TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

They lied, claiming Saddam was developing nuclear weapons. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, but there were none, and they knew it. They claimed removing Saddam would have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Going into Iraq may have been the worst decision any president has made in the history of the country. We should have never been in Iraq.

The speaker expresses concern about the current president of the United States, calling him a draft dodger, womanizer, and pathological liar. They believe it is dangerous for America and the world. Despite not wanting to see this in politics, they suggest that the House of Representatives should introduce a resolution of impeachment against Bill Clinton. They believe it is necessary to address the ongoing issues and move forward. They explain that under the constitution, the House introduces the resolution, and the US Senate conducts the trial. They believe this course of action is necessary for the country's well-being and the peace of the Western world.

The speaker discusses the Iraq war and how they believe the American people were deceived by the neocons. They claim that false information was spread about Saddam Hussein's involvement in the World Trade Center attacks and the anthrax attacks that followed. The speaker also mentions that the FBI traced the anthrax to a U.S. government source at Fort Detrick. They argue that the Patriot Act, which was passed during this time, undermined the Constitution and reopened the bioweapons arms race. The speaker concludes by stating that the act allowed federal officials to violate international bioweapons agreements without facing prosecution.

Mister Bois, when will you apologize for the 1,000,000 Iraqis who suffered due to your lies? You deceived us about weapons of destruction and connections.

Congress has little power and is offended that the speaker won't appear before a partisan committee. The speaker believes the real story goes back to 2016, with attempts to interfere with the election and overthrow the Trump administration. The speaker stands for fair trade, securing borders, and ending endless wars. Special interests in Washington can't make money under Trump, so they weaponize the justice system to prevent his return to the White House.

I've evolved by watching what's been going on. I supported it because I thought they were telling us the truth. It was all lies. They lied us into that war. The war did nothing to improve American security. We destabilized the Middle East. We turned Iraq into an Iranian proxy state. We created a huge, again, destabilization, which created a huge, refugee problem that spilled over into Syria. We got involved in Afghanistan. We were told that we were winning, and the country was being transformed into a, you know, democracy. And everything turned out to be just a lie. Cost us around $8,000,000,000,000, and almost a million direct deaths, with excess mortality numbers as high as five million. The foreign policy establishment, the blob.

Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in 250 years. He repeatedly said he knew nothing and would protect certain information. Yet, he led the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump in the Senate. He was conflicted because he was part of the hoax that brought Charmela in, manufacturing false accusations and pushing them out to the world. It's not surprising, given his history of lying. But he lied to set up a presidential impeachment. He should be investigated for lying about his interactions with Charmela, the whistleblower whose information started a presidential impeachment.

Liz Cheney, Dick Cheney's daughter, is running against Kamala Harris, which I believe hurts Harris. Cheney is a deranged person who has always wanted to go to war. She wanted to stay in Syria and Iraq, while I chose to withdraw. If it were up to her, we’d be involved in conflicts in many countries. She's a radical war hawk. It’s easy for her to advocate for sending troops from the comfort of Washington, but she wouldn’t feel the same if she were in the line of fire. I’ve had meetings with many people, and she consistently pushed for military action.

The speaker emphasizes the need to compel Iraq to destroy its weapons of mass destruction and expresses belief that the resolution is a march towards peace and security. Another speaker criticizes Joe Biden for his role in the Iraq war, stating that he used his position as chair of the foreign relations committee to ensure the war was authorized. It is mentioned that Biden prevented experts from testifying and controlled the senate debate, leading to distorted information. Additionally, Biden opposed an amendment that would have required further authorization for the war. The speaker concludes that Biden's actions played a major role in getting the war resolution passed.

The war in Iraq was a mistake by George Bush. The U.S. should have never been in Iraq because it destabilized the Middle East. The speaker claims "they" lied about weapons of mass destruction, asserting that there were none.

I stand by my observations regarding Joe Biden. I feel a bit sorry for him, as he seems out of touch and not in charge. After becoming Speaker, I sought a meeting with him due to pressing national security concerns, but his staff kept making excuses for weeks. Eventually, I went public, and they finally agreed to meet. However, it turned out to be an ambush with many officials present, focusing on Ukraine funding. During our brief private conversation, I asked why he paused LNG exports to Europe, which was hurting our allies and fueling Putin's war. To my shock, he genuinely didn't realize he had signed the executive order to pause those exports. This left me worried about who is truly running the country.

Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in the last 250 years. He repeatedly said he knew nothing, would not discuss, and would protect information, yet he led the impeachment trial of President Trump. He was conflicted because he was part of the hoax involving Charmela, manufacturing false accusations and spreading them. It's not surprising; he's lied about almost everything, including to set up a presidential impeachment. He should be investigated for lying about his interactions with Charmela, the whistleblower who initiated the presidential impeachment.

They deleted and destroyed a year and a half of testimony, which I believe is a major crime, with Cheney and Bennie Thompson involved. They should face consequences for their actions. When asked if Liz Cheney should go to jail, I think anyone who voted in favor of this should be held accountable. However, I won't direct the FBI or the Attorney General to take action; that's up to them to investigate. My focus remains on energy policies like "drill, baby, drill." Ultimately, they can decide their own course of action.

Just leave the stage, have a meal, and leave. These politicians want to send our kids to war without even knowing the basics. They lied about Iraq and caused a lot of debt and death. They're frauds. Lipstick won't change that.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 to respond to an accusation that Nancy Pelosi became rich through insider trading. Speaker 1 responded that the accusation is ridiculous. Speaker 1 supports stopping members of Congress from trading stocks, not because anyone is doing anything wrong, but to instill confidence in the American people. Speaker 1 has no concern about investments made over time. Speaker 1's husband is into investments, but it has nothing to do with insider information. Speaker 1 stated that the president is projecting because he has his own exposure.

I've put an end to the weaponization of government. A prime example of this was when a sitting president was allowed to viciously prosecute a political opponent, like myself. But how did that turn out? Not too good. Not too good at all.

Speaker 0: It's been a few days since you issued that resignation. You’ve been called weak by the president of the United States. You’ve been called a traitor by Lindsey Graham. You’ve been called an anti-Semite by Mitch McConnell, among others. Now there are reports that you’re under a leak investigation potentially accusing you of a felony that could put you in jail even though you now are raising your two boys. You’ve remarried, but you’re their sole biological parent still here. I ask you now whether this was worth it. Speaker 1: I think it most certainly was, Megan. I mean, the attacks against me are to be expected. The ad hominems from people like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham at this point are fairly laughable. They don’t wanna discuss the issues. I wanna discuss the issues. As for the leak allegations, I’m not concerned because I know I did nothing wrong. Of course, I am concerned because we’ve all seen the FBI and the full way of the government come down on individuals who speak out. So that has me a little bit concerned, but I know the truth and the facts are on my side. So I think the important issues to address are what’s at hand, why we’re at war, and how we get out of the state that we’re in right now. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Your boys have already lost one parent. I mean, the thought of this government for which you’ve been working and the government for which you’ve sacrificed so much, actually trying to put you in jail over an alleged leak after the number of leaks we’ve seen go unpunished over the past ten years is truly outrageous, Joe. I mean, does it anger you? How does it make you feel? Speaker 1: You, you know, it it does anger me, but it it’s all just to be expected. I I knew this was going to happen. I I know their playbook. I think we’re all very familiar with their playbook. So, actually, the fact that they’re leaking these allegations so so they have to leak the allegations of an FBI investigation. If there truly was an FBI investigation, and who knows, maybe there will be, there would be a process and procedure for that. They would actually formally come to me. And if they were still collecting information, they most certainly wouldn’t leak it. So the fact that the FBI, DOJ, or really probably just partisans are leaking this this so-called investigation against me at a time when I’m going on and publicly speaking out against the course the administration is on, to me, that tells me everything that I need to know. I feel very confident in what I’m doing right now. I think I have a mission, and I think it is to do everything I can to stop this war. So to me, I kinda view everything else as a sideshow, and I just wanna stay focused on the mission.

Speaker says, "Trump listen, man. I I supported him this last year. I apologize for doing so. It was a bad calculation. At the time, it seemed like the right one." He adds, "But he should be impeached and removed for this one." He continues, "And not not on some, like, not not on some ridiculous Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the congress will never do it because they're all a bunch of, you know, corrupt hacks. This is the one thing they support. This is, like, the yeah." He reiterates, "Donald Trump should be impeached and removed for this." "All of his supporters should turn on him." "It's the absolute betrayal of every"

I stand by my observations about Joe Biden. He seems to be out of touch and not in control. When I became Speaker, I sought a meeting with him due to pressing national security concerns, but his staff repeatedly denied my requests. After weeks of pressure, I finally met him at the White House, only to find it was a setup with other officials present. During our brief moment alone, I asked him about a pause on LNG exports to Europe, which I believed was harming our allies and fueling Putin's war. To my shock, he genuinely didn’t know about the executive order he had signed. This left me worried about who is truly running the country.

I intended to leave, but when the president claimed a mandate to cut Medicaid, I told him he didn't have one. The Speaker admonished me, then ordered me to be escorted out, which I complied with. I don't hold animosity towards the Speaker, who was following the rules. However, the president called Democratic members lunatics on TV without reprimand, using incivility to exploit our civility. The president also referred to a sitting senator as Pocahontas. This incivility is frequent. I'm here to serve my district and hope the Freedom Caucus won't strip my committee assignments, but if they do, I'll have more time to work on articles of impeachment. I am going to introduce the articles of impeachment because this level of incivility emanating from the presidency is something we cannot tolerate. If President Obama had behaved this way, he would have been impeached.

"Of the war in Iraq was a big fat mistake. They lied. Okay. They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none, and they knew there were none." "Bush got us into this horrible war with lies by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true." "I lost a lot of friends that were killed in that building. The worst attack ever in this country, it was during his presidency." "We spent $2,000,000,000,000, thousands of lives, wounded warriors all over the place we're in."

The speaker states they would have prosecuted Hillary Clinton and even offered to do so for Trump, but Trump declined. The speaker believes prosecuting Clinton would have been the "greatest honor" of their life. They claim to believe in justice, not disliking people, and even feeling sorry for some they've jailed. The speaker asserts that the only way to end "all the garbage" is to jail the "bad guys." They believe that jailing the "bad guys" will scare them and make them stop their actions, at least temporarily.

"58 house Democrats have recently voted to advance articles of impeachment." "Impeach him first and then indict him." "Yes. The president, a sitting president, can be indicted." "On the day Donald Trump leaves office, the justice department may indict him." "It's clear that Trump is the target, and he'll be indicted eventually." "The only thing worse than indicting him would be not indicting him." "Merrick Garland, if you indict Trump, you'll be my person of the year of the decade." "There should be no case in which they wouldn't indict." "The only reasons Trump hasn't been indicted by now is because he's a former president and because he has handpicked judges on his side."

The speaker claims that an individual lied before Congress and the media, stating that Obama's targeted assassination program killed no civilians on the Afghan or Pakistan border, when the speaker believes 50-75 innocent people were killed. The speaker says the individual was caught in that lie. Three years later, the speaker says the same individual lied emphatically to Congress about tapping CIA staffers' computers, initially denying it, then admitting to the lie. The speaker notes that in both instances, there were no perjury charges.

The speaker argues that the war in Iraq resulted in an enormous, unrecoverable cost: “we spent $2,000,000,000,000, thousands of lives,” and that the outcome left the United States with nothing to show for it. The speaker contends that Iran is now taking over Iraq, describing it as having “the second largest oil reserves in the world,” and asserts that this outcome proves the involvement in Iraq was a mistake. The speaker states that George Bush made a mistake and that the United States “should have never been in Iraq,” claiming that the intervention destabilized the Middle East. Regarding accountability, the speaker questions whether Bush should be impeached and suggests a preference for letting the other party decide how to label the issue, saying, “So you still think he should be impeached? I think it's my turn, ain't it? You do whatever you want.” The speaker emphasizes a belief that those responsible “lied,” specifically about weapons of mass destruction, asserting, “They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none, and they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Alright.” In sum, the speaker presents three core assertions: (1) the Iraq War was extraordinarily costly in financial terms and human lives, and produced no tangible gain; (2) the war destabilized the Middle East and empowered Iran to increase influence in Iraq, which the speaker frames as a mistaken outcome; and (3) the leaders claimed WMDs existed when they did not, asserting that there were no weapons of mass destruction and that those claims were knowingly false. The dialogue also touches on impeachment as a potential consequence for the leadership involved, framed through the speaker’s yes-or-no stance and interjections about accountability.