TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

AI has access to everyone's bank accounts, using AI to target potential abusers. The IRS uses AI to analyze returns, bank statements, and books for fraud potential. AI nationwide, mostly catching tax evaders through tips. The IRS doubts the constitutionality of AI snooping. The IRS doesn't need evidence for audits. AI doesn't investigate emails but checks bank accounts. AI captured $500 million in 6 months. The Department of Justice controls IRS AI. Accountability is lacking in the government. The IRS targets the NFL owners. IRS agents feel they're destroying lives. The IRS uses AI to target rich partnerships and digital assets. Join the American swiper program to help seek the truth.

The IRS has been using AI to access bank accounts of American citizens without search warrants or evidence of a crime, violating the 4th Amendment. An undercover journalist discovered this and found that the IRS claims to have access to every person's bank account. The IRS targets the middle class and little guys who can't defend themselves, rather than the wealthy. A new administration is needed to address this issue and hold federal officials accountable for violating citizens' rights. The IRS's use of AI to target the middle class is a move to extract money from them. The former head of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, stated that the US can pay any debt by printing money, ensuring zero probability of default. This system is designed to destroy the middle class and consolidate wealth in the hands of a few.

The speaker claims to have released a Substack article and press release detailing IRS and judicial corruption. The speaker alleges that the IRS is targeting Ebenezer Howe, a legal non-filer, by fabricating returns in his name and manipulating his individual master file. According to the speaker, the IRS constructed a fraudulent debt, sued Howe through the DOJ (United States versus Howe), and is now foreclosing on his house due to these fraudulent returns. The speaker states that American Made Action is taking a stand against this and working with Michael Ellis. The speaker urges listeners to read the Substack article at annvandersteel.substack.com, which includes exhibits and the press release, claiming it reveals further fraud against Americans by the IRS and federal government. The speaker asserts that the government is stealing property, sovereignty, and freedom through a track and surveillance state.

Every year, hundreds of thousands of searches of Americans' private communications are conducted without a warrant. This violates citizens' constitutional rights. The FBI claims they will fix the problem internally, but the number of illegal searches keeps increasing. It seems like the FBI only wants to avoid getting caught.

I believe the people of this country are being violated. Our privacy is being taken from us by figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump. We are unaware of the extent of the information they possess about us, and this lack of knowledge is deeply concerning.

There's support for clearing government waste on both sides, but also concern about the access Musk and Doge staffers have to sensitive data, especially given Musk's investments with China. As a congressman, I can say that the IRS has been a nightmare. When I write letters of concern for my constituents, it takes up to six months to get a response. The IRS has hundreds of groups with access to sensitive information, yet there were no complaints. Now that Elon Musk is involved and potentially making changes, suddenly everyone is upset. If you have nothing to hide, you have no reason to be asking questions. Congressmen will be in trouble when this paper trail leads back to them.

Speaker 0 says that on Friday the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas threatening a criminal indictment related to testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June about a multiyear project to renovate historic Federal Reserve office buildings. They emphasize respect for the rule of law and state that no one, not even the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. The speaker argues this unprecedented action should be understood in the broader context of administration threats and ongoing pressure, stating the threat is not about the June testimony or the renovation project, nor about Congress’s oversight role. The Fed, through testimony and other public disclosures, allegedly tried to keep Congress informed, and the speaker asserts those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges, according to the speaker, arises from the Fed setting interest rates based on what will serve the public, rather than following the President’s preferences. The core issue, the speaker says, is whether the Fed can continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions or whether monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation. The speaker notes service at the Fed under four administrations, both Republican and Democrat, asserting a record of carrying out duties without political fear or favor, focused on the mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Public service, the speaker adds, sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. Finally, the speaker commits to continuing to perform the job the Senate confirmed them to do with integrity and dedication to the American people, and thanks the audience.

Speaker 0 asserts that the IRS has been using AI to access American citizens' bank accounts without a search warrant or a crime claim, discovered by an undercover journalist. They claim the IRS has access to every person’s bank account, and that the agency has been working with the Department of Justice and has no problem going after the “little guy” to ensure taxes are paid. This is described as a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. Speaker 0 and Jim Jordan sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about how AI is used and how civil rights are protected. Speaker 1 asks what the end game is and how to protect constitutional rights given the inevitability of AI, seeking ways to safeguard Americans. Speaker 0 responds that a new administration is needed in November, accusing the current administration of being lawless in terms of surveillance of the public, members of Congress, local officials, protesters, and voters. They claim the administration has “weaponized the government against us,” and that protections of the Bill of Rights—First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments—have been ignored. Speaker 0 states that one of the goals is to address this perceived weaponization and surveillance.

We're here to address a serious issue: an unelected billionaire has accessed our constituents' private information. Oversight will fulfill its duty to investigate why the Department of Treasury has been compromised and hold accountable those responsible for this breach. We need clarity on who controls the treasury, their permissions, intentions, and what they plan to do with your money and identity. We demand answers now.

A woman was shown a picture that resembled her and joked about it. Later, two FBI agents visited her workplace, asking about her whereabouts on January 6th. They threatened her boss with prison time for covering for her. The speaker questions if there is any court order allowing the monitoring of American citizens' text messages. The response mentions court orders authorizing search warrants and surveillance. The speaker emphasizes that search warrants should specify what is being searched or seized, but this is not happening. They express concern about the use of software to target individuals who haven't committed crimes. Another speaker discusses the rise of dangerous extremists and their involvement in acts of violence, including the January 6th insurrection. They inquire about the Department of Justice's efforts to address this threat.

The IRS is allegedly using AI to access Americans' bank accounts without warrants or specific claims of criminal activity. This was reportedly discovered by an undercover journalist. The IRS claims to have access to everyone's bank account and is allegedly working with the Department of Justice. They purportedly have no problem targeting ordinary citizens to ensure tax compliance. This is considered a violation of the 4th Amendment. Jim Jordan and another individual sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about their use of AI and how they are protecting citizens' civil rights.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

The IRS has been using AI to access American citizens' bank accounts without search warrants or evidence of wrongdoing. An undercover journalist revealed that the IRS claims to have access to everyone's bank accounts and is collaborating with the Department of Justice. They focus on enforcing tax compliance among ordinary citizens. This practice raises serious concerns about violations of the Fourth Amendment. In response, Jim Jordan and I have sent a letter to the IRS requesting more information about their use of AI and measures to protect the civil rights of Americans.

The IRS has been using AI to access American citizens' bank accounts without warrants. They claim to have access to everyone's accounts and are willing to go after small taxpayers. Jim Jordan and I demanded answers from the IRS. We need a new administration to protect our civil rights from this lawless surveillance.

The Department of Homeland Security is seeking access to millions of IRS taxpayer records through an automated computer system. This is concerning because taxpayer records are highly secure, and misuse can result in a felony conviction. Previously, agencies needed to justify requests for specific taxpayer records related to a crime. This new system would allow access to millions of records without justification, including those of documented citizens. The rationale is to find undocumented immigrants, but this could penalize those who pay taxes in good faith. The first IRS general counsel quit due to legal and ethical concerns, and his replacement was forced out for refusing to grant access to 7,000,000 records without proper justification. There are fears that a more pliable replacement will risk taxpayer data. Given past government database hacks, aggregating this data creates a target for foreign adversaries. This policy is viewed as dangerous, an abuse of taxpayer records, and a step towards authoritarianism.

There's support for clearing government waste on both sides of the aisle, but also concern about the access Musk and Doge staffers have to sensitive data, especially given Musk's investments with China and billions from the government. When PayPal was owned by Elon Musk, there were no security breaches. The IRS is a nightmare, with folks not back to work years after COVID. As a Congressman, it takes me up to six months to get a response regarding constituent concerns. The IRS has hundreds of groups with access to sensitive data. People are only complaining now that Elon Musk is involved. The only reason to ask questions is if you're doing something crooked. Congressmen will have red faces when this paper trail leads back to them. People are pitching a fit because Musk is making needed changes.

There's massive fraud in this country, including foreign nationals using fake social security numbers and identities to steal billions in taxpayer benefits. By clamping down on this fraud in our tax and entitlement systems, we could save over a trillion dollars. Doge are subordinate staffers of the federal government and political appointees that serve and answer to the president. They will analyze and assess for signs and symptoms of fraud and how IT systems are failing to detect it. We need to protect the integrity of these systems that Americans rely on. We are restoring neutrality, ethics, and accountability to the IRS to identify large-scale fraud, unfair politicization, and unfair targeting. We want to ensure confidence in the IRS and that no dollars are being stolen from the American people.

"We got them. We finally got them. We caught the IRS red handed." "They're frauds, fabricated, phantom tax returns the IRS claims that you filed but can't produce because they never existed." "Here's the crime. An IRS agent falsified the records." "A supervisor covered it up." "The DOJ marched into court and used those fake records against Americans and then admitted under oath they have no signed returns to back it up." "That's not sloppy paperwork. That's a RICO fraud, a criminal enterprise operating under color of law." "And it doesn't stop there. Judges look the other way." "Multilayered fraud, IRS, DOJ, and the judicial system." "It's time to shut down this rogue agency once and for all." "Chew on this, America."

If Doge targets USAID today, they might go after other agencies tomorrow, like the postal service or the IRS. There's a disconnect in our reactions; Chuck Schumer suggests that if they audit USAID, they could also audit the IRS or postal service. The IRS audits individuals, and there's a fear that your money could be used against them. Has anyone else noticed this?

I want to assure every tax payer that the IRS will not be sifting through records randomly. We are performing a basic anti-fraud review to prevent large scale theft of taxpayer benefits. We pay billions in child tax credits to illegal aliens, so we are implementing systematic reforms. The IRS has been weaponized against Americans for years, engaging in politically based audits and leaking taxpayer information. We are restoring neutrality, ethics, and security controls. One of our major projects involves upgrading IT systems to protect taxpayer information from theft by criminals or foreign governments.

The IRS is allegedly using AI to access Americans' bank accounts without warrants or claims of criminal activity. This was reportedly discovered by an undercover journalist who found the IRS claims access to everyone's bank accounts. The IRS is also allegedly working with the Department of Justice and targeting ordinary citizens to ensure tax compliance. Jim Jordan and Speaker 0 sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about their AI usage and civil rights protections. Speaker 0 claims the current administration has been lawless in its surveillance, targeting members of Congress, local officials, protesters, and voters, and weaponizing the government. Speaker 0 suggests a new administration is needed to protect constitutional rights.

"AI has access to, like, everybody's bank account?" "Yes." "I doubt it." "They are assholes. Really? They are the definition of an asshole." "The Department of Justice and inspector general." "it's actually the Department of Justice who is currently, quote, controlling the AI used by the IRS." "There's also the Bank Secrecy Act, which examines transactions to detect money laundering and tax evasion." "That draft memo states, quote, to improve accountability for AI issues, agencies must designate a chief AI officer." "The Biden White House issued an executive order, which included some federal limits on the use of artificial intelligence." "Alex Mayna, who works in criminal investigations at the IRS, says that they're currently targeting the National Football League." "So last week, Ladar decided to go after the owners of the NFL teams." "All of them." "Because they they are, like, billionaires, and, like, they pay, like, very little taxes."

The Congresswoman states that the IRS has been using AI to access Americans’ bank accounts without a search warrant or any specific crime claim. An undercover journalist discovered that the IRS claims access to every person’s bank account, and that they have been working with the Department of Justice and that they have no problem targeting the “little guy” to ensure tax payments. She describes this as a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment and, with Jim Jordan, sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about how they are using AI and how they are protecting citizens’ civil rights. She then asks, what is the end game here? Acknowledging that the AI tools are hard to contain, she asks how American citizens and constitutional rights can be protected. In response, she argues that a new administration in November is needed because the current administration has been “absolutely lawless” in its surveillance of Americans, including members of Congress, local officials, protesters, and voters, and has weaponized the government against them. She says this administration has completely ignored the Bill of Rights, referencing the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, and states that one of the things we...

They've seized financial systems at the Treasury, gaining access to Americans' financial records, members of Congress, prosecutors, and regulators. Courts have repeatedly stated that they're violating the Constitution and laws. That's what deserves attention, not administrative state discussions. All you've done is complain about the process. Isn't the goal to improve the lives of Americans? It seems you're focused on process and think that improvements do not matter. If the goal is to improve lives, the focus shouldn't be on taking down individuals. The focus should be on how to make the American people better off.

The FBI's actions against President Trump and other American citizens demand accountability. Where are the Republican senators demanding justice? I experienced this firsthand when FBI agents served a subpoena at my home. This is retaliatory abuse and intimidation by the Biden administration, using the FBI. The raid on President Trump's home was based on trumped-up document retention issues. This is unacceptable. We must stand for freedom, against the extremist left, and for the Constitution and the liberty it represents.