reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Lauren Conland discusses a rising number of missing scientists and high-profile disappearances connected to sensitive government work. The guest emphasizes a pattern rather than isolated incidents, noting multiple cases linked to space research, military programs, and classified information. They explore possible explanations, including personal struggles, possible foul play, or pressure related to national security. While acknowledging a lack of conclusive proof, the interview repeatedly highlights the need for greater transparency around unexplained events and the handling of sensitive data. The conversation also covers how public interest in UAPs has intensified government inquiries, with references to congressional efforts, the timing of released footage, and the challenges of distinguishing between drones, unknown phenomena, and potential adversarial technology. Throughout, the speaker cautions against assuming blame without solid evidence and urges responsible reporting and sensitivity toward families. As the discussion moves to specific cases, the role of media coverage and investigations is examined. The guest mentions NASA, JPL, and figures tied to research on extraterrestrial debris, stressing that many details remain undisclosed. The exchange ends with a focus on national security implications and transparency from authorities.

The discussion on the Shawn Ryan Show centers around recent UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) hearings and testimonies from military pilots and officials. Key points include the description of UAPs, notably dark gray or black cubes within clear spheres, as reported by military pilots who have encountered these objects. The conversation highlights skepticism towards government agencies like NASA and the Pentagon, suggesting they are seeking funding under the guise of studying UAPs while previously denying their existence. Tim Burchett expresses frustration over the lack of transparency and accountability, arguing that government agencies are more interested in securing funding than providing the public with information. He criticizes the secrecy surrounding UAP data, asserting that excessive classification hinders understanding and fuels distrust. Burchett also discusses the recent UAP hearings in Mexico, questioning the credibility of claims made there and suggesting they may have been a publicity stunt. The testimonies from pilots David Fravor and Ryan Graves reveal firsthand encounters with UAPs, including descriptions of their extraordinary capabilities, such as rapid acceleration and maneuverability that defies current human technology. Graves emphasizes the stigma faced by pilots reporting UAP sightings, which discourages open discussion and reporting. David Grusch, a whistleblower, claims that the U.S. government is involved in secret programs related to UAPs, including crash retrieval and reverse engineering efforts. He mentions the existence of non-human biologics associated with these crafts, raising further questions about the government's transparency. Overall, the conversation underscores a growing interest in UAPs, the need for accountability, and the challenges faced by those seeking to uncover the truth behind these phenomena.

The conversation centers on Luis Elizondo’s account of sensitive investigations tied to aerospace and defense research, and the wider public controversy around what governments may have withheld. The host and guest discuss reports of missing or deceased researchers linked to highly restricted work, and they reference an active law-enforcement effort into the circumstances surrounding these cases. Elizondo describes personal warnings he says he received and explains that his own background in a government program shaped his views on how information is controlled, who is briefed, and why disclosures often arrive unevenly. Elizondo also addresses claims raised by members of Congress regarding alleged cross-domain biological research involving captured nonhuman entities and human subjects. He explains that while he does not claim first-hand knowledge of specific biological procedures, he says the concept has long circulated among intelligence and military contacts and that a cooperative relationship may exist between governments and “off-world” or otherwise non-terrestrial actors. He frames the discussion as partly conceptual, arguing that cooperation could be plausible for any intelligent species and that concealed government involvement would raise serious legal and constitutional concerns. The host connects these ideas to broader ethical questions, including the distinction between kidnapping and scientifically sanctioned study, and they debate how such knowledge could be kept secret for decades. Later, they shift to alleged directed-energy weapon attacks and a specific case involving a researcher who claimed harassment related to advanced energy weapons. Elizondo discusses directed-energy concepts in general terms and links them to injuries and medical uncertainty, while also describing how secrecy can incentivize silencing vocal researchers. The discussion then expands to speculative physics and intelligence practices, including arguments about quantum entanglement, the manipulation of spacetime, and the existence of remote-viewing style intelligence methods, which he says were treated seriously within government channels. In the closing segment, Elizondo returns to the theme of incomplete public transparency and the social consequences of disclosure. The host presses him about how long such events may have been known and what objectives could be driving them. Elizondo describes government credibility, institutional guardrails, and the difficulty of reconciling national security secrecy with accountability, emphasizing that law enforcement should continue gathering data before conclusions are drawn.

George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell discuss the recent government UFO report, officially titled the 2022 annual report on UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena), which was delayed until 2023. The report is brief, consisting of only a few pages, and lacks detailed information about the 510 new cases added, many of which are classified. They note that while the report indicates some cases involve advanced technology, specifics about the incidents remain vague, including their locations and characteristics. The hosts express disappointment over the report's lack of depth, suggesting that it appears to downplay the significance of UFO phenomena. They highlight that the report's language seems bureaucratic and diluted, potentially minimizing public interest. They emphasize the importance of understanding that many cases remain unresolved and that the reporting system is improving. Jay Stratton, a key figure in UFO investigations, is introduced as someone who has played a significant role in various programs, including OSAP and AATIP. Stratton's efforts focused on destigmatizing UFO reporting within the military and intelligence communities. He discusses his background in intelligence and the need for a structured approach to address UFO phenomena, emphasizing the importance of collaboration across agencies. The conversation also touches on the potential existence of advanced technologies and materials related to UFOs, with a call for transparency and accountability in government programs. The hosts express optimism about future disclosures and the potential for whistleblowers to share critical information. They conclude that understanding UFOs requires looking beyond just aerial phenomena to encompass broader implications for humanity.

The episode centers on a witness who was cleared to testify to Congress about a triangular, silent craft observed at a military base, detailing a firsthand encounter that defies conventional aviation. The guest describes the craft as enormous, with a triangular shape and lights at its vertices, hovering without audible propulsion and then accelerating instantly beyond the canopy without sonic advance. The account emphasizes the absence of an engine noise, the lack of a visible cockpit or tail, and the impression that the craft operated with propulsion and physics beyond known technologies. During the discussion, the hosts explore the challenges faced by whistleblowers, including pressure, public scrutiny, and the risks to their careers, while noting that some testimony was redacted to protect the individuals involved. They discuss the vetting process for witnesses, connections to notable figures in the UAP community, and the tension between making testimony public and safeguarding sensitive information. The conversation also touches on government and organizational responses to these disclosures, including how agencies may classify partially revealing material and how public figures react to alleged secrecy. The speakers reflect on the potential implications of such sightings for national security, technological development, and transparency, considering whether what was observed could indicate advanced, possibly covert, propulsion systems or even reverse-engineered technology. Throughout, there is an emphasis on verifying accounts, honoring the courage of those who come forward, and maintaining a critical, evidence-based approach to extraordinary claims while acknowledging the broader public interest in disclosure and understanding what these testimonies reveal about evolving questions surrounding unidentified aerial phenomena.

Luis Elizondo, a former U.S. Army Counter Intelligence special agent, discusses his background, including his father's involvement in the Bay of Pigs invasion and the impact of that history on his life. He shares his experiences with paramilitary training as a child and his eventual career in intelligence, where he led the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) investigating unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Elizondo clarifies that while AATIP was sensitive, it was not covert. The program evolved from the Advanced Aerospace Weapons Special Application Program (ASAP), initiated in 2007 with bipartisan support from senators, including Harry Reid. AATIP focused on the technical aspects of UAPs, while ASAP had a broader scope. He notes that many members of Congress have had their own UAP experiences but are hesitant to discuss them publicly. He mentions Skinwalker Ranch, where significant research was conducted under Bob Bigelow, who funded various investigations into UAPs. Elizondo acknowledges the strange occurrences reported at the ranch and the need for further investigation. He emphasizes the importance of transparency regarding UAPs, arguing that the public deserves to know about the existence of these phenomena, which have been investigated for decades. Elizondo addresses the implications of UAPs for national security, particularly their interference with nuclear capabilities. He recounts incidents where UAPs reportedly disabled nuclear silos, raising concerns about their origins and intentions. He stresses that the government has been aware of UAPs for a long time and that the lack of transparency erodes public trust. He discusses the potential for foreign adversaries, like Russia and China, to possess advanced technologies, and the implications of this for U.S. security. Elizondo advocates for a shift in how the government communicates about UAPs, suggesting that the public is more prepared to handle the truth than previously thought. Elizondo also touches on the evolution of societal perceptions regarding UAPs and the importance of understanding consciousness in relation to these phenomena. He believes that the conversation around UAPs is changing and that younger generations are more open to exploring these topics without stigma. In conclusion, Elizondo calls for continued dialogue and transparency about UAPs, emphasizing the need for a constructive approach that respects national security while informing the public. He believes that the ongoing investigation into UAPs could lead to significant paradigm shifts in understanding humanity's place in the universe.

Luis Elizondo discusses the complexities surrounding UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) and the government's handling of related information. He emphasizes the national security implications of UAP encounters, noting that these vehicles have approached military formations closely, raising concerns about air safety and potential interference with nuclear capabilities. Elizondo believes that the American public can handle the truth about UAPs, contrary to government assessments that suggest otherwise, which he argues could undermine faith in institutions. Elizondo recounts his background in military intelligence and his recruitment into the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (ATIP), where he learned about the government's long history of investigating UAPs. He clarifies that ATIP was not a solo effort by Senator Harry Reid but a bipartisan initiative involving other senators who had personal experiences with UAPs. The program aimed to understand UAP interactions with military assets and was prompted by concerns over national security. He describes the rigorous data collection methods used to document UAP sightings, including radar, gun camera footage, and eyewitness accounts from trained military personnel. Elizondo asserts that the evidence collected is compelling and suggests that these technologies are not of human origin. He also discusses the potential for UAPs to originate from Earth's oceans, given our limited understanding of underwater environments. Elizondo addresses the stigma surrounding UAP discussions and the challenges faced by whistleblowers in the field. He highlights the need for transparency and accountability in government dealings with UAP information, advocating for a collaborative approach between private organizations and government entities to further investigate these phenomena. He expresses concern over the classification of information to prevent embarrassment or cover up failures, emphasizing that such practices are illegal. Elizondo believes that the conversation around UAPs is evolving, with increasing bipartisan support in Congress and a growing willingness to engage with the public on the topic. Elizondo concludes by stressing the importance of data over personal opinions in the UAP discourse, encouraging individuals to analyze the evidence themselves. He believes that the ongoing dialogue about UAPs is just the beginning and that significant progress has been made in recent years, paving the way for future revelations and understanding.

Michael Shellenberger discusses his recent experiences in Brazil, particularly regarding the Twitter Files and extreme censorship in the country. He highlights the actions of a Brazilian Supreme Court justice who has been demanding bans on journalists and politicians from all social media platforms, a tactic reminiscent of military censorship operations. The Brazilian public reacted with large protests advocating for free speech, which Shellenberger found inspiring. Rogan and Shellenberger delve into the implications of censorship, particularly in the context of misinformation surrounding COVID and elections. They discuss the arbitrary nature of bans on individuals, citing specific cases where politicians were deplatformed for supposedly spreading misinformation. Shellenberger expresses disappointment in Brazilian President Lula for supporting censorship, contrasting it with his earlier views of Lula as a proponent of democratic socialism. The conversation shifts to broader themes of censorship, free speech, and the changing political landscape, with Shellenberger reflecting on how the left's stance on free speech has evolved. They discuss the historical context of censorship and the importance of protecting free speech as a fundamental right. As the discussion progresses, they touch on the topic of UFOs and government secrecy. Shellenberger reveals that he has been investigating whistleblower claims regarding UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) and the government's alleged cover-up of information. He mentions a new whistleblower who has provided credible reports about a secret UAP program, suggesting that the Pentagon is withholding significant information from Congress. Rogan and Shellenberger explore the implications of such secrecy, considering the potential societal impact of revealing the truth about extraterrestrial life. They discuss the fear that such revelations could provoke, including the collapse of societal norms and the challenge to established beliefs. The conversation concludes with reflections on the nature of truth, the role of government in managing information, and the importance of transparency in a democratic society. Shellenberger emphasizes the need for stronger whistleblower protections and accountability within government agencies, advocating for a more open dialogue about UAPs and other critical issues facing society today.

The hosts discuss the mysterious drone sightings in New Jersey, where reports indicate sophisticated drones evading detection. Rich McHugh, a journalist, shares his skepticism turned belief after witnessing numerous drones with unusual characteristics, prompting local authorities to seek federal assistance. Despite confirmed sightings near military installations, the government remains secretive, leading to public panic and speculation about potential threats. Theories range from government cover-ups to foreign adversaries or even extraterrestrial involvement. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy urges federal agencies for more transparency, highlighting the growing concern among residents. The hosts express frustration over the lack of information and the government's tendency to obfuscate, emphasizing the need for clarity to prevent public fear.

Luis Elizondo discusses his background in counterintelligence and his work with the U.S. government, particularly regarding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). He describes how he was approached in 2008 to join a secretive program focused on UAPs, which led him to encounter various reports and videos of objects exhibiting extraordinary capabilities, far beyond known technology. Elizondo emphasizes that these objects often lack conventional features like wings or engines, raising significant national security concerns, especially since they are frequently observed over sensitive military installations. He recounts his gradual realization of the seriousness of the UAP issue, noting that many military pilots have reported encounters with these objects, which often maneuver in ways that defy current understanding of physics. Elizondo mentions the existence of numerous classified videos that have not yet been released to the public, asserting that the three well-known Pentagon videos are just the tip of the iceberg. Elizondo reflects on the historical context of UAP sightings, referencing official documents from the 1950s that indicate a long-standing awareness of these phenomena. He argues that the government's reluctance to disclose information stems from a desire to maintain control and avoid public panic, which he believes is misguided. He stresses the importance of transparency and public discourse on the topic, asserting that the American people deserve to know the truth. Throughout the conversation, Elizondo shares personal anecdotes, including a profound experience related to the death of his mother, which led him to contemplate the essence of human existence beyond the physical body. He suggests that the conversation about UAPs transcends national security, touching on philosophical and existential questions about life and intelligence in the universe. Elizondo concludes by emphasizing the need for open dialogue and the responsibility of individuals in power to engage with the public on these critical issues, advocating for a collective understanding of the implications of UAPs and the potential for life beyond Earth.

In this episode of Weaponized, hosts Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp interview UAP researcher Richard Dolan, focusing on Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs) and their connection to UFO phenomena. Dolan highlights the significant yet overlooked activity of USOs in Earth's oceans and lakes, noting that only 25% of the ocean floor and 5% of its volume have been explored. He emphasizes the strategic importance of water for these objects, as it provides a stable environment, protection from cosmic rays, and a potential habitat for extraterrestrial life. Dolan discusses his new book series, which documents 672 USO sightings, revealing patterns such as the predominance of triangular USOs described as black and disc-shaped ones as silver or gray. He shares a compelling case from 1945 involving a disc-shaped object near the Aleutian Islands, which sparked his interest in USOs. Dolan's research indicates that military encounters with USOs have increased, particularly at night, suggesting a behavioral shift in these phenomena since the late 1960s. He recounts incidents where USOs have disrupted military operations, including a notable case involving the USS Franklin Delano Roosevelt, where weapon systems failed during a sighting. Dolan also mentions the potential existence of underwater bases, particularly near Puerto Rico, and discusses various hotspots for USO activity, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Bermuda Triangle. The conversation touches on the secrecy surrounding UAPs, with Dolan asserting that the Pentagon is aware of the true nature of these phenomena but is not forthcoming with information. He speculates on the implications of advanced non-human intelligence monitoring humanity, suggesting that their interest may be linked to our technological advancements and potential threats we pose to ourselves. Dolan concludes by expressing hope for greater transparency in the future while acknowledging the complexities of human-alien interactions.

Luis Elizondo, former head of the Pentagon's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), asserts that we are not alone in the universe and emphasizes the reality of UFOs, citing his investigations into unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) that have national security implications. He describes encounters with technologies that outperform U.S. military capabilities and raises concerns about potential interference with nuclear facilities. Elizondo highlights the stigma surrounding UFO reports, which has led to underreporting among military personnel. He explains the evolution of terminology from UFO to UAP, noting that the latter encompasses phenomena observed in various environments, including underwater and in space. Elizondo recounts his journey from military intelligence to AATIP, where he focused on military encounters with UAP, supported by multiple sensor data. He discusses the challenges of addressing UAP within the government, including a lack of transparency and the reluctance of leadership to inform higher authorities. Elizondo outlines five key observables that distinguish UAP: instantaneous acceleration, hypersonic velocity, low observability, transmedium travel, and advanced technology beyond current human capabilities. He mentions historical incidents, such as the USS Nimitz encounter, and the implications of UAP sightings at nuclear facilities, which pose a significant national security concern. He expresses the need for open dialogue about UAP, emphasizing that while there is no immediate threat, the capabilities of these phenomena warrant investigation. Elizondo concludes by advocating for a balanced approach to understanding UAP, remaining open to possibilities without jumping to conclusions about their origins or intentions.

This episode of "Weaponized" features hosts Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp discussing the implications of recent congressional hearings on UFOs and UAPs. They emphasize the importance of transparency and the need for credible whistleblowers, expressing concern over the control of the narrative surrounding UAPs. Corbell highlights the significance of having Lou Elizondo testify under oath, asserting that it allows the public to assess his credibility. He expresses worries about a new control system emerging, which could shape the UAP narrative and limit genuine disclosure. The hosts reflect on the differences between the first and second congressional hearings, noting that the first felt authentic while the second appeared managed and controlled. They discuss the Immaculate Constellation document, which they believe reveals critical information about UAPs and the potential for non-human technology. They also touch on the role of foreign governments in UFO investigations, suggesting that the U.S. has pressured allies to keep information under wraps. Corbell and Knapp express frustration over the lack of accountability and the manipulation of information, particularly regarding the testimony of Michael Shellenberger. They argue that the current environment is chaotic, with many whistleblowers emerging, making it difficult for the public to discern credible information. They conclude that while there is growing interest in UAPs, the challenge remains to ensure that the truth is revealed without interference from those who wish to control the narrative.

The discussion centers on the government's handling of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the challenges faced by Sean Kirkpatrick, the former director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Kirkpatrick, a physicist and ex-intelligence officer, resigned due to harassment, noting that he faced more threats from U.S. citizens than from foreign adversaries. He emphasizes the need for scientific investigation to combat conspiracy theories, stating that many claims about extraterrestrial technology lack substantiation and can often be explained by existing military programs. Kirkpatrick explains that the overlap between scientific investigation and intelligence work is crucial for understanding UAPs. He highlights the billions spent by NASA on searching for extraterrestrial life, arguing that physicists should engage in this field to elevate the conversation from conspiracy to fact. He also addresses the issue of overclassification in government data, explaining the complexities involved in declassifying information and the biases in reporting UAP sightings, which often stem from military test ranges. Kirkpatrick expresses disappointment over the public's distrust of intelligence officers and the lack of critical thinking in society. He believes education and transparency are vital for improving public understanding of scientific methods. Ultimately, he stresses the importance of evidence-based analysis in addressing claims of extraterrestrial encounters, asserting that belief without evidence leads to misinformation and confusion.

Bottom line: It's very simple. Either A, the reality is that UAP are here, or B, this is some form of mass hysteria. And if it is mass hysteria, that means admirals, generals, trained pilots with top secret clearances, weapons officers, Air Force nuclear technicians literally with their fingers on the nuclear button that are all crazy. 'Are we ready to tell the American people the truth about UFOs?' The discussion frames disclosure as a binary choice with national security and public trust at stake, citing witnesses, leaked videos, and pilots posting publicly. In 2017, after trying to brief General Mattis and facing bureaucratic pushback, Lou Elizondo and Chris Mellon released three Pentagon videos to the New York Times, a moment that propelled UFO discourse into the mainstream. Lou Elizondo is described as 'the Man Behind modern UFO disclosure' who ran the Advanced Aerial Threat Identification Program, 'an offshoot of AASAP.' He has led defense and intelligence work against threats and served at Guantanamo. The interview notes his liaison role with the Special Access Oversight Committee and his association with Gray Fox, an elite mission unit. It adds that the three videos released in 2017 were cleared by the Pentagon and presented to the Times, helping shift the topic from fringe chatter to data-driven discussion, even as questions about occupants, origins, and purposes remained. The conversation dives into occult and esoteric roots of space exploration: Freemason influences, Jack Parsons, Aleister Crowley, and the idea that NASA’s history hides science within mysticism. It argues that religion and science can lean on each other toward deeper understanding. The discussion covers infrared observations, nuclear connections, and the possibility that consciousness interacts with physical reality, touching on quantum ideas and holographic theory. They describe Hal Puthoff as 'the Godfather of the CIA's remote viewing program' and recount remote-viewing experiments, including detainee sessions and Skinwalker Ranch. The claim that 'The United States government has in its possession a craft of Unknown Origin' is repeated, along with implications for secrecy, progress in physics, and the stigma surrounding extraordinary claims. Finally, the talk turns to ethics and future steps: whether full disclosure would help or harm, and how information should be shared. They discuss trust, national security, and the possible role of international bodies. The closing sentiment centers on love, humanity, and the responsibility to pursue knowledge with compassion, warning that seeking forbidden knowledge without purpose can end badly, while responsible science and unity may guide us forward.

Tim Gallaudet, a retired Rear Admiral and oceanographer, discusses various aspects of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and their potential connections to the ocean. Gallaudet highlights his extensive background, including his roles in the U.S. Navy and NOAA, and his current involvement with the Galileo project, which aims to scientifically study UAP. He notes that there are global hotspots for UFO activity beyond California and Florida, with documented sightings in South America and the Pacific Northwest. Gallaudet emphasizes the scientific interest in hydrothermal vents, which host unique life forms and could potentially relate to UAP, suggesting that there may already be "aliens in our oceans." Gallaudet reflects on the credibility of whistleblower accounts regarding UAP, mentioning a book about the Air Force's deception of a civilian researcher, which parallels current government actions. He criticizes the Department of Defense's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) for failing to meet Congressional mandates and for potentially disseminating disinformation about UAP. He discusses the implications of UAP on national security, particularly regarding underwater encounters and the need for better understanding of these phenomena. Gallaudet shares an anecdote about a submarine officer's encounter with an unidentified object, underscoring the potential risks posed by UAP to military operations. Gallaudet expresses concern over the lack of scientific investigation into UAP, advocating for their inclusion in ocean research priorities. He mentions his efforts to engage with the National Academies of Sciences and the White House to promote UAP studies, emphasizing the need for transparency and collaboration in understanding these phenomena. He speculates on the origins of UAP, considering possibilities such as ancient civilizations, extraterrestrial sources, and interdimensional beings. Gallaudet acknowledges the stigma surrounding UAP research and the need for credible voices to advance scientific inquiry. The conversation also touches on the potential for weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, with Gallaudet emphasizing the importance of studying these technologies responsibly. He concludes by discussing his upcoming book on leadership, which aims to inspire the next generation and share lessons from his career in oceanography and military service.

Joe Rogan welcomes Christopher Mellon, a former government official with extensive experience in intelligence and defense, to discuss UFOs and UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena). Mellon shares his background, including his work with the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Department of Defense, where he developed an interest in UFOs after witnessing a compelling video of a UFO at a young age. Mellon explains that during his time in government, discussing UFOs was politically risky due to the stigma surrounding the topic. He recounts instances where he sought information about UFOs but faced resistance and a lack of serious inquiry from colleagues. He notes a significant shift in attitudes towards UFOs following a 2017 New York Times article, which gave people more permission to discuss the subject openly. The conversation delves into the historical context of UFO investigations, including Project Blue Book and the Robertson Panel, which sought to debunk UFO sightings during the Cold War. Mellon emphasizes that the government has often dismissed credible sightings without thorough investigation. Mellon discusses notable incidents, such as the Nimitz encounter in 2004, where military pilots observed a Tic Tac-shaped UFO exhibiting extraordinary speed and maneuverability. He highlights the credibility of the pilots involved and the multiple sensor systems that corroborated their accounts. The discussion touches on the potential implications of UFOs on national security, particularly concerning nuclear facilities and military operations. Mellon expresses concern that the government has not adequately addressed these issues and advocates for a more organized approach to studying UAPs. Mellon mentions the need for a dedicated office or task force to investigate UAPs, suggesting that existing databases and military technology could be utilized to gather more information. He emphasizes the importance of transparency and public engagement in understanding these phenomena. The conversation also explores the possibility of extraterrestrial technology, with Mellon acknowledging the intriguing nature of recovered materials and their potential implications for advanced propulsion systems. He discusses the scientific community's reluctance to engage with the topic and the need for more rigorous investigation. Mellon concludes by expressing hope that increased interest in UAPs will lead to greater understanding and collaboration, potentially benefiting national security and scientific advancement. He remains open to future discussions and developments in the field.

In this episode of Weaponized, hosts George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell discuss various topics related to UFOs and UAPs, including recent congressional hearings and underwater phenomena. They mention the heightened interest in UFOs, with Congress and the media becoming more engaged than in previous decades. The conversation shifts to a recent incident involving underwater objects, with guest Rory Kremer, an underwater archaeologist, sharing his experience of witnessing a bright light emerge from the ocean while sailing. Rory describes the object as large, spherical, and capable of transitioning from water to air, raising questions about its origin. The hosts express frustration over the lack of transparency and urgency from government agencies regarding UAP sightings, particularly in the UK, where mystery drones have been reported over military installations. They highlight the confusion surrounding these incidents and the potential for disinformation campaigns aimed at the public. Chris Sharpe, another guest, emphasizes the need for accountability and the importance of journalists in uncovering the truth about UAPs. The discussion also touches on the recent Netflix series produced by George, which explores various UFO incidents, including a notable case in Brazil. The series aims to present credible evidence and firsthand accounts while protecting the identities of witnesses. The hosts conclude by acknowledging the ongoing challenges in reporting on UAPs and the need for continued investigation and dialogue within the community. They express gratitude for the growing interest in the subject and the support from their audience, emphasizing the importance of collaboration in uncovering the truth about unidentified phenomena.