reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker addresses the World Health Organization and argues that current measures like social distancing, hand hygiene, and surface disinfection are sufficient to control the spread of COVID-19. They believe that the scientific understanding of how the virus is transmitted will naturally improve over time.

In this video, the speaker talks about two viruses in the country. One is the coronavirus vaccine, which has a vaccine available, and the other is the anti-democracy and hate vac virus, which doesn't have a vaccine. They mention that there is an oxygen shortage in hospitals, similar to the shortage in our democracy. They suggest that our democracy needs an infusion of oxygen.

There is a discussion about the control of information and how false information can be challenged. Social media platforms are urged to take responsibility and partner with scientific and health communities to provide accurate information. The idea of government enforcement against fake news is also mentioned. Shutting down information is seen as impractical, and instead, flooding accurate information and relying on trusted sources are suggested strategies. The video then shifts to a description of a past pandemic, where millions of people died, the global economy suffered, and societal impacts were long-lasting.

The speaker believes that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who are pretending that there is a serious respiratory viral health threat. They argue that the virus in Wuhan was not exaggerated and that there is no new health threat. They suggest that if there is a new virus, it is not more serious than influenza, which coincidentally disappeared at the same time. The speaker no longer believes in the existence of respiratory viruses and thinks that people still get ill with the same illnesses as before, but the cause is unknown.

The speaker discusses violence among black people, stating that there is no place where black people live and do not engage in violence against each other. They claim that in African countries with black governments and leaders, black people still kill each other. The speaker cites examples of violence in Kenya, including femicide, and notes similar issues in the Caribbean, Haiti, Jamaica, and the United States. They assert that black people will engage in violence in any community. The speaker claims that the only difference in Africa is the lack of guns, with violence instead enacted using sticks, machetes, knives, and bottles. They cite Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Sudan, Somalia, and Nigeria as examples of black-on-black violence.

There are people who doubt the reality of the Ebola outbreak, but in West Africa, where the disease is prevalent, there is a massive propaganda campaign to convince people that Ebola is real. Signs, posters, and billboards are everywhere, and there is even a hit song called "Ebola is Real." Public service phone messages and DJs at clubs also remind people that Ebola is real. However, the video questions the need for such an extensive campaign if Ebola is truly as widespread and deadly as reported. The video also analyzes a New York Times report showing a supposedly sick Ebola patient who appears to be less ill than initially portrayed.

There is a claim that viruses do not exist and have never been found in nature. It is stated that no scientific publication can prove otherwise. The lack of evidence is attributed to the inability to isolate and purify viruses. This is seen as a problem in the field of biology, as the connection between viruses and diseases is not proven. The speaker emphasizes that this information is important for everyone to know.

Speaker 0 notes: “Have them write the information.” Speaker 1 points out that two people were sitting together: George Gao, director general of the Chinese CDC, and the deputy director of the CIA, who later became head of the entire intelligence community, at an event during the Wuhan military games two months before the Wuhan outbreak. They remark on how conveniently they were seated near each other given how closely they would coordinate two months later. In this segment, social media is mentioned 19 times. Speaker 2 comments that social media is now the primary channel for news, that interruptions to platforms could curb misinformation but also limit access to legitimate sources, and that health ministries worldwide are trying to combat misinformation and disinformation. Speaker 1 describes the tabletop exercise: the deputy director of the CIA becomes head of the ODNI as soon as Biden takes office and is dealing with social media issues. The speaker notes that George Gao attended the exercise, asking why the simulation—which was about an animal-borne coronavirus outbreak in Latin America—had the China CDC head at the table and the U.S. ODNI head present, while the outbreak was said to start in Brazil, and there were no Latin American health officials present. The president of the UPS foundation is mentioned as the only Latin-named figure. The speaker questions why the Brazil CDC director isn’t in the exercise if it’s simulating a Latin American outbreak and points to the arrangement as contradictory to the premise. Speaker 3 repeats that experts agree new disinformation campaigns are generated daily, describing the problem as huge and potentially undermining pandemic response and governance. Speaker 1 emphasizes disinformation keeping us from ending the pandemic, noting the Wuhan games are ongoing in Wuhan, and describing rumors that the US military engineered the virus and that USAID funded work, with a web of claims about public health, vaccines, and pharmaceutical company misdeeds. The speaker asserts that Pfizer, Moderna, and Gates Foundation funding are involved, including claims that Moderna patented the coronavirus vaccine before the outbreak and that Moderna is a Pentagon arm with no prior successful vaccine. Speaker 2 warns that unrest from false rumors and divisive messaging is rising and undermining response efforts as trust declines. Speaker 1 mentions the “China CDC, in charge of the Wuhan lab,” and notes that healthcare workers, if poorly trained, might give wrong information or say “I don’t know,” which erodes public trust. Speaker 0 recalls a Sierra Leone radio interview about whether Ebola was man-made, highlighting the importance of the TOT (tabletop exercise) and ensuring that nobody suspects a man-made origin. Speaker 4: Proposes steps to prevent spreading misinformation on social media by collaborating with telecommunications companies to control information access and ensuring a trusted source floods the zone with messaging, including trained influential community leaders and health workers to disseminate the desired messaging. Speaker 1 questions the idea of flooding the zone with messaging and notes the need for a rapid response to disinformation, while acknowledging that there are intelligence sources identifying foreign disinformation campaigns as part of a larger effort to address the pandemic.

The speaker states the virus was not isolated. Live animal samples are irrelevant. The speaker suspects the origin is different than originally thought. China's government is presenting the city where the virus emerged as the city that defeated it in a new patriotic film.

Between 200 million and 1 billion people globally are prescribed statins, cholesterol-lowering drugs. For people at low risk of heart disease—most of those prescribed statins—the totality of evidence shows a 5-year benefit of 1%. This corresponds to a 1 in 100 chance that taking the drug “religiously” prevents a heart attack or stroke, without prolonging life. The transcript notes that for individuals older than 75, using publicly available data and the example of President Trump, the benefit is described as 1 in 446. In this framing, treating 446 people would prevent one heart attack. The speaker says President Trump is also taking aspirin, and adds that in people without significant vascular disease, the risk of a fatal bleed is significantly higher than preventing a heart attack. The speaker’s main point is that no one is immune to medical misinformation, “not even the president.” They argue the issue is larger than any individual because “the system” is “more powerful,” and conclude that “collectively we have to sort this out together.”

The speaker points out that the world map we commonly see is inaccurate. They explain that Africa is shown smaller than it actually is, while countries like Greenland, Russia, and the US appear larger. They present an alternative map that accurately represents the sizes of countries. The speaker questions why this information is not taught in schools.

Canadian health officials assure the public that the risk of coronavirus remains low and there is no need to panic. They address the spread of misinformation on social media and emphasize that Canada is prepared to detect and contain the virus. Border measures are deemed ineffective and potentially harmful in controlling the disease. Special screening at customs is not observed. The use of masks is not recommended for healthy individuals, although research suggests they could help reduce the pandemic. An interesting point is made that if everyone stayed still and isolated for two weeks, the virus would die.

Speaker 0 outlines a discussion on global threats and resources. The audience quickly names Russia as the major threat, with China and North Korea also suggested; Venezuela is mentioned by one participant as well. The speaker then pivots to a question about natural resources: which place has the largest oil deposit on the planet, more than Saudi Arabia or Iran? The answer highlighted is Venezuela, noted as arguably the single greatest source of oil and minerals on the planet. The focus shifts to Venezuela’s leadership: President Nicholas Reyes, who rose to power on nationalist pride and, in six years, has crippled the national economy by half and raised the poverty rate by almost 400%. Reyes is up for reelection. His opponent is Gloria Bonaldi, described as a history professor turned activist, running on a social justice platform. The speaker adds a claim about predictions for Venezuela’s future, stating that as of today the chances of total economic collapse are 87%. Media framing is contrasted: on the news, Venezuela would be called a crisis, but on the world stage it would be called a failed state. The speaker notes other examples of failed states in recent history—Yemen, Iraq, and Syria. A further point is made that Venezuela is the only one of these places within a thirty-minute range from the US of “next gen nuclear missiles.” The claim continues that you will not hear about any of this on the news because the biggest players on the world stage do not want you to; unstable governments are seen, in their view, as opportunities. The closing assertion is that Russia and China can never be the most major threat until countries like Venezuela leave the door open to the United States’ backyard.

Speaker 1 reassures viewers that there is no need to panic about the coronavirus in their region. They encourage people to go about their daily lives, including going to Chinatown and participating in activities like Mardi Gras. Speaker 0 echoes this sentiment, emphasizing that New Yorkers should enjoy life and not miss the upcoming parade. Speaker 1 dismisses the idea of closing down borders, stating that transmission is not easy and requires direct person-to-person contact. They also mention that if the virus were easily transmitted, there would be more cases. The speakers emphasize that the coronavirus is not a significant threat and compare it to a common cold or flu.

The speaker believes that the virus will reach Brazil and many people will be infected. However, they do not think this justifies any changes in daily habits. They mention that the media coverage of the virus creates the impression of a catastrophe, comparing it to the Spanish flu. The speaker reassures that such extreme situations will not occur because the virus does not have that potential. They claim that out of every hundred people who contract the virus, eighty to ninety will only experience a mild cold.

Speaker: Noted claims about the Amish and COVID. - The speaker traveled to Lancaster County, Amish country, visiting the house of a relative of Gideon King, described as the one person, the only known person in the Amish community who supposedly died from COVID. They say there may be up to five people, but the names of five people were not provided. A $2,500 reward on Twitter was offered for names of more than five people in Lancaster County who died from COVID; no one could name more than one person, and they all named Gideon King. - The speaker visited the house of Sam King, a relative of Gideon King. Sam said he doesn’t know if Gideon actually died from COVID. They think Gideon died in the hospital. - If there were five Amish people who died, this would mean the Amish death rate was 90 times lower than the infection fatality rate of the United States. - The explanation offered: this is possible because the Amish aren’t vaccinated and didn’t follow a single guideline of the CDC. They did not lockdown, did not mask, did not social distance, did not vaccinate, and there were no mandates to get vaccinated in the Amish community. - The speaker asserts there are no autistic kids in the Amish community, claiming it is very rare to find kids with ADD, autoimmune disease, PANDA, PANS, epilepsy, or other chronic diseases. - The speaker states the US government has studied the Amish for decades, but there has never been a report released to the public. The stated reason is that such a report would show that not following guidelines leads to better health. - The speaker concludes there is no public report after decades of study because it would be devastating to the narrative and would show that the CDC has been harming the public for decades.

New Zealand is facing a global issue, and there are many rumors circulating on social media. The speaker acknowledges seeing these rumors but cannot individually dismiss all of them. Instead, they want to assure the public that they will provide daily updates with the most current information. They encourage the public to trust them as a reliable source, as well as the director general of health and the ministry of health. They invite people to visit their website for clarification anytime.

The speaker asserts that social distancing was completely made up and used to justify school closures because most schools didn’t have the space for such measures. They claim it was a very specific thing and that Fauci, testifying before the Senate in January 2024, admitted it was totally fabricated. The speaker also states that the CDC director said the same. They emphasize that there was not a single thing said that was true, describing this as concerning. They quote the idea: “If you can make if you can make people believe absurdities, you can make them commit atrocities.” The speaker concludes with, “So that's my perspective.”

The speaker addresses the issue of fake news and conspiracy theories about the pandemic agreement, clarifying that the WHO does not have the power to impose lockdowns, vaccine mandates, or restrict travel. These claims are false, and the WHO is not seeking such authority.

The speaker repeatedly questions why the virus is being referred to as the Chinese virus. They assert that calling it the Chinese virus is not racist and emphasize that it originates from China.

You may have heard about the cruise ship stranded for days near Cap Verde, where a rare virus outbreak killed three people and sickened a few more. The illness is allegedly due to hantavirus, described as an airborne virus that comes from rodent droppings, urine, or saliva, and that also transmits from human to human. The speaker contrasts this with the COVID story, which was said to come from a bat and a pangolin and some wet market. A reference is also made to January 2020, when people were stranded on an Italian ship. There is a plot twist in this account: one woman left the ship and collapsed at the airport in Johannesburg, which the speaker says probably infected other people, drawing a parallel to the movie Contagion. The speaker claims that fake news media are sharing this blogger’s video on purpose to spread fear among the public. The message conveyed is that all parties want people to feel safe, but fear campaigns typically begin with the World Health Organization saying there is nothing to worry about, while “we’re monitoring the situation” in case people fall for it. The speaker asserts that once monitoring is in place, the story is amplified, the fear meter is cranked up, and mandates follow. In closing, the speaker urges keeping the story right where it belongs, implying it should not be amplified or believed.

Living on Maui, the speaker claims that the media is not being truthful about the damage and death toll. They personally know individuals who assert that the situation is far more severe than reported. The speaker also alleges witnessing a media cover-up.

Over 50% of French people believe the government is hiding information about the coronavirus. The video discusses theories circulating on social media, such as the virus being created in a laboratory. However, there is no evidence to support these claims. The problem with conspiracy theories is that they are difficult to disprove without evidence. The possibility of the virus originating from a lab and infecting the population is still being considered, but most scientists believe it is unlikely. However, some scientists argue that manipulating the genome of potentially pathogenic viruses in labs is a common practice, and this possibility cannot be completely ruled out.

Living on Maui, the speaker claims that the media is not being truthful about the damage and death toll. They personally know individuals who assert that the situation is far more severe than reported. The speaker also alleges witnessing a media cover-up.