TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

- The speakers discuss data on vaccination, noting that “月 15 日 な ん と 1 800 万 人 の 接 種 回 数 人 数 分 の デー タ が 蓄 積 さ れ て お り ま す” – roughly, a large accumulation of data on vaccination counts (about 18 million vaccination events). - Speaker 1 attempts to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. They say the unvaccinated “は 山 ま 行 け な っ いう は 特 に 当たり 前 な ん ですよね 。 打っ て も 別 に 殴ら れ る わけ じゃ な 打っ て い ま せ ん の で 、何 の 問 題 も なく 、 フラ ット に な る わけ です 。” In other words, the unvaccinated are described as obviously not having issues even if they are not vaccinated, while vaccinated people may become “flat” or experience issues. - The main focus is on the vaccinated group. They describe a “緑 の 裏” that starts low, with a peak over one to two weeks. They note a pattern beginning around two months, with large peaks around three to four months. They interpret this as possibly reflecting a reaction pattern in doctors, who after vaccination might observe effects on the day, the next day, or about a week later, suggesting a vaccine effect or adverse response that diminishes over time. - There is mention of sending information to PM DA (a recipient or channel for information), indicating that the information is being transmitted to PM DA as part of the data flow. - Another finding is that as vaccination numbers increase, the “山” (the peak) of the adverse or death-related data shifts to the earlier positions, described as moving “前の方、左 の 方 に 移 動 し て い る.” The implication is that the distribution of the peak shifts with increasing vaccination counts. - Speaker 1 then asserts that “接 種 回 数 が 増 え て い く と 、死 亡 者 の 山 の 湿 原 が 早 く なり ます。” meaning that as vaccination numbers rise, the peak of fatalities or deaths “湿 原” becomes earlier, i.e., happens sooner. - They conclude that if there were no toxicity or lipid adjuvant effects from vaccination, the peak would not occur. This is presented as a finding: “ワクチン 接 種 に 毒 性 だ と か 脂 肪 を 誘 導 する 効 果 が なけれ ば 、山 に まず な ら な い わけ です よ .” In short, the absence of toxicity or adjuvant effects would mean the peak wouldn’t appear. - The overall takeaways emphasize observed patterns: the vaccinated group shows a rising and shifting peak over time with increasing vaccination counts, and there is a suggestion that the vaccination might be associated with a pattern of adverse observations that intensify or appear earlier as more people are vaccinated.

私は認知症神経科学の専門家で、最近の研究では、65歳以上の人々が2回のコロナワクチン接種後に認知症リスクが増加していることが示されています。未接種者に比べて、軽度認知障害（MCI）の発症率が2倍以上に増加し、アルツハイマー病のリスクも上昇しています。認知症は深刻な問題であり、薬がないため、介護が必要な状況が続くことがあります。 Translation: I specialize in cognitive neuroscience, and recent research shows that individuals aged 65 and older have an increased risk of dementia after receiving two doses of the Corona vaccine. The incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has more than doubled compared to non-vaccinated individuals, and the risk of Alzheimer's disease has also increased. Dementia is a serious issue, and without medication, the need for care can persist for a long time.

The speaker, a medical oncologist, discusses the introduction and spread of medical oncology in Japan. They mention the increase in cases of fast-progressing cancer and the need for doctors to share information. They express concern about the risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine and highlight cases of adverse effects and deaths. They criticize the World Health Organization (WHO) for its handling of the vaccine and call for an investigation into the damages caused. The speaker also mentions ongoing research on the effectiveness of vitamin D in treating COVID-19. They express frustration with the scientific community's lack of transparency and call for more comprehensive research on the genetic vaccine. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of science and the need for accountability.

The transcript reports that the largest single study on vaccines and dementia, involving over thirteen million people, found that vaccinated adults who received flu shots and pneumococcal shots faced a 50% increased risk of Alzheimer's disease and a 38% increased risk of dementia. It is claimed that the risk increased the more doses participants received, with individuals who lined up to receive more flu shots over the years experiencing the highest risks of neurodegenerative conditions, and that the risk persisted for more than ten years. The narrative states that once a person receives many of these shots, it is inducing neuroinflammatory injury, dementia, and Alzheimer's in vaccinated adults. Additionally, the transcript asserts that not only does the flu shot not work, according to colleagues at the Cleveland Clinic, but flu shots increase the risk of flu by 27%. It concludes by saying that flu shots, in addition to increasing flu risk, appear to increase the risk of dementia.

COVID-19 injections are associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, according to an FDA and CDC study. The speaker claims that psychosis is 440 times more likely, dementia 140 times, schizophrenia 315 times, suicidal thoughts 150 times, and homicidal ideation 25 times. Brain clots are allegedly 3,000 times more likely, depression 530 times, and violent behavior 80 times. Cognitive decline is purportedly 115 times more likely and delusions 50 times. The speaker believes psychiatric harm is caused by the accumulation of toxic spike proteins, mRNA, lipid nanoparticles, and other unknown components.

The speaker discusses an asserted link between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, claiming a strong association. They state that the information comes directly from the FDA and the CDC and promise to leave the study link in the comments. The speaker notes that “these were the thresholds that were all breached for being way over,” and asserts that the items about to be listed are “a more likely determination.” The claim is that these are thresholds or criteria related to the studied association, and the speaker emphasizes that these are “times” of likelihood. Specifically, the speaker lists several neuropsychiatric outcomes and how much more likely they are purported to be following vaccination. They say: psychosis is “four forty times more likely.” Dementia is “140 times” more likely. Schizophrenia is “three fifteen times” more likely. They also mention “Suicidal thoughts,” but the transcript ends before the figure for suicidal thoughts is provided. The speaker frames these figures as a direct consequence of the injections, tying them to the referenced thresholds and thresholds being breached as evidence of a strong association. In summary, the primary claims presented are that there exists a strong association between COVID-19 injections and neuropsychiatric disorders, supported by data from the FDA and CDC, with specific numerical claims that psychosis, dementia, and schizophrenia are markedly more likely post-injection, quantified as 440 times, 140 times, and 315 times more likely, respectively, with a forthcoming figure for suicidal thoughts that is not included in the provided transcript. The overall argument hinges on breached thresholds and the designation of these conditions as more likely determinations following vaccination, as presented by the speaker.

The largest COVID study found a link between the vaccine and heart/brain disorders. Data from 100 million people in 8 countries showed slight increases in conditions like myocarditis and Guillain Barre syndrome. The study does not prove the vaccine caused these issues. Despite concerns, experts say the vaccine's benefits outweigh the risks. People like Elizabeth Foster question the vaccine's impact on their health. It's important to consult with a doctor before deciding to get vaccinated.

The speaker discusses potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, including its potential to suppress the immune system and reactivate latent viral infections. They mention a scientific journal, The Lancet, which released a study showing that immune function among vaccinated individuals was lower than that of unvaccinated individuals. The speaker expresses sympathy for those who may have been misled or forced to take the vaccine. They also highlight data from The Lancet's study, revealing a higher rate of medical incidents among double-vaccinated individuals aged around 80 compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker questions why this finding is not receiving more attention.

Speaker 0: The transcript cites multiple studies indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. A study by Oten colleagues found that the mRNA vaccine mRNA and spike protein were being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. It is stated that the mRNA shot is based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it, which purportedly found a two hundred percent increased risk of stroke after dose two of mRNA shots. The claim is that the vaccine goes to the brain, causes brain damage and neuronal destruction, and that this is reflected in neuropsychiatric conditions. This is linked to a study by Doctor James Thorpe and colleagues, which allegedly identified eighty-six neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, and violent behavior, all claimed to be far in excess of what was reported with flu vaccinations, and described as corroborating multiple other studies. The transcript also references a study from Korea finding increased Alzheimer's risks and increased cognitive impairment risks, and another Korea study reporting a massive increased risk of depression, sleep disorders, and anxiety from these injections. The overall assertion is that, based on peer reviewed evidence, the injections damage the brain, cause brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Speaker 0: Take the shot and protect yourself and the people around you. We all feel a chill when we hear that. Mrs. van der Hof from the RIVM, you’ve researched the effects of vaccination. If you look under the line, has it had any usefulness? Speaker 1: It has certainly been useful. In fact, from our research, but also from many other studies, people who were vaccinated had a lower chance of dying from COVID, and we see that effect with every shot that’s given. We also studied whether there is a higher chance of dying from diseases other than COVID shortly after vaccination, to see whether there is vaccine harm, and we do not find that either, which is also in line with what is found internationally. Speaker 0: Okay, because that is the story you hear at the dinner table. Earlier this week someone said, I see so many people dying, there must be something. Speaker 1: Yes. Well, there are certainly people who have died due to the vaccination. We cannot deny that. That has been investigated; we find that in the Netherlands through Lareb, and we find that internationally as well. You just have to weigh the very small chance that you become ill or die from a vaccination against the chance that you become very ill or die from COVID. And the balance tips toward vaccination. Speaker 0: Yes, vaccination protects more than it harms, you just said. Also, have you studied the chance of death due to vaccination? Speaker 1: Well, we looked at people who were vaccinated and whether within 2 months after vaccination they had an increased chance of dying from anything other than COVID. If there were an indication there, we would see it, and we absolutely do not find that. Speaker 0: No, that is simply not found. Okay. Mrs. Van der Broek, and the pandemic was a priority.

Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.

The discussion centers on concerns about the safety of pediatric vaccines, the governing framework for vaccination and related notifications, and how schools and child-care settings handle cases where vaccination is incomplete. Key points raised by Speaker 0 (in Japanese) include: - The number and variety of pediatric vaccines have been increasing, with regular schedules reaching up to about 30 doses from birth. - Some vaccines include additives such as thiomersal (mercury-containing) and, in the case of influenza vaccines given after six months, thiomersal and aluminum compounds, causing anxiety about brain development and cancer risk. - Thiomersal is described as an organomercury compound that biodegrades to ethylmercury; its linkage to neurodevelopmental disorders has been asserted in materials from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). The materials indicate thiomersal and other additives (e.g., aluminum compounds) can be associated with concerns about cancer risk and memory impairment. The presenter cites materials labeled as current vaccine formulations like “Beugen” (B型肝炎ワクチン) containing thiomersal and organic silver derivatives, and notes concerns about aluminum compounds. - The speaker emphasizes that even with explanations from experts that trace amounts are unlikely to have measurable effects, caregivers remain cautious, influencing decisions about vaccinating their children. - There is a claim that disease risk reduction and broader environmental exposure concerns (e.g., artificial sweeteners, nicotine residues, colorants) contribute to vaccine hesitancy, especially given declining birth rates yet rising incidences of developmental disorders, dementia, or behavior-related conditions. - The speaker asks for the audience’s attention to the confusion surrounding vaccines and their additives, seeking to understand why some guardians opt not to vaccinate. Key organizational questions and clarifications provided by Speaker 1: - Under the Public Health Vaccination Act, local governments issue vaccination recommendations and encourage vaccination, including sending vaccination advisories that specify the timing and method. The notices concern vaccines such as the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), human papillomavirus (HPV), and Japanese encephalitis vaccines. The advisory notices are not mandatory, but vaccination is strongly encouraged. - When a guardian declines vaccination, it does not constitute abuse or neglect according to the law; preventive services and enforcement do not classify non-vaccination as neglect. Speaker 3 and Speaker 4 address practical and ethical concerns in child-care and education contexts: - In child-care facilities, there is no legal right to label a guardian as neglect simply for non-vaccination, though vaccination status is recorded in health forms. They stress the goal of preventing punitive treatment of guardians and promoting fair, informed medical care for children. - Questions are raised about whether vaccination histories influence admission or screening processes for child-care and school enrollment. The response indicates vaccination status is not a disqualifying factor for admission, and the health information form includes vaccination history; non-vaccinated children should not be disadvantaged in enrollment. - It is acknowledged that some guardians and teachers may hold misconceptions about vaccines, including concerns about toxins. The discussion calls for improved information sharing among health services, childcare, and education officials to reduce misinformation and support informed decisions. Speaker 2 (Takena Kazuko, Head of Childcare Family Division) and Speaker 4 (Ministry or Education official) respond to concerns about information sharing and the role of staff training: - They emphasize the distinction between compulsory vaccination guidance and voluntary advisories, reiterating that withholding vaccination is not automatically considered neglect. - They agree on the need to prevent punitive attitudes toward guardians, to inform teachers and childcare staff about how to communicate vaccine information, and to ensure consistent understanding across health, childcare, and education sectors. - A request is made to improve public awareness so that vaccination decisions are respected and differences in opinion are honored. Overall, the transcript details regulatory mechanisms for vaccination recommendations, the non-punitive stance toward non-vaccination in guardians, and the need for better information sharing and respectful dialogue among public health, childcare providers, and schools to address vaccine hesitancy without resorting to neglect determinations.

Speaker 1 asks for information on how the vaccine links to dementia, citing a grandmother who suffered from dementia after the COVID vaccine. Speaker 0 responds: "I'm so sorry, and thank you for bringing that up." He notes: "lipid nanoparticles traverse the blood brain barrier" and "lipid nanoparticles were developed and understood to traverse the blood brain barrier." He cites "the indoctrinated brain" by doctor Michael Nels and says "the combination of propaganda, repetition of messages while people are in a state of fear actually damages and rewires the brain" and that there is "this actual brain damage from the injection specifically destroying or damaging the prefrontal cortex." He mentions "lost their memories of themselves" and "there's so much dementia and Alzheimer's type damage in the Pfizer documents." He adds "these lipid nanoparticles damage the brain as they circulate through the system, you know, crossing the blood brain barrier." He suggests "traumas based interventions" and "you can possibly rebuild the myelin sheath of the nervous system." "So that's the best I can do, and I'm really sorry that that happened to your grandma."

A study from the Oxford Academic QJM Medical Journal suggests a potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and the development of Alzheimer's disease. The study, conducted in Seoul, South Korea, analyzed data from a random 50% sample of city residents aged 65 and above. Findings showed an increased incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in vaccinated individuals, particularly those receiving mRNA vaccines within 3 months post-vaccination. No significant relationship was found with vascular dementia or Parkinson's disease. Preliminary evidence suggests a potential link between COVID-19 vaccination, particularly mRNA vaccines, and increased incidences of AD and MCI. The study underscores the need for further research to elucidate the relationship between vaccine-induced immune responses and neurodegenerative processes, advocating for continuous monitoring and investigation into vaccines' long-term neurological effects. The CDC and FDA still recommend COVID-19 vaccines.

The speaker discusses the inflammatory and amyloidogenic effects of small sequences called epitopes, which can cause memory dysfunction in mice. They also mention a study that found the introduction of gene transfection technologies containing the spike protein can induce amyloidogenic cascades. The speaker highlights a 200% increase in the diagnosis of CJD in France after the rollout of vaccination programs, suggesting a potential link. They discuss the loss of cognitive function associated with exposure to the spike protein and propose that amyloidogenic disease processes may underlie long-haul COVID-19 symptoms. The speaker mentions the role of viral infections in facilitating intercellular aggregate dissemination and shares examples of misfolding prion amyloidogenic diseases.

先生方のプロフィールを紹介します。コマ野先生は薬学博士であり、100年生き方塾の代表理事を務めています。最近の研究では、コロナワクチン接種後に認知症リスクが増加することが示されました。65歳以上の人々に対する55万人の調査では、ワクチン接種者の認知症リスクが未接種者に比べて2倍増加しました。この結果は深刻であり、認知症の増加は重要な問題です。 Translation: Let me introduce the profiles of our guest speakers. Dr. Komanoya, a pharmaceutical doctor and representative director of the 100-Year Living Institute, discussed recent research showing an increased risk of dementia after receiving the corona vaccine. In a study of 550,000 people aged 65 and older, the risk of dementia for vaccine recipients doubled compared to non-recipients. This finding is concerning, highlighting the significant issue of dementia increase.

A recent large-scale vitamin D study was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. It was a four-year study involving 25,000 adults across the United States, conducted by 140 researchers. The study found that people who took vitamin D3, compared with omega-3 (which has other positive studies but not with telomere length in this study), had telomere length preservation. This new study follows a Canadian study from two years earlier, conducted over ten years with about 12,000 participants, which showed that vitamin D could reduce the risk of dementia by about forty percent. The earlier study was so convincing to the speaker that close family members, including the speaker’s wife and mom, began taking vitamin D3 regularly after that study, due to the goal of reducing dementia risk. According to the speaker, the current study’s findings suggest that vitamin D3 can help prevent dementia and also help maintain or preserve telomere length significantly, “only aging a year and four years.” The speaker notes that they did not say telomere length was reversed; to their knowledge, there’s no way to extend telomeres once they have shortened, so preservation is emphasized as important. The speaker urges starting vitamin D3 early, highlighting the implications of preserving telomere length and potentially reducing dementia risk as compelling reasons to take vitamin D3 regularly. The comparison to omega-3 is acknowledged, but the focal points are telomere length preservation and dementia risk reduction associated with vitamin D supplementation.

コマ野先生は薬学博士で、認知症の研究に専念しています。最近の研究では、65歳以上の2回ワクチン接種者の認知症リスクが未接種者に比べて2倍増加し、3ヶ月後にはアルツハイマー病になるリスクも有意に上昇しています。認知症は深刻な問題であり、65歳以上の5人に1人が認知症になっています。この状況が悪化すると、高齢者の認知症リスクがさらに増加し、日本の認知症患者数が深刻な状況になる可能性があります。 Translation: Dr. Komanoya is a pharmaceutical doctor specializing in dementia research. Recent studies show that the risk of dementia doubles for those over 65 who receive two vaccine doses compared to those who do not. After three months, the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease significantly increases. Dementia is a serious issue, with one in five individuals over 65 affected. If the situation worsens, the risk of dementia among the elderly will further increase, potentially leading to a critical situation in Japan.

I am Masayasu Inoue, a professor of molecular pathology. The COVID-19 pandemic led to rushed genetic vaccines causing unprecedented injuries. Japan's high vaccination rate resulted in severe adverse effects. The government plans to introduce new self-replicating vaccines despite risks. International collaboration is needed to stop these dangerous actions. Censorship hinders spreading vaccine dangers. Trust in Japan-made vaccines is cautioned against for future pandemics. Sharing information globally is crucial for unity and protection of human rights. Let's work together to safeguard our health and future. Thank you.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

Bonjour, je suis Anaïs Bocquet, docteur en biologie santé, spécialisée en immunologie. Je vais vous parler du virus SARS-CoV-2 et de sa protéine Spike. Cette protéine est un GOF, clé d'entrée du virus dans l'organisme. Elle présente des propriétés persistantes, bactériophages et cancérogènes. Elle est également amyloïde, fusogène et impacte le système immunitaire. Les injections anti-Covid produisent une protéine Spike similaire à celle du virus, avec les mêmes propriétés. Cela peut causer des problèmes à long terme. Il est important de comprendre comment le virus et la protéine Spike interagissent avec d'autres pathogènes, comme les bactéries. Les questions scientifiques sont nombreuses et nécessitent l'intervention d'experts dans divers domaines. Merci de votre attention. Translation: Hello, I am Anaïs Bocquet, a doctor in health biology, specialized in immunology. I will talk to you about the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its Spike protein. This protein is a GOF, the key to the virus entering the body. It has persistent, bacteriophage, and carcinogenic properties. It is also amyloid, fusogenic, and impacts the immune system. Anti-Covid injections produce a Spike protein similar to that of the virus, with the same properties. This can cause long-term problems. It is important to understand how the virus and the Spike protein interact with other pathogens, such as bacteria. There are many scientific questions that require the intervention of experts in various fields. Thank you for your attention.

**Original Language Summary:** スピーカーは、現状を周りに広めてほしいと述べ、国会での原口先生の活動が大きな力になると強調。村上先生は、コロナ自体は重症化しないが、ワクチン接種によって別の病気が重症化し死亡する事例があると指摘。パンデミック条約とIHR（7月19日期限）に対する全国的な運動を呼びかけ。 イベントでは、国が行わない日本人大量死の検証として、接種者1800万人データベースが初公開された。参加を呼びかけ、自身のデータがない人も、データ提供者として協力してほしいと述べた。詳細な情報は動画コメント欄にあり、専門知識を持つ人々を含め、得意分野を活かして協力し、真相を解明し命を守ることを訴えた。 **English Translation:** The speaker asks listeners to spread awareness of the current situation and emphasizes that Mr. Haraguchi's activities in the Diet are a great source of strength. Mr. Murakami points out that while COVID-19 itself does not cause severe illness, vaccination can lead to the aggravation and death from other diseases. He calls for a nationwide movement against the Pandemic Treaty and IHR (deadline July 19). The event featured the first public release of a database of 18 million vaccinated individuals as part of a verification of mass Japanese deaths that the government is not conducting. They urged participation, stating that even those whose data is not included should cooperate as data providers. Detailed information is available in the video comments section, and they appealed for cooperation, including those with specialized knowledge, to use their areas of expertise to uncover the truth and protect lives.

高知大学医学部の佐野重俊特任教授は、ワクチン接種後に発生する皮膚疾患を研究しています。70代男性患者の右腕上腕部には皮膚の異常が見られ、他にも海上方針やヘルペスの再発などの症例がありました。佐野教授は、特殊な染料を用いて組織を調べた結果、ワクチン由来のスパイクタンパクが皮膚に存在することを確認しました。スパイクタンパクはウイルスの表面にあり、免疫系がウイルスを攻撃するための目印となります。ファイザー社やモデルナ社のワクチンは、ウイルスの遺伝子の一部を注入し、体内でスパイクタンパクを生成させることで免疫を形成します。 --- Professor Shigetoshi Sano at Kochi University Medical School is researching skin diseases that occur after vaccination. A 70-year-old male patient exhibited skin abnormalities on his upper arm, along with other cases like herpes reactivation. Using a special dye, Sano confirmed the presence of vaccine-derived spike proteins in the skin. Spike proteins are found on the virus's surface and serve as markers for the immune system to attack the virus. Vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna inject parts of the virus's genetic material to prompt the body to produce spike proteins, thereby generating immunity.

**Original Language (Japanese):** 市町村が持っているワクチン接種データを解析した結果、接種後120日前後に死亡者の大きなピークがあることが判明。ワクチンが死亡を誘導しないなら、このようなピークはありえない。接種後数ヶ月経ってから死亡する人が多いため、ワクチン接種による死亡が実際より少なく計上されている可能性がある。接種回数が増えるごとに、死亡までの時間が短くなる傾向が見られる。mRNAワクチンには免疫抑制作用があり、スパイクタンパク質の産生量に比例する。スパイクタンパク質を発現する細胞が免疫によって破壊されることも毒性の可能性がある。ワクチン接種の死亡者数は想像以上に多く、毎年の超過死亡の原因の一つかもしれない。約7万人の仲間とともにmRNAワクチン接種を止めさせるよう政府に働きかけているが、まだ成功していない。先週、ワクチン接種を止めるべきだという署名約10万人以上を厚生労働省に提出。国際的に協力し、危険なワクチン接種を止めさせるよう頑張りたい。 **English Translation:** Analysis of municipal vaccination data revealed a significant peak in deaths around 120 days post-vaccination. Such a peak would be impossible if the vaccine did not induce mortality. Because many deaths occur months after vaccination, vaccine-related deaths may be underreported. The time to death tends to decrease with each subsequent dose. mRNA vaccines have an immunosuppressive effect proportional to spike protein production. The destruction of spike protein-expressing cells by the immune system is another potential toxicity. The number of vaccine-related deaths may be higher than imagined, potentially contributing to annual excess mortality. Along with approximately 70,000 colleagues, efforts are underway to stop mRNA vaccinations, but have not yet succeeded. Last week, a petition with over 100,000 signatures to halt vaccinations was submitted to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. There is a desire to collaborate internationally to stop dangerous vaccinations.

Tokyo Institute of Technology Professor Emeritus Mr. Murakami and I would like to share some information. In March, it was discovered that there is a significant amount of DM mixed in with the RNA, which was supposed to only contain RNA. Multiple researchers have confirmed this. One issue is that some LANWELISH, specifically SV4, promoter sequences are mixed in with the virus genes, which are necessary for gene expression. This can activate the immune system and cause various problems. DNA can induce mutations and easily enter cells, potentially disrupting important genes. The presence of LANWELISH promoter sequences in the virus can increase the risk of cancer. Vaccines that suppress the immune system can further increase the risk of cancer. It is important to minimize impurities in DNA, as they can cause inflammation and immune reactions. Different batches of vaccines may contain different impurities, such as DNA. DNA should not be introduced into cells.