reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It seems unlikely, especially when it involves the president's family and associates. Seeking such pardons raises questions about guilt; if someone is innocent, why would they need one? Preemptive pardons suggest that crimes may have occurred, even if they are not publicly known. If the president were to issue these pardons, it might be framed as protecting his family from external threats. However, the underlying concern appears to be about his own and his family's legal troubles. The idea of a permanent pardon for individuals like Rudy Giuliani and the president's children is troubling, especially if they haven't been convicted of any crimes. Many would interpret these pardons as an admission of guilt.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It seems unlikely, especially when it involves the president's family and associates. Seeking pardons suggests concern over potential wrongdoing. If someone is innocent, why would they need a pardon? Preemptive pardons imply that crimes may have occurred, even if not publicly known. If the president grants these pardons, it could be seen as protecting his family from external threats, but it raises questions about guilt. The idea of a permanent pardon for individuals like Giuliani or the president's children is troubling, especially if they haven't been convicted of any crime. If the president pardons anyone, many would interpret it as an admission of guilt. Recently, it was reported that President Biden will pardon his son, Hunter Biden.

The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, which they believe may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence linking this research to the pandemic. The speaker claims Anthony Fauci denied this research under oath and may have sought a preemptive pardon. They argue that gain of function research continues in biolabs worldwide, posing a risk of future pandemics. The speaker faced criticism for warning about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine. The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, contrasting this with instances where they quickly make assumptions without conclusive evidence. They attribute this to the politicization of intelligence, citing the Iraq War as an example of intelligence being used to influence policy.

Preemptive pardons are being discussed for individuals potentially targeted by Trump, including members of Congress and Anthony Fauci. Although these individuals haven't requested pardons, there is speculation about Fauci's risk due to allegations of lying to Congress, which could lead to felony charges. Evidence from his private emails supports these claims. Additionally, there are expectations that Biden may pardon his brother Hunter, who has a significant criminal history, and possibly himself. The precedent set by Hunter Biden's pardon, which covered all potential future accusations, raises the possibility of similar actions for Fauci and others.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It's unusual, especially when it's the president's family involved. Seeking preemptive pardons raises questions about guilt; if there's no wrongdoing, why ask for one? Such actions suggest that crimes may have occurred, even if not publicly known. If pardons are issued, they might be framed as protecting family reputations from external threats. The notion of a permanent pardon raises eyebrows, especially for individuals like Giuliani and the president's children, who haven't been convicted of crimes. If the president pardons them, many would interpret it as an admission of guilt. Meanwhile, there are still legal avenues to pursue accountability for any wrongdoing.

Biden recently pardoned Mark Milley, Dr. Fauci, and the January 6 committee, which was illegally formed and manipulated evidence. Milley allegedly assured the Chinese general that he had control over nuclear codes, while Fauci misled Congress about gain-of-function research. These actions protect key figures in a larger power structure. Trump is determined to confront these threats, as they have attempted to undermine him. The globalist agenda is increasingly being recognized as deceitful, and the public is growing frustrated. It's crucial to inform the left that their influence is waning. As they continue their destructive behavior, it fuels resistance against their globalist system. The fight against this agenda must continue, and there is a call to dismantle it entirely.

I believe that two other Biden family members, Jim and Joe Biden, knowingly committed crimes alongside Hunter Biden. Joe Biden obstructed investigations and lied about his involvement. Testimonies from Bob Olinsky and Devin Archer indicate he was aware of the dealings and was selling access to foreign adversaries. He also misled about pardoning his son. Jim Biden received loans without paying interest or principal, raising questions about their legitimacy and tax implications. The individuals who sent money to the Bidens were often questionable characters seeking favors from Joe Biden, the "big guy."

Biden auto pen thing was Payola. People were paying for pardons. New revelations from the New York Times about Joe Biden and the auto pen scandal. According to New York Times, mister Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons. Rather than ask Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the auto pen, which they saw as routine. Jeff Zients, former Biden chief of staff, three minutes later, hit reply all and wrote, 'I approve the use of the auto pen for the execution of all of the following pardons.' The final list reportedly included Fauci. 'cash for clemency deal' and 'three people controlled access, and they were making money off of it.' The House Oversight Committee has brought in a number of former Biden aides to speak about this, and this will drive a wave of questions.

Mike, it wasn't surprising that Joe Biden pardoned his family at the end of his term. The Hunter Biden pardon indicated that James Biden, who was involved in Hunter's business dealings, would also be pardoned. If Hunter's activities were criminal, the new Justice Department could have pursued investigations through James. The Biden family's involvement in these deals raises concerns about potential crimes, and the pardons aim to prevent any investigations. With a pre-pardon, there’s no basis for launching an investigation, as the Justice Department would lose the ability to seize evidence or documents related to the case.

A House committee is investigating Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement with the CIA regarding COVID-19's origins. According to the committee, Fauci was escorted into CIA headquarters without record and participated in analysis to influence the agency's review. This follows a whistleblower claim that the CIA paid people to bury the lab leak theory. The committee is ordering HHS to provide documents detailing Fauci's movements during the pandemic, specifically in and out of CIA controlled sites.

Everyone anticipated Biden would pardon his son, but the extent of his dishonesty is shocking. Democrats are realizing they aren't the party of moral superiority; they've lied about numerous issues, including the laptop and the lab leak. This has led to a loss of faith in their principles. All politicians lie to protect their interests, but Trump is different—he openly states his intentions. Biden's blanket pardon raises questions about a potential money laundering scheme involving Hunter Biden, who is connected to numerous legal troubles. Calls for impeachment arise, but Republicans hesitate due to a lack of evidence. Ironically, Trump faced impeachment for investigating what Biden just pardoned his son for, highlighting the hypocrisy surrounding foreign influence on the first family.

Speaker 0 contends that a large number of pardons were issued by the auto pen on the final day of the Biden presidency, and asserts there is no record showing that Joe Biden participated in the authorization of those pardons. The speaker claims that these pardons include notable examples such as those for Dr. Anthony Fauci, members of the Biden family, Adam Schiff, the January 6 committee, and an extensive list that the speaker describes as continuing at length. The core assertion is that every one of these pardons was signed with the auto pen and there is no evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in the decision-making process behind them. According to the speaker, the absence of Biden’s involvement in the decision-making is a key element of the argument, and the implication is that this absence of direct participation should be recognized in legal terms. The speaker further states that these pardons could be declared null and void by the Department of Justice. The underlying claim is that there is a basis for such a nullification rooted in the way the pardons were issued, specifically the use of the auto pen and the lack of documented presidential involvement. The speaker also asserts that the ongoing investigation will produce evidence that will support the DOJ’s decision to void the pardons. In this framing, the investigation’s forthcoming findings are presented as capable of reinforcing the claim that the pardons were improperly issued or improperly authorized due to the absence of direct presidential action. The overall narrative presented is one of procedural challenge to the pardons, anchored in the asserted method of issuance (the auto pen) and the supposed lack of Biden’s participation in the process. The speaker emphasizes a sequence in which the pardons, if deemed void, would be reversed or nullified by official action from the Department of Justice, with future investigative evidence expected to validate that outcome in court.

Mister Speaker, President Biden's recent pardons for his family were shocking and unprecedented. It’s hard to believe he would issue pardons for over a decade of nonviolent offenses. Four years ago, when there were hints that President Trump might do something similar, prominent figures like Biden, Schiff, and Schumer condemned it as outrageous. Now, they support Biden's actions, which we find disgusting. This raises suspicions about the so-called "Biden crime family." If they truly weren't involved in wrongdoing, why would they need pardons? This issue will receive significant attention, and we will be examining it closely.

They didn't just pardon Hunter; they effectively concealed 11 years of activities that could reveal Joe's involvement. Evidence exists, including checks and references to "the big man." This pardon was not merely about Hunter; it also obscured Joe's actions during that time. Additionally, there were lies told to the American public leading up to the election, and after it, they did exactly what was anticipated. This is not the end; expect more family members to be pardoned in the future.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It's typically reserved for those close to the president, like family or associates. Seeking such pardons raises questions about guilt; if someone is innocent, why would they need one? Preemptive pardons suggest that crimes may have been committed, even if not publicly known. If the president issues these pardons, it may be framed as protecting his family from external threats. The obsession with pardons indicates concern over potential criminal culpability. The idea of a permanent pardon raises further questions about accountability. If figures like Rudy Giuliani receive pardons, many would interpret that as an admission of guilt, questioning the necessity of such actions if there were no wrongdoing.

US scientists linked to Biden investments allegedly misled the Pentagon about their research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Documents reveal that EcoHealth Alliance, led by Peter Daszak, concealed the true intentions of their high-risk coronavirus research in Wuhan. The project, called Diffuse, aimed to shift parts of the research to Wuhan under less stringent safety measures. The involvement of Daszak and Ralph S Barrick in gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab raises concerns about safety and ethics. Additionally, Hunter Biden's investment firm invested in Metabiota, a company connected to the Wuhan lab, raising questions about financial ties and the origins of the pandemic.

Republicans, including Indiana Senator Jim Banks, are highlighting a specific timeframe regarding Joe Biden's pardon for Hunter Biden, particularly noting that it extends back to 2014, the year Hunter joined Burisma's board. This broad timeframe may fuel ongoing accusations against Hunter, suggesting he must have committed crimes to warrant such a pardon. Biden's statement indicates that the charges against Hunter arose from political pressure from his opponents, and a plea deal fell apart due to disagreements over potential future charges. While some argue Hunter was treated differently than others in similar situations, the lengthy investigation and limited charges suggest a narrative of unfair persecution, which the president seems to support, linking it to his own political standing.

We previously discussed how Trump was briefed on the origins of COVID-19. Initially, there was skepticism about the virus coming from China, with various narratives, including the wet bat theory, being promoted. Recently, it was revealed that Gina Haspel, as CIA director, authorized payments to six intelligence officers to alter their assessments on COVID's origins. This decision aimed to align with the narratives pushed by Fauci and the media, preventing Trump from receiving credit for accurate intel. Now, years later, many still view this as a conspiracy. It's crucial to continue investigating these matters, as more instances of misconduct may emerge through courageous whistleblowers and congressional oversight.

The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, and its potential link to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence showing why ending this research is in the American people's best interest. The speaker claims that Anthony Fauci funded the pandemic and then denied it under oath to Senator Rand Paul. They also suggest Fauci sought a preemptive pardon from President Biden. The speaker was attacked for warning against US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, fearing potential pathogen releases. The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, suggesting politicization of intelligence to meet objectives or influence policy. They draw a parallel to the intelligence used to justify the Iraq regime change war and its consequences. The speaker emphasizes the need to address these issues within the intelligence community and highlights the importance of leadership.

During the Biden administration, attempts to obtain records on funding for Wuhan research were blocked; findings came largely from FOIA challenges. Communications allegedly show Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins instructing: 'read this, this is some more crap coming from me, the senator from Kentucky, I wanna be done with this. When you're done reading it, delete this material.' The speaker says this is illegal and constitutes two crimes: destroying federal records and lying to Congress. The auto pen pardon raises questions about Biden's awareness; the operator says he never met the president, and 'thousands of auto pen pardons' were issued. The speaker has invited Fauci to testify; if not accepted, a subpoena will be issued. They claim Fauci lied to Congress and that gain-of-function research was funded by the United States government with Fauci's approval. Kennedy, Bhattacharya, Makary cooperative. End deadline for Fauci's response is this week or next.

President Biden is considering pardoning Dr. Anthony Fauci. During a congressional hearing, Senator Paul questioned Fauci about his May 11th statement regarding NIH funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Fauci firmly stated he has never lied to Congress and does not retract his statement. Senator Paul accused Fauci of being responsible for the pandemic, which he claims resulted in millions of deaths and significant financial costs. He argued that Fauci's funding of gain-of-function research contributed to the virus's transmissibility in humans. Fauci countered that while some conspiracy theories are false, many hold truth, and suggested that it is Senator Paul who is misleading the public.

The Hunter Biden pardon primarily serves to protect Joe Biden, not just Hunter. The pardon covers all crimes Hunter may have committed since January 1, 2014, a date linked to significant events in Ukraine, including Hunter's involvement with Metabiota, a company tied to bioweapons labs. This connection raises questions about corruption and money laundering involving Joe Biden. The discussion highlights how past actions, such as Joe Biden's pressure to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Hunter, reflect a broader pattern of political maneuvering. Additionally, there are concerns about the implications of this pardon for future presidential actions and the potential for blanket immunity for other officials. The conversation also touches on the Biden administration's handling of illegal immigration and the need for accountability among government officials.

Joe Biden has issued a series of pardons, including General Mark Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and members of Congress who served on the January 6th Select Committee, as well as US Capitol and DC Metropolitan Police Officers who testified. Biden emphasized that these pardons do not imply wrongdoing or guilt. This move comes amid speculation about preemptive pardons, particularly for those targeted by Donald Trump. The significance lies in the names pardoned, especially given the political context surrounding the January 6th events. The individuals must decide whether to accept the pardons, as accepting could imply admission of guilt. With only a few hours left in Biden's presidency, it remains to be seen if they will accept.