reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I am an American citizen with the right to bear arms. I will carry my gun as I please, without needing a permit. I will disregard any law that violates my rights, even if it means going to prison. It is the duty of every American citizen to carry a gun everywhere they go. If you are not carrying a gun or have one within reach, you are wrong.

I'm willing to collaborate with anyone serious about censoring Americans and pushing a progressive agenda, but the problem is they're just not serious enough. Try to violate our First Amendment rights, and we'll respond by exercising our Second Amendment rights.

"These kids, did extraordinary things, but they never should have been put in that position in the first place." "This was a madman." "He was an all purpose hater, by the way." "Hated groups left, right, you name it." "There's no way to pin an ideology on this, and I think people should remember this as the facts come out, about this manifesto." "But what I learned from this once again is that guns and we're a proud hunting state." "There's a lot of law abiding gun owners in Minnesota, but there's gotta be more we can"

The First Amendment exists because in other countries, people were imprisoned or killed for speaking their minds. The Second Amendment is there to protect the First Amendment. If the government disarms the people, they can do anything they want. In Venezuela, Chavez took away everyone's guns, then Maduro lost an election but stayed in power. People protested, but they were facing soldiers with assault rifles. Maduro is still in power because the people were disarmed. This is the kind of risk we face.

"Out the crime statistics? Not not exactly like I need you need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events so that they look to their leadership to turn down the temperature." "The issue is right now, they don't feel like there's any fear." "It's like memes. It's just memes to everybody, I guess." "I'm playing video games. Okay? I'm done today. I don't give a fuck." "God, I'm it's gonna be so fucking gay if I get killed in the next fucking two months of shit I'm doing." "Well, the cuck shit out here, please don't anybody make any actual fucking the most cucked weak ass fucking bullshit ass speeches on my side." "God, if it happens, holy shit. I'm gonna make a death note before I go out to go live and not god, it's so cucked. It's so optics cucked."

I don't agree with the idea of changing gun culture through gun control. It's unrealistic. We need to focus on making potential threats worry about our actions instead. Outlawing everything isn't the solution. We should have controls to prevent the wrong people from getting guns. It's about defending ourselves, not taking away rights. Good luck. Translation: The speaker disagrees with using gun control to change gun culture and believes focusing on making potential threats worry about our actions is more effective. They argue against outlawing everything and emphasize the importance of controls to prevent the wrong people from accessing guns for self-defense.

Kyle introduces himself: "My name is Kyle. I'm Antifa, and there's so much rage in me that I've had to record this, like, 15 times trying to get the message out." He says, "They fucked up. K? Go watch my other videos." He asserts that if listeners are not caught up, they’ve missed the fight, but if they are, it's time to "suit up. Boots on the ground. Nicollet and fucking 26th." He specifies, "My house is four blocks away. Anywhere between Franklin and Nicollet and 26th and Nicollet, show up ready to go." He states he is not talking about peaceful protests anymore and not having polite conversations anymore; he is talking specifically to his followers and asserts, "This is everything I have fucking talked about, and this is exactly what I said was gonna happen. This is exactly what I said was gonna fucking come when we didn't fucking go and march on fucking Whipple with guns." He proclaims, "Sorry, but welcome to America 2026 where second amendment is the only thing that's gonna keep you fucking protected from literal fucking Nazi gunmen that are killing innocent people in the street with impunity." He emphasizes, "This is not a fucking joke." He concludes with a call to action: "There's nothing fun to chant about it. Get your fucking guns and stop these fucking people."

I will not take away anyone's guns, as I believe in the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court has settled the argument on gun rights, with Antonin Scalia's decision providing an expansive interpretation. However, I understand the heartbreak caused by gun violence, as two members of my family were killed. As president, I will work to reduce gun violence, but I don't think taking away guns is the right solution at this time. It would only polarize the country and be seen as an attack on the Constitution. Instead, I want to focus on stopping school shootings and protecting our children, even if it means implementing measures similar to those used for airline security.

At the core of the left, at the core of a liberal, is someone that would use the sword if they had it. They are very violent people at their core. They always have it. They can't debate. They can't have conversation. So they'll resort to these tactics. They're gonna do everything they possibly can to try to murder this movement because they can't beat us. So they're gonna try to take weapons. And now we're very aware of that. I'm aware of it. We have to have full time security. This is not a joke. This is who these people are.

The transcript shows a volatile exchange centered on immigration and constitutional rights. Speaker 0 repeatedly asks how many constitutional rights the other participants are willing to give up to “get these people out,” framing the issue as a test of loyalty to the country. He emphasizes a confrontational stance against immigrants and their supporters, pressing for an explicit, finite number of rights to sacrifice. Speaker 1 responds with extreme, inflammatory rhetoric. He declares, “As many constitutional rights as it takes to keep the race in the country alive is how many I’m willing to walk on,” and identifies as a “national socialist authoritarian,” asserting a willingness to sacrifice rights to preserve a “race in the country.” He attacks the idea of protecting the Constitution, stating, “my constitution, my democracy, my fucking… inalienable fucking constitutional car driven rights,” and contrasts that with what he sees as the real priority of protecting the country and race. He references “the force doctrine” and asserts that “your rights are whatever the fucking force doctrine says you’re allowed to do.” He also claims that the United States acts as “the force doctrine of the entire world.” During the exchange, Speaker 0 derides Speaker 1 as “white racist fuck” and “unamerican,” while Speaker 1 escalates, declaring that he does not care about the constitution if it endangers the country or race. He asserts, “What I care about is our country,” and later says, “Willing to let this country burn and your entire race burn if it meant that you didn’t violate the constitution? I don’t give a fuck about that.” He proclaims, “If I need to throw away the first amendment, the second amendment, the third, the fourth, the fifth, sixth, and all of them in order to make sure that The US and its people stays alive,” questioning how that could be acceptable. The dialogue includes explicit harassment and slurs, including “chill faggot,” and culminates in a moment where Speaker 0 calls for clipping the exchange, expressing it as “fucking gold.” The participants debate whether constitutional protections should yield to perceived national or racial imperatives, with both sides railing against the other’s stance and repeatedly foregrounding the primacy of protecting the country over preserving constitutional rights, according to their respective positions.

" And all they should be hoping to do is have someone to sit with at lunch or someone to play with on the playground, and they should be waiting to hear an update when they get home." "Having your child killed while they are sitting in a pew for a morning prayer service is not what any parent should have to worry about." "There is a shooting, then come the thoughts and prayers, and then comes the attempt to shift the focus." "We have seen this play out over and to over again." "We live in a country with more guns than people, where there are not universal background checks." "There are not bans on assault weapons, and it is far too easy to buy a gun." "It's the guns, everyone. It's not really a secret."

The speaker believes the focus should be on mental health, not guns, stating that most gun owners are good people. They argue that the issue is a mental health problem disguised as a gun problem. They believe people should be able to defend their homes and property, and that disarming law-abiding citizens won't make the world better, especially considering the vast number of guns in circulation. The speaker questions the logic of giving up guns, stating a desire to stay alive and be capable of defending themselves against bad people. They want to be the one making the decision in a confrontation and to be trained in firearms.

"A human being with a soul, a free man, has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express his views." "that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it's okay to shoot people you disagree with, to kill Nazis for saying things they don't like." "Well, there's free speech which of course we all acknowledge is important so so important." "But then there's this thing called hate speech." "Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate, but they don't define it that way." "They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence." "And we punish violence, don't we? Of course, we do."

The speaker states that many rights could be gone, including those related to unreasonable search and seizure, the 5th amendment, and the 6th amendment right to an attorney. The speaker mentions the first amendment and the second amendment, stating they are in favor of the second amendment and do not believe anyone's guns should be taken away. The speaker claims someone wants to terminate the Constitution of the United States.

"First of all, you know, I'd heard different things about his ideology." "He wasn't a registered democrat or republican." "He may have been a groyker, which is a follower of Nick Fuentes, who's on the right." "But I'll say this, it shouldn't matter." "This has happened to democrats." "This has happened to republicans." "The shooters were on both sides of the extreme." "And so what should matter is that we should all come together to, one, tone down the rhetoric, and two, keep our events safe, and and three, make sure that this doesn't happen again." "And so playing the blame game is not toning down the rhetoric." "Playing the blame game only makes the rhetoric and the problem worse."

I have experience with firearms from hunting, military service, and trap shooting. Responsible gun ownership should not be defined by extremists. This is about protecting our children and communities, not the second amendment.

I was created in the image of god, and I want to talk about Gavin Newsom's 11% tax on guns and ammo in California. It's a violation of our rights. The law says we can have guns in our trucks, but only if they're in a case. Gavin Newsom is a traitor, and our government is allowing chemical warfare from China and aiding Mexican drug cartels. They're killing Americans and the border patrol does nothing. There's also a lot of child trafficking happening. Governor Greg Abbott, shame on you. We believe in law and order and self-defense.

I'm Lily Tang Williams, a Chinese immigrant who survived communism. Can you guarantee our government won't become tyrannical? If not, the gun control debate is over because I won't give up my guns. Visit China to see how gun control works for the CCP dictatorship.

"the person who shot and killed right wing political commentator Charlie Kirk was like the majority of shooters in America, a young white male from a conservative pro gun religious background." "After being told for two straight days that the left had declared war on America, that the shooter was most likely trans, or in congresswoman Nancy Mace's words, pro tranny." "We still don't know the motivation for the killing, but we will find out more in the coming days." "We have a gun problem in America." "the two children who were shot in school the same day Kirk died were shot by a 16 year old who had been radicalized online by white supremacist groups and had easy access to a handgun." "The day Charlie Kirk died, the Republicans in the Senate voted not to release the Epstein files, something Kirk himself had called for them to do."

The only obstacle to the new world order is the right of Americans to bear arms. Efforts to take away guns are driven by the intent of the Second Amendment, which was not for hunting or protection against burglars. Our forefathers established this amendment so that as long as every American owned a weapon, the government could never oppress us. Bills to take away weapons are constantly introduced in Congress, but they are often defeated. The truth is, in a town where everyone owns a weapon, crime is almost non-existent.

The speaker believes there have been attacks on the Constitution, particularly the First Amendment, with Democrats claiming it enables disinformation. The speaker argues the First Amendment exists because the founders came from countries where free speech was punished. The speaker asserts the Second Amendment is there to stop tyranny and protect freedom of speech. They have debated this, especially with people in LA who want to take away guns. The speaker asks if anyone can guarantee the U.S. will never have a tyrannical government, and since no one can, people need to keep their guns to prevent it.

My name is Mark Robinson. I stand for law-abiding citizens' rights to bear arms. Blaming us for shootings won't solve the problem. Criminals won't give up their guns, leaving us defenseless. I will fight for our constitutional rights at city council. The Second Amendment applies to all, and we demand to keep our rights. Let's unite and dispel myths dividing us. We are the majority, and we will stand our ground.

I have a shotgun and a 20 gauge for hunting, but I'm not taking away anyone's guns. The viral video claiming otherwise is a lie. I did not say I would take your AR.

I hope when this is all over, you remember who fired first. You've tried to kill the president twice, and now you've assassinated man for talking. You don't really wanna do this. K? 400,000,000 plus firearms in this country, and they don't belong to the left, bro. Yeah. If you think it's okay to murder someone because of their opinion, you get what's coming to you. You and yours.

Speaker asserts: "Having an armed citizenry comes with a price" and that is "part of liberty." He uses "Fifty thousand, fifty thousand, fifty thousand people die on the road every year" to compare gun rights to driving's costs. He states, "You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death." He adds, "I think it's worth it" to protect "the Second Amendment" and "God given rights." He calls for "an honest and clear reductionist view" of gun violence, not a utopian one, and claims reductions come "through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools." He cites armed guards at baseball games, airports, and banks, and notes, "There's not a lot of mass shootings at gun shows. There's all these guns because everyone's armed."