reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 notes that the last administration was not transparent on the issue, but with the task force created, they have guided members within what they're cleared for. He asserts that they have encountered alien beings and recovered vehicles, with physical proof, and that he was partially cleared into those activities, having read intelligence reports from those programs. Speaker 1 reflects that online discourse about encounters and videos is plentiful, and asks if there is belief that the US government knows about alien beings coming to Earth. Speaker 0 responds that he doesn’t like to characterize where they came from, but they are definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. He claims to have recovered vehicles and physical proof and says he had partial access to the data and to intelligence reports. He confirms seeing with his own eyes according to his account. Speaker 2 says NASA speaks for itself and claims transparency with data, and asks whether to believe David Crush or if he is lying, and where the evidence is. Speaker 0 asserts that members of the current administration are very aware of this reality and the current president is knowledgeable on the subject. He trusts the president’s leadership and believes the president has assembled a team; he says if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3 says he has access and has had meetings with very smart people who believe there is something out there, and it makes sense there could be. He is not convinced himself. He asks if the person believes one, that he knows, and two, that he’s open to transparency on UAPs. Speaker 0 reiterates that the president is very well informed on the issue, and avoids revealing more than the president might want to reveal. He notes a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 1 asks about years of threat and testimony. Speaker 0 says he was physically threatened even before submitting his intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration, and sought legal protection because of professional and personal fear. Speaker 1 asks about recovering pilots or remains and whether that was seen with his own eyes. Speaker 0 confirms there were pictures and says yes, there were remains. Speaker 1 questions whether the origin is from another planet or outer space, and if it is interdimensional, seeking clarification. Speaker 0 explains he has talked to many veterans of the program and keeps an open mind on origin. He acknowledges an extraterrestrial hypothesis but does not usually go there because he did not see the data, and he is not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government has. He is not aware of any remains or signs of extraterrestrial beings or technology by his department. Speaker 3 says the US government knows, but asks whether other governments know. Speaker 0 says they know and have their own programs, and notes that two and a half years ago the US has been in an arms race with peer competitors like Russia and China, who have their own programs. He says he was able to view intelligence discussing adversarial programs and will leave it at that. Speaker 3 states that they’ve recovered things, and Speaker 0 confirms, noting there were bodies and physical remains. They discuss whether the motive or intent of the visitors was peaceful or not, acknowledging a mixed bag of activity and motive. They consider whether Earth’s genetic material could be a reason for visits, even jokingly proposing Jurassic Park as a tourist attraction for genetic material on Earth.

We, along with other senators, will press the Secret Service for answers. The American people deserve transparency. Past conspiracy theories have proven true, so we must uncover the truth of this situation.

Speaker 0: If these assessments are correct, they are very covert weapons, aren’t they? Speaker 1: That’s correct. There’s no entry or exit wound. How they’re designed is to make the target feel like they’re crazy, like they’re imagining things. Speaker 0: And you also said these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct? Speaker 2: I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC. Speaker 0: I think it was Mister Grozov said you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. Is that correct? Speaker 3: That is correct. Speaker 0: Might that have something to do with part of the CIA’s motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons? Speaker 3: That is a very logical possibility. Speaker 0: Thank you. Mister chairman, I yield back. Speaker 2: Gentleman yields. Chair now recognize the gentleman from New York, Mister Goldman, for his random questioning. Speaker 3 (Mister Goldman): Thank you, Mister chairman, and thank you to our witnesses for being here. Mister Grosev, I want a follow-up on the interactions you’ve had with Russian intelligence about these AHIs. Mister Zaid, I want to ask—this is hypothetical—but I’m trying to understand why the U.S. government would try to block information sharing or conceal information that they have. One thing that comes to mind is whether there’s an operational risk to revealing any of the details of their investigation. Is that something you have come across in any of your work? Speaker 2 (Mister Zaid): There are a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released. I do think that’s something we could address more in a classified environment to explain that, but there are understandable reasons why the U.S. government has not revealed much of what it knows. Speaker 1: There’s some long-term things that needs to be done in terms of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act.

"Did president Obama ordered any kind of surveillance of the president? Well elect." "We don't know we don't know who sent the taskings, if the taskings were changed into what went into these intelligence reports, but we're gonna try to find that out." "And I thought it was important for the president to know this." "That's why I briefed the speaker this morning, and I came down here, as soon as I could." "I think the president is is concerned, and he and he should be." "He'd like to see these reports." "Hopefully, when we get them, hopefully, they'll get them to the White House also."

This situation has escalated from questions to chaos, with a U.S. senator searching for drones alongside local police. A state police briefing revealed frustration over the unknown origins of these drones. Calls for a limited state of emergency and FAA intervention have been made, as the Department of Defense has not provided clear information. The FBI claims no evidence of malicious intent, but this raises further concerns. The lack of transparency from the government is alarming, leading to public frustration and speculation. There's a pressing need for the Department of Defense to disclose what they know. The FAA's no-fly zones are ineffective, and the senator urges constituents to demand accountability from federal authorities to prevent panic and misinformation.

Everything is on the table regarding unidentified aerial phenomena. Recently, in a classified briefing, two specific shapes were discussed that the U.S. government cannot identify, supported by footage and photographs. It seems clear that the government is not being transparent with the American people and Congress about these incidents. Congress deserves to be informed to address safety concerns, especially along the eastern seaboard.

I have an update from President Trump regarding the drones observed over New Jersey. After investigation, it has been confirmed that these drones were authorized by the FAA for research and other purposes. Many of the operators were hobbyists and private individuals flying for recreational reasons. The situation escalated due to public curiosity, but these drones do not pose a threat. With that, I will now open the floor to questions.

I've been frustrated about drones flying over New Jersey, including one that hovered over my farm. After writing a column on the issue, I learned that the intelligence community briefed the House Intelligence Committee about these drones, but no one had the courage to disclose this information publicly. Members of Congress know the origins of these drones but are silenced by fear of repercussions from the intelligence community. This raises serious concerns about our democracy. It seems we are increasingly living in a police state under Joe Biden.

Speaker 0 questions: "You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war, but you're the only person in your government saying this. Even your defense secretary wouldn't say that when he was asked, standing over your shoulder on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?" Speaker 1 responds: "Because I just don't know enough about it. I think it's something that I was told is under investigation, but Tomahawks are used by others, as you know. Numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us. But I will certainly whatever the report shows, I'm willing to live with that report."

You are not being honest with this committee. We asked for all memorandums from the Secret Service on July 15th, have you provided them? You are dodging important questions that the American people want answers to. We had to subpoena you to be here, and you still won't answer. These are not difficult questions.

The discussion centers on the government's lack of transparency regarding drone incursions over military bases and civilian areas. Michael Shellenberger points out inconsistencies in official statements, where authorities claim to be investigating while simultaneously asserting there’s nothing to worry about. He highlights numerous instances of unidentified drones over sensitive locations, questioning the military's control over U.S. airspace. Both Republican and Democratic representatives agree on the need for clearer authority and funding for detection systems to address these incursions. Shellenberger emphasizes that while there’s no evidence of foreign control over the drones, the government's failure to communicate effectively leads to misinformation and public concern.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

The Pentagon is aware of drone sightings over New Jersey near sensitive installations but has found no evidence linking these activities to foreign entities or adversaries. There is no indication that these drones are from the US military; local law enforcement is investigating the situation. Additionally, claims made by Representative Jeff Van Drew about an Iranian mothership off the East Coast launching drones are false. There is no Iranian ship near the United States. The Pentagon will continue to monitor the situation.

We went outside and noticed there were no drones in the air, so I decided to launch mine. I wanted to demonstrate that my drone operates without issues. For those claiming that drones can't be flown in restricted airspace, that's not accurate. You can fly them there, but you'll receive a warning.

Why did the shooter act? Was he alone or connected to others? What motivated him? We sought answers from the DOJ and FBI, but they claim it's an ongoing investigation and can't share information with Congress. This is unacceptable. As a member of the intelligence and armed services committees, I regularly access sensitive information, so it's hard to believe we can't get updates on this investigation. I don't know if they're intentionally withholding information, but stonewalling is common in oversight. Misinformation thrives in the absence of clarity, and our goal is to provide transparency and counter conspiracy theories surrounding these events. So far, I have seen no evidence linking state actors to these assassination attempts.

There have been multiple drone incursions over military bases and sensitive sites, including a recent two-week incident at Langley and another at Wright Patterson. These situations raise significant concerns about the identity and technology of the drones involved. Authorities like the FAA, DOJ, and Homeland Security need to better assess whether these drones are adversarial. While they claim there’s no evidence of foreign operation, the absence of evidence does not rule out potential threats. The drones at Langley evaded radar detection, highlighting the need for improved resources and answers. A letter has been sent requesting further information on this issue.

There are drones flying around New Jersey ports, and the government is aware of their origins. The military knows where they launched from and can trace them back to their source. However, there's a lack of communication about this situation, leaving people in suspense. It's unlikely that these drones are a threat, as any enemy activity would have been more aggressive. The public deserves transparency, especially since these drones have been spotted over areas like Bedminster. The truth should be shared with the people.

Repeated sightings of large drones flying in flocks at low altitudes, particularly in New Jersey, have been reported. The President is aware of these incidents, and the administration is closely tracking the activity, coordinating with DHS and FBI to investigate. When asked if the federal government has ruled out foreign entities controlling the drones, the speaker stated they could not make any predictions or comments, referring to DHS and FBI. While unable to provide a specific timeline, the speaker confirmed the President has been made aware of the situation. Acknowledging frustration over the lack of answers, the White House says they are closely monitoring the incidents and working with agencies on the ground to investigate.

Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs? Yes. Were these programs designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft? Yes. Do any US contractors have similar programs? I prefer to address that in a closed session. In your book, you mention government employees injured by UAPs who are on leave and receiving compensation. Is that correct? Yes. How can the government deny recovering craft if they are compensating injured individuals? That's a great question. I've seen documentation from the US government regarding individuals who sustained injuries from UAP incidents.

I asked colleagues to create a committee with subpoena power to investigate the lack of Secret Service protection for the president. The Secret Service director agreed to brief us, but it hasn't happened yet. I question why the president wasn't given more protection and who is responsible for that decision.

We should keep classified information about UAP technology confidential to protect national security. However, the American public deserves to know about the new realities and evidence that the defense department and intelligence community have discovered regarding UAPs. It's important to share this information with citizens, as they have a right to understand these developments.