reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

The Biden family received over $15 million from foreign nationals and companies, including Ukraine, Russia, and China, between 2014 and 2019. Joe Biden has lied about his involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings at least 16 times. The president met or spoke with Hunter's foreign business associates at least 22 times. Checks written to Joe Biden were found in banking records, including $40,000 from China and $200,000 from a bankrupt healthcare company linked to his brother James Biden. The evidence is clear, and the Constitution requires the House to follow the truth. We have a duty to continue the process.

The speaker argues that there is substantial evidence indicating that Hunter Biden engaged in illegal activities and received millions of dollars from foreign nationals. The main question is what Joe Biden knew about his son's actions and when he knew it. The speaker believes that Congress has a duty to investigate whether Joe Biden was complicit in the scheme and financially benefited from it. The speaker outlines a pattern where foreign clients pay the Bidens, and in return, the vice president uses his influence to benefit the clients. The speaker mentions specific instances involving Russian and Kazakhstani individuals. The speaker calls for further investigation and subpoenas for documents to determine Joe Biden's involvement. The speaker criticizes the Department of Justice, FBI, and IRS for not taking action and accuses them of concealing possible crimes. The speaker concludes by suggesting that if evidence shows Joe Biden took half of Hunter Biden's income, Democrats should put politics aside and join in impeaching a corrupt president.

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

I want to talk about waste, fraud, and abuse. People like President Musk and Trump are using their public offices to enrich themselves by billions of dollars. Why is there silence about looking into the actions of the president and the richest man on Earth? I will say President Musk and Trump often use their public offices to enrich themselves. I will withdraw calling Trump "grifter-in-chief." It's despicable that this committee is silencing me for bringing up that Trump is making millions of dollars.

We reviewed over 2,000 pages of financial records revealing a complex network of shell companies involving Joe Biden and his family members. Evidence suggests human trafficking and financial corruption, with money flowing from various foreign countries. The investigation will uncover how the Biden family profited from Joe Biden's political influence. This information needs to be shared with the American people for transparency.

The speaker stated that they think it's ridiculous to suggest President Trump is acting for his own benefit. They claim he left a life of luxury and a successful real estate empire for public service, not just once, but twice, and the American public reelected him because they trust he acts in the country's best interest. The speaker asserted that Trump has lost money being president. They don't recall similar questions being asked of the previous president, a career politician who was allegedly profiting off the office. The speaker maintains that President Trump does not do this, and the White House holds itself to the highest ethical standards.

The speaker challenges the idea that Hunter Biden committed a crime, stating it's not illegal to profit from one's last name. They then direct Chuck to the Marco Polo report, which they claim details potential crimes.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

The speaker discusses allegations of payments made by an undisclosed country to the Biden family. They mention that the family created shell companies while Joe Biden was vice president to profit from his position. The speaker questions if Biden's compromised position affects his decision-making as president. They claim to have evidence of $10 million received by the family and suggest it could be between $15 and $30 million in total. The speaker highlights that the countries involved, including China, are not reputable and even major companies avoid doing business with them. They emphasize the need for Biden to explain why his family received money. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of media coverage and promises to continue investigating and revealing the truth to the American people.

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged web of concealment and corruption, highlighting the numerous companies and transactions involved. He emphasizes that the Biden family's only business is politics and questions the purpose of creating so many companies to conceal money. The speaker also mentions specific companies connected to Hunter Biden and the growing list of companies being investigated. He criticizes the Department of Justice for the lack of progress in investigating Hunter Biden. The speaker concludes by stating that there is no legitimate business for the Biden family except their involvement in politics, and the committee will continue to investigate and provide information to the press and the DOJ.

President Biden's denial of discussing business with Hunter Biden's associates is called a lie by the speaker. The speaker claims that Joe Biden's 40-year career in Washington, DC is the Biden family business. The speaker presents evidence of James Biden receiving a loan based on his political connections, and then transferring money to Joe Biden. The speaker also mentions an email referring to Joe Biden as the "big guy" in a joint venture. The speaker accuses Hunter Biden of not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into Joe Biden's alleged corruption and pay-for-play tactics.

If the Trump family had 22 businesses producing nothing of value, registered to five family members with 233 bank accounts and 175 LLCs, receiving millions annually without offering a product or service, would you suspect corruption? This describes the Biden family, which has the same structure. What are these 175 LLCs doing to generate such income? If they aren't producing anything, what are they selling? I'm open to understanding what the Biden family is involved in. Can anyone explain the purpose of their 233 bank accounts and 175 LLCs? If they do sell something, who are their customers? I doubt they have any U.S. customers. Prove me wrong.

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged web of concealment and deception, suggesting corruption. They claim that the Biden family lacks a legitimate business structure and instead relies on politics for income. The speaker highlights the numerous companies and transactions involved, expressing concern about the velocity and purpose of these transactions. They mention reviewing documents at the treasury building, which raised serious questions. The speaker emphasizes the creation of multiple companies during Joe Biden's vice presidency and suggests that the purpose is to conceal money gained through his political career. They provide examples of various company names and assert that such a structure serves no legitimate purpose. The speaker also questions the Department of Justice's investigation into Hunter Biden and asserts that the former president had a legitimate business, unlike Joe Biden. The speaker concludes by stating that the committee will continue to investigate and present the facts.

I have been on this investigating committee for over 20 years and as an attorney, I can confidently say that there is more evidence to impeach Donald Trump for a third time than to implicate President Biden. The focus on the Biden family is a way to deflect from the lack of evidence against President Biden. The shifting arguments have only served to exonerate President Biden.

President Biden's denial of discussing businesses with Hunter Biden's associates is called a lie by the speaker. The investigation has allegedly uncovered evidence of Joe Biden's involvement in illegal business transactions. Examples include James Biden receiving a loan based on his last name and wiring money to Joe Biden, and an email mentioning "the big guy" receiving a 10% stake in a joint venture. The speaker also accuses Hunter Biden of not registering as a foreign agent despite his work with a Chinese energy company. The speaker calls for an impeachment investigation into President Biden's alleged corruption and pay-for-play tactics. They claim that the confusion surrounding Biden's business transactions was intentional to hide money from the American people and the IRS. The speaker questions if the president is compromised by foreign sources and suggests an impeachment inquiry is necessary to answer these questions.

The speaker criticizes the Biden family, stating that they have no business experience except for politics. They claim that the oversight committee, along with other committees, has uncovered evidence of public corruption and a pay-for-play scheme involving foreign nations, resulting in millions of dollars. The speaker mentions that Hunter Biden ignored a congressional subpoena as a private citizen, which would typically result in contempt and punishment. They argue that private citizens have a responsibility to answer congressional subpoenas and suggest that Hunter Biden should be held in contempt by the full House of Representatives. The speaker concludes by yielding back their time.

I'm still waiting for proof of Joe Biden enriching himself, especially regarding his son and brother. Despite four years of investigation during Trump's presidency, no charges have been made. If there was evidence of wrongdoing, charges should have followed. A Chinese company did transfer money to Hunter and Jim Biden's shell companies, which then funneled money to their personal accounts, including a $40,000 check to Joe Biden. However, the lack of charges raises questions about the validity of these claims. Until there are actual charges, this discussion remains open. Thank you for joining us; stay tuned for more.

The new press secretary is described as being very prepared. It is asserted that it's ridiculous to suggest President Trump is doing anything for his own benefit. He supposedly left a life of luxury and a successful real estate empire for public service, not just once but twice, and the American public reelected him because they trust he acts in the best interest of the country and puts the American public first. It is claimed that this president has actually lost money for being president. The speaker doesn't remember these types of questions being asked of the previous president, described as a career politician who was clearly profiting.

The speaker discusses the analogy of a criminal ordering a hit and how it relates to the impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden. They claim that Joe Biden was involved in his family's business schemes in Romania while he was president. They mention that Biden delivered an anti-corruption speech in Romania and had discussions with the Romanian president about anti-corruption efforts. They also highlight that the Biden family received money from a corrupt Romanian oligarch through a company called Bladen Enterprises. They mention Hunter Biden's meetings with the US ambassador to Romania and the flow of over $1,000,000 to the Bidens.

The president's statements contradict the fact that he has spoken to Hunter Biden's business associates. However, Speaker 1 argues that the president never claimed to have never spoken to anyone. He simply stated that he had no involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings. Speaker 1 finds it unreasonable to expect a father not to greet people his son is dining with. This is the only evidence presented. Additionally, it is mentioned that Hunter Biden used this as a party trick to impress others.

Speaker 1 states that the Biden family engaged in influence peddling, resulting in tens of millions of dollars. He claims his legitimate businesses became illegitimate through alignment with Hunter Biden, which involved selling the "Biden name." Speaker 1 alleges that Joe Biden was aware and involved, citing his participation in at least two business phone calls. He asserts that Joe Biden's claim of never discussing foreign business deals with his son or brother is a lie, supported by documents and evidence. Speaker 1 further alleges that Joe Biden negotiated with the Chinese Communist Party on a golf course to secure a board seat and receive money from the Chinese. He references a WhatsApp message and a billion dollars in Ukraine, conditioned on removing a prosecutor investigating Hunter.

Joe Biden was accused of lying to the American people, with evidence allegedly found in bank statements. The speaker claims that the media covered up these lies. They also express concern about the Biden family making money from China, calling it highly unethical. The speaker questions the nature of the Biden family business, suggesting it is only influence peddling. They emphasize that Joe Biden has been involved in government for 50 years and has been dishonest with the American people. The investigations into these allegations are ongoing.

Hunter Biden falsely claimed under oath that his father had no involvement in his business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. Texts and testimonies reveal Hunter seeking his father's influence in business matters, contradicting his sworn statements. Bobolinski confirms President Biden is the family brand being sold.

Joe Biden is accused of taking cash from foreign countries frequently. The speaker suggests that an unannounced raid on Biden's homes would have been more effective than the one on Senator Menendez. They question whether three weeks' notice would be enough for Biden to clean out any incriminating evidence. The speaker claims that Biden only cares about enriching his own family, while they claim to care about enriching the listener's family.