TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses a simulation event that took place in October 2019, hosted by Bill Gates, Thao Chi, and April Hayes. The last simulation focused on pandemic planning and the suppression of freedom of speech. The speaker mentions that COVID-19 was likely circulating by mid-September, but the Chinese government restricted information about it. They also mention that Bill Gates bought and sold shares of BioNTech vaccine, which later became the Pfizer vaccine. The speaker suggests a connection between Gates' actions and the announcement that the vaccine didn't work. They also mention that Gates provided funding to the speaker's institution.

He says he 'sought a preemptive pardon for anything during a certain period of time, by president Biden before he left office,' and 'strong armed and smeared people like doctor Jay Bhattacharya, anybody who came out and said, I don't know if that's natural. This actually smacks of lab.' He notes that 'this gain of function research is happening in biolabs around the world.' He recalls warning 'against US funded biolabs in Ukraine when the Russia Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason,' and says he was attacked for it. He warns 'Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another COVID like pandemic?' and says, 'And for that, I was called a Russian asset.'

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed inconsistencies in statements made by colleagues and realized something was amiss. The simultaneous lockdowns across multiple countries convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses those in power of lying and implementing ineffective measures. He believes that the vaccines being administered are intentionally harmful, based on his extensive experience in drug design. He is unafraid of legal action and challenges them to sue him, confident that he would win.

The speaker claims the original plan to eliminate older generations with a bioweapon failed due to incorrect tuning. They connect the arrest of Harvard professor Charles Lieber in 2019 for possessing nanobot technology to China's alleged attempt to steal this technology for bioweapon tuning. To protect the technology from China, it was supposedly redeployed to Ukraine. The speaker highlights that Pfizer was late in developing its COVID vaccine. They allege Pfizer used SV40, a cancer-causing agent, in their vaccine design, then attempted to remove the evidence before FDA approval. The speaker links this to the Cutter incident involving polio vaccines during FDR's presidency. They question how a monkey virus from the 1950s appears in COVID vaccines 75 years later, suggesting malice. The speaker recalls discussing two Pfizer patents in 2021, suspecting SV40 would be used in a vaccine, most likely Pfizer's.

The speaker discusses the ideology of scientists who have questioned the origins of viruses like AIDS, hepatitis, and Ebola. They mention Dr. Duisburg from the University of California at Berkeley as one of these scientists. The speaker also mentions that the COVID vaccines contained varying percentages of bioweapon material, with the booster having the highest concentration. They note that over 13 billion COVID vaccines were administered to around 5 billion people, but not all individuals received the vaccines. The speaker suggests that the PCR swab was another method of inoculating people with nanotechnology, specifically Graphene Ferric Oxide. They mention facing pushback when trying to publish their research on this topic, but eventually succeeded. However, they were subsequently attacked.

Speaker 1, a former vice president of Pfizer, discusses his experience in the pharmaceutical industry and his concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic. He claims that global lockdowns indicate a supranational operation orchestrated by organizations like the WHO or the World Economic Forum. He accuses public figures of lying about the virus and asserts that the vaccines are intentionally harmful. Despite facing censorship and defamation, he remains convinced that the injections were designed to cause harm and even death. He expresses worry and believes that his knowledge and experience in drug development support his claims.

The speaker, a former VP at Pfizer, claims to have been censored for speaking against the "fraudulent pandemic" and "intentionally dangerous injections." He believes these injections were designed to injure, kill, and reduce fertility, and that digital IDs will be required for access to digital money, with validity dependent on mRNA injections. He warns of a coming financial crisis engineered to legally steal assets via altered private property laws, recommending David Rogers Webb's "The Great Taking" for more information. He urges resistance to digital IDs, as they will control access to resources based on vaccination status. The speaker asserts that acute respiratory illnesses are not contagious or caused by viruses, citing a century of clinical experiments. He suggests colds and flu result from internal equilibrium loss, not external infection. He further claims that vaccines have always been harmful, designed to cause allergies by sensitizing individuals to common food proteins. He also alleges that climate change is a lie used to frighten people and justify restrictions, and that the push for EVs is a ploy to destroy European car manufacturing. Modern cars are full of surveillance technology, and geofencing will restrict movement. He urges non-compliance and resistance to these measures.

An Ivy League organic chemist describes pushing scholarly dialogue into public policy and his Cornell experiences, including being canceled in 2020 after a tweet about police and a Buffalo incident; Cornell issued a denouncing letter signed by the president, provost, chief of police, and others, which he calls kabuki. He recounts warning of a banking collapse in 2002, early guest lectures with Morgan Stanley, and the loss of Pfizer consulting. He critiques COVID-19 policy, accusing Fauci and Birx of incompetence or malice, and endorses Doctors for COVID Ethics; he cites VAERS data to question vaccine harms. He discusses lab-origin theories (North Carolina), Ukraine biolabs, gain-of-function, and the strategy of flooding information and QAnon to manipulate narratives. He covers university funding, endowments, DEI, and education reform; financial markets, gold, platinum, energy, and AI. Writing clarifies thinking; he emphasizes skepticism toward official narratives.

The presentation titled “COVID world 10/09/2022” presents an assessment of estimated extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine bioweapons over three years. Key figures cited are: estimated extra deaths of 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects of 1.9 billion across three years (2020–2022). Two main differences from the prior estimates (10/01/2022) are highlighted: - The estimate base data now covers 47 countries representing about 2.3 billion people, after adding 11 countries and their populations, making the estimates more representative globally. - For 2021 and 2022, extra deaths are now taken in full, rather than half, into account as input. Extra deaths for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported factual deaths in the listed countries. Missing months in 2022 are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average since January 2021, corrected by a five-year evolution (2015–2019). Calculation details described include: - For 2020, the world extra deaths are derived from the column “ED/100k extra deaths per 100k people” per country, aggregated to a global rate of 112 extra deaths per 100k people, applied to the world population to yield 9 million extra deaths (2020). - For 2021, the column “ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given” is aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global vaccine doses to yield 12.1 million extra deaths (2021). - For 2022, the column “ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given” aggregates to 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield 9.6 million extra deaths (2022). The serious adverse effects figure is computed by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by a reported-adverse-effects-per-death ratio of 87.6, resulting in approximately 1.1 billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and 0.8 billion for 2022. Overall, the presenter notes about ten million extra deaths annually worldwide since 2020, implying about 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if the trend continues. The narrative then makes strong claims about the nature of SARS-CoV-2 and vaccines, stating that SARS-CoV-2 is designed and made by humans in a lab, with genetic inserts such as PRRA and HIVGP120 that allegedly prove non-natural origin. It is claimed that these inserts are present only in dissimilar natural viruses and that there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS-CoV-2 about the genetic codes and the technology to insert them, including references to Doctor Richard Fleming and related materials. Additional assertions describe Genentech COVID vaccines as producing large amounts of toxic spike protein in human tissues, allegedly making the vaccines themselves bioweapons and causing health damage beyond natural infection. The transcript references sources and links for these claims and notes the appendix data source as Our World in Data’s “Excess Mortality” raw death counts, with downloadable data from September 2022. In the latter portion, there are interjections from other speakers (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2) about deflating what they call fake controlled opposition and critiques of political figures and media narratives, framing the system as lacking real democratic choice and advocating a systemic solution to what they describe as a parasitic system.

Everything was alive from the beginning, asymptomatic people don't transmit, and kids are a break on the disease, not harbingers. Lockdowns were a farce, and masks don't work. COVID-19 vaccines destroy your immune system and distribute widely in the body. The genetically modified RNA in the vaccines can't be broken down and contains contaminants. Pfizer put an SV40 promoter in the vaccine, known to bind p53, the guardian of the genome, and cause cancers. The vaccines have design flaws, distribute to the brain, bone marrow, ovaries, and testes, and have long-term production. The vaccines are dangerous, have process-related impurities, and cause cancer, strokes, and heart attacks. There were 40% more deaths in 2021 between 18 and 64, so stay away from the vaccines.

An emeritus Cornell organic chemist who also follows markets and politics describes his career and battles over free speech. He says he was canceled in 2020; a letter denouncing him was "kabuki" and trustees intervened, though Pfizer dropped a long-time Pfizer consulting gig. He frames universities as a mix of free speech and academic freedom but critiques DEI, endowments, and funding freezes, urging elites to recalibrate education for twenty years ahead. On COVID, he, in Doctors for COVID Ethics, claims VAERS data show serious problems and accuses Fauci and Birx of malice and incompetence; suggests the NC lab gained-function origin and Ukraine labs funded by the US. He questions Vegas shooting narratives (Route 41) and calls politics "kayfabe" with the deep-state needing to flood information. Economically, he predicts overvaluation, potential 70% corrections, warns of debt, boomer endowments, gold, energy, and real assets as hedges. He emphasizes writing as thinking.

We were all going to die from some little virus, and people were just hiding in their homes. The creator of mRNA technology is a Jew, Wiseman. When all the COVID stuff hit, I couldn't even go to restaurants. A lot of people don't know that Fauci and Gates were front men. They are evil and have something coming. The orchestration of this is Jewish. If you look at who runs Pfizer and Moderna, who was in the CDC, and who was in control of the whole COVID thing, Zions. The creator of the technology, mRNA, Weizmann, Jew. It was Jewish from top to bottom. Mass extermination of the world population, Jews. There's this viral clip where a guy reads off the COVID stuff and says every part of it is Jew. That guy nailed it in that presentation. His name is Christopher Woods.

The speaker addresses a New Zealand commission, apologizing for the COVID narrative originating from the U.S., specifically Massachusetts, home to Moderna, Pfizer, and PCR companies. A billion-dollar campaign inhibited vaccine hesitancy, with Tulsi Gabbard noting that those spreading hesitancy were placed on terrorist watch lists. The speaker claims the news has been censored due to powerful budgets spinning a different story. The speaker cites 30 years of experience, beginning with the Human Genome Project at MIT, where his team engineered a robotic pipeline to purify plasmids. His team spun out technology to Agenkor Biosciences, which received a $27 million government grant from Francis Collins to be a commercial genome center for the NIH. He states he specialized in sequencing phosmids. He claims the peer review system is captured due to reliance on pharmaceutical advertisement dollars. He has dozens of patents in genomics and invented a DNA sequencer. Having no financial interest in vaccines, he began speaking out due to red flags.

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed discrepancies in statements made by colleagues, including Sir Patrick Valens, which led him to question the narrative. The simultaneous global lockdowns convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses these individuals of lying and challenges them to sue him, confident in his claims. He expresses concern over the injuries caused by the vaccines, stating that they were intentionally designed to harm and kill people.

The speaker believes criticism of them is an attack on science. They stated vaccinated people don't need to worry about serious illness or transmission, but later acknowledged fully vaccinated people can transmit the infection. Masks were described as working "at the margins, maybe ten percent." School closures were considered an appropriate approach initially, but remote learning may have "forever damaged" kids, though the speaker doesn't believe it's "irreparably damaged anyone." The speaker claims they didn't recommend lockdowns, but recommended shutting the country down to the president, knowing it would have serious economic consequences. The speaker suggests the virus originated from the animal-human interface in wet markets, but that the place of origin was not within the market itself. Another intelligence arm concluded COVID began with a lab leak in China. The speaker denies the NIH funded gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute, while others claim NIH funded research that made a bat coronavirus more contagious. The speaker denies that this is gain of function.

Speaker 0 argues that 'the trustworthiness of the information that we actually receive from the news media' is a major problem and notes that 'the easiest thing for our democratic colleagues to do is to scare people.' He asks, 'COVID nineteen was politicized?' Speaker 1 answers, 'the whole process was politicized' and says 'we were lied to about everything... the vaccines would prevent transmission' and 'they prevent infection'—claims he says are contradicted by 'the animal studies and the clinical trial showed.' He accuses the CDC of letting 'the teachers union' write school-closure orders that 'hurt working people all over the country, and then pretend it was science based.' He adds examples: 'Martin Koldor from Harvard' was 'ejected [from COVID]... because he wasn't in the orthodoxy'; 'FDA during COVID' officials 'Gruber and Krausz' criticized Biden mandates; Biden said, 'I would never take that vaccine, the Trump vaccine' then mandated it and fired top FDA officials who said it had not been properly tested.' The exchange ends with 'Yes.'

An organic chemist at Cornell who ventures into economics, he recalls being canceled in 2020: 'the closest you and I actually came to actually meeting, but we didn't, was in 2020, I got canceled during the the height of cancel season.' He says the letter denouncing him was 'kabuki' He asserts universities are 'a funny combination of free speech and academic freedom' and notes 'There are no rules' in this arena. On COVID, he claims 'I think it killed a lot of people, and they knew it' and mentions Doctors for COVID Ethics. He argues the Internet is 'democracy's greatest hope and worst enemy' and that 'The deep state realized they were losing control of the narrative' – flooding with noise. He contends Vegas involved 'There were shooters everywhere' and warns markets are '200% overpriced' with a 'five percentile boomer.' He critiques endowments and DEI, calling for reform.

Retired mathematician Norman explains how he became involved in political commentary after questioning the COVID narrative. Despite his prestigious career and expertise in risk analysis, his views were labeled as conspiracy theories and misinformation. He faced censorship, being disinvited from conferences, and even had his Wikipedia page hacked. Norman's research papers on the subject were suppressed, and he was treated as an outcast in academic circles. His talk at an NHS conference unrelated to COVID was canceled due to his Twitter posts about vaccines. Norman's dissenting voice made him a sought-after figure in the freedom movement.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.