reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"The amount of energy required to melt the girders, the steel in the tower, cannot be gotten to a melt point with the fuel that was in the airplane." "Not possible." "So any melting did not occur as a result of the hit from the airplane." "What are the puffs of smoke coming from? Well, they claim they're from the collapsing floors." "No, no, no. Those puffs of smoke are controlled demolitions." "That's exactly what they are, because that's exactly how they work." "The collapse of the building was caused by controlled demolition." "Building 7, the owner. He is heard on the video. Okay? And he says, pull it. It's pull it." "And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse." "And that's when the LINK-seven blew up."

The speaker observed the Pentagon after the 9/11 attack while firefighters were still working. According to the speaker, the fire was still burning in some parts of the Pentagon. The speaker saw a large hole in the side of the building. However, the speaker claims that, upon close inspection, there was no evidence of a plane crash anywhere near the Pentagon, only the damaged side of the building. The speaker states that the only remaining pieces were small enough to pick up by hand, with no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage visible.

The speakers claim there were no planes on 9/11. One speaker says that people believe what they saw on TV, but there was no airplane at the Pentagon or World Trade Center. A credible witness stated the planes were remotely controlled. Another speaker says that remote controlling an airplane the size of a 767 is very difficult, and there was no wreckage from any airplane at the World Trade Center. Flights 11 and 77 didn't exist, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Flight 93 was allegedly spotted years later at O'Hare Airport. The crash site in Shanksville had no wreckage. Cell phone calls from the airliners would have been impossible due to technological limitations at the time. Pilots in a simulator couldn't hit the buildings at high speeds. An airplane can't fly above its maximum operating speed, and a hijacker wouldn't be able to fly with the "clacker" activated. At high speeds, the slightest pressure on the yoke will produce large changes in aircraft direction or structural failure. One speaker claims the planes passed through the buildings at uniform motion.

I turned on my computer and suddenly there was an explosion. I thought it was a bomb. Debris covered me and my son was thrown out of his stroller. Some floors collapsed and people were trapped. When I left the Pentagon, I didn't see any airplane parts or evidence of a plane crash. There was no jet fuel on me, my son, or the people I helped. Others in the area also didn't see any plane parts or luggage. I believe there is something more sinister going on. Fabricating an official story when the evidence proves it false is unjust.

The documentary presents a sweeping narrative that the modern era’s wars and security state are driven by deliberate, government-sponsored manipulation—false flag operations and orchestrated crises designed to terrify populations, justify expanded power, and secure global hegemony. It threads together historical examples, contemporary incidents, and testimonies to argue that the public has been misled by official narratives and that truth is being hidden behind “specters of fear.” False flag origins and early precedents - The program defines false flag operations as covert actions designed to appear as if carried out by other actors, with a long focus on the use of terror as a pretext for political ends. - Adolf Hitler’s regime is cited as a classic example: Reichstag fire in 1933, with a patsy framed for the blaze, enabling new laws that consolidated power. The film emphasizes the crisis as a vehicle to drift toward dictatorship and aggression. - The 1953 Iran coup is described as a CIA-MI6 operation (Operation Ajax) that overthrew Mohammad Mossaddegh after his nationalization of oil, with Western intelligence allegedly admitting to terror attacks and propaganda against Mossaddegh. The narrative stresses the role of MI6 and the CIA in orchestrating fear and regime change, and the long-term consequences of SAVAK and imperial influence. - Operation Gladio is presented as an umbrella for Western intelligence-led bombings in Europe (Italy, NATO states) designed to be blamed on leftists; Bologna’s 1980 bombing is highlighted as an instance where officials later spoke of Gladio’s civilian targeting. - The Gulf of Tonkin incident is recounted as a staged pretext to escalate U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia, with declassified accounts and tapes cited to show manipulated intelligence and the subsequent Tonkin Resolution enabling mass casualties. Cold War and postwar covert operations - The film cites Northwoods, a proposed plan to hijack aircraft and blame others to justify war with Cuba; it notes that President Johnson pursued some operational concepts in that vein, linking them to defense planning in the era. - The USS Liberty incident is recounted with claims of an Israeli attack that was allowed to proceed despite clear identification of the ship, and subsequent suppression of details. The narrative includes interviews with figures who allege political orders to sink the ship and to blame it on Egypt. - The 1964 Tonkin incident, the 1967-1968 war moves, and covert operations across the globe are woven into a larger claim that Western powers have repeatedly manufactured or exploited external threats to justify expansion and intervention. 7/7 and London: a modern false flag argument - The film pivots to the July 7, 2005 London bombings, arguing MI6 involvement and suggesting that Al Qaeda links were contrived or manipulated. It points to Madrid’s 2004 bombings as a precursor, noting that officials later admitted Al Qaeda had limited or no connection in some cases. - It presents testimony about MI6 involvement with operatives associated with or acting as assets, including claims about a mastermind linked to MI6 and the protection of a suspect (Aswat) by British intelligence. - The documentary emphasizes anomalies in the official narrative: a single bus diverted to Tavistock Square, eyewitness inconsistencies about the bomber, and post-event claims about surveillance footage and MO incongruities. It asserts evidence of cover-ups, whistleblowers, and political calculations aimed at maintaining fear and martial-law-like measures. - It frames the London attacks as a tool to bolster Tony Blair’s political standing, allow the passage of restrictive laws, and justify overseas military campaigns, while alleging a broader pattern of Western governments staging terror to secure interests. 9/11 and the “inside job” thesis - The centerpiece is a claim that 9/11 was an inside job, with expert and lay testimonies questioning the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, Building 7, and the presence of alternative explanations (thermite, controlled demolition). - The film cites declassified and public materials (Northwoods-like concepts; cited White House memos about luring Saddam into a war through staged actions; investigations into the Pentagon frames) to argue that the government manipulated intelligence and public opinion to justify the Iraq War. - It features a roster of notable figures—former MI5/MI6 whistleblowers, CIA veterans, and academics—who challenge the official 9/11 account, including references to Operation Northwoods, the PNAC document, and analyses suggesting a “false flag” justification for imperial aims. - Charlie Sheen’s public remarks are highlighted as a turning point in mainstream attention to alternative theories, followed by media coverage of new 9/11 footage and debates about Building 7, the Pentagon frames, and thermite evidence. - The documentary cites physicists and engineers who question official explanations, citing molten metal, traces of thermite, and expert analyses of the WTC collapse as signs of demolition rather than collapse from fire alone. Surveillance, civil liberties, and the information war - A recurring claim is that the modern battle is largely informational: psychological warfare, public relations, and control of the narrative are seen as the dominant form of warfare, with public opinion manipulation described as the real battlefield. - Edward Bernays is invoked as the architect of modern propaganda, with quotes about shaping masses and an “invisible government” pulling the strings—an “unseen mechanism” that governs democratic societies. - The film argues that fear and threats are used to erode civil liberties: expanded surveillance, identity cards, free-speech restrictions, and the use of homeland-security rhetoric to suppress dissent, including zones for demonstrations and media suppression in multiple democracies. - It mentions whistleblowers from MI5/MI6 who claim funding of extremist groups and complicity in covert actions, and it frames journalists and activists as agents of influence or targets of state pressure when challenging official narratives. Iraq, oil, and empire - Pentagon and White House documents are cited to claim that post-9/11 strategy sought to counter regional threats and secure access to oil resources, with basing and long-term occupation framed as part of a broader plan for permanent military presence and regional control. - The film argues that the “war on terror” is a pretext for a broader imperial project: redrawing borders, destabilizing regions to facilitate resource control, and exploiting crises to profit defense contractors. - It contends that the “new world order” seeks to keep populations under surveillance and compliance, with public narratives constructed around fear of terrorism and the need for security measures that erode cherished liberties. Closing call - The speakers urge viewers to uncover motive (qui bono), question official stories, and resist the expansion of government power through fear and manipulation. - They advocate for independent inquiry, whistleblowing, and public accountability to stop what they call an ongoing cycle of manufactured crises used to justify a global empire and a police-state governance model. Note: The summary mirrors the documentary’s asserted claims, statements, and testimonies as presented, without endorsing their veracity.

The speaker believes it's impossible for a plane alone to penetrate the World Trade Center towers, suggesting bombs exploded simultaneously with the plane impact. The speaker claims the building's unique construction, with steel on the outside, should have made it impenetrable. Another speaker describes seeing the plane impact Building Number 2 and an explosion erupting from the other side almost instantly. The first speaker reiterates the belief that the planes contained more than just fuel and were traveling at high speed, seemingly descending into the building to gain additional momentum. The speaker emphasizes the buildings' robust construction with heavy-caliber steel, asserting the destruction was caused by more than just the planes. The speaker concludes that the country has fundamentally changed.

I'm a "no planer," meaning I don't believe planes were used in the 9/11 attacks. People believe what they saw on TV, but there was no plane wreckage at the World Trade Center or the Pentagon. Remotely controlling a plane that size to hit the towers dead center is nearly impossible. Flight 93 allegedly crashed in Shanksville, but there was minimal wreckage, unlike a typical plane crash. The plane supposedly went underground at 580 mph, yet a hijacker's bandana and a passport were found at the site. Also, cell phone calls from the planes at high altitudes wouldn't have been possible with the technology at the time. Experienced pilots couldn't replicate the attacks in a simulator at high speeds, and exceeding a plane's maximum operating speed like that would be extremely difficult and dangerous.

I turned on my computer and immediately heard a loud explosion. I thought it was a bomb. Debris covered me and my son, who was thrown out of his stroller. Some floors collapsed, trapping people. When I left the Pentagon, I didn't see any airplane parts or evidence of a plane crash. There was no jet fuel on me, my son, or the people I helped. Others in the area also didn't see any plane debris. I believe there is a more sinister explanation than the official story. Those responsible should be held accountable.

"In the morning of 09/11/2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world." "Osama bin Laden." "NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC seven's collapse." "This man never existed nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention." "They dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it." "The rescue of Jessica Lynch." "This is the story of nine eleven brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about"

The speaker believes it's impossible for a plane alone to penetrate the World Trade Center towers, suggesting bombs exploded simultaneously with the plane impact. The speaker claims the building's unique construction, with steel on the outside, should have made it impenetrable. Another speaker describes seeing the plane impact Building Number 2 and an explosion erupting from the other side almost instantly. The first speaker reiterates the belief that the planes contained more than just fuel and were traveling at high speeds, seemingly descending into the building to gain additional momentum. The speaker emphasizes the buildings' robust steel construction and concludes that the destruction was caused by more than just the planes themselves. The speaker believes the event has fundamentally changed the country.

I walked up to the Pentagon after the plane crash. The fire was still burning, and I saw a big hole in the building. There were only small pieces left, no big parts like wings or fuselage. No plane crashed near the Pentagon, just the side of the building.

According to the speaker, the Pentagon is the most heavily defended building in the world. The 9/11 Commission stated that Hani Hanjour, the alleged pilot of the plane that crashed into the Pentagon, was the worst pilot. Instructors wouldn't certify him to fly a single engine propeller plane. The speaker claims Hanjour supposedly flew a commercial jetliner, performed aerobatic maneuvers, and crashed it into the side of the Pentagon. The Pentagon had an active surface-to-air missile defense system and many security cameras. The FBI confiscated 80 to 90 videos of what hit the Pentagon but won't release them. The speaker concludes that 9/11 is the biggest lie of our lifetime.

They claimed it was a plane, but the building exploded randomly. It's not a plane; that side just blew up after the first explosion. They don't know what they're saying. How could a plane have caused that? It happened too quickly. The building was fine before, then suddenly it exploded. How did that happen?

Outside the Pentagon, firefighters are still battling the blaze caused by the crash. I observed the significant hole in the building, but there is no evidence of a plane crash nearby. The only remnants visible are small pieces that could fit in your hand; there are no large sections like tail or wing parts anywhere around.

- "the planes, hit the buildings, and the there was an explosion fire." - "the buildings collapsed due to structural weakening due to the fires." - "Fires in high rises have never brought down steel frame of high rise building at all." - "we have the evidence of the 10 key features of controlled demolition." - "In fact, right is a controlled where you are using or the people who made this happen used demolition." - "There's 40,000 tons of structural steel designed to resist this collapse." - "A football field away from the Twin Towers." - "These have to be easily three of the most highly secure buildings outside the Pentagon."

The Pentagon is heavily defended. The pilot who crashed into it, Hany Hajar, was a poor pilot according to the 9/11 commission. The Pentagon had surface-to-air missile defense. The FBI confiscated many security videos. This video is the only one available.

Speaker 0: Probably the best known builder, particularly of of of great buildings in the city. There's a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect, or possibly by bombs or or aftershocks. Do you have any thoughts on that? Speaker 1: Well, it was an architectural defect. You know, the World Trade Center was always known as a very, very strong building. Don't forget, that took a big bomb in the basement. Now the basement is the most vulnerable place because that's your foundation, and it withstood that. And I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour because he did the building. And I said, I can't believe it. The building was standing solid, and half of the columns were blown out. I mean, so this was an unbelievably powerful building. If you know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside. So you had the steel on the outside of the building. That's why when I first looked and you had big heavy I beams. When I first looked at it, I couldn't believe it because there was a hole in the steel. And this is steel that was you remember the the width of the windows in the World Trade Center folks? I think you you know, if you're ever up there, they were quite narrow. And in between was this heavy steel. I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a seven sixty seven or seven forty seven or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this deal? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steelers on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have, and it was almost just like a like a can of soup. Speaker 2: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into Building Number 2. And when you see that approach the far side and then all of a sudden, within a matter of millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Speaker 1: Right. I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously, they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building. I mean, these buildings were rock solid, And, you know, it's just an amazing it's an amazing thing. Speaker 3: And it's not right to call up and then extrapolate and connect him to 09:11 when he came out on the day of 09:11 and the day after on Fox and on CNN and said, I believe there had to be bombs in those buildings. It was brought down by explosives. A plane doesn't do that. And then described the architecture of Tower 1 and Tower 2. If he was an insider, he wouldn't have said that. Speaker 4: A lot of people ask, how is it possible that, a Boeing plane would be able to destroy the or two planes would be able to destroy the Twin Towers because they were constructed to withstand like a 07/2007 Speaker 5: attack. It's tremendous power and tremendous heat, and people were willing to die. And when they're willing to die and when they're willing to become kamikazes of a sense, there's very little you can do about it. I mean, the the heat and the power actually, it was amazing that the the initial jolts didn't jar the building as much as people would have thought. But the the tremendous amounts of fuel that was dumped on the building and 1,600 degrees temperature, I guess that's probab

Here's a summary of the provided transcript: The speaker questions how a 757 could fit into a 14-16 foot hole in the Pentagon without leaving wreckage. Photos taken before the Pentagon's outer wall collapsed show a hole, wire spools on the lawn, and broken concrete facing. The roof shows fatigue but hasn't collapsed. The speaker points out the absence of wreckage like a tail, fuselage, wings, or engines. Engine 331 from the Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority is visible in photos. The fire chief from this engine company initially agreed to an interview but canceled an hour before airtime, and two firefighters were reportedly placed on indefinite leave. Fire retardant foam is being sprayed on the front of the Pentagon, and the speaker reiterates the question of whether the hole is large enough for a 757 and where the wreckage is.

Eyewitnesses describe explosions at the World Trade Center, with initial confusion about the cause. Some report seeing a plane strike the tower, while others claim it was a bomb. A professor alleges 9/11 was an inside job, claiming the government's OBL story is fiction. He suggests a frame-by-frame analysis of the South Tower impact reveals a "cartoon display," arguing an aluminum plane couldn't penetrate the building as depicted. Others claim there was no plane visible in certain shots. Eyewitnesses describe a large explosion sound and debris, with one reporting the elevator blew up. Another witness near the Pentagon claims there was no plane debris, just a hole in the ground. Some suggest the collapse of the towers resembled a controlled demolition, citing consecutive "bangs" and a waterfall-like descent. One person claims it's impossible for a building to collapse like that unless all columns are blown up simultaneously. A reporter references the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 during a live broadcast while the building was still standing. A speaker claims the government's conspiracy theory involves Islamic radicals armed with box cutters defeating the air defense system, and questions whether to believe the government or the people who lived through it.

A 125-foot wide, 44-foot tall plane reportedly executed a 270-degree downridge spiral before striking the Pentagon, despite the pilot being known as terrible. The crash site contained no seats, luggage, or bodies, only bricks and limestone. The official explanation claims the intense heat from jet fuel vaporized the entire plane, but Flight 77 had two six-ton Rolls Royce engines made of steel and titanium alloy, and it is scientifically impossible for jet fuel to vaporize 12 tons of steel and titanium. Bodies were reportedly identified by fingerprints or DNA, which raises the question of how a fire could vaporize aluminum and tempered steel but leave human bodies intact. There was allegedly no evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon, with only small, hand-sized pieces remaining. Government agents allegedly removed debris and covered the lawn with dirt and gravel. Videos from security cameras were confiscated by the FBI and the Department of Justice has refused to release them.

The transcript questions the official narrative of 9/11, citing anomalies and inconsistencies. It is claimed that Hannehan Yuer was a terrible pilot, yet supposedly executed a complex maneuver to strike the Pentagon. Some claim there was a lack of identifiable plane debris at the Pentagon, and videos were confiscated. Experts state that jet fuel could not have vaporized the plane's engines. The collapse of the Twin Towers is questioned, citing free-fall speed and molten metal found weeks later. Some suggest explosives or thermite were used, with core columns being cut. Building 7's collapse, not hit by a plane, is called a controlled demolition. Witnesses report explosions in the basements of the World Trade Center before the plane impacts. NORAD's failure to intercept the planes is highlighted, suggesting deliberate confusion due to war game exercises. The source of funding for the 9/11 attacks remains undetermined. The 9/11 Commission's report is criticized for ignoring evidence and conflicts of interest. The "war on terror" is viewed as a means of social control, with terrorism as a manufactured enemy image. Some claim the CIA was involved in previous terrorist acts. Exercises mirroring the 9/11 attacks were allegedly taking place simultaneously. The possibility that the attacks were a setup job is raised.

A CNN correspondent reported from the Pentagon, near where a plane went down. The fire was still burning in some parts of the building. Upon close inspection, the correspondent saw a huge gaping hole in the side of the building, but no evidence of a plane crash anywhere near the Pentagon. The only pieces left were small enough to pick up by hand. There were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage anywhere around.

How could anyone fly a 60 ton, 125 foot wide, 44 foot tall plane through this obstacle course? The aircraft before striking the Pentagon reportedly executed a 270 degree downward spiral, and yet Hani Hanure was known as a terrible pilot who could not safely fly even a small plane. The official explanation is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane. From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The videos from security cameras, which would show what really hit the Pentagon, were immediately confiscated by agents of the FBI.

The speaker questions how a 60-ton plane could navigate a difficult obstacle course. It's claimed the aircraft executed a 270-degree spiral before striking the Pentagon, despite the pilot's alleged incompetence. Doubts are raised about the official explanation that jet fuel vaporized the entire plane, including its Rolls Royce engines made of steel and titanium. Questions are posed about how bodies could be identified via fingerprints and DNA if the fire was hot enough to vaporize metal. One speaker states there was no evidence of a plane crash near the Pentagon, with only small, hand-sized pieces remaining. It's claimed government agents removed debris and covered the lawn with dirt and gravel. Security camera videos were confiscated by the FBI and have not been released. The speaker suggests the government would release the videos if they proved a 757 hit the Pentagon.

The Pentagon is heavily defended and the pilot who crashed into it, Hani Hanjour, was considered the worst pilot by the 911 commission. Despite being unable to fly a single engine propeller plane, he supposedly maneuvered a commercial jetliner to hit the Pentagon. The building had surface to air missile defense at the time. The FBI confiscated around 80 to 90 videos of the incident but has not released them. This video is the only available evidence. The speaker believes that 9/11 is a major lie.