TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Here are 22 cabinet and cabinet-level appointments for your signature. Next, there are 47 subcabinet-level appointments and 31 acting designations to help take control of the government. Additionally, we have 15 commission chairmen and acting chairmen. Lastly, there’s a proclamation order stating that flags shall be flown at full mast on all future inauguration days, including this one. It’s a beautiful setting, with pleasant weather and great sound quality. Thank you.

It's an honor to have President Zelenskyy of Ukraine here. We've had a long and productive relationship, and we've reached a very fair deal that benefits both our countries and the world. This deal involves rare earth minerals, and it represents a significant commitment from the United States. We've also had good discussions with Russia, including a conversation with President Putin, to try and bring the conflict in Ukraine to a close. We need to negotiate a deal to stop the loss of life and redirect resources to rebuilding. The previous administration wasn't even speaking to Russia, but we've initiated talks and see the confines of a deal. If I were president, this war would have never happened. Your soldiers have been incredibly brave, and now we want to bring this to an end. We'll be signing the agreement shortly, and we're hopeful that we're close to a deal.

We've had very tough fighting with great fighters, and we are proud of them. But now we want to get it over with; it's enough. It's an honor to have you here, thank you for coming. We're going to sign an agreement at the conference in the East Room a little after lunch, and we'll be having lunch together. We are also discussing other things, and we appreciate everybody being here. It's a somewhat exciting moment.

It's an honor to have President Zelenskyy of Ukraine here. We've been working closely together for a long time, and we've negotiated a fair deal that will benefit both our countries and the world. I've also had good discussions with President Putin, and we're trying to bring the conflict in Ukraine to a close. Too many soldiers are dying, and we want to see the money used for rebuilding instead. The previous administration didn't engage with Russia, but I believe if I were president, this war would have never happened. We're providing great equipment to Ukraine, and their soldiers have been incredibly brave. We're going to sign an agreement soon, and I think we're close to a deal to stop the shooting. It's an exciting moment, and I appreciate everyone being here.

Speaker 0 congratulates on that treaty and says, "That's gonna take place today at 03:00 in the Oval Office. We're gonna have a signing with Rwanda and The Congo." Speaker 1 notes that Rwanda and Congo "were going at it for many years and with machetes. It is one of the worst one of the worst wars that anyone's ever seen," and adds, "I just happened to have somebody that was able to get it settled. I mean, just a brilliant person who is very comfortable in that part of the world." He asks, "Are you uncomfortable there?" and replies, "No." He adds, "That's the part of the world that I know. Very comfortable." He says they "were able to get them together and sell it" and that "not only that, we're getting for The United States, a lot of the mineral rights from The Congo as part of it." They are "honored to be here" and "they never thought they'd be coming to the White House," and "they're so honored." "That's at 03:00, I believe."

Good morning, everyone. It's great to see you all. I'm excited to be here. We appreciate you being here. It's not our first meeting, and I'm very proud that Ukraine has such great strategic friends like the United States. We are thankful for this support. We're here today as a show of support, and we have committee chairs and the president with us.

The Alaska Summit reinforced my belief that while difficult pieces within reach, I believe that in a very significant step, President Putin agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine, and this is one of the key points that we need to consider. We're going to be considering that at the table, also, like who will do what, essentially. I'm optimistic that collectively we can reach an agreement.

Donald J. Trump is now the 45th president of the United States. This moment is unprecedented and filled with emotion. We acknowledge the challenges ahead, but we are committed to overcoming them. Despite the difficulties, we will work together to achieve our goals and bring about positive change. This gathering signifies a moment of unity and resilience, even in the face of uncertainty.

Donald J. Trump is now the president of the United States. It is a great honor to introduce him for the first time.

Unyielding pursuit of America first agenda. Let's make America great again. Welcome our hometown hero, President Donald John Trump, the 45th, 46th, and 47th president of the United States.

President Trump, send your message to persecuted Christian Armenians. Mister president Trump, you have message for persecuted Christian Armenians, sir? Thank you very much.

Speaker 0, acting as G7 chair, states they will exercise their role as chair because they have a few more minutes with the president and his team. Speaker 0 indicates they must then start the meeting to address some big issues.

Good morning, everyone. It's great to see you all. We appreciate you being here. We know each other well, and this isn't our first meeting. I am very proud that Ukraine has such strategic friends like the United States. We are very thankful for your support. We have committee chairs and the president present today.

Welcome to the 45th, 46th, and 47th presidents of the United States, President Donald J.

Having a president who values diplomacy and alliances is crucial. Today is truly remarkable because of the significance of these alliances.

Today marks a historic moment in the Middle East as nations come together to forge a new path. These agreements signify a shift towards comprehensive peace, defying past conflicts and divisions. The world witnesses a choice for cooperation, friendship, prosperity, and hope over conflict and despair. Arabs, Israelis, Muslims, Jews, and Christians can now envision a future of unity, harmony, and peace, living, praying, and dreaming together. Congratulations to the people of Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and the kingdom of Bahrain. This day holds immense significance for the entire world.

Speaker 0 delivers an introduction: 'Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the next president of The United States, president Donald, Jay Trump.' The wording frames Trump as the 'next president of The United States' and uses the honorific 'president' before his name. The name appears as 'Donald, Jay Trump' with a comma between the forename and middle name, which is presented within quotation marks. The moment signals a formal, ceremonial introduction at a political event. There is no discussion of policies or context beyond the introduction. The fragment stands as a single line from Speaker 0, indicating a transition in a crowd setting.

Speaker 0 presented a letter to the president, stating it was sent to the Nobel Prize Committee. The letter nominates the president for the Peace Prize, which Speaker 0 believes is well deserved. The president thanked Speaker 0, expressing that the nomination was very meaningful, especially coming from Speaker 0.

Speaker 0: President Trump, sir, how confident are you there could be lasting peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan? Very confident. And does the deal today protect Christian?

We have very tough fighters, and we're proud of them, but now we want to bring this to an end because enough is enough. I appreciate you being here. Thank you for coming. We will sign an agreement at the conference in the East Room shortly after lunch, which we will have together. We're also in discussions about other things, and we appreciate everyone's presence. This is a somewhat exciting moment.

Donald J. Trump is now the president of the United States. It is a great honor to introduce him for the first time ever.

The press conference ends and the leaders leave. Please remain seated.

Glenn: Welcome back. We’re joined again by Seyyed Mohamed Marandi, a professor at Tehran University and a former adviser to Iran’s nuclear negotiation team. There’s talk in the US of seizing Kharg Island, which would handle 80–90% of Iran’s oil shipments, effectively a nuclear option to shut down Iran’s economy. What would be Iran’s likely response if the US pursued this path? Marandi: It would be a major problem to access the island because the US would have to fly over Arab regimes in the Persian Gulf. Iran would retaliate if Iranian territory were occupied, taking the war toward a major escalation. The regimes hosting the island would have to pay a heavy price, far greater than now. For the United States, the island is well protected, with Iranian assets on the shore supporting the islanders, and it’s farther from the US Navy and closer to Iran’s shore. But more importantly, such an aggression would be futile: it would not change the Persian Gulf trade through Hormuz, which Iran has effectively controlled by requiring permission to pass. An invasion or occupation would lead to fierce combat and punishment of the regimes that enabled it—Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar—desert-based states with oil and gas but little water. If the US succeeds in taking the island, Iran’s retaliation would involve destroying assets of the cooperating countries. Long-term, Hormuz could be effectively closed, with upstream infrastructure damaged and no oil or gas able to move, making a later reopening contingent on a peace agreement. The operation would be logistically, militarily, and economically disastrous for global markets. Glenn: There are reports Iran is mining Hormuz. Do you know anything about that operation? Marandi: Iran hasn’t mined Hormuz, the Persian Gulf, or the Indian Ocean. The Iranian navy capable of wartime actions is largely in underground tunnels and includes speedboats, surface-to-sea missiles, and a network of underground bases. Iran has not moved to mine the Gulf. It does not want escalation. Iran has always negotiated; US claims that Iran wanted nuclear weapons at the negotiating table are rejected by Iran, the fatwa, and IAEA history. If negotiations had failed, the US invasion would be unjustified. Doha and Qatar are prepared to restart gas facilities and allow oil to flow if peace returns. If the US escalates to destroy key infrastructure, Iran will retaliate, and Iran can hurt US assets and its proxies more than the US can hurt Iran, with long-term global energy consequences. Iran has been striking bases in the region and says it is prepared to continue until after the midterm elections. Glenn: The US energy secretary says the US Navy is studying options to escort tankers through Hormuz. What are the main challenges? Marandi: It would be virtually impossible. Iran’s navy is largely underground, with mines, surface-to-sea missiles, and drones capable of targeting Hormuz from Iran. If open war begins, Iran would retaliate against regimes hosting US bases. Even if Hormuz were opened temporarily, without oil, gas, tankers, or production, there would be no purpose, and energy prices would spike permanently. The US would likely be forced to accept Iran’s terms for peace to allow oil to flow. Glenn: Trump has spoken of further destruction if needed, but says he’s run out of targets. What do you expect from the American side? Marandi: The US is already targeting nonmilitary sites and civilian targets in Iran. They slaughter civilians, including families and children, with premeditation. They could intensify attacks on oil, gas, electricity infrastructure, which would invite Iran to retaliate. Iran’s society is united, with people on the streets despite the bombardments. If the US destroys infrastructure, Iran would respond, but Iran does not want escalation; it would be catastrophic for the global economy. The media in the West is controlled, and there is little outrage at threats to destroy Iran. Glenn: Israeli and American aims now—what’s at stake, and how end this? Marandi: Since the Gaza genocide and Lebanon escalation, Zionism is increasingly viewed as evil, and public opinion against Zionism is growing in the US. The destruction of Israel’s credibility is the greatest defeat, not battlefield losses. End this war now would be prudent; as Iran strikes back, global sympathy for Iran grows and the empire weakens. If Israel were to use a nuclear weapon, that would be catastrophic and could prompt broader proliferation. Glenn: Any chance Iran could retaliate against Britain or European states? Marandi: Europe and the US will have diminished presence in the region; bases would be forced to leave. He notes the possibility of false-flag attacks in the West and asserts Zionist manipulation as a risk, but emphasizes Iran’s determination to defend sovereignty and support for Palestinians and others. Glenn: Just a final note—Iran had three negotiations, not two, including the JCPOA. Thank you for joining. Marandi: Thank you.

Senate leaders, the Speaker of the House, and the Secretary of State were introduced, followed by the Vice President and the President. The Prime Minister of Israel spoke about the strong alliance between Israel and the US, emphasizing bipartisan support. The importance of standing with Israel for American security was highlighted. The audience was urged to support both countries. The speech ended with blessings for Israel and the US. Thank you. Translation (if needed): Senate leaders, the Speaker of the House, and the Secretary of State were introduced, followed by the Vice President and the President. The Prime Minister of Israel spoke about the strong alliance between Israel and the US, emphasizing bipartisan support. The importance of standing with Israel for American security was highlighted. The audience was urged to support both countries. The speech ended with blessings for Israel and the US. Thank you.