TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses controversial US patents related to directed energy weapons and mind control techniques. They mention patents from various years that involve manipulating brain states, emotions, and vital signs remotely. The speaker questions which government may be using these patents on its citizens.

A police car equipped with a microwave radiation device called the ADS was spotted at an event. The ADS was originally developed for use in Afghanistan but was never used. State media claims that the device, known as WB one, has a range of 250 feet but can be extended to 0.6 miles. It is considered a riot control weapon and poses a threat to civilian protesters and dissidents in China.

Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

The speaker argues that directed energy weapons (DEWs) have been used and acknowledged by the U.S. government, with claims tied to multiple contemporary events and controversial assertions. They reference Maui, claiming that directed energy weapons were used to set Maui ablaze so that billionaires could drive out locals and buy real estate cheaply, and they note a recent Department of Defense tweet as supposed proof. The speaker highlights Owen Shroyer’s attention to the tweet, quoting it as saying the Department of War “has directed energy weapons. Yes. We are scaling them,” and describes DEWs as giant high-powered lasers that heat clouds after cloud seeding, creating a “perfect storm.” They connect this to “the perfect storm” coming across America. The discussion then shifts to alleged false flags produced by combining DEWs with other actions. The speaker cites Owen Shroyer, again, and references Ezra’s remarks, stating that “the World Economic Forum elites openly admit that chemicals are being sprayed into the atmosphere to cool the planet even on the food supply,” and that “one insider admitted that most of these operations are handled by the military, carried out quietly and behind closed doors.” They place blame on political elites, describing Lindsey Graham, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi as “filthy rich, robbing the American tax player blind,” and contrast this with Iliana Omar’s wealth growth from negative $65,000 to $30,000,000 in five years. They criticize Fauci and Mayorkas, labeling Fauci a “career bureaucrat” who, according to the speaker, “injected our children with a deadly bioweapon chemical cocktail,” and note Fauci remained on a government salary with security detail during Trump’s presidency. The speaker then discusses a third type of DEW: frequency-based methods, including audio frequency devices that can be carried in a backpack and used on crowds, allegedly as part of the January 6 events. They assert that DEWs were used to agitate the crowd, along with 250 undercover FBI agents dressed as Trump supporters, and Capitol Police openings fire on protesters. The speaker asserts that the very DEWs “have killed people before,” and speculates this could have contributed to a Capitol Police officer’s heart attack that day. In closing, the speaker asks the audience whether they trust their government and government officials with this type of power, inviting responses in the comments.

This video discusses the potential of radio frequency (RF) weapons and their implications in warfare. RF weapons, which operate within the radio frequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, could have devastating effects on military personnel and equipment. The Soviet Union is believed to be ahead in RF weapon development, particularly in high-powered microwaves that can disable electronics and incapacitate humans. The video also explores the concept of electronic mind control, where RF devices can alter human moods and awareness. The potential use of RF weapons by the Soviets and the United States' limited knowledge and research in this area are highlighted.

The speaker discusses a weapon that can be programmed for various wavelengths. They mention a blue object, such as a card and an umbrella, which did not burn when exposed to flames.

Pentagon scientists have developed a new weapon utilizing the laser-induced plasma effect, allowing lasers to project human voice commands over a distance. This technology can secure perimeters by warning individuals to disperse without deploying troops. Additionally, the laser can create discomfort through targeted heat, prompting immediate movement away from the area. It also functions as a continuous flashbang, producing audible effects to disorient and confuse individuals, similar to traditional flashbang grenades. While laboratory testing of the audio feature has been completed, a fieldable version is expected within five years for use in crowd control and area protection.

The speaker explains that they will turn on a device that emits a 65 kilohertz beam, similar to a laser. They mention that the beam is inaudible and unlikely to cause harm. By adding modulation to the beam, they make it audible. The speaker clarifies that the sound is actually created within the beam itself, and it stays within the beam. They proceed to play music through the device, and the sound appears to come from the listener's head. They experiment by pointing the beam at different surfaces and ask the audience to raise their hands if they can hear it clearly.

We used a device called the LRAD, which is a long range acoustic weapon, to make the enemy surrender. It sends sound waves directly to the brain, making it seem like the sound is coming from inside the head. The LRAD cannot be blocked or stopped, as it conducts the sound through the brain. Another weapon we used is the B2K, a microwave weapon that cannot be blocked by plugging your ears.

The speaker discusses the use of a device described as "less than lethal" and emphasizes that it is not nonlethal. He states, "Less than lethal. It's not nonlethal. It's less than lethal," and adds that it is still risky because if it hits him in the eye, it could take out an eye. He asserts that he can shoot the person in the face if he has to, saying, "So I can shoot him in the face if I have to." The speaker then references Sandy, saying that’s when she heard him talk about shooting somebody in the face, and identifies the target by saying, "It was that motherfucker right there."

This video discusses the potential of radio frequency (RF) weapons and their implications in warfare. RF weapons, which operate within the radio frequency segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, could have devastating effects on military personnel and equipment. The Soviet Union is believed to be ahead in RF weapon development, particularly in high-powered microwaves that can disable electronics and incapacitate humans. The video also explores the concept of electronic mind control, where RF devices can alter human moods and awareness. The potential use of RF weapons by the Soviets and the United States' limited knowledge and research in this area are highlighted.

Speaker 0 questions whether wireless mind control exists, suggesting technologies available to the public, like ChatGPT, are far less advanced than what is secretly being developed. They ask if technology exists to "WiFi into your brain" or use Bluetooth for control. Speaker 1 believes "they" are trying to achieve wireless control, citing research into LRAD technology, which can transmit voices directly into a person's head. They suspect a project is underway to apply this technology to the entire population, potentially involving "intracorporeal bionano networks" that are syringe-injectable and self-assemble within the body. This is framed in medical terms, but Speaker 1 believes the intention is wireless control.

These covert weapons leave no trace, making it easy for adversaries to deny their use. They cause targets to feel crazy with no visible wounds. Attacks are reported in Washington DC, with suspicions of Americans using similar weapons on Russians. This could be linked to the CIA's mission to conceal such technology.

These weapons are designed to make targets feel like they're imagining things, especially with low-intensity, long-duration exposure. I know people with AHI symptoms who have died from their ailments. I have seen a 1991 version of the weapon; it looked like a satellite dish with a unit attached. Miniaturization has happened over the years, but antenna size (related to the wave) limits how small it can get. Still, it can be contained in a car trunk or even a large backpack.

The transcript centers on claims that the United States used directed energy weapons during the kidnapping raid in Caracas to capture Nicolás Maduro on January 3, 2026, with Redacted independently confirming the news from multiple sources. The host asserts that this technology is not new and that the U.S. has used it on previous, unreported occasions. The operation, termed “Absolute Resolve” and part of a broader Caribbean campaign, allegedly involved roughly 150 aircraft conducting strikes around Caracas before Delta Force and CIA operatives seized Maduro and Celia Flores and flew them out. Reuters is cited as framing the raid as a strategic message to China and Russia, noting that air defenses supplied by those countries were reportedly disabled in the opening moments. A circulating Venezuelan security guard’s transcript, which is also retweeted by White House press spokesperson Carolyn Leavitt, is highlighted as aligning with what modern electronic warfare and directed energy weapons can do. The guard describes a scenario where all radar systems shut down without explanation, followed by a large drone presence over positions. He recounts a moment when something was launched that produced “a very intense sound wave,” after which his unit experienced severe physiological effects: people bleeding from the nose, vomiting blood, and an inability to move or stand. He describes eyes going blind first and bodies collapsing, with the head feeling like it would explode. The host clarifies what is meant by directed energy, distinguishing electronic warfare (attacking the spectrum, jamming, spoofing, overload, or cutting networks) from kinetic actions. The Economic Times is cited as describing something called the “Wraith” as an electronic warfare umbrella used in the Maduro capture to create a digital blackout that paralyzed security infrastructure. There is some confusion around the name because CX2 markets a product called Wraith as an autonomous airborne EW platform that locates high-value emitters such as jammers and radars, with a promotional video illustrating its jamming capabilities. A third component discussed is sonic or acoustic weapons. The listener is shown a concept of active denial technology described by the Pentagon as a focused beam of radio frequency millimeter waves that penetrate only about one sixty-fourth of an inch into the skin, causing an intolerable heating sensation that compels movement; stepping out of the beam ends the sensation. The host references a Fox News segment in which Peter Ducey tested the system, illustrating crowd-control and perimetry uses. The conversation then elaborates that directed energy weapons are a real arms category used by major powers for years, with China and Russia possessing their own systems. The host mentions that initial testing of these weapons reportedly occurred in Afghanistan, with subsequent use in Syria during the Obama era, and asserts that the U.S. has employed such weapons for years, including during the Maduro operation. The discussion includes warnings against overestimating unilateral U.S. dominance in this arena, noting that both China and Russia have developed and deployed directed energy capabilities and that the technologies are broader and older than some public narratives suggest. The segment also touches on ongoing geopolitical dynamics involving Iran and global security concerns related to these weapons.

Discussion centers on 'Guys, if your, assessments here are correct, these are very covert weapons, aren't they?' 'There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy.' 'And you guys also said that these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct?' 'I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC.' 'I think it was mister you mister Grozov said you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. Is that correct?' 'That is correct.' 'Might that have something to do with part of the CIA's motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons?' 'That is a very logical possibility.' 'There's a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released.' 'There's some long term things that needs to be done in terms of of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act. DOD'

A high powered microwave system weapon has been developed that can gradually harm or even kill an enemy without leaving any trace. It was revealed in 2012 that this weapon is designed to expose a target's living space to microwaves, resulting in various physical effects, such as damage to the nervous system. The US government, including the NSA and CIA, must address and clarify their intentions and actions regarding this weapon.

Directed energy weapon targeted individual patents from the year February, pulsative manipulation of central nervous system. Published in 02/2002, method and device for producing a desired brain state via magnetic waves. And this fun one from 2013 has four different assignees, controls brain state by placing engineered EMF patterns into the AC wiring of a building. And from 2014, induced desired brain state in person by adding waves into a music file. And from the year February, induce desired emotional state through an EMF, sleeplessness, sexual arousal. 2015 monitors vital signs of subject via remote application of radar waves handheld. And then here's one from 02/2002. Remotely transmit intelligible subjective sound into targeted consciousness. Voice to skull. Oh, and who's the original assignee? The United States Air Force. And so would the USDP government use such patent?

There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy, like they're imagining things. And you guys also said that these attacks are happening right here in this city. I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC. that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. That is correct. Might that have something to do with part of the CIA's motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons? That is a very logical possibility. There's a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released. And I do think that's something we could address more in a classified environment to explain that, but there are understandable reasons why the US government, has not revealed much of what it knows.

In this video, the speaker talks about how people often get called conspiracy theorists when they share things online. They mention reading US patents and provide examples of patents related to directed energy weapons, brain manipulation, and remote transmission of sound. The speaker highlights that one of the patents is assigned to the United States Air Force. They question whether the US government would use these patents on its own citizens.

The speaker discusses assault weapons and shows a device that emits radiation. They argue that this device is an assault weapon because it exceeds the acceptable radiation level. The speaker suggests that instead of focusing on banning traditional assault weapons, efforts should be made to ban devices that emit harmful radiation. They mention going to a business to give them the device as a way to make the community safer.

The speaker was shocked to discover a document from the United Nations Human Rights Office detailing patents for directed energy weapons (DEWs) that can control minds and behavior. The patents include descriptions like making voices appear, causing individuals to hear voices through EMF waves, and controlling human behavior with extremely low frequency waves. By searching the patent numbers on Google, one can find detailed information about each patent. The speaker thanks Brianna for bringing this to their attention.

The speaker explains that they will turn on a device that emits a 65 kilohertz beam, similar to a laser. They clarify that the beam is not audible but can be made audible by adding a modulation. They assure that the high amplitude of the beam won't hurt anyone. The speaker mentions that sound waves can create sound when they intersect at high amplitude. They state that the sound created by the device is in the beam itself. They proceed to play music through the device, and the sound appears to come from the audience's heads. The speaker tests the device by scanning the audience and bouncing the sound off the wall. They ask the audience to raise their hands if they can hear it clearly.

I asked Ben Beis about the potential of a weapon using this technology. He mentioned that it could manipulate people to act against their better judgment. When asked about assembling a weapon from existing parts, he said he could do it in three weeks to target an entire town. CNN has been pressing the Department of Defense and the Air Force for information on radio frequency weapons, but they have been resistant. Finally, the DOD stated that the topic is too sensitive to discuss.