reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I remember you from New York. You told me to go back where I came from. Who did you come here with? Did you get paid by the Democrats? Go home, you're a loser. I'm going to the strip club, everything's on me. Let's party.

Speaker 0 discusses the House of Representatives’ vote on defunding the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). He asserts that this measure is not neutral or benevolent but a leftist enterprise, and that while leftists can contribute to it, hardworking Americans shouldn’t be forced to fund causes they find repugnant. He notes that 81 Republican members joined all Democrats to keep funding the enterprise from federal dollars. He emphasizes that while legitimate disagreements exist within the Republican Party, this should not be one of them. He argues that Republicans campaign on the precepts that the US government is too big and expensive and that money should not be taken from Americans to support left-leaning initiatives that undermine the party’s stated goals. He urges listeners to find out how their representative voted and to raise the issue with them. The speaker predicts that some Republicans will blame the outcome on the Senate filibuster, though he contends the Senate filibuster rule should not dictate House outcomes. He warns against what he calls an exaggerated view that nothing could pass the Senate without including that funding, and critiques the idea of relying on the filibuster. He advocates ending the “zombie filibuster,” arguing that filibusters should require debate instead of being conducted silently or while asleep. He calls for enforcing the existing rules of the Senate to require a speaking filibuster and then turning to issues he says Republicans were elected to address. These include reducing federal wasteful spending, ending funding for the National Endowment for Democracy, and passing the SAFE Act, which he claims would ensure that “80% of all Americans” agree with taking steps to stop noncitizens from voting in US elections. In closing, he urges Republicans who were elected under the Republican banner to stay true to their party and avoid switching to another, humorously concluding with “Don’t get on a donkey.” The overall message urges a principled commitment to Republican aims, opposition to funding perceived as left-leaning, and procedural changes to the filibuster to enable legislative action on his preferred agenda.

Come on, guys, let's go. I see some stragglers in the back. I know you want to join us personally.

Stop! This has gone too far. I have a duty to be in this room, representing 200,000 people from Northwest Georgia who elected me to be here today.

Have you said thank you at all during this entire meeting today? You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Can you offer some appreciation for the United States of America and the president who is trying to save your country?

I will shut down the government if we don't get what we want for border security. I am proud to take the responsibility for shutting it down because we need to prevent criminals, drug problems, and illegal immigration. I won't blame you for the previous shutdown, but this time it's about border security. Thank you.

I'm so happy to welcome America's Governors to the White House. You're all amazing people, even some of you Democrats. We've actually worked very well together. I can only think of one or two instances where it didn't work out so well, but that's pretty normal. I want to welcome you and let you know that I'm here for you. Anything I can do to help, I'm available. We can accomplish a lot working together.

I am declaring war on the Republican party. If you're a Republican on TikTok and engage with me, you deserve severe consequences. If you confront me in person, it could be fatal for you. This is a serious declaration; you are no longer considered American. You've crossed a line, and now it's time for retribution. Enjoy your day.

I'm speaking to Republicans who love our country and are privately offended by Donald Trump's actions. It only takes three of you to stand up and ensure these last twenty-two days are an anomaly, not the beginning of the end. For those democracy-curious Republicans who acknowledge this has gone too far but fear the threats, remember the words of Thomas Paine: "These are the times that try men's souls." Those who stand by their country now deserve our love and thanks. Tyranny is not easily conquered, but the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly. To my Republican colleagues, America needs you.

Republicans just passed a bill that eliminates taxes on tips, overtime, and Social Security. Yet, Democrats voted against it. The same Democrats who opposed giving you back $5,000 of your own money are now blocking this tax relief. And despite this, you're mad at me? You're still going to vote for them after they do things like this. You're really mad at me?

I used to be a Democrat, but after meeting this man, I won't vote for a Democrat again.

Republicans must make a decision on the strongest border bill ever, as doing nothing is not an option. The former president opposes the bill because he wants to use the border problem as a political issue against me. It is widely acknowledged that the American people want a solution that ends the ineffective political rhetoric.

Democrats were addressed with the question, "Democrats, can you hear us?" followed by the statement, "This is your first warning. Now you can supply a little bit of a correction."

To my colleagues on the other side, if you reject immigrants, don't pretend to welcome them. I've drafted a bill for you, which removes the Statue of Liberty, symbolizing your intention to dismantle America's fabric. I challenge any Republican who voted for HR 2 to introduce this bill.

Sometimes you have to confront the presidential nominee of your party and speak your mind directly to them.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they expect Democrats to support them. Speaker 1 responds that they personally do not. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 needs the Democrats' help to stay in a leadership position. Speaker 1 answers no, stating that if five Republicans side with the Democrats, they will be out. Speaker 1 acknowledges that this situation is complex.

Republicans need to be very concerned. If you continue to disregard the American people who supported you, and if you make things difficult for Trump, you will face consequences. We demand change and are tired of the usual Washington politics. If you don't listen, we will ensure you are voted out in 2022 and 2026. This is a promise from the American people and supporters like Elon Musk.

I released all the senators who couldn't confront the president's actions from their responsibility. This is an opportunity for them to do better.

The speaker mentioned the goal of getting Republicans elected. However, the gentleman was not recognized and members were reminded not to engage in personal attacks against each other.

The speaker presents a conditional scenario directed at the president: if the president said today that he would be happy to meet with the Democrats if they stop holding the government hostage, then Democrats could walk in tonight, pass the continuing resolution (CR), and provide seven weeks. The speaker believes the president could then bring everyone together, and that the Democrats would likely negotiate on a number of issues and reach an agreement. The speaker emphasizes that the president does not want to negotiate under duress. This point is tied to a claim about Democratic sentiment: anonymously, a Democrat senator told the speaker that none of them want to vote to open the government because, in their words, “we’d face the guillotine.” The speaker notes that these words came “from our base,” suggesting this is the view of the president’s political allies or supporters. In summarizing the exchange, the speaker asserts that this line of reasoning reflects a critical dynamic in the current standoff: the possibility that a straightforward, pressure-free offer from the president to engage with Democrats could break the deadlock and lead to a constructive dialogue on policy issues. The implication is that the threat or perception of political duress is a barrier to reaching a resolution, and that a different approach—one that signals openness to negotiation without coercion—might unlock bipartisan progress. The transcript includes the assertion that if the president were to publicly welcome negotiations under a non-duress framework, there would be movement toward a compromise on multiple issues, facilitated by a temporary timeline (seven weeks) and a renewed, inclusive negotiation process. The speaker underscores the idea that such an approach could shift dynamics away from fear of political punishment within the base toward substantive agreement. Towards the end, the speaker remarks, “Look. Think you just made a very important,” indicating that the argument is intended to highlight a potentially pivotal point about how the administration’s stance could influence willingness to engage and resolve the government funding impasse. The transcript ends with this incomplete thought, leaving the broader implications implied but not fully explicit.

Who are the 17%? I've been to Washington 17 times. I spoke to him 17 minutes ago. There were 17 Republicans plus me. Planning it for 17 years?

The speaker proposes bringing someone up for a couple of minutes. The speaker states that the world will see a vibrant Republican.

I made a mistake in calling Mr. Parnas a Republican witness, he is actually your witness. I was a Republican for Trump. The committee is in recess due to votes, we will reconvene in 10 minutes.

If the next Republican president doesn't make big changes, there may never be another chance. If you're worried about your job or social standing, it's understandable. But if you're not willing to help with the changes, please stay out of it.

When I'm president, I'll send reinforcements to Texas instead of a restraining order.