reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Countries like London, France, Washington DC, Australia, and Canada are mentioned as places where Islamic extremism operates. The speaker believes that while there are problems like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban, Islam as a whole is successful and growing. They argue that the crisis lies in the West importing Islamist extremists for cheap labor, who then rely on welfare and refuse to work. The speaker praises Poland for its strict policies against Islamic extremism and criticizes France for allowing extremists to use resources and support the Iranian regime. They conclude that both the extremists becoming stronger and the West becoming weaker are contributing to the problem.

There will be an increase in radical extremists and terrorists from Europe due to their indecisiveness and political correctness. They falsely believe they understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than we do. This is a dangerous assumption.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss immigration in Europe, arguing that Poland has done a good job by “allowing nobody in,” and that “most European nations, they're decaying.” They say leaders in Europe are “a little freaked out by” the posture and imply that Europe is destroying its own countries. They suggest that if this continues, Europe will become weak and no longer be strong allies; their ideological shifts will reflect the change in the people entering the countries. Speaker 0 expresses concern about London and Paris, calling the Mayor of London “a disaster” and stating he has “a totally different ideology of what he's supposed to have,” noting he gets elected because many people have come in and vote for him. He adds, “I hate what's happened to London, and I hate what's happened to Paris.” Speaker 2 asks whether Speaker 0 intends a message of tough love to our allies to push reforms or if many allies are simply weak and not worth aligning with. Speaker 0 responds that they are “weak,” and that they want to be politically correct, and “they don't know what to do,” including in trade, which he describes as “a little bit dangerous.” He reiterates that Europe’s political correctness makes them weak. Speaker 0 indicates that there should be people removal for those who entered the country illegally: “think they should get the people out that came into the country illegally.” Speaker 2 then asks about NATO. Speaker 0 brings up Sweden as an example: “Sweden was known as the safest country in Europe, one of the safest countries in the world. Now it's known as a very unsafe well, pretty unsafe country. It's not even believable. It's a whole different country. Sweden.”

There will be an increase in radical extremists and terrorists from Europe due to their indecisiveness and political correctness. They falsely believe they understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than we do. This is a dangerous assumption.

The speaker contrasts European political responses to immigration and crime with American policies, arguing that European left-wing politicians ignore urgent problems. They claim: - In Spain, “they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.” - In France, “they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight.” - In Germany, “not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.” - In Sweden, “you have bomb attack every other day.” The speaker asserts that these are real problems for the European left-wing politicians, yet contends that those politicians do not care. The immediate target is a European debate about the rule of law in the United States and deportation policies: the speaker says, “You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.” A call is made to apply the same approach in Europe: “We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.” The speaker urges listening to them and not to “what you are proposing to all of us,” asserting that “Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.” The rhetoric culminates in a warning: “You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.”

An individual claims there are more extremists in the UK than in the Middle East, stating that some things Islamists say in UK mosques they wouldn't say in Afghanistan. They attribute this to the presence of the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Islamists in areas like Small Heath and Birmingham, who voice support for Hamas, which they identify as the armed forces of the Muslim Brotherhood. They note the Muslim Brotherhood is banned in the UAE but not in the UK, and argue it should be banned. They claim the group uses freedom of speech to censor opposition and uses the term "Islamophobia" to stifle criticism. They highlight that Islamic Relief is registered as a charity in the UK but banned in Saudi Arabia and the UAE due to investigations allegedly showing it sends money to terrorist groups in the Middle East.

Islam is evil, with Prophet Muhammad setting a violent example. His followers resort to terrorism. Islam promotes hatred, violence, and submission, incompatible with freedom. De-Islamizing societies is crucial for maintaining freedom. No appeasement, only vigilance, perseverance, and strength against barbarism are needed.

The speaker discusses the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe, particularly within the European Union institutions. They explain that the European Commission sought to gain support from various societal components, including religious groups, to counter the growing distrust towards the EU. The Muslim Brotherhood, being well-organized, quickly responded and began infiltrating institutions and anti-racist networks that fund Islamist groups fighting against Islamophobia. This diversion of funds away from research on Islam has had a detrimental impact, leaving only a handful of researchers studying Islam in France.

Every house produces garbage, and we dispose of it to prevent illness and disease. Similarly, society has its own garbage in the form of extremist ideologies that promote discrimination and violence. These ideologies thrive in Western countries where they can operate freely and have support. Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Oman, and Kuwait are not facing a crisis, but the West is. The West imported these extremist ideologies for cheap labor, but they don't contribute to society and instead rely on welfare. Poland, on the other hand, has effectively dealt with Islamic extremism by cracking down on it. The West's problem lies in both the strengthening of extremists and its own weakness.

There is a problem of anti-Semitism in certain Muslim communities, which has been imported due to mass migration. The insecurity and anti-Semitism in France today are a result of uncontrolled immigration over the past 50 years. With 6 million Muslims and only 600,000 Jews, being both French and Jewish can make you feel like a foreigner in your own country. Muslims, including those working on construction sites, have access to explosives and firearms, which could lead to daily attacks if there was a directive to kill Jews. The goal of Islamists is to create the perception of Muslim persecution.

Macron believes the Islamic world is in crisis due to issues like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban. However, he acknowledges that Islam is generally successful and growing rapidly. He argues that Muslim countries like Dubai, Abu Dhabi, UAE, Bahrain, Oman, and Kuwait are not in crisis, but certain places are. Macron blames the West for importing Islamist extremists for cheap labor, who instead want welfare and to marry French women. He contrasts this with Poland, which has not experienced any terrorist attacks and suggests that both the extremists becoming stronger and the West becoming weaker are contributing factors.

Muslims living with various religious groups, including other Muslims, is a problem. This results in unhappiness in Gaza, Egypt, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Syria, Lebanon, Nigeria, Kenya, Sudan, Morocco, and Afghanistan. Muslims are happy in Australia, Belgium, France, Holland, Italy, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, the USA, Canada, Norway, India, and England due to welfare benefits. They are happy in almost every non-Islamic country. However, they do not blame Islam, their leadership, or themselves for their unhappiness. Instead, they blame the countries where they are happy and want to change them to be like the countries they left.

There will come a day when Europe will see more radical extremists and terrorists due to poor decision-making and a misguided sense of political correctness. Many assume they understand the Middle East and Islam better than others, but this is a form of ignorance.

Uncontrolled immigration, inadequate integration, and a misguided dogma of multiculturalism have proven toxic for Europe. Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy, and David Cameron have all acknowledged the failure of multiculturalism. This approach does not require newcomers to integrate, allowing them to live separate lives within society. In extreme cases, this can lead to actions that undermine stability and threaten security.

I was arrested, interrogated, and threatened multiple times. Western countries need stricter immigration laws to prevent our defeat. People label us as Islamophobes, but if you examine the text and history, you'll see how Muslims have historically applied hate towards Jews and Christians. In 1948, when Israel was established, all Muslim countries expelled Jews, resulting in 830,000 deaths. Hate is the underlying cause, and it is deeply ingrained in Islam.

Europe's lack of decisive action and obsession with political correctness will lead to an increase in radical extremists and terrorists. Their ignorance in thinking they understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than we do is a dangerous mistake.

Speaker 0 asks how to weed out Muslims in a country that despises you and means you harm without vilifying or persecuting those who are fine and part of the social fabric. Speaker 1 responds by highlighting that Arab states have taken a strong stance against the Muslim Brotherhood and asks why the West hasn’t. The Muslim Brotherhood has been banned in Egypt and in many Gulf states (not Qatar), and there is a reason: they know how dangerous this organization is, that it doesn’t represent peace-loving Muslims who simply want to practice their religion and not impose a perverted version of jihad. Speaker 1 asserts that the Muslim Brotherhood is not pro-Muslim; it is an organization providing cover for terrorism that disproportionately impacts Muslims, especially in the Arab world. He emphasizes that the biggest victims of terrorism are the people of the Middle East, the majority of whom are Muslims, and urges people to educate themselves about what’s really happening on this front before it’s too late. Speaker 0 then asks why Europe is failing and has massively open borders, taking people from regimes where terrorism is life-threatening. Speaker 1 answers with a single word: subversion. He claims this is most evident in the Israel-Palestinian conflict, stating that the way the war and the conflict are presented in international media is not an accurate reflection of what’s happening on the ground. He believes many Palestinians would share that sentiment. He contends that what’s happening in Gaza is not how it’s reported, because narratives are shaped to present a certain story, a process he attributes to Al Jazeera. He questions who runs Al Jazeera and asserts it is state-run by Qatar, and says they have been a chief sponsor of a “laundered ideology” presenting Palestinian victimhood even if some stories are fabricated. He claims Al Jazeera has falsified stories during the Gaza war. Speaker 1 concludes that when people push back against Islamism, they’re accused of conspiracy or exaggeration, but the speaker argues that there is a conspiracy to undermine the West. He acknowledges that it may seem crazy to say so, but asserts that such a conspiracy is exactly what is happening. He identifies this as the fundamental ideology of Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Islamic Republic of Iran on the Shia side, and says this is something that must be spoken out against to educate the general public.

The speaker highlights that extremist groups like the IRGC and Muslim Brotherhood operate outside of Muslim countries, such as in London, France, Washington DC, Australia, and Canada. They argue that while there are problems like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and Taliban, Islam as a whole is successful and growing. The speaker criticizes Western countries for importing Islamist extremists for cheap labor, who then rely on welfare instead of working. They contrast this with Poland's strict policies against Islamic extremism and the absence of terrorist attacks there. The speaker also mentions how some individuals in France support the Iranian regime and oppose sanctions in Congress.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a global rise in Islamist-linked threats and the impact of migration on security in Western countries. They begin by asserting that France’s government can no longer keep its own people safe from “potential radical Islamic terrorists that they have welcomed into their country,” and claim that France has allowed so many Middle East and North African migrants that crowds can no longer be assembled. They extend the concern to other Western nations, stating that the threat is now widespread, including in Germany, where they say many people are afraid to attend famous Christmas markets because they have become highly dangerous targets for radical Islamists. Speaker 1 provides details: since 2014, seven European Christmas markets have been attacked—three in France and four in Germany. Authorities arrested five men suspected of planning attack number eight in Germany last week; among them is described as a Muslim cleric from a German mosque who allegedly urged his followers to kill as many people as possible. The report notes that an attack in Poland on a Christmas market was foiled as well. The German case is characterized as a migrant who came from Egypt, moved to Germany, and, according to the speakers, worked at a mosque in a country they describe as tolerantly allowing him to operate there. They claim this individual began indoctrinating other Muslims to murder Christians. They describe attending a German Christmas market at this point as akin to playing Russian roulette, expressing fear that an asylum seeker living on tax dollars could drive a car into a market and kill many people. The speakers reference Australia, stating that 16 people were murdered on a beach “this past Sunday,” and claim that there is a heightened threat as their government imported tens of thousands of migrants from Muslim-majority countries, with the Muslim population purportedly doubling in a decade. They criticize Australia’s Labour Party as “left-wing,” asserting it has “the strictest gun laws in the world” yet intends to add more, while instructing viewers to light a candle as a symbolic response. They describe the current government as being led by people who are detached from reality and who prioritize political orthodoxies over people’s lives, claiming that the media feeds the same narratives and spin. Speaker 2 endorses a symbolic action: “Light a candle. Put it in their front window tonight at 06:47PM to show that light will indeed defeat darkness.” They state that a national cabinet meeting will consider a proposal to empower agencies to examine what can be done in this area. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes a narrative of increasing Islamist terrorism linked to migrant populations in Europe and Australia, argues for stronger security measures and altered political responses, and frames mainstream reporting as insufficient.

Macron, the president of France, believes the Islamic world is in crisis due to problems like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban. However, Islam as a whole is successful and growing rapidly, with countries like Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Kuwait doing well. The speaker argues that the crisis lies within the West, as they imported Islamist extremists for cheap labor, who now seek welfare and French spouses instead of working. In contrast, Poland has effectively dealt with Islamic extremism by cracking down on it. The speaker believes that both the extremists becoming stronger and the West becoming weaker contribute to the problem.

There will be an increase in radical extremists and terrorists from Europe due to their lack of decisive action and their obsession with political correctness. They falsely believe they understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than we do, which is pure ignorance.

Muslims living with various religious groups face problems, including Muslims living with Muslims, which is a very big problem. This results in unhappiness in Gaza, Egypt, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Syria, Lebanon, Nigeria, Kenya, Sudan, Morocco, and Afghanistan. Muslims are happy in Australia, Belgium, France, Holland, Italy, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, The USA, Canada, Norway, India and England due to welfare benefits. They are happy in almost every country that is not Islamic. They do not blame Islam, their leadership, or themselves. Instead, they blame the countries they are happy in and want to change these countries to be like the countries they came from, where they were unhappy.

Europe is the cradle of Western civilization, and the cultural and religious bonds between it and the U.S. will last beyond political disagreements. However, Europe is at risk of civilizational suicide. Many European countries are unable or unwilling to control their borders, but they are starting to push back, which is good. They are also starting to limit the free speech of their own citizens, even as those citizens protest against border issues. Europe needs to respect its own people and sovereignty, something America can't do for them. If a country like Germany takes in millions of immigrants who are culturally incompatible, Germany will have killed itself. The speaker loves Germany and wants it to thrive.

The speaker points out that extremist groups like the IRGC and Muslim Brotherhood operate in Western countries, while Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and UAE restrict their activities. They mention that Islam is generally successful and growing, with countries like Dubai and Abu Dhabi thriving. However, they argue that Western countries have imported Islamist extremists for cheap labor, leading to problems. They contrast this with Poland's strict policies and lack of terrorist attacks. The speaker believes that both the extremists becoming stronger and the West becoming weaker contribute to the crisis.