TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker alleges the Tennessee Department of Children's Services is taking undocumented kids and putting them in state's custody and the state foster care system. They are assisting these kids into getting a court order from the juvenile court that says that they're abandoned, then they get an order of abandonment and a special circumstances juvenile immigration status. They warn 'how clever and how smart cartel immigration is.' The speaker says they 'finally got my hands on a court order' showing 'how they did this right here in Davidson County.' They claim to have told state legislators, congresspeople it's 'totally illegal,' and cite phone conversations stating that 'DCS Commissioner Quinn is well aware of it and she is central to it' because she has told providers to report to her if they have any issues with undocumented kids. Huge. It is trafficking. I mean,

This bill is described as a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents. The speaker opposes criminalizing parents for wanting to love their children.

The speaker questions the ACLU's stance on 85,000 missing children and suggests that the sponsors of these children are not real. They claim that the sponsors are involved in a racket and are not answering the phone. The speaker believes that a large number of these sponsors are involved in sex trafficking and accuses the current administration of supporting this through their policies. They also mention a partnership with cartels for human trafficking.

California now pays for gay men in gay marriages to rent a woman's body for children, which is seen as child trafficking. Big fertility involves buying, selling, designing, and discarding people, reminiscent of a past we fought to end. This is all done in the name of progress and tolerance. Translation: California now pays for gay men in gay marriages to rent a woman's body for children, which is seen as child trafficking. Big fertility involves buying, selling, designing, and discarding people, reminiscent of a past we fought to end. This is all done in the name of progress and tolerance.

The speakers question why anyone would vote for Democrats, citing open borders, gender-affirming care, and lenient stances on child trafficking as reasons. One speaker claims Democrats in California don't prioritize punishing child traffickers. Another speaker asserts that California is attempting to lower the age of consent to 14 and is decriminalizing the sale of sex. They believe a 16 or 17-year-old should not have to prove force, fraud, or coercion in sex trafficking cases for perpetrators to be jailed. They describe this as a "slippery slope" and question how anyone can still vote for the Democratic party.

The government is implementing laws and rulings indicating they believe children belong to the government, not their parents. These policies are expected at the state, local, and federal levels under a Harris-Waltz administration. Many across the country now recognize the "idiocy" in California's stance. The district must do the right thing, even if the state does not. The government should stand up for parental rights, the safeguarding of children, and women's rights.

Children were sent to addresses flagged for sexual abuse without proper vetting. A whistleblower revealed that the Office of Refugee Resettlement repeatedly placed a child identified as a victim of sex trafficking with abusers. During a recent hearing, the secretary admitted they do not verify the legal status of these children, stating that extensive vetting slows down the process. The priority seems to be moving a large number of children quickly, rather than ensuring their safety.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law preventing schools from informing parents if their children are on a medical pathway for gender transition, putting kids at risk of irreversible medical treatments. This goes against the UK's decision to ban puberty blockers and opposite sex hormones. Children and parents have the right to know and consent to such treatments. The law must be nullified to protect children's well-being. Spread awareness that California public schools may not be safe for kids.

Children are being taken from innocent parents, and there are numerous cases of abuse and misconduct within Child Protective Services (CPS). Some CPS workers have been charged with child abuse and even caught encouraging a 14-year-old foster girl to become a prostitute. There have been instances of children dying in foster care due to negligence and abuse. The system is failing to protect children, and there are allegations of human trafficking within CPS. Parents nationwide are taking action against CPS, and there are concerns about the influence of globalists and the dark workings of the occult in relation to CPS and child trafficking.

Tax dollars are being used to facilitate the travel of children who may be trafficked for sex or forced into sweatshops. The lack of verification for family members and the absence of rapid DNA testing under the current administration raise concerns. The head official at the border acknowledged the issue when questioned, admitting that children are being sent to potential traffickers. This disturbing revelation highlights the urgent need for action to address the exploitation of vulnerable children.

States are involved in government-subsidized child trafficking, taking children and giving them to others for money from the federal government. This is due to the Adoption and Safe Families Act, implemented in 1997 by Bill and Hillary Clinton. The law takes money from the Social Security Fund and gives it to states as an incentive to kidnap babies. Each child is worth around $1 million to the state, making this a multi-billion dollar industry. Shockingly, 83% of children taken by Child Protective Services (CPS) are based on unsubstantiated allegations. Caseworkers and social workers often commit fraud by withholding and destroying evidence.

Speaker calls AB four ninety five in California “a meat market bill” and “a trafficking bill” and points to realimpact.us. He claims the bill “allows an individual to obtain this new form that comes with the bill” to name a child; e.g., “John goes to a school in California and says, I have this form, and I am asking for Susie Q to be received into my custody.” He asserts the bill “does not require a background check for this man,” “requires no identification, no driver's license, no nothing,” and “There's no requirement in the bill for the school to call you” before a custody transfer. He warns, “If this bill passes, you're gonna have to get out.” In Grock's exchange: “According to AB four ninety five, a child can be taken from school from their caregiver. Yes.” “Non relative extended family members … sign the affidavit? Yes.” “Can anyone … non relative family member? Yes.” “Is there anything … prevent a stranger from kidnapping a child? Grock says no.” “This is life in California. If you live there, the time to stand up or leave is now.”

California Governor Gavin Newsom's law requires schools to hide a child's gender dysphoria from parents, which Newsom claims protects the child-parent relationship. However, this law prevents schools from informing parents when their children believe they were born into the wrong body, potentially leading to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgery. Newsom's actions are attributed to weak leadership and caving into radical activist pressure. Newsom has increased homelessness by 40% and is allegedly enabling drug addiction, mental illness, and sexual assault. His government is accused of affirming mental illness and psychiatric disorders rather than treating them. A movement is organizing to fight back against these policies. The speaker urges people to sign up and subscribe to Public to combat California's disinformation and fight back against Newsom's policies. Newsom is accused of lying and weaponizing the government to attack the child-parent relationship.

Children arriving at the border with questionable guardians are not verified. Taxpayers fund their travel and necessities, potentially aiding traffickers. Officials admit to knowingly sending children into sex trafficking or sweatshops. The lack of DNA testing raises concerns about child safety.

AB 495 would expand affidavits by redefining the term relative to include nonrelative family members, hundreds or thousands of people. The affidavit would allow an adult with whom the child resides to exercise the parent’s rights over the child’s education and medical care. It is intended to be temporary and not supersede the parent’s decisions. The form requires only the child’s name and birthday, and the adult’s alleged name and address, with no identification and no requirement to contact the parent. The back states that a person relying on the affidavit has no obligation to make any further inquiry or investigation. A nonrelative is defined as anyone with a familial or mentoring relationship, such as teachers, medical professionals, clergy, neighbors, and friends. The transcript warns of scenarios where a creepy neighbor could use this to enroll or obtain care, giving kidnappers a leg up and a head start.

We have 500,000 children with sponsors in this country that we can't locate. We don't know if they're being subjected to child labor, sexual exploitation, or other crimes. This situation highlights a hypocrisy among those who claim to protect victims, especially innocent children. My commitment is to support and safeguard these vulnerable individuals, and I won't waste time convincing those who don't understand this. My priority has always been safety, and it's alarming that we currently have no idea where these 500,000 children are.

States are involved in government-subsidized child trafficking, taking children and giving them to others for money from the federal government. This is due to the Adoption and Safe Families Act, implemented in 1997 by Bill and Hillary Clinton. The law takes money from the Social Security Fund and gives it to states as an incentive to kidnap babies. Each child is worth around $1,000,000 to the state, making this a multi-billion dollar industry. Shockingly, 83% of children taken by Child Protective Services are based on unsubstantiated allegations. Caseworkers and social workers are often involved in fraud.

The California legislature has passed four bills aimed at removing children from their homes and placing them in government systems, where everyone except parents will have knowledge about their personal struggles. This policy is about parental notification, not outing. Meanwhile, the attorney general is suing Chino Valley Unified School District, but the temporary order issued recently is just to maintain the current situation until a final decision is made. This decision will determine if the policies are legal, constitutional, and necessary for protecting children.

I recently visited the southern border and spoke with the head of the border guards union. Children are coming over with phone numbers and addresses written on them, but we are not thoroughly checking them. This could be leading them into dangerous situations like prostitution and sweatshops, all funded by American tax dollars.

CPS, or Child Protective Services, is accused of corruption, profit-seeking, and secrecy in this video. Senator Nancy Schafer investigated the corruption within CPS and found that poor parents are often targeted because they lack the resources to fight the system. She also discovered that case workers and social workers commit fraud and fabricate evidence, but charges against them are ignored. The Adoption and Safe Families Act, signed by Bill Clinton, incentivizes the adoption of children from foster care, leading to the abduction and sale of young children. The video includes personal testimonies of children who have been abused and mistreated while in the custody of CPS. The corruption within CPS is alleged to be part of a larger problem involving pedophile rings and human trafficking.

Speaker 0 conveys a series of grave allegations about the abuse and trafficking of children. They state that children are not only kidnapped and, in some cases, bred by families as a cash crop, but that there are people in the United States who breed children in order to sell them. The claim continues that when these children are sold, they come without birth certificates, which, according to the speaker, makes it easier to kill them without anyone asking where they are. In addition to this, Speaker 0 asserts that children are being imported by the plane load, again noting that these children have no documentation. Beyond child slavery or child sex abuse, the speaker asserts that there is child torture, described as involving adrenalized blood. They mention “the whole blood drinking ceremony of the satanic world,” and reference ritual ceremonies and ritual murder, as well as incidental murder. The speaker also raises a working assumption about the survivability of these children, asking how long they survive, and states that, from witnesses they have spoken to, the answer is two years. These points are presented as direct claims about widespread abuse, trafficking, and ritual violence directed at children, with a specific assertion that some of these children lack birth certificates and travel with no documentation, facilitating harm and concealment. The overall narrative emphasizes a combination of kidnapping, forced breeding for profit, illegal importation, lack of documentation, and extreme forms of torture and ritualistic violence, culminating in the asserted conclusion that the observed survival time for these children is two years, according to the witnesses referenced by the speaker.

The Biden administration's border policies have led to a surge of unaccompanied children, creating opportunities for exploitation. Vulnerable children are being trafficked with taxpayer dollars due to a failure to properly vet sponsors. One interviewee shared that on her journey over the border, people in her group were robbed, several girls including her were raped, and she witnessed the decapitation. Children are not going to their parents but are being trafficked, with government officials complicit. The HHS ORR program is a failure, allowing children to be trafficked on their watch. Over 500,000 children have arrived at the border alone and are funneled through agencies and contractors with little training to protect them. Children are being placed with sponsors with criminal history and gang affiliations. There is a market for juvenile organ harvesting, and cartels rely on gangs to facilitate trafficking within the U.S. Tax dollars are funding child and human trafficking, essentially slavery, sanctioned by the government and NGOs.

States are involved in government-subsidized child trafficking, taking children and giving them to others for money from the federal government. This is due to the Adoption and Safe Families Act, passed in 1997 by Bill and Hillary Clinton. The law takes money from the Social Security Fund and gives it to states as an incentive to kidnap babies. Each child is worth around $1 million to the state, making it a multi-billion dollar industry. 83% of children taken by Child Protective Services are based on unsubstantiated allegations. Case workers and social workers often commit fraud.

California's Bill AB665 is causing confusion, so let's clarify. Currently, 12-year-olds in California can consent to mental health treatment without parental knowledge or consent. However, there are safeguards in place to prevent impulsive decisions. The bill aims to remove these safeguards, allowing 12-year-olds to decide if they want to leave home and enter residential shelter services under state care. The bill also includes various professionals who can facilitate this transition. It has passed the Senate Judiciary Committee and will now go to the Senate floor before returning to the assembly for a final vote. To oppose the bill, contact your state senator and assembly member for a meeting or town hall discussion.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law preventing schools from informing parents if their children are on a medical pathway for gender transition. This law puts children at risk of irreversible medical treatments without parental consent. Similar actions in Britain have led to a ban on puberty blockers due to their harmful effects. Children and parents have the right to know about any potential gender dysphoria diagnosis. Schools should not promote the idea of being born in the wrong body. Action is needed to overturn this dangerous law in California to protect children and their parents.