TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A speaker asserts that “a dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of the agenda 2030.” The claim continues that, “in many self proclaimed democratic states, devices denouncing this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest.” The speaker frames a broad consolidation of power as a totalitarian shift quietly taking hold “in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other vassal nation of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization, and World Economic Forum.” A focal point of the message is the case of a private entity founder named in the speech: “all private entity founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting for a fair trial.” The speaker states that Fulmisch’s “crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lies.” The appeal follows to a moral appeal: “I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defense of those persecuted by the globalist regime.” The speaker explicitly shifts responsibility away from Fulmisch, declaring, “It is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity.” A list of individuals is named as principal actors behind the alleged crimes: “Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Claus Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Burla, and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions.” The statement closes with a direct call: “Free Reinhard Fulmisch.” The language presents a stark framing of persecution, accusing a defined group of leading a globalist operation and portraying Fulmisch as a victim of this alleged regime. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of collective action and solidarity among believers and “people of goodwill” to resist the described oppression and to advocate for Fulmisch’s release.

As a nation with an ancient history and unique language, we Hungarians are proud to have maintained our culture for over a thousand years. Our patriotism and Christian values may not align with mainstream Western political thinking, but they are deeply ingrained in our society. While I may not be a favorite among liberals, Hungary prioritizes family, nation, and God over individual ego. We face criticism from the West because we offer a different, more traditional interpretation of society, challenging the exclusivity of liberal ideologies. Despite potential dangers, we remain strong and resilient. While we seek rational relations with everyone, accusations of being a puppet are baseless, especially given our history with Russia. We believe that Europe needs Russian involvement in its security architecture.

Hungary chose to defend its borders during the 2015 migration crisis, a stance that clashed with the EU's open-door policy. We believed it was our right and duty to protect our nation, culture, and traditions. Many European nations are experimenting with post-Christian, post-national societies, which we see as risky. Despite being labeled a "totalitarian thug" by President Biden, our nation maintains strong economic and defense ties with the U.S. The core issue is our success as a conservative, national alternative within Western civilization. Our economic, political, and cultural achievements, rooted in traditional values and national identity, challenge the liberal world view. They criticize us because our success proves there is an alternative to their leftist liberal ideals.

Prime Minister Orbán is seen as a controversial figure in the West due to disagreements with figures like George Soros, who believes borders are obstacles and migration is the goal. Orbán's resistance to this view has made him a target for left-wing media. Accusations of centralizing power, being undemocratic, and violating civil rights are addressed with a focus on Hungary as a "conservative island of difference." Orbán's nationalism clashes with international organizations like the EU and ICC, the latter of which Hungary exited due to disagreements over justice. Orbán is fighting postmodern secularism and radical Islamic immigration. On the Ukraine conflict, where Hungary takes a middle position, the question is raised whether it matters if Putin takes Ukraine and what the off-ramp is. Orbán defines Hungarian nationalism and the government's role in promoting Hungarian culture, including pronatalist policies. He emphasizes the importance of Christianity to Hungarian identity and fostering cooperation between government and religion. Regarding the U.S., Orbán has a warm relationship with President Trump and seeks U.S. foreign policy that strengthens allies like Hungary. He navigates a multipolar world with the U.S., China, and Russia, and considers the implications of China's rise. The U.S. president has tried to motivate Europe to move away from China.

The Obama administration, and even the early Trump administration, used taxpayer money to support the socialist government in Albania. This involved partnering with George Soros on projects aimed at weakening the independence of the Albanian judiciary. This wasn't isolated to Albania; similar activities occurred in Romania, Hungary, Guatemala, and Colombia. Soros, a billionaire, doesn't need this funding, yet the State Department and USAID enabled his influence, allowing him to shape foreign policy and even review funding applications. This taxpayer funding, the speaker argues, indirectly subsidizes Soros’s activities, both domestically and internationally, and is a way for the State Department to oppose conservative agendas. The speaker highlights this as an example of the government funding groups that oppose American interests, while right-leaning organizations are largely ignored. Legal action was necessary to obtain the documents revealing these activities.

The exchange centers on claims regarding a plan attributed to George Soros and its alleged global implementation to increase migration to the United States and Europe. Speaker 0 references a 2015 publication by George Soros, stating that the plan has now been implemented worldwide to bring millions of illegals into The United States and into Europe, and notes that Viktor Orban, Hungary’s leader, recently pointed this out. Speaker 1 recalls the details from the 2015 Project Syndicate publication, outlining two main components. First, Soros purportedly argued that the European Union must accept at least a million EU seekers annually. Second, he purportedly emphasized that Abekwa financing is critical and proposed issuing long-term euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including funding related to migrants, social welfare, and care as they arrive in the European Union. In addition, the plan allegedly called for establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, beginning with moving them from Greece and Italy to their destination countries. The dialogue attributes these specific elements to Soros, presenting them as a policy framework or strategy. Throughout the discussion, Speaker 0 adds a brief, fragmentary remark, “that’s why they don’t like,” which appears to reference opposition or criticism without elaboration within this excerpt. Key claims highlighted in the conversation include: (1) a 2015 Soros plan published in Project Syndicate proposing that the EU accept a minimum of one million asylum seekers annually; (2) the proposal of Abekwa financing as a critical element, including the idea of issuing long-term euro bonds to fund the migration crisis, along with supporting migrants’ social welfare and care needs as they arrive; and (3) the suggestion to create safe channels for asylum seekers, starting with relocating individuals from Greece and Italy to other EU destination countries. The participants frame these points as explanations of a policy approach that they assert has been implemented globally, and they reference Viktor Orban’s commentary to support their argument. The transcript captures a concise allegation-based discussion about Soros’s 2015 proposals, their supposed financing mechanisms, and the establishment of safe relocation channels for asylum seekers, tied to ongoing political debates surrounding migration in Europe and the role of opposition figures such as Viktor Orban.

The liberal elite in the West used taxpayer money to spread their ideology, funding NGOs and politicians to undermine our sovereignty. One motivation is money, opening gates for business, but leftists also sincerely believe in ideas like open borders. We never tried to educate anyone; we always insisted on making our own decisions about migration. Trump changed the mindset of the West. Previously, migration was good, resisting it was bad. Now, defending your interests is good, and illegal migration is bad. The EU launched wars with potential economic partners like Trump's America, China, and Russia. Central Europe, however, is building good relations and prioritizing connectivity. We must find a way to cooperate, as isolation won't work.

Well, we in Hungary have been bucking the liberal trends for 15 years with policies like strong borders and prioritizing citizens, but Trump stole our thunder. We felt squeezed between the U.S. and Brussels, but now the U.S. isn't on our back anymore. The global liberal elite uses taxpayer money to push their ideology, funding NGOs and media against our sovereignty. It's a liberal deep state. They push open borders and transgenderism, driven by money and ideology. They believe combining Muslim migrants with Christian societies will create a better society, but we should decide for ourselves. Trump changed the mindset in the West. Defending your interests is now good, and traditional values are back.

Forces behind governments, such as the World Economic Forum, the UN, the WHO, the IMF, and the World Bank, are pushing an agenda of control over land, money, speech, and lives, framed as saving the planet and helping the poor. The WEF creates ideas, the UN uses language like equity and sustainability, the WHO creates emergencies, the IMF and World Bank trap countries with loans, and the media controls the narrative. The speaker claims the goal is to break the West by crushing energy independence, destroying the value of money, opening borders, silencing dissent, and instilling fear to make people easily controlled. Digital money, digital IDs, and permanent emergency powers are part of this plan. The speaker suggests that leaders like Donald Trump, Viktor Orban, and Vladimir Putin are fighting back against this agenda by prioritizing national interests and independence from globalist groups. The speaker concludes that this is about survival and urges people to resist being scared, silent, and obedient.

Well, we lost our appeal after Trump. For fifteen years, Hungary stood against liberal headwinds, securing borders, and defending values. We were a hero, an island of difference, but Trump changed everything. Previously, the US and Brussels were crushing us, but now America's off our chest, a real relief. These liberal elites used taxpayer money to spread ideology, funding NGOs and politicians to undermine our sovereignty. The motive? Money and ideology. They believe in open borders and transgenderism, ideas not pushed on non-Western nations. This stems from a leftist community ashamed of Western civilization, aiming to destroy and rebuild it. But we believe in national decisions, not forced migration from Brussels or Washington. Trump shifted the mindset, valuing national interest and traditional values.

Soros, in my opinion, fundamentally hates humanity and is eroding the fabric of civilization. He's getting D.A.s elected who refuse to prosecute crime, causing problems in cities like San Francisco and LA. This isn't just happening in the United States, but in other countries too. Despite being old and senile, Soros is smart and good at spotting value for money. He made his first money by shorting the British pound. Soros noticed that local races offer higher value for money compared to national races. He realized that changing how laws are enforced, rather than changing the laws themselves, can have a significant impact. If laws are not enforced or are enforced differently, it can be life-changing.

There is an unknown group of "globalitarian misanthropists" calling the shots, not figures like Ursula von der Leyen, Bill Gates, or Klaus Schwab. Elected governments are merely puppets implementing their plans, which seems to be erecting a one-world government. This would transform free societies into a collectivism where individuals are malleable parts. The EU is a stepping stone towards this one-world government. Europeans would never surrender national sovereignty directly, so the EU institutions were created under the pretext of preventing wars. By relinquishing competencies to the EU, it conditions Europeans to accept a one-world government.

The speaker questions George Soros's authority to dictate public policy and impose his agenda. They express gratitude that Salvadorans are now immune to Soros's influence and that no one there believes his lies anymore.

The speaker criticizes the European Union, claiming it has become a corrupt dictatorship. They accuse governments in countries like the Netherlands, Germany, France, Belgium, and Italy of compromising people's health with vaccines. They also allege that democracy is being undermined through the withholding of information on vaccine deals and freedom of speech is being suppressed under the guise of combating misinformation. The speaker argues that the EU is driving up food and energy prices, confiscating land from farmers due to the Green Deal. They claim that the media, influenced by former politicians, is paid to deceive the public about non-existent diseases, climate change, and Eastern enemies. The speaker defends Hungary as a model for how member states should interact with the EU, praising its adherence to traditional Christian values, low energy prices, and strict immigration policies. They demand action from the parliament and commission.

The speaker asserts that “The Bush regime was front for the Vatican” and that “The most important enemy this country has today, people will never understand it, but the biggest enemy that this nation today has is the Vatican.” They question the origin of the nation’s founders, asking, “What do you think the founding fathers … where did they come from?” and answer, “they came from Europe.” The speaker traces history back to “twenty five hundred years Rome under the Caesars of Rome,” stating that “after the fall of the Caesars in the fourth century and with the coming of the Vatican in the fifth century,” Europe has been dominated for that same span. The claim is then made that “All of Europe has been dominated for over two thousand five hundred years by Rome and Europe has dominated the world for two thousand five hundred years.” The speaker urges listeners to “start looking at the Holy father, and you better start finding out the connection between the Vatican and the Nazi party of Adolf,” tying the Vatican to broader historical influence and power. The overarching assertion is that “The Bush regime was front for the Vatican,” and that the Vatican represents “the most important enemy this country has today.”

Hungary faces opposition from various entities: the Soros Empire, Brussels bureaucrats, and American democrats. They demand things we don't want to give. The US administration wants us to join the war, provide weapons, and give more money to Ukraine. Brussels wants us to accept migrants, build migrant ghettos, allow sexual propaganda in schools, and surrender economic decision-making rights. They also want us to give up unanimous decision-making on foreign policy. If we refuse, they will withhold funds and support our internal enemies. Hungary rejects being part of a right-wing club that only answers to Brussels. We prioritize our independence and sovereignty, as mandated by our constitution.

I outline the speaker’s central claims about George Soros, the CIA, and global political influence. The speaker contends that George Soros has been one of the CIA’s most valuable private assets for over forty years, acting as the civilian, deniable funding arm of American regime-change operations worldwide. Because of this, Soros is not only allowed in the United States but protected there, enabling him to operate with impunity, which the speaker says explains his arrogance and continued influence. The speaker traces a pattern of Soros-backed “color revolutions” starting with Serbia in 2000, refined in Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, and the Arab Spring in 2011. They assert that logos for USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the Open Society Foundations appear in all these cases, framing Soros as central to these movements. According to the speaker, the Arab Spring served as a trial run for Europe’s migrant crisis. They claim that in 2011 the CIA and Soros turned that playbook on Libya and Syria. Gaddafi allegedly warned in March 2011 that removing him would unleash millions to flood Europe from Africa; eight months later, Gaddafi was dead, Libya descended into chaos, and migrant waves began as predicted. By 2015–2016, the speaker asserts, battle-hardened jihadists and economic migrants were crossing the Mediterranean with iPhones, prepaid cards, and Twitter guides written in Arabic, described as the same social media mobilization tactics used in Kyiv and Tahrir Square. Wayne Madsen is cited as having called this pattern out in 2015, described by the speaker as a deliberate CIA social-engineering operation to fracture Europe from within, applying the same playbook to new targets. The speaker then asserts that the United States has been subject to this strategy from 2020 to the present, pointing to the summer riots of 2020 as an example. The claim continues that Soros’s Open Society Foundations donated at least $33,000,000 to groups that organized and sustained the 2020 riots, and that Soros-backed NGOs provided lawyers, maps, and logistics for the southern border caravans, as well as funding to influence police departments and district attorneys in major cities, effectively helping to elect them. The speaker argues that Soros is implementing the color-revolution playbook “on us now,” with the target being ordinary Americans rather than foreign nations. A historical reference is made to JFK, who allegedly spoke of splintering the CIA after the Bay of Pigs betrayal, a chance JFK did not realize, leaving the world the speaker claims the CIA built. The speaker notes that Hungary, a country of 9 million, has passed Stop Soros laws and expelled his operations, asking why the United States cannot do the same, and suggests finishing what JFK started.

Globalist elites control governments via financial markets, institutions, and mainstream media. They don't represent the interests of Europeans or most Americans, but their own, and their agenda is to destroy Russia. They want to replace Putin because Russia is the last major European power with a national identity, language, and culture based on orthodox Christianity, making it the enemy of globalists. Globalists have flooded Western countries with non-Europeans to dilute, weaken, and destroy national identity and culture, and eliminate Christianity's cultural power. They want to do the same to Russia, which has enormous mineral, agricultural, oil, gas, and rare metal resources. Destroying the Russian government, removing Putin, and entering Russia would allow them to strip its resources and enrich themselves further. Russia is holding out.

The future of Western civilization is in the balance. In Europe, political opposition is being jailed and free speech is under assault. Republicans and conservatives believe the fundamental values and tenants of Western civilization that the country has been built on are under assault. The November election was the beginning of the pushback on that assault, but it's not over.

George Soros is my opponent. He has a powerful army at his disposal, including money, NGOs, universities, research institutions, and Brussels' bureaucracy. He uses this army to impose his will on us Hungarians. Soros believes that the values we hold dear led to the horrors of the 20th century, but I disagree. It was the abandonment of Christian values by some Western European states that led to the atrocities of Nazism and communism. Unfortunately, today's progressives are planning to repeat those mistakes.

Being the president of the U.S. is easier than running Hungary, a small, landlocked country in Central Europe that has been invaded countless times. Yet, Hungary has maintained its distinct sovereignty, largely due to leaders like Prime Minister Viktor Orban and his political director, Balazs Orban. Hungary wants to remain sovereign, with the right to decide who they ally with and how to govern themselves. The contemporary liberal elites in Washington and Brussels, want a globalized system based on one ideology and are not used to this. We believe the only way to survive is through national conservative ideas based on national sovereignty and mutual trust.

During World War 2, the Nazis kidnapped children and used them to expose Jewish families. One 11-year-old Hungarian Jewish boy willingly did this and became a trusted member of the Nazi party. After the war, he was given a great education and tons of stolen gold. This man, George Soros, is now in his nineties and is one of the wealthiest individuals in the world. He funds various organizations in the United States, but this is not widely known. Soros is a Jewish Hungarian Nazi who aims to help his constituents and the cabal take over the world under the ideology of Nazism.

George Soros, a Hungarian billionaire, is disliked in Hungary and many other nations for his attempts to influence governments. He was the first person to meet with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez after his election, as reported in Spain. Despite being questioned about this meeting, Sánchez has never responded in parliament. It is interesting to see the alliance between the left and extreme left with globalist billionaires. This alliance contradicts their previous anti-globalization stance and allows these billionaires to dictate how we should live while they live luxuriously.

The Biden administration calls me a fascist, but liberal originally meant freedom. Now in Europe, it means you're an enemy of freedom. We're treated worse than Russia, yet we're a U.S. ally. The point of NATO shouldn't be to provoke war with Russia; it's a bad strategy because we can't beat them. Using the justice system against political opponents like what's happening in the U.S. is unimaginable in Hungary; that's what the communists did. Ukraine isn't winning; it's a lie. They'll run out of soldiers before Russia. The focus in Russia isn't freedom; it's keeping the country together. We can't beat them, and they won't give up. Killing Putin would be a mistake because anarchy in Russia is dangerous. If the U.S. wants peace, it can have it. Trump is the man who can save the West because his foreign policy was the best.

It's dangerous when the US administration views you as an enemy. Liberalism once meant freedom, but now it opposes it. We're allies with the US but are treated worse than Russia. NATO's strategy to provoke war with Russia is bad; we can't beat them. Using the justice system against political opponents is a communist tactic, unimaginable in Hungary. Ukraine isn't winning; it's a lie. They'll run out of soldiers before Russia does. The US misunderstands Russia; their priority is keeping the country together, not freedom. Killing Putin could lead to anarchy. Sending Western troops to Ukraine would trigger World War III. The Nord Stream attack showed a lack of sovereignty. Peace is needed immediately; call back Trump, whose foreign policy was the best in decades.