie; België ongeveer 0.15 procent. België zou 80 procent meer bijwerkingen moeten declareren om op het niveau van Nederland te komen. Een jong meisje kreeg 2 dagen na vaccinatie enorme iliofemoropoplitheale trombose; het ziekenhuisverslag zegt: diep-veneuze trombose, niet van een vaccin dat 2 dagen voordien werd toegediend, maar van een anticonceptiepil (oestroprogystageen). Bij tweede dosis vaccin kreeg ze opnieuw trombose; ze staat nog niet geregistreerd in de dossiers van de geneesmiddelenbewaking. Sommigen geloven dat het vaccin geen bijwerkingen kan hebben; promotie van het vaccin wordt voorgesteld als verplichting; elke arts die informatie verschaft die in strijd is met de huidige stand van de wetenschap zal streng worden vervolgd. De huidige stand van de wetenschap is dat het vaccin een wonder is dat geen bijwerking heeft. Dat is niet waar. English translation: During a special RTL broadcast about misinformation, the prime minister faced the youth and said: "I checked it the same evening. The federal medicines agency had already registered more than 14,000 reports of side effects, of which 9,800 were serious. Of the 227 reported deaths, the agency says that 4 are probably related to the vaccine." There is a problem with reporting side effects. "Look, this is the European database of adverse event reports." Netherlands has 0.7 side effects per vaccination; Belgium about 0.15 percent. Belgium would have to declare 80 percent more side effects to reach the Netherlands level. A young woman got 2 days after vaccination an enormous iliofemoropopliteal thrombosis; the hospital report says: deep vein thrombosis, not from a vaccine given 2 days earlier, but from a contraceptive pill (ethinyl estradiol). After a second dose, she had another thrombosis; she is still not registered in the pharmacovigilance dossiers. Some believe the vaccine cannot have side effects; promotion of the vaccine is presented as mandatory; any doctor who provides information that conflicts with the current science will be prosecuted. The current science is that the vaccine is a wonder with no side effects. That is not true.

The speaker expresses skepticism about the number of COVID patients in hospitals and claims that most patients are vaccinated. They urge the media to tell the truth and ask for support. Another speaker, identified as a nurse, asks if they are seeing the same people in the hospital. The first speaker responds by mentioning serious adverse effects, specifically myocarditis in 20-year-olds, which can lead to cardiac transplants. They highlight the low organ donor rate in Australia. The conversation ends with a request for clarification.

I'm a doctor and scientist who has worked with the NHS and the World Health Organization. I sent an urgent report to the MHRA stating that the COVID vaccines were unsafe and causing harm. The yellow card scheme showed 250,000 adverse event reports and 1,253 deaths associated with the vaccines. The MHRA responded, suggesting that some reports may be coincidental. Since then, the Vigi access database has recorded over 5,000,000 reports of COVID vaccine harms, injuries, and deaths. These vaccines are genetic therapies, not safe or effective. Trust me, I am a scientist and doctor.

The speaker, a medical professor in Japan, discusses the need to raise awareness about medical complications related to COVID-19 vaccines. They highlight specific cases of adverse effects, including a 28-year-old man who died after receiving the vaccine. The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, criticizing the World Health Organization (WHO) for its handling of the vaccination campaign. They argue that the vaccines should not have been approved and that the WHO lacks the necessary expertise. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of conducting comprehensive research on the outcomes and damages caused by the vaccines. They express concern about the decline of science and the need for transparency in reporting vaccine-related incidents.

The speaker discusses the vaccine's link to death and disability, citing over 37,000 deaths globally reported on VAERS. They criticize regulators for not addressing this issue earlier and mention a conversation with Francis Collins about vaccine-related deaths. The speaker also mentions a conversation with Dr. Redfield, who admitted downplaying vaccine injuries to avoid creating hesitancy. Dr. Redfield acknowledged that there are more injuries than reported.

Jean-François Delfraissy responds to Samia's accusations of betrayal and poisoning by stating that he sympathizes with her but the words used are not accurate. He explains that the side effects of the vaccines were discovered gradually and that there was a precautionary approach, as seen with the withdrawal of the AstraZeneca vaccine due to myocarditis cases. He emphasizes the extensive surveillance of side effects at both national and international levels. Delfraissy acknowledges the individual suffering but highlights the overall positive impact of vaccination in combating the pandemic. Regarding Aurélien Rousseau's statement that there are no side effects with the new COVID vaccine, Delfraissy disagrees, explaining that any vaccine can cause side effects in certain individuals due to their immune response.

The speaker discusses the recognition of side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine by public authorities. After two years of conspiracy theories, the link between the vaccine and various health issues is now acknowledged. Only 72 out of 241 cases have received compensation for vaccine-related adverse effects. The main incidents recognized are cardiac disorders, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis. Neurological disorders, such as facial paralysis, and severe vascular issues like strokes, thrombosis, and pulmonary embolisms, have also been reported. The difficulty in reporting adverse events and the low number of victims seeking compensation are highlighted. The speaker suggests that the media downplayed the severity of these effects during vaccination campaigns.

Jean-Marc Sabatier, a research director at CNRS, discusses the lack of scientific debate and censorship surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. He explains that there is a silence and taboo within the scientific community regarding the adverse effects of vaccines. Despite evidence showing problems with current vaccine platforms, there is a favoritism towards the narrative promoted by Big Pharma and those who follow it. Sabatier highlights the explosion of side effects and the increased risk of infection after vaccination. He attributes the lack of scientific consensus to administrative and political influences within research organizations like CNRS. Despite facing marginalization and potential repercussions, Sabatier remains committed to conducting research based on scientific evidence and protecting public health.

In this video, the speaker discusses the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and criticizes the lack of transparency and accountability in the vaccination process. They highlight the rise in serious health emergencies, the neglect of natural immunity, and the higher rate of adverse events compared to other vaccines. The speaker calls for the release of data on vaccine dosage, dates, and deaths, and expresses concern over the public's diminishing trust in health services, media, and politics. They also mention their personal sacrifices for speaking out against the vaccines and emphasize the need to challenge the powerful interests involved.

The speaker warns against manipulating patients and emphasizes the importance of safe vaccines. They mention having written a book advocating for safe vaccines and criticize the government's stance on vaccination. The speaker shares a personal experience of being vaccinated and still contracting COVID-19, highlighting the need for revaccination. They accuse big pharmaceutical companies of manipulating the population and influencing politicians. The speaker refers to a book that challenges official COVID-19 statistics and argues that the increase in deaths is due to age rather than the disease itself. They also mention cases of medical abuse and negligence in hospitals. The speaker estimates around 160,000 deaths in France, attributing them to pre-existing conditions and lack of treatment.

A mother from Seine-et-Marne plans to sue Pfizer after experiencing health issues following vaccination. Several individuals share their stories of developing various conditions after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine. One person experienced pain and numbness throughout their body, while another suffered from thrombocytopenia, a decrease in platelets. Another woman fell ill after her second dose and tested positive for Covid-19. She now faces serious health problems, including neurological issues and memory loss. These cases highlight concerns surrounding the vaccine's potential side effects.

Le ministre de la santé affirme que le vaccin Covid ne provoque pas la maladie de Krost-on-Jacob. Les parlementaires ont le droit de s'exprimer librement, mais doivent respecter les faits scientifiques. Une plainte est déposée contre le ministre de la santé pour ses propos.

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, discusses the adverse effects of both the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccines. He criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its role in covering up the origins of the virus and for not supporting early treatment protocols. Dr. McCullough highlights the dangers of the mRNA vaccines, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. He presents data showing that a significant percentage of people experience severe side effects from the vaccines. Dr. McCullough calls for the removal of all COVID-19 vaccines from the market and suggests that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO.

Jean-Marc Sabatier, a research director at CNRS, discusses the lack of scientific debate and censorship surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. He explains that there is a silence and taboo within the scientific community regarding the adverse effects of vaccines. Despite evidence showing the deleterious effects of current vaccine platforms, there is a push to follow the narrative of pharmaceutical companies and authorities. Sabatier highlights the explosion of side effects and the increased risk of infection after vaccination. He attributes the lack of scientific consensus to administrative and political influences within research organizations like CNRS. Despite facing marginalization and potential sanctions, Sabatier remains committed to conducting research based on scientific evidence and protecting public health.

The speaker expresses concern about the negative effects of vaccines and the lack of transparency in reporting related deaths and side effects. They argue that the government and media should acknowledge these issues and fulfill their role in informing the public. The speaker cites statistics from the Ministry of Health's website to support their claims. They also mention a case where a hospital committee chairman raised concerns about vaccine-related deaths but faced backlash. The speaker emphasizes the importance of reporting and investigating vaccine-related health issues, even if it goes against the prevailing narrative.

Speaker 0 assures that reported side effects of the vaccine are expected and not concerning. They urge people to report any unusual reactions. Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of transparency and unbiased investigation into outbreaks following vaccination. They question the accuracy of recording underlying causes of death related to COVID-19. Speaker 0 dismisses these concerns, stating that spreading doubts about vaccine safety during a pandemic is dangerous and undermines public health. Speaker 1 finds the minister's response concerning and ends the conversation.

The speakers discuss the issue of side effects not being properly accounted for in the context of pharmacovigilance. They mention a commission on side effects and criticize the lack of transparency from health authorities. They highlight cases where autopsies have linked vaccines to deaths and express frustration with the Minister of Health's denial of side effects. The speakers also criticize the media for not challenging the Minister and point out the apparent double standards of those who promote the government and pharmaceuticals. They argue that journalists should question the Minister's claims and demand assurance of no side effects before encouraging vaccination.

Dr. Sukhrit Bakadi, a retired microbiologist and co-author of the book "Corona False Alarm Facts and Figures," expresses concerns about the COVID vaccine, calling it dangerous and a massive experiment on humanity. Various individuals share their experiences and concerns about adverse reactions and deaths following vaccination. They question the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, citing instances of blood clots, seizures, paralysis, and even deaths. They highlight the high number of adverse event reports compared to previous vaccines and the lack of transparency in reporting. The video raises doubts about the necessity and safety of the COVID vaccine.