TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker has 32 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, with senior positions at Pfizer, including vice president and worldwide head of research in allergic and respiratory diseases. Since 2020, the speaker claims to have been speaking out against the fraudulent pandemic and the intentionally dangerous injections. The speaker states that they have been censored and smeared as a result. The speaker suggests that censorship and smearing is the experience of people who try to convey truths that authorities want suppressed.

We're discussing one of the most horrific scandals in history, linked to the great lie of Hitler. It's astonishing how some members of the National Institutes of Health and the media seem to perpetuate this deception. Individuals like Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex are accused of serious wrongdoing, and I believe they are guilty of genocide. I challenge them to take legal action against me. Additionally, I call out Burroughs Wellcome for knowingly distributing a dangerous drug.

I was a former VP at Pfizer, overseeing respiratory and allergy meds research. In early 2020, I noticed global lockdowns happening simultaneously, indicating a coordinated effort beyond national levels. I believe the actions taken were not based on a genuine pandemic threat but rather a deliberate plan. I am confident in accusing those involved of lying about the safety of the vaccines, which I believe were intentionally designed to harm people. I have extensive experience in drug design and stand by my assertion that these injections are dangerous and potentially lethal.

This discussion centers on a significant scandal in science and history, specifically criticizing the actions of certain individuals within the National Institutes of Health. The focus is on figures like Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex, who are accused of serious wrongdoing, including genocide. There is a strong condemnation of their practices, particularly regarding a drug produced by Burroughs Welcome, which is alleged to be harmful. The speaker expresses a desire for legal confrontation with these individuals and organizations to address these accusations.

The speaker discusses the ideology of scientists who have questioned the origins of viruses like AIDS, hepatitis, and Ebola. They mention Dr. Duisburg from the University of California at Berkeley as one of these scientists. The speaker also mentions that the COVID vaccines contained varying percentages of bioweapon material, with the booster having the highest concentration. They note that over 13 billion COVID vaccines were administered to around 5 billion people, but not all individuals received the vaccines. The speaker suggests that the PCR swab was another method of inoculating people with nanotechnology, specifically Graphene Ferric Oxide. They mention facing pushback when trying to publish their research on this topic, but eventually succeeded. However, they were subsequently attacked.

Today, I want to address the AIDS epidemic and draw a parallel to the lies of Hitler during World War II. The National Institutes of Health, along with the media, are perpetrating a horrible scam in the name of science. I challenge individuals like Gallo, Fousey, Hazeltine, and Essex from the NIH, who I believe are guilty of genocide, to take me to court. Burroughs Welcome, the pharmaceutical company, has knowingly released a deadly drug. I am not alone in exposing these truths. Renowned virologist Peter Duesberg has risked his career to speak out. Despite losing his laboratory and funding, his tenured professorship remains intact.

Today, the speaker discusses the parallels between the AIDS epidemic and World War II, calling it a scandal and scam. They criticize the National Institutes of Health, specifically mentioning individuals like Gallo and Fousey, accusing them of being criminals guilty of genocide. The speaker also mentions Burroughs Welcome, claiming they knowingly released a harmful drug. They question why the press ignores these truths and highlight the actions of virologist Peter Duesberg, who has risked his career to speak out. The speaker concludes by stating that Duesberg has already lost his laboratory and funding, but his tenured professorship remains intact.

Today, I draw parallels between the AIDS epidemic and the lies of Hitler, accusing NIH members like Gallo and Fauci of genocide. I challenge them to take me to court, armed with evidence from my book. Renowned virologist Peter Duesberg risks his career to speak out against the deception.

Today, I want to address the AIDS epidemic and draw a parallel to the lies of Hitler during World War II. The National Institutes of Health, along with the media, are perpetrating a horrible scam in the name of science. I challenge individuals like Gallo, Fousey, Hazeltine, and Essex from the NIH, who I believe are guilty of genocide, to take me to court. Burroughs Welcome, the pharmaceutical company, is knowingly distributing a deadly drug. Renowned virologist Peter Duesberg has risked his career to speak out against this. Despite losing his laboratory and funding, he remains tenured and committed to exposing the truth.

Today, I want to address the AIDS epidemic and draw a parallel to World War II. I believe there is a massive scam happening in the name of science, perpetrated by individuals like Gallo, Fousey, Hazeltine, and Essex from the National Institutes of Health. They are guilty of genocide, and I challenge them to take me to court. Burroughs Welcome, the pharmaceutical company, is also responsible for knowingly distributing a deadly drug. I have concrete evidence of this in my book, "Deadly Deception." I am not alone in exposing this truth. Renowned virologist Peter Duesberg has risked his career to speak out against the lies. Despite losing his laboratory and funding, he remains tenured.

The speakers discuss a broad denial about vaccine injuries and the idea that, despite evidence, the medical establishment and political figures push the narrative that vaccines are safe and effective. They claim that many people who are vaccinated want to move on and avoid acknowledging serious side effects, including turbo cancers, undetected myocarditis, and neurological issues, and that autoimmune disease is being attributed to other causes. They argue that the medical establishment, federal health agencies, and some members of Congress who produce supportive content, such as segments like Steve Colbert’s, advocate for taking the shot. They question how many people were killed or died from the shot, asserting that Bayer’s data shows “close[ly]” to thirty-nine thousand worldwide, and that if only ten percent are reported, the true number would be in the hundreds of thousands. They claim there are millions of adverse events, but that this is denied and covered up. The speakers contend that the shot was not a real vaccine. They describe it as gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine. They explain a sequence in which a vaccine is typically an attenuated or killed virus that requires adjuvants like aluminum or mercury to stimulate the immune system, because the attenuated or killed virus may not work well on its own. In contrast, they say this shot is mRNA, which is modified so it does not degrade. They describe how it is put into a lipid nanoparticle designed to permeate barriers like the blood-brain barrier, and they assert it would never stay in the arm, distributing all over the body. They claim the lipid nanoparticle allows the mRNA to enter cells, hijack cellular structures, and cause the cells to express spike protein, which the body then attacks as foreign. When asked who is responsible, they reference a “doctor Frankenstein” figure and name Francis Collins, head of the NIH, and Anthony Fauci as possible figures in question. The response indicates that while they consider all of them criminally liable, they would say it is primarily Fauci, with acknowledgment that people like Collins are implicated as well.

There's a hero we don't talk about enough, Jay Bart Classen, an MD and PhD who worked at NIAID alongside Dr. Anthony Fauci in the 1980s and is still at NIH. Classen wrote a peer-reviewed paper, published in Cy Vision, a biomedicine publication, alleging that the Mossad, using US assets, created COVID-19 as a bioweapon for genocide. He names specific Mossad agents and mentions Bill Gates, detailing his observations. I even spoke with Classen, who confirmed his findings, stating he has provided the best information he could. He urged us to spread the word. So, we're letting people know about this peer-reviewed research.

Today, I want to address the parallels between the AIDS epidemic and the events leading up to World War 2. The National Institutes of Health and the media, particularly individuals like Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex, are perpetrating a massive scam and scandal. They are guilty of genocide and knowingly distributing a deadly drug. I challenge them to take me to court, where I can provide concrete evidence as outlined in my book, Deadly Deception. Renowned virologist Peter Duesberg has also risked his career to expose the truth. It's puzzling why the press ignores these obvious facts. Duesberg, being tenured, has nothing to lose.

Today, I want to address the AIDS epidemic and draw a parallel to World War II. I believe there is a massive scam happening in the name of science, perpetrated by individuals like Gallo, Fousey, Hazeltine, and Essex from the National Institutes of Health. They are guilty of genocide, and I challenge them to take me to court. Burroughs Welcome, the pharmaceutical company, is also responsible for knowingly distributing a deadly drug. Renowned virologist Peter Duesberg has risked his career to speak out against this deception. Despite the evidence, the media and press seem to ignore these truths. Duesberg has already lost his laboratory and funding, but his tenured professorship remains intact.

This video discusses a scandal involving the National Institutes of Health and individuals like Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex, accusing them of perpetrating a great lie comparable to Hitler's actions. The speaker accuses them of being criminals guilty of genocide and challenges them to take legal action against him. Additionally, Burroughs Welcome is accused of knowingly distributing a harmful drug.

The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.

There is a conspiracy to not help in a lot of different ways. One speaker believes another is a politician as much as a scientist. The other speaker disagrees, stating they are not a politician and that no political consideration has ever influenced their scientific decisions. One speaker thinks the other may be naive in understanding how to get things done in Washington, stating you don't get many shots of going out like the Lone Ranger. There is a blatant conflict of interest that runs rampant through all of NIH. This is the history of how AZT became the subject of over eighty percent of the studies being done by NIH for AIDS treatments, a drug that's already shown itself to be highly toxic, very expensive, and of at best extremely limited effectiveness.

Viruses have never been isolated, which is a major fraud against humanity. There is no measles virus, and each year a new virus with similar symptoms emerges. This started with the Third Reich and Doctor Enders. In my book, "A Second Thought about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis," I discuss this issue. Even Professor Peter Guisberg lost his funding at Berkeley University for writing "Inventing the AIDS Virus" and questioning the existence of a virus. The situation is dire.

I ask if you intend to substitute your judgment for that of professional scientists. I won’t substitute my judgment for science. The New York Times reported on fraudulent studies by NIH regarding amyloid plaques and Alzheimer's. Are the scientists who disagree with you considered bad? The corrupt ones, like those behind the fraudulent amyloid studies. Do you have a medical degree? No. Your failed presidential campaign has raised money. How much from HHS's issues? Zero. I want to enter emails about your fundraising into the record. Without objection. You previously stated that Black people should not follow the same vaccine schedule as whites. Can you explain? Studies show Black individuals may have stronger reactions to certain antigens, suggesting they need fewer. That’s dangerous. Your views could mislead parents. Do you think science is dangerous? These are peer-reviewed studies. I yield.

The speaker claims the AIDS epidemic is the most horrible scandal and scam in history, drawing a parallel to the lies preceding World War II. They accuse members of the National Institutes of Health, specifically Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex, of genocide. The speaker invites them and Burroughs Welcome to sue, claiming they have proof in their book, Deadly Deception, that Burroughs Welcome is knowingly distributing a killer drug. They highlight Peter Duesberg, a virologist who put his career on the line, losing his laboratory and funding, to speak out.

The speaker claims the AIDS epidemic is the most horrible scandal and scam ever perpetrated in science and humanity, drawing a parallel to the lies preceding World War II. They accuse members of the NIH, particularly Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex, of genocide and invite them to take them to court, along with Burroughs Welcome for allegedly producing a killer drug knowingly. The speaker asserts that in court, they would provide absolute proof and evidence, as presented in their book, Deadly Deception. They highlight that virologist Peter Duesberg has put his career on the line, losing his laboratory and funding, to expose these truths. The speaker questions why the press ignores these obvious truths.

We're discussing a major scandal related to the AIDS epidemic, drawing parallels to the events leading up to World War II. The actions of the National Institutes of Health, particularly individuals like Gallo and Fauci, are being called into question, with accusations of criminal behavior and genocide. There's a challenge for these individuals to face legal consequences for promoting harmful drugs. The speaker references their book, "Deadly Deception," as evidence of their claims. They highlight the courage of virologist Peter Duesberg, who risked his career to speak out against the prevailing narrative despite losing funding and resources.

I was accused of being part of a propaganda effort to censor those questioning the origin of the virus. I stand by my assertion that the virus is not a lab construct, which aligns with the intelligence community's conclusion. I cannot control how my work is used. It is wrong to censor and lie to the public, and I should have done better.

The speaker accuses individuals from the NIH, including Gallo, Fousey, Hazeltine, and Essex, of being criminals guilty of genocide. They challenge Burroughs Wellcome to take them to court, claiming they have evidence of a killer drug. The speaker questions why the press ignores these truths and mentions virologist Peter Duesberg, who has risked his career by challenging the mainstream narrative. Despite losing his laboratory and funding, Duesberg's tenured professorship remains intact.

I really hope Bobby can do some good things because he cares deeply and has stood up for important issues, even when it hurt him. I used to believe the propaganda against him, thinking he was just an anti-science nut. But after reading his book, I realized it was real. If it wasn't, he would have been sued. The book blew my mind with information about how Fauci got principal investigators from respectable colleges onto committees that chose AZT, a highly toxic and ineffective drug, as the treatment. They started using that, and I don't know how many people that killed. Fauci did some extraordinarily evil stuff and he knows what he did.