reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers on the government's lack of transparency regarding drone incursions over military bases and civilian areas. Michael Shellenberger points out inconsistencies in official statements, where authorities claim to be investigating while simultaneously asserting there’s nothing to worry about. He highlights numerous instances of unidentified drones over sensitive locations, questioning the military's control over U.S. airspace. Both Republican and Democratic representatives agree on the need for clearer authority and funding for detection systems to address these incursions. Shellenberger emphasizes that while there’s no evidence of foreign control over the drones, the government's failure to communicate effectively leads to misinformation and public concern.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

There is footage and records of unidentified objects in the sky that we can't explain. It is believed that the Pentagon has been hiding a program from Congress and the executive branch. This program, run by unelected officials, avoids oversight and goes against American democracy. There is a disinformation campaign targeting the US populace, which is unethical. A bill called the UAP Closure Act aims to force the Pentagon to reveal the truth to Congress and the American people. However, there are efforts to kill this bill by Speaker Mike Johnson, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Congressman Mike Turner, and Mike Rogers. It is important to call lawmakers and demand the passage of the UAP Disclosure Act.

We have a right to know about UAPs, yet current and former US officials claim the Pentagon has unlawfully withheld significant information, including military intelligence on UAPs. A whistleblower's report indicates that the executive branch has managed UAP issues without congressional oversight for possibly decades. This report mentions a secret DOD program called Immaculate Constellation, which consolidates UAP observations from various military and civilian sources. It details various UAP shapes and incidents, including orbs surrounding an F-22 and a sphere descending near a Navy aircraft carrier. Additionally, a source reported a high-definition video of a UAP emerging from the ocean off Kuwait. Despite efforts to obtain information through FOIA requests, the government has increasingly restricted access to UAP-related documents since 2017.

Tim Gallaudet, a former rear admiral and acting director of NOAA, will testify today. He will discuss credible whistleblower statements indicating that UAPs (unidentified aerial phenomena) suggest the existence of nonhuman intelligence, highlighting that we are not alone in the universe. These revelations are expected to be impactful and reflect Congress's serious approach to addressing this issue as a matter of national defense.

Lou Elizondo, a former Pentagon official and whistleblower, discusses the government's handling of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs). He criticizes the administration's claim that these sightings pose no threat, emphasizing the lack of understanding about their origins and intentions. Elizondo highlights the historical context of drone threats and questions the government's transparency, particularly regarding classified briefings. He notes that while some reports may stem from public sensitization, the government’s response—such as shutting down airspace—indicates a serious issue. He suggests that sophisticated drones could be state-operated, requiring significant infrastructure. Elizondo calls for more open discussions with Congress and the public about these phenomena.

There is serious evidence of unidentified objects in the sky, with footage and records showing their unusual movements and trajectories. These objects do not follow easily explainable patterns, prompting ongoing investigations to understand their nature.

A new whistleblower report alleges the existence of an unacknowledged special access program called "Immaculate Constellation." This program purportedly serves as the parent program for UAP crash retrieval, reverse engineering, and a large database of sophisticated UAP encounter documentation. The central allegation is that this program and its information have been illegally withheld from Congress. According to the speaker, the U.S. Constitution mandates congressional oversight of all executive branch activities. The speaker emphasizes that the alleged withholding of information from Congress by the Pentagon and the Defense Department constitutes an abuse of power and a potential act of disinformation, regardless of the nature or origin of UAPs.

Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee task force on the declassification of federal secrets, discusses what she describes as evidence of interdimensional beings operating through existing time spaces. She references photo and video material from classified briefings that are now being made public, including a video “dead dropped” to Representative Eric Burleson from within the Department of War showing a UAP/ unidentified aerial phenomena deflecting a Hellfire missile, captured from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Luna says there is evidence of an advanced technology not created by mankind, and while some cases previously labeled as UAPs were later identified as drones, there remains a portion of evidence that cannot be explained. She notes that multiple governments have examined these phenomena, and emphasizes a national security perspective: as AI and drone technology evolve, it is important to determine whether these are potential adversarial weapons. She argues that the federal government’s denial of access to some members of Congress is alarming and incompatible with a free, transparent society, and she expects the American people to draw their own conclusions after reviewing the evidence. Luna adds that Representative Gates joined the initial codal discussion with her and Representative Tim Burchett, and stated that if viewers have seen the material they have seen, they too would become believers. She then questions whether the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings, asking whether the technology could be something the U.S. possesses that others should not know about, or if it indicates capabilities possessed by a foreign actor that operate in ways that are hard to understand. Based on interviews and testimony she has reviewed, she says there is reason to believe the tech is not created by mankind, though she concedes it is also possible that certain advanced U.S. weapons could be involved. The conversation centers on the accessibility of evidence, the secrecy surrounding it, and the potential implications for national security and public transparency.

I'm shaking after seeing this cylindrical UFO for the third night in a row. It looks so close that I can almost see a figure inside. I've received reports from across the country about a large yellow orb that is stationary over homes. Last night alone, over 1,200 people reached out to say they witnessed the same phenomenon. I’m uncertain if this is an Iranian ship or an alien spacecraft. We need answers from Biden.

There are drones flying around New Jersey ports, and the government is aware of their origins. The military knows where they launched from and can trace them back to their source. However, there's a lack of communication about this situation, leaving people in suspense. It's unlikely that these drones are a threat, as any enemy activity would have been more aggressive. The public deserves transparency, especially since these drones have been spotted over areas like Bedminster. The truth should be shared with the people.

The speaker regrets not asking for a briefing on UAPs (UFOs) when they were acting secretary of defense. They recall being briefed on nuclear war and terrorism strikes, but they should have also requested information on UFOs. They believe it's possible that UFOs could be generated by life forms from another planet or from Earth. They mention that out of 241 anomalous incidents, 228 were determined to have explanations, but they are unsure about the remaining 13. The speaker believes that more information about UFOs will be revealed soon due to increased media attention. They express their dislike for being in the public spotlight but mention three topics they are willing to address publicly: Afghan refugee issues, Veterans Affairs, and Havana syndrome.

These photographs from 2019 show unidentified objects, confirmed by the Pentagon. Pilots training off the Atlantic Coast have reported seeing such objects daily for years. One notable sighting occurred off Jacksonville, Florida, in 2015, captured by a targeting camera. The pilots expressed surprise at the object's behavior, noting its rotation and altitude without visible propulsion. They speculate these could be secret US technology, adversary spy vehicles, or something otherworldly. The highest probability is that these are part of a threat observation program. When asked about the possibility of Russian or Chinese technology, the pilot acknowledged it could be a concern and expressed worry about the situation.

Congress passed the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023, mandating the government to reveal what it knows about unidentified flying objects (UFOs). Despite evidence of non-human origin and testimonies from whistleblowers, powerful congressional members are allegedly obstructing transparency. Congressman Tim Burchitt expresses frustration over this cover-up, suggesting that the government may be hiding advanced nonhuman technology and possibly having communicated with extraterrestrial beings. He questions the accountability of the Pentagon, which has failed audits and lacks transparency regarding its spending. Burchitt believes that the reluctance to disclose information stems from corruption and the desire to maintain control over advanced technologies that could disrupt military interests. He emphasizes the need for honest answers and transparency regarding UFOs and government actions.

The UAP Disclosure Act of 2023 requires the US government to reveal information about unidentified flying objects (UFOs). These UFOs are real and not of human origin, with physical evidence and testimonies from high-level whistleblowers confirming their existence. However, powerful members of Congress, controlled by secretive federal agencies, are working to hide the truth. The government's motive for the cover-up is likely to protect their own crimes and maintain power and control. Honest lawmakers should be asking questions about the government's use of tax dollars, the existence of advanced nonhuman technology, and potential communication or agreements with the beings behind the UFOs. Congressman Tim Burchitt is one of the few politicians genuinely outraged by the cover-up. The legislation is still being negotiated, but transparency and disclosure are crucial.

Good evening, Chris. I strongly disagree with the notion that the FBI or the Defense Department understands the recent phenomena over the East Coast. Those in the FBI are confused and lack answers about these objects, which are reportedly the size of large SUVs. Contrary to claims that they are too small to detect, there have been attempts to intercept them using anti-drone technology, which has failed, particularly at the PSEG nuclear site in New Jersey. Additionally, these sightings are not limited to the East Coast; reports are coming in from Australia, Japan, Indonesia, China, Russia, and Europe.

Why is there a classified briefing about hobbyist drones if they aren't military? I can't speak for Congress on that. We're sharing as much information as possible, but I don't have the details of the briefing to clarify what is classified. Rest assured, we are providing all the information we can based on what we know.

We should keep classified information about UAP technology confidential to protect national security. However, the American public deserves to know about the new realities and evidence that the defense department and intelligence community have discovered regarding UAPs. It's important to share this information with citizens, as they have a right to understand these developments.

In 2017, a New York Times story exposed a secret government UFO program, leading to congressional inquiries. Instruments report unexplained flight characteristics. Acknowledging UAPs is a recent development. One speaker stated that, based on interviews, the government possesses UAPs and that sources claim crash retrievals have occurred, including nonhuman biologics. Another speaker stated that the American people are being lied to. Nonhuman intelligence exists and has interacted with humanity. The Pentagon and CIA will have to respond. One speaker has feared for their life. When asked about verifying the US government's possession of spaceships of nonhuman intelligence, one speaker stated they would go to jail to reveal what they know.