TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A speaker describes waking up with a strong, urgent felt need to understand what is happening in their life and to figure out what’s going on. After attempting to prepare for a walk, they become emotionally unsettled but manage to read a verse that they believe will shed light for others. The other participant introduces the passage and then reads it aloud, delivering a long, dystopian warning about a hidden agenda. The quoted text asserts: “We will keep their lives short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite. We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so that they never see what is happening. We will use soft metals, aging accelerators, and sedatives in food and water as well as in the air. They will be covered in poisons wherever they turn. The soft metals will make them lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many funds, and yet we will give them more poison. Chemical poisons will be absorbed through the skin of idiots who believe that certain hygiene and beauty products presented by great actors and musicians will be eternal youth to their faces and bodies. And through their thirsty and hungry mouths, we will destroy their minds and systems of internal organs, reproduction. However, their children will be born as disabled and deformed, and we will hide this information. The poisons will be hidden in everything around them, in what they drink, eat, breathe, and wear. We have to be ingenious in distributing poisons because they can see far. We'll teach them that poisons are good with funny pictures and musical tones on TV. Those who are looking for them will be helpful. We will will enroll them to push our poisons. They will see that our products are used in film, and they will get used to them, and they will never know their true effect. When they give birth, we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them that we are helping them. We will start earlier when their minds are young, and we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things. When their teeth decay, we will fill them with metals that kill their minds and steal their future. And when their ability to learn has been affected, we'll create more drugs that will make them sicker and cause them other illnesses for which we will create even more drugs. We will make them docile and weak before us by our power. They will grow depressed, slow, and obese. And when they come for us to help, we will give them more poison. We will focus our attention on money and material goods so they never connect with their inner self. We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures so that they are never one with the unity of all. Their minds will belong to us, and they will do as we say. And if they refuse, we will find ways to implement technologies that alters the mind in their lives. We will use fear as a weapon. We will establish their governments, and we will establish opposition within them. We will own both sides. We will always hide our goal, but we will continue our plan. They will do the work for us, and we will prosper from their toil. Our families will never mix with theirs and our blood. It must be pure because it is. We will make them kill each other when they oppose us. We will keep them separate from unity through dogma and religion, and we will control all aspects of their lives and and tell them what to think and how. We will guide them kindly and let them believe that they are guiding themselves. We will instigate animosity among them through our factions. When a light shines among them, we will extinguish it by mockery or death, whichever make them tear their hearts apart and kill their own children. We will accomplish this using hatred as our ally, anger as our friend. Hatred will completely blind them, and they will never see that in their conflicts, we will be their leaders. They will be killing each other. They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors as long as we see that they are against us. We will benefit greatly from this for they will not see us for they cannot see us. We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths. We will repeat this until our ultimate goal is achieved. We will continue to make them live in fear and anger, and we will give them images and sounds. We will use all tools we have to achieve this. The tools will be provided by their work, and we will make them hate themselves and their neighbors. We will always hide the divine truth from them that we are all one. That he must never know. They must never know that color is an illusion. They must always believe that they are not equal. And drop by drop by drop by drop, we will advance our goal. We will take over their lands and resources and wealth to exercise control over all media. We will use this media to control the flow of information and their feelings in our favor. When they rise up against us, we will crush them like insects because they are less than that. They will be helpless to do anything about it. Wow. The speaker notes having discussed with several people about a hidden agenda on earth and being newly awake to conditioning they’ve experienced for a long time. They acknowledge feeling overwhelmed by the depravity described, but insist they cannot dwell on it and must continue sharing love and light, planting seeds for others to know that they don’t have to live this way. They urge others to wake up and question reality, saying, “you don’t know what you know until you know it,” and expressing that they cannot make others see what they cannot yet see. They resonate with the idea that the “face fake matrix” is keeping people imprisoned in fear. The overall message emphasizes awakening to a perceived hidden control plan, choosing to respond with love and truth, and encouraging others to question reality and seek greater unity beyond fear and division.

Henry Kissinger, world famous as US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under Nixon and Ford. NSSM 200, the Kissinger Report, was a top secret 1973 memorandum about the planet’s resources. Kissinger proposed a plan to consolidate the smooth flow of valuable resources from various countries to the US. He stated that taking other countries’ resources was easy when countries were stable, but unstable countries were difficult to access. The question, he posed, was how to stabilize less developed countries. He argued that the world’s most valuable resources such as oil, natural gas, gold and minerals were in less developed countries. In his report he wrote: Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interest of The United States. This was presented as a rationale for population policy, including abortion and birth-control measures, to create stability and access to resources. Kissinger advised that in order to create stability one needs population policy, including legalizing abortion, giving families money if they use contraception, and if necessary, accepting sterilization and abortion. If that wasn’t sufficient, population policy could entail forced birth control, forced sterilization and forced abortions. Furthermore, he advised withholding aid, disaster aid and food aid if a less developed country refused to implement US population control programs. The content claimed that this was a method to pillage a country’s resources, create stability by reducing the population, and remove anti-imperialist youth. The result, it is claimed, was a massacre worldwide documented in research papers ignored by mainstream media and the UN. Two examples cited are China and Peru. China: It is claimed that China’s one-child policy started in 1979 and changed in 2015 to a two-child policy if the first child is a girl. With the financial help of the United Nations Population Fund, UNFPA, China developed state-of-the-art tracking systems to monitor women’s monthly cycles. It is claimed that if a fetus was not allowed by the government, the woman would be arrested and forced to have an abortion. The speaker states that the UN supported, funded, and facilitated China’s population control program, including a $100,000,000 donation to UNFPA and a $12,000,000 computer complex to monitor the program, along with technical expertise and personnel. It is claimed that abortions were used as a weapon of mass destruction and that hundreds of millions of lives were exterminated. The UNFPA allegedly defended China’s actions and was awarded by the UN for China’s population control program. The policy is described as preventing hundreds of millions of births and conducting hundreds of millions of abortions under the one-child policy, with reports of high female suicide rates and a skewed sex ratio. Peru: Between 1995 and 1997, over a quarter of a million Peruvian women were sterilized as part of President Fujimori’s family planning goals financed by the US, described as the Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign, with reports of coerced sterilizations and threats to withhold food for refusing sterilization. It is claimed that many women were traumatized, with poor hygiene in hospitals causing deaths or severe harm. The transcript argues that in every less developed country, UN concern was not development, health or women’s empowerment, but reversing unchecked population growth. Kissinger is described as laying out protocols for modern times, and various allegations are presented about his background and alleged roots, including claims about his family name and ethnicity. NGOs: The transcript discusses NGOs connected to the UN, noting that NGOs are tax-exempt and 501c organizations, with examples including the Population Council, funded by John D. Rockefeller III and associated with eugenics and depopulation aims. It claims the Population Council supported et al. projects such as intrauterine devices in several countries, and published material advocating measures like adding fertility-control agents to water and compulsory sterilization. It argues that there are 37 NGOs worldwide advocating negative population growth under the banner of sustainability and overpopulation concerns. Planned Parenthood: The transcript asserts that Planned Parenthood, founded by Margaret Sanger, has internationally scaled activities with abortions, and claims about tissue procurement and compensation. It cites statements about compensation for tissue specimens and mentions editing to discuss tissue donation, with a claim that Planned Parenthood profits or receives funding from major foundations and governments. It states that the Trump administration ended US funding for Planned Parenthood in 2019. Ending note: The transcript mentions Kissinger’s removal from the Pentagon Defense Policy Board and promises to continue discussing the UN, its NGOs, and alleged threefold purposes: pillaging resources, money laundering, and population control, with the aim to expose the alleged depopulation program.

"Suffering is not a necessary part of evolution, but it is the road most traveled." "Wherever you see a hypochondriac, you're seeing a eugenicist." "Wherever you see a person who identifies as progressive, you are seeing a eugenicist, even if they don't realize that they're a eugenicist." "One of the foundational thought processes of a eugenicist is that they believe they can manipulate what God has created to create something superior." "Transhumanism is the same when you get down to it, the same thing that Adolf Hitler was talking about, creating a superior race." "They're just trying to rebrand it and resell it to you as something you might want, and that's how they sell it with you with little stupid Apple watches." "And we'll do a little Neuralink implant just right up in there. Don't worry." "It's just gonna be a little frontal lobotomy." "Everyone will wear wearables. Everybody will wear it. It's gonna be a cool thing."

Marx and Engels advocated for the destruction of certain groups in a socialist revolution, labeling them as "racial trash" who must perish. They believed that some societies were too primitive to be brought up to revolutionary standards and needed to be eliminated. This mindset extended to Slavic people, with Marx viewing them as vulgar and unworthy of existence. The idea of a "revolutionary holocaust" to eliminate weaker classes and races was promoted by Marx.

"Whites are psychopaths, and their behavior represents an underlying biologically transmitted proclivity with roots deep in their evolutionary history." "Rape culture in America is a legal, economic, and moral institution." "This goes beyond gaslighting, and it's rooted in psychological delusion." "So we're going to we have it written in the law, you can rape black women, but we've never been a racist country." "We won't allow Florida tax dollars to be spent teaching kids to hate our country or hate each other, only to hate black people." "I think whites are psychopathic." "There are many lies. The level of lying that white people do that has started since colonialism, we're just used to it." "What would you say for folks who may say that your work is considered to be reverse racism? I don't make room for that."

Speaker 0 describes birth control as something created by Margaret Sanger and connects her to the “tiny hats.” He claims Sanger was attempting population control and that her project aimed to “get rid of one group of people and then get rid of everybody else,” calling the birth control movement “poison.” He asserts that birth control involves taking synthetic estrogen and a synthetic steroid, “poisoning your body,” and reiterates that Sanger was a demonic figure who “can expect to” receive retribution from the tiny hats. He asserts that the tiny hats funded Planned Parenthood and the birth control movement, with funding from the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, and labels the entire matter a “deep rabbit hole.” He argues that birth control and clinics were part of a broader scheme leading to depopulation, and ties the issues to Marxism, feminism, and the involvement of the Rothschilds, describing a conspiratorial network behind these movements. Speaker 1 counters that birth control could help keep the population more or less static until resources can be increased, suggesting that preventing starvation depends on either birth control or resource acquisition, and framing the question as choosing between the two: “birth control or picking up the resources.” He concedes there is a limit to increasing resources, implying that there is a trade-off between controlling population growth and expanding resources, but he does not take a firm stance beyond recognizing a resource limitation. Overall, the transcript presents two perspectives: Speaker 0 advances a conspiratorial critique linking birth control to Sanger, “tiny hats,” and powerful financiers, portraying it as poison and part of a depopulation agenda connected to Marxism and feminism. Speaker 1 raises a pragmatic ambiguity, suggesting that birth control could stabilize population while resources are improved, but notes that resource limitations impose a constraint.

Terri Beatley, author and founder of the Hosea Initiative, argues that America's declining birth rate is not a mere lifestyle trend but may be linked to a long-running population control agenda sold under the language of health care, choice, and women's rights. She discusses her research into the population-control movement in the U.S., highlighting Bernard Nathanson, cofounder of what became the abortion industry, and the organization now known as Planned Parenthood, framed as women’s health care. Beatley recounts her personal journey from buying into Margaret Sanger’s legacy and postponing motherhood to later becoming a homeschooling mother who left a six-figure career. She discusses how the abortion industry affected parental rights in Virginia and led her to interview Nathanson, who she says transitioned from abortion advocate to anti-abortion advocate. Nathanson allegedly performed abortions and taught other doctors how to kill babies, while also cofounding the first pro-abortion political action committee (NARAL). Beatley emphasizes Nathanson’s exposure to real-time ultrasound, his eventual conversion to a pro-life stance by 1979, and his later life as a vocal critic of abortion, including his “eight-point strategy of deception” to promote abortion. Beatley explains that Nathanson’s eight-point propaganda plan was revealed to her in an interview (December 1, 2009) with Nathanson, conducted while he was ill and near death. She outlines the eight points as follows: 1) Frame the argument around choice, presenting it as a woman’s right to choose. 2) Craft catchy slogans, such as “my body, my choice” and “every baby a wanted baby.” 3) Manipulate the media, with Nathanson described as the “Fauci of yesteryear.” 4) Fabricate facts to evoke empathy, including claims of a million illegal abortions annually and 5,000–10,000 women dying from abortion complications, which Beatley asserts are lies. 5) Use polling statistics to mislead public opinion, with Nathanson allegedly fabricating a 60% figure while acknowledging the true figure was far smaller. 6) Repetition of lies through media, a strategy Nathanson reportedly endorsed. 7) Justify decriminalizing abortion by arguing it would not stop abortions, while noting that legalization can increase demand. 8) The Catholic strategy, including a four-part plan to target Catholics: blame bishops for abortion deaths, back Catholic pro-choice politicians, split Catholics into orthodox and “Kennedy-style” pro-choice camps, and promote the “Catholic straddle”—standing pro-life personally but voting pro-choice politically. Beatley stresses the broader consequences she associates with abortion advocacy: a rapid rise in breast cancer linked to birth control practices, evisceration of parental rights across all 50 states, and a cultural shift that allegedly contributed to societal decline. She argues that Nathanson’s legacy—if exposed and understood—could influence hearts and minds toward ending abortion, as opposed to political action alone. Beatley references Nathanson’s “Silent Scream” and his resignation letter on the second anniversary of Roe v. Wade (1975), noting that Nathanson urged Americans to love and stop the killing, and that his conversion took place after viewing ultrasound footage. The conversation shifts to practical actions: Beatley promotes distributing “fact check booklets” produced by Hosea Initiative to educate families, churches, and communities. The booklets cover Nathanson’s history and the eight-point propaganda strategy. Hosea Initiative’s website is given as HoseaFourU.org (Hosea, thenumberfour,you.org). Beatley emphasizes an online Raise Up Your Voice community, seeking passionate pro-life representatives in every county (3,143 counties) to build a national educational movement and “repent for apathy” in voting choices. The interview closes with Beatley urging widespread dissemination of Nathanson’s story and the eight-point strategy, claiming that education can empower people to “connect the dots” and reduce the abortion industry’s influence. She frames the effort as an information war and suggests that President Trump could amplify Nathanson’s message to reach a broad audience.

Synthetic molecules in medicines are intentionally being used for sterilization and population control, according to the speaker. They claim that a billion-dollar enterprise is working to eliminate billions of people, starting in Africa. Multilateral agencies and health authorities are accused of colluding against the people and engaging in chemical warfare.

The speaker warns that Codex Alimentarius will harm fertility by weaponizing food globally. Various organizations are part of a genocidal agenda to reduce the population for a sustainable planet, eliminating people as "useless eaters." This vision includes clean air, water, and green landscapes, but at the cost of human existence.

Speaker 0 argues that white Americans will soon be a minority, and that this is great. Speaker 1 counters that whites will not be the majority and describes it as an exciting transformation and evolution, a progress of the country. Speaker 2 states that whites will be a minority very soon and says, “I'm okay with that.” Speaker 1 asks, if the white working class is in trouble, whether new Americans should be brought in. Speaker 3 predicts America will look very different in a hundred years, with racial labels becoming less distinct (“You're black, you're white, you're Hispanic, you're Puerto Rican, whatever”), and says that complexity will be good in the end. Speaker 2 contends that white Americans feel they are losing their country and ownership, and that they are, in the end, not the future. Speaker 3 asserts that for the first time in American history, the number of white people went down; “White population is declining for the first time in history in America.” Speaker 3 cautions that white people will not be the majority in the country anymore, noting it will be the first generation with whites as a minority. Speaker 1 proclaims, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Speaker 3 proclaims that to abolish whiteness is to abolish white people. Speaker 1 contends that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate. Speaker 3 declares, “We gotta take these motherfuckers out.” Speaker 2 asks whether it was the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. Speaker 3 responds, “We have to kill white people,” and, when pressed, mirrors that sentiment with, “When we say we wanna kill whites, we don't really mean we wanna kill whites. We do. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 1 comments, “When do we start killing white people?” and then, “start killing all white folks, but maybe?” Speaker 3 reiterates the extermination goal, stating, “We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 5 adds, “An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in The United States Of America. Absolute minority.” He concludes that this shift is not a bad thing and calls it a source of strength.

Abortion was legalized in this country, and crime rates subsequently dropped by 40%. The speaker questions whether abortion is responsible for the decrease in crime. They mention that statistics show that women, particularly black women, have the highest abortion rates. However, the speaker criticizes the idea of targeting black individuals for termination, calling it racist.

One speaker suggests killing unwanted children in foster care. They ask for statistics on the percentage of foster children who are abused, molested, or enslaved. Another speaker says they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children who have been abused. One speaker states that if they don't want to have a baby, they should have the choice not to, because people should still have the choice, and that the other speaker doesn't understand the magnitude of having a child.

The speaker discusses the idea of sterilization and population control, suggesting that there are too many people on the planet. They mention a quote from Bill Gates about the need for billions of people to die. The speaker then mentions Africa as a starting point for research and elimination, stating negative views about Africans and their place in the world economy. They claim that Africans have their rights taken away, are suppressed, and used for experimentation. The speaker also suggests that chemical warfare is being used against everyone, rather than a bacterial war.

"So those people are going to be like the Japanese soldiers who were on Pacific Islands and didn't know the war was over." "This another reason why this is the worst, worst, worst social contagion that we'll ever have experienced." "A lot of people have done the worst thing that you could do, which is to harm their children irrevocably because of it." "Those people will have to believe that they did the right thing for the rest of their lives, for their own sanity and for their own self respect." "The entire organization gets paralyzed by that one person." "And you know you can't." "And if we don't, there's no way back for them and their child." "They've sold their child a bill of goods that they can't deliver on, I'm the one who has to be bullied to try to force me to deliver on it."

A woman told the speaker that "neo aristocrats" at the top of the pyramid consider anyone consuming nonrenewable resources to be "useless eaters." The neo-aristocrats envision a society where they are surrounded by servants and technicians, requiring only 10% of the population. Since 1974, the World Health Organization has allegedly had a commission to develop vaccines to permanently end the fertility of women. The WHO was reportedly convicted in the Philippines of involuntarily sterilizing over 3,000,000 women. A smallpox eradication program in Africa was allegedly designed to eliminate 150,000,000 sub-Saharan Africans. The H1N1 vaccine with squalene was supposedly designed to create permanent infertility, which is why pregnant women and children were prioritized for vaccination.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

- "The World Health Organization was a criminal racketeering organization as defined by the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act." - Since 1953, it has been "an exclusively vaccine promoting enterprise for the benefit of the people who have commercial interest in vaccines." - If you read their opening charter and the hearings that gave rise to it—from Bretton Woods in July 1944 to its founding charter in 1953—what's missing is "who is writing the checks." - The financial backers were "Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust" as the check writers. - "As long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice." - The same group of people who established the World Health Organization in 1953 are "the same group of people that were formed out of the Eugenics Office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913." - This same group is described as the ones "making this decision" about the WHO and pandemics. - The speaker adds: "I don't know how you feel about Eugenics, but I have a problem with it."

The speaker admits to using orphans and mentally handicapped individuals to study experimental vaccines in the 1960s, stating that it was a common practice at the time. They also acknowledge writing a letter expressing the belief that experiments should be performed on those less likely to contribute to society, such as children with disabilities. The speaker confirms using babies of mothers in prison and individuals under colonial rule in the Belgian Congo for vaccine studies, involving almost a million people. They mention changing their views since then.

Margaret Sanger's organization aimed to exterminate the Negro race through sterilization and ethnic cleansing. They labeled certain groups as feeble-minded or lower class, particularly targeting black communities. They deceived people by claiming to help them while actually injecting them with diseases. Examples include the Tuskegee experiment and the HIV injections in the 1980s and 1990s.

Jane Goodall expressed a desire to reduce the global population, citing concerns over overpopulation. Bill Gates, associated with the World Economic Forum, suggested that improved healthcare and vaccines could potentially lower the population by 10 to 15%. There are implications that these influential figures aim to control or eliminate those they deem unnecessary. The argument is made that if they believe in the need for depopulation, they should demonstrate their commitment by starting with themselves.

All of a sudden, we were given this free free thing from the from the Society of America abortion. 78% of your free abortion clinics were placed in black and urban areas for the purpose of something free of charge from a racist society. As a to put it in words, the one pro abortionist, we don't need so many Negroes anymore. There's no more cotton to pick. These feelings about black people, this was one way of doing it as a social benefit, if you will. We're here to help you. Black women and let it be stated, black women never demonstrated, demanded, or even requested the right to an abortion. Been asking for the right to decent housing, the right to education, in fact, the right to health care. And all we've been given for your charge is the right to kill our unborn child.

The speaker expresses gratitude for being at the Planned Parenthood annual meeting and receiving an award. They admire Margaret Sanger for her courage, tenacity, and vision. They mention a biography about Sanger and reflect on her fight against archetypes and accusations. Another speaker brings up Sanger's controversial statements about wanting to exterminate the Negro race and using sterilization for ethnic cleansing. They mention the injection of diseases and the Tuskegee experiment, as well as the HIV injections in the 80s and 90s.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

This video discusses the dangerous ideas of early American progressives and their belief in reducing the population by sterilizing or aborting certain individuals. It also mentions Yuval Harari's solution of drugging and keeping the "useless class" online. The video highlights the disturbing views of George Bernard Shaw, who advocated for killing people deemed unworthy of life. It further explores the connection between science and eugenics, showcasing the lobotomy and the first transgender surgery. The video emphasizes how eugenics was taught to the Nazis by the Human Betterment Society in California. It concludes by discussing the Nazis' implementation of euthanasia and categorization of individuals in concentration camps.