reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker emphasizes the importance of respect for dialogue and for a different institution's dictation. They express disappointment that some people are so consumed with hate that they cannot impress their brother. The speaker asserts individuality: “You speak for yourself.” They declare that if someone will not stand with Israel and the Jews, then they will not stand with that person. The address ends with “Thank you, and God bless you.”

The speaker targets Netanyahu with vehement accusations and vows defiance. 'There you are, mister Netanyahu. Just who do you think you are? Killing thousands and flattening neighborhoods, then wrapping yourself in Judaism like it's some shield from criticism. You're making life for Jews miserable and life for American Jews impossible. Oh, don't you roll your eyes at me, mister.' 'You know what you're doing, and you're doing it on purpose.' 'Well, now you can just sit in that chair because I'm not going anywhere, I've been to every BPA meeting, every school board meeting, and I can go all day.'

The speaker questions whether calling for the genocide of Jews violates MIT's code of conduct. They mention instances of anti-Semitic behavior on campus and criticize the university's response. They express concern about incidents of harassment and discrimination against Jewish students and staff, highlighting the fear and dehumanization they experience. The speaker emphasizes the importance of defending Jewish identity and culture, stating that they will not be erased. They assert their strength and unity, declaring "never again is now."

Speaker 0 argues that there are self-hating anti‑Zionist, anti‑Israel Jews in New York, including friends and family, who will vote for Mamdani, whom he calls a vicious anti‑Semite. He says Mamdani would never recognize Israel as a Jewish state or the nation state of the Jewish people, but recognizes Jordan, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia as Muslim states with hierarchies that exclude certain groups; for example, in Saudi Arabia you can’t become a citizen unless you convert, and in Qatar you can’t own a Christian or Jewish Bible. He asserts a double standard and calls that the core of antisemitism. He claims Zorn Mandami is a vicious antisemite and contends that if he is elected mayor of New York, antisemitism will spread to other democratic cities. After six years as a Democrat, he says he formally quit the Democratic Party and is now an anti‑Democrat who will work hard to see the defeat of the Democratic Party, which he describes as anti‑Israel, anti‑Zionist in many respects. Speaker 1 asks what he thinks about Jews and Israelis who voted for Mamdani and what they tell him when they ask why. Speaker 0 replies that there are Jewish rabbis and former rabbis who support Mamdani, calling them self‑hating Jews. He says some Jews have supported Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini, and that being Jewish does not make one immune to political folly. He contends these are people who are Jewish on their parents’ side, who have “never entered a synagogue, never been to Israel, know nothing about Judaism,” yet claim, “as a Jew, I support Hamas. I support Mamdani. I support terrorism. I support all that.” He asserts that because the Democratic Party has turned anti‑Israel, they must be fought, though he says it is hard to be opposed to the Democrats after six years as a Democrat; he cannot vote for a party that is anti‑Zionist, anti‑Israel, and anti‑Semitic, and that encourages leaders like Mamdani, and he suggests that news now will leave the Democratic party. Speaker 1 asks if, if Mamdani and professor Dostoevitz win in York, he would advise Jews in the city to leave. Speaker 0 answers: No. Fight back. He pledges to lead the fight against Mamdani, to bring him to court and to apply legal, political, economic, and other pressures to prevent his success in anti‑Zionism, anti‑Israel, and anti‑Semitic attitudes. He concludes: we must continue to fight him, but do not leave—stay and fight.

The speaker is asked if their organization will engage in peace talks with the Israelis. They respond by saying that they don't view it as peace talks, but rather as capitulation or surrender. They question who they would even talk to, suggesting that it would be a conversation between the oppressor and the oppressed. They argue that talking without the presence of weapons is still not enough because they have never seen a successful conversation between a colonizer and a national liberation movement. They emphasize the importance of their struggle for dignity, respect, and human rights.

The speaker accuses President Greenberg of funding genocide and betraying students to Zionist interests. They declare him guilty and express anger towards him.

The speaker expresses frustration over debates on chants and slogans distracting from the ongoing genocide in Palestine. They criticize the conflation of Zionism with Judaism and call for accountability for Israeli actions. The speaker urges people to speak out against the atrocities and support independent journalism. They emphasize the importance of standing up against oppression and not being complicit in silence.

Speaker 0 frames the camera as part of the fight for Palestinian liberation and recalls a Gaza colleague saying, "I resign myself to Allah's will. Bombs, with American cover, with American tax money. They want us to take down our voices and use this." He adds, "They want us to just give up. But trust me, we are shattering their complacency. Israel's problem is the very existence of Palestinians. Yes. It's the very existence of us." He declares, "And we're not silent," and insists, "The time is now. Time is now. The pressure towards liberation starts with us." Speaker 1 recounts personal persecution: "Two weeks ago, I was assaulted by the Israel immigration authorities. I was the only black passenger on the Hondala. It's no coincidence that I was one of the last to be released from prison."

The speaker expresses their gratitude for being present but acknowledges that they should be focusing on their studies instead. They recount a recent incident on campus where classmates and professors chanted for the genocide of Jews, defaced school property, and spread anti-Semitic messages. The neighboring university's president condemned the incident, but their own university's president remained silent. The speaker describes how their beloved university has become a hostile environment for Jewish students, with acts of intimidation and harm taking place. They criticize the university for not holding the perpetrators accountable and express their fear and lack of safety on campus. The speaker calls for the university to uphold its policies and for their fellow classmates to stand up against this crisis.

We demand our administration meet our demands as our tuition funds the Zionist entity. This revolution is for all, not just students. Join us in resisting with Iraq or other tools. Hold a Palestinian flag at our protest to show solidarity. The idea of outside agitators is false - we welcome everyone to join us.

The speaker discusses the history of resistance movements and the perception of violence. They mention figures like John Brown, Nelson Mandela, and the Palestinians. The speaker argues that oppressed groups often resort to armed resistance when peaceful means fail. They highlight the plight of the Palestinians under Israeli occupation and criticize the world's expectation for them to suffer in silence. The speaker questions whether historical figures like George Washington and Nelson Mandela would be condemned for their resistance. They emphasize that history has shown support for resistance movements seeking liberation.

The speaker criticizes universities, claiming that the younger generation is weak and overly educated with no grasp of reality. They argue that universities are teaching students misinformation about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and supporting terrorism. The speaker applauds billionaires and CEOs who are withdrawing funding and refusing to hire students who blame Israel for Hamas' actions. They mock students who ask for therapy after facing consequences for their actions and express frustration with the perceived lack of intelligence and life experience in the younger generation. The speaker concludes by stating that these students should be held accountable in the workforce.

The speaker's message to the people of Gaza is that they have achieved victory. The speaker expresses shame for not doing enough and insists that change must come in the form of the fall of the American empire and imperial western powers, which they claim have been hurting people since the beginning. The speaker believes these empires will fall, inshallah. The message to Gaza and oppressed people worldwide is that people are willing to fight and put their lives on the line to bring these empires down.

The speaker urges Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson to join the Israeli army and experience the reality of the conflict in northern Gaza. They criticize wealthy Jews in Los Angeles who believe they are victims while Israel allegedly kills Palestinians. The speaker argues that this perspective lacks class consciousness and disregards the lives of Jewish Israeli soldiers and hostages. They find it sickening that these privileged individuals oppose a ceasefire while sitting in their privileged positions.

The speaker expresses anger towards a group of people, accusing them of being Zionist cowards and racists. They claim that their family fought against Hitler and criticize the others for handing out flyers. The speaker calls them fascists and accuses them of supporting genocide. They also accuse the group of not believing in equality and democracy. The speaker ends by telling them to leave.

Speaker 0 states that they sacrificed their life to secure this country’s freedom, specifically its freedom of speech. They accuse the addressed party of arresting people for words while turning a blind eye to crimes committed by invaders. They also condemn the addressed party as “a disgrace to your uniform, and an insult to mine.”

Speaker 0 presents the view that great academies of the rabbis were established, thousands of new laws formulated, and that the Pharisees who killed Jesus Christ remained the rulers of Judaism. He asserts that in Babylon the Pharisees codified oral traditions into the Babylonian Talmud, which he claims reveals Israel’s apostasy and supports Christ’s descriptions of the Pharisees as hypocritical and malignant. He cites a Talmud passage in Treatise Sanhedrin claiming a Pharisee may kill indirectly, giving an example where binding a neighbor leads to starvation and liability is avoided. He contends the Pharisees manipulated Romans to kill Christ, arguing Romans were the direct cause of Christ’s death but the Pharisees claimed Romans as the guilty party. He states Christ called Pharisees adulterers and that the Talmud provides “loopholes” for adultery, providing examples such as exceptions for sex with a minor or a heathen’s wife, and endorses seduction of unwed adolescent girls described as designated bond maids. He emphasizes death penalties differ for natural versus perverse sexual acts, alleging that rape in a perverted form falls outside legal jurisdiction, and claims sexual perversion was a long-standing practice in Babylon. Speaker 1 continues by noting three major Talmudic treatises contain passages endorsing the seduction and marriage of three-year-old girls, with Simeon Ben Yohai among prominent rabbis upholding this privilege. He states that in Israel today, many venerate Simeon Ben Yohai. He quotes Simeon Ben Yohai and the great Raba approving intercourse with a little girl under three years and a day, comparing virginity to tears returning to a little girl, and asserts the same section covers sexual activity with small boys. He adds that the Good Samaritan story portrays Pharisees as racial bigots, unwilling to respond to a non-Jew’s suffering. He notes that God’s command to the Canaanites was harsh and that by New Testament times, separation and the sword had become obsolete, with God no longer making racial distinctions. Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss Gentile status in the Talmud and Jewish encyclopedias, claiming the Talmud’s critical attitudes toward Gentiles, including that Gentiles are not men but barbarians, lack legal rights, and that a Gentile’s suit in Jewish courts favors the defendant if the plaintiff is Jewish. They claim Christians are curses within the Talmudic framework, that Jesus is portrayed as a bastard, and that Gentiles face death for Sabbath observance or for providing testimony in a Jewish court. They assert that the Talmud equips Jews with an ethic fostering bigotry, isolation, and persecution, leading to the expulsion of Jews from Babylon to the West by the eleventh century. Speaker 2 reframes as a positive counterpoint: the tradition of Talmudic questioning, continuous inquiry, and a culture of learning that never ends, which exploded when the walls of the ghetto fell, and remains part of contemporary Jewish culture. Speaker 3 declares solidarity with Israel, insisting “Israel’s fight is our fight,” vowing unity and resistance to anti-Semitism, and asserting they will not be discouraged, defeated, or silent. Speaker 4 interjects with a hostile confrontation, expressing willingness to “kill Christ again,” accusing Jews of killing Jesus, and making violent threats toward a pastor and others; a rabbi’s circumcision practice is described graphically as supportive of Talmudic Judaism, followed by a denunciation aimed at Christian Zionists.

The speaker claims the actions of the Iranian Armed Forces demonstrate their dedication, strength, resilience, and courage. Conversely, they assert the Israeli regime is barbaric and evil, having no problem murdering families and recording it. The speaker states Zionism is extraordinary because they murder in front of cameras, as seen in Gaza for twenty-one months. They believe Zionists are a menace to humanity and are fine with people seeing images of dead children.

The speaker addresses the MIT class of 2025, acknowledging uncertainty and fear surrounding institutions. They remind graduates of their initial dreams to impact humanity and urge them not to let fear hinder them. The speaker claims that MIT's undergraduate body and graduate student union voted to cut ties with the "genocidal Israeli military" and called for a ceasefire in Gaza. They state that MIT faces threats and suppression for supporting Palestine. The speaker alleges that there are no universities left in Gaza, and MIT is complicit in Israel's actions, as the Israeli occupation forces are the only foreign military that MIT has research ties with. Graduates are asked to turn their MIT rings, symbolizing their entry into a world where they carry the responsibility to stop the "ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people." The speaker expresses confidence in the class of 2025's ability to face pressure and make a difference.

- Grabbing a gun equates to freedom, and violence is sometimes a revolutionary essential. - The U.S. settler state must be crashed to impact the Israeli state. - Armed resistance will defeat Zionism on an open battlefield, so weapons flow to Zionists must be stopped. - October 7 was a profound moment to dig in and go harder. - Putting bodies on the line to protect the vulnerable is essential. - Struggle for indigenous sovereignty on Turtle Island. - Being a "Gorilla Scholar" means being prepared to be fired for your beliefs. - Some have been snitched on to the administration for course content. - Groups like Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolution have been misrepresented due to imperialist ideology. - Challenge the settler state, like the University of Virginia, and exploit institutional resources. - Al Aqsa Flood on October 7 was a decisive strike against imperialism. - Faculty should teach Palestinian liberation and resistance struggles. - The armed resistance movement rejects dependence on oppressors. - Subjugated people must overthrow the broader imperialist world system.

The speaker states that Zionists came in with their dogs as an act of provocation, and asserts that if those dogs come close again, it will be seen as an act of aggression, and they will kill those dogs.

Speaker says, "Message for the people of Gaza is going to be more of the message that should be sent to the people here" and that "they have achieved the victory." He admits, "We haven't done anywhere near enough," adding, "We do feel ashamed" and that "change must come"—"in the form that it must come is that this empire, the American empire that's been hurting our people since the beginning." He condemns, "The imperial western powers that have been hurting our people since the beginning, they must fall," and says, "inshallah inshallah they will fall." The message to Gaza and the oppressed peoples across the world is that "there are people here both young and old who are going to be willing to fight and are willing to put their lives and everything they can on the line to bring these empires down because they must come down."

The speaker accuses university officials of prioritizing private property over free speech, funding genocide with tuition dollars, and targeting Palestinian students. The board of trustees is blamed for profiting from weapons sales to Israel. The accused are found guilty and sentenced to divest from companies supporting genocide, protect pro-Palestinian speech, and end academic partnerships with Zionist institutions. The people demand justice and accountability from the university. Translation: The speaker accuses university officials of prioritizing private property over free speech, funding genocide with tuition dollars, and targeting Palestinian students. The board of trustees is blamed for profiting from weapons sales to Israel. The accused are found guilty and sentenced to divest from companies supporting genocide, protect pro-Palestinian speech, and end academic partnerships with Zionist institutions. The people demand justice and accountability from the university.

The speakers express their refusal to participate in the oppression of Palestinians by the Israeli army, which they view as the operational wing of Jewish supremacy. They condemn the ongoing genocide and occupation, attributing the recent conflict to the closure of Gaza and the Israeli government's actions. They reject the idea that killing civilians in Gaza will bring security. The speakers also express fear of the Israeli government's increasing fascism, suppression of anti-Zionists, and violent evictions in the West Bank. They emphasize the belief that Palestinians deserve freedom equal to Israelis.

The speaker strongly criticizes Israel, referring to it as a psychopathic, apartheid, racist, colonial settler regime. They advocate for resistance and bringing down the Israeli government, drawing parallels to the actions taken in South Africa, Algeria, and Ireland. The speaker emphasizes the need for a revolution, echoing Azir's call for a collective revolution of humanity to reclaim society.