reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I had the privilege of attending President Trump's meeting with the UK Prime Minister today. I saw firsthand his exceptional diplomacy and statesmanship as he strengthens international support for peace in Europe and the Middle East. We're also pursuing a new trade deal between the US and the UK, which promises greater prosperity, security, technological advancements, and medical breakthroughs for both nations. President Trump inherited a world seemingly headed towards endless war, record-high inflation, falling living standards, and an open border. Now, we're reopening American energy to lower living costs, actively pursuing peace, and tackling debt through historic cuts to the federal bureaucracy. We're reasserting American strength and leadership, using our power and vision to restore peace globally. This has been an extraordinary first month of his presidency.

The conversation centers on a reported peace framework and the idea that Iran is “giving up all of their chips” and cards. The speaker says many people seem to believe the rumor that a peace deal is in play, and reacts by calling themselves an optimist while insisting the approach must be “realistic.” The speaker argues that any peace deal “won’t be acceptable to Israel,” and that the key requirement is taking steps to restrain Israel. They say that, if the U.S. looks at the Israelis “with clear eyes,” it could achieve a deal with Iran that does not include everything the U.S. wants—for example, the speaker says Iran will not “hill(s) in the deal about zero enrichment” and will not “hand us over all your enrichment.” The speaker’s main goal is ending the fighting, which they say is “definitely possible.” However, the speaker expresses skepticism that the U.S. has taken the first “hard step” of telling Israel it is “done taking offensive action without our permission.” They describe the war as “existential for the Israelis,” and argue the situation cannot assume Israel will not face conditions that could lead to continued attacks or another “terrorist attack.” The speaker says the U.S. cannot “take that off the table” or “rule it out,” and cannot allow others to dismiss considerations as “a conspiracy theory.” The speaker further claims the U.S. has had institutional difficulty being skeptical and “not trusting” regarding Israel, saying Israel “lied us, lied to us to get us into this war.” They argue the U.S. needs to “turn Matter” (stating “as a matter of fact”) and apply more verification, especially because Israel is described as an ally that has misled the U.S. Finally, the speaker says if Israelis believed the U.S. would extricate itself from the conflict, “there would be an element within Israel” seeking actions to prompt Americans to recommit to the conflict, reinforcing the need for not taking anything off the table and emphasizing verification.

The speakers discuss President Trump's speech in Saudi Arabia, which they believe was a momentous and historic foreign policy address that received very little coverage in the American media. One speaker suggests anyone hoping to understand President Trump's foreign policy should watch the whole speech, as Trump is building a new world order. The speakers are baffled by the lack of coverage, with one attributing it to the media's disdain and bias towards Trump. They argue that the speech laid out Trump's views on foreign policy and specific countries, particularly regarding Syria and Iran. Another speaker was unaware of the speech until seeing a tweet about it, and was taken aback after watching it. One speaker suggests the speech outlined Trump's theory of building economies and creating wealth through partnerships. They also note the speech seemed to signal a return to the old realpolitik, similar to that of George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. They recommend watching the full speech on YouTube or checking out clips on the White House Twitter feed.

The Trump administration quietly lifted sanctions on individuals like Abu Mohammed al-Jahlani, a former Al Qaeda affiliate, to facilitate cooperation with Israeli and American demands, such as normalizing ties with Israel and removing Palestinian factions. This is described as a "Faustian bargain" that will harm Syrian minorities. The administration also delisted warlords Abu Hamshah and Saif Abu Bakr, previously accused by the US Treasury of kidnapping, extortion, sexual violence, and involvement in the massacre of over 1,500 Alawites. The speaker claims that while Western media promotes the idea that Syria's diversity is being preserved, Christians are being persecuted. The speaker alleges that the goal is to erase Syria's secular identity, cleanse minorities, and establish a compliant, ultra-religious state. The speaker concludes that this policy is a betrayal and complicity, repeating the mistakes made in Afghanistan, and warns of future blowback.

Good afternoon. It’s an honor to welcome you back to the State Department. American engagement and leadership are essential for advancing our interests. We’ve worked tirelessly to rebuild our alliances and partnerships, which are now stronger than ever. In the past four years, we've faced challenges but emerged stronger. Our economy is booming, and we've made historic investments in infrastructure and clean energy. Our alliances, particularly NATO, are more robust, and we’ve successfully countered adversaries like Russia and Iran. We’ve also prioritized diplomacy, bringing home Americans wrongfully detained abroad. As we look to the future, we must continue leading in artificial intelligence and clean energy. America is built on the idea of equality and progress, and together, we can achieve great things. Thank you for your dedication, and may God bless you all.

Speaker 1 clarifies that they never said they would cut military aid to Israel. They believe that if the US-Israel relationship becomes so strong that Israel no longer needs aid, it would be a mark of success. They emphasize viewing the relationship as a friendship, not just a transaction. Speaker 1 aims to lead Israel into a new version of the Abraham Accords, involving countries like Saudi Arabia and Indonesia. They also stress the importance of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear capabilities. Speaker 1 prefers speaking authentically, even if others distort their words.

The speaker discusses Syria, indicating that “you can expect some announcements on Syria” and expressing a hope that Syria becomes “a country that's very successful,” asserting that “this leader can do it” and repeating, “I really do. I think this leader can do it.” The speaker acknowledges that “people said he's had a rough past,” noting that “we've all had rough pasts, but he has had a rough past,” and adds, “I think, frankly, if you didn't have a rough past, you wouldn't have a chance.” The speaker then highlights the relationship with Turkey, stating that “he gets along very well with Turkey, with president Erdogan,” and characterizes Erdogan as “a great leader. Erdogan's a great leader.”

The speaker outlines a vision for a post-Islamic Republic Iran, arguing that the Iran people associate with terrorism, extremism, and poverty is a misperception, and that a free Iran will be peaceful, flourishing, and different from the current regime. The speaker asserts that after the fall of the Islamic Republic, Iran’s security and foreign policy will change fundamentally: the nuclear military program will end, support for terrorist groups will cease immediately, and Iran will work with regional and global partners to confront terrorism, organized crime, drug trafficking, and extremist Islamism. Iran will act as a friend and stabilizing force in the region and as a responsible partner in global security. In diplomacy, relations with the United States will be normalized and the friendship with America and its people will be restored. The State of Israel will be recognized immediately. The speaker envisions expanding the Abraham Accords into the Cyrus Accords, bringing together a free Iran, Israel, and the Arab world, framed by mutual recognition, sovereignty, and national interest. In energy, Iran is described as possessing some of the largest oil and gas reserves in the world and will become a reliable energy supplier to the free world. Policymaking will be transparent, with Iran’s actions described as responsible and prices as predictable. On governance, Iran will adopt and enforce international standards, confront money laundering, and dismantle organized corruption. Public institutions will answer to the people. In the economy, Iran is portrayed as one of the world’s last great untapped markets, with a educated, modern population and a diaspora connected to the world. A democratic Iran will open its economy to trade, investment, and innovation, and Iran will seek to invest in the world, replacing isolation with opportunity. The speaker emphasizes that this is not an abstract vision but a practical one grounded in national interest, stability, and cooperation, and calls for the international community and the Iranian people to stand with this change. The fall of the Islamic Republic and the establishment of a secular democratic government in Iran are presented as restoring dignity to the Iranian people and benefiting the region and the world. A free Iran is described as a force for peace, prosperity, and partnership.

The speaker believes that Iran will change instantaneously when the current regime disappears. They anticipate many people will be excited to help rebuild the country. The speaker expresses a desire to "make Iran great again."

The Assad regime in Syria has fallen after 13 years of civil war, marking a historic opportunity for the Syrian people to build a better future. The United States will work with regional partners to manage the transition and ensure stability. Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia, previously Assad's main supporters, have weakened significantly due to recent conflicts, including the war in Ukraine and attacks on Israel. The U.S. will maintain its military presence to counter ISIS and support a political transition towards a sovereign Syria with a new government. Vigilance is necessary as some rebel groups have troubling histories. The U.S. remains committed to humanitarian relief and the safe return of American citizens, including Austin Tice. This moment presents both risks and opportunities for a more secure Middle East.

We must remember the plan from Egypt and the Arab nations. We've been invited by Mohammed bin Salman for discussions in Riyadh. We need to figure out how to make this beneficial for everyone, especially considering the best interests of the United States and the people of my country, Jordan. We can immediately take 2,000 sick children to Jordan and await the Egyptian plan to tackle larger issues. That gesture of taking 2,000 children with cancer or other illnesses is truly appreciated. We will work with Egypt and Jordan, with high-level assistance from others, to achieve great progress. With the United States in control of a significant piece of land, there will be stability in the Middle East for the first time. The people of Gaza will live safely in another location, free from the constant violence. They will have great homes and families, safe from Hamas. I am confident we can work something out with Egypt, almost certainly.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi met with Syrian President Bashar Assad during a congressional tour of the Middle East, defying the White House's stance. Pelosi emphasized a message of friendship and hope, stating that the visit aimed to foster peace. Despite the White House's concerns about Syria's involvement in Iraq, Pelosi expressed satisfaction with the discussions, particularly regarding Syria's ties to militant groups and relations with Israel. She noted that Assad showed willingness to resume the peace process. This visit is viewed as a challenge by Democrats to encourage the White House to reengage with Syrian leadership, particularly following the deterioration of US-Syria relations after the 2005 assassination of a former Lebanese prime minister.

The speakers describe the United States and coalition forces beginning major military operations aimed at disarming Iraq, freeing its people, and defending the world from grave danger. They assert that the threat comes from the Iraqi regime’s actions, its history of aggression, and its drive toward an arsenal of terror, and that this terrorist regime can never have a nuclear weapon. Saddam Hussein is depicted as a homicidal dictator addicted to weapons of mass destruction, and regime change in Iraq is presented as the only certain means of removing a great danger to the nation. The regime is accused of destroying weapons of mass destruction, ceasing all development, and stopping support for terrorist groups, while violating those obligations; despite warnings, Iraq is said to be reconstituting its nuclear program, rebuilding previous nuclear facilities, and pursuing nuclear weapons. The speakers claim that the Iraq regime possesses ballistic missiles with a range that threatens Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey, and other nations, and that its conventional ballistic missile program was growing rapidly, posing a threat to American air forces overseas. They note that the Iraqi military has fired upon American and British pilots more than 750 times in the past year, and that the regime already had missiles capable of hitting Europe and bases overseas, with future capability to reach the United States. Regime change in Iraq is asserted as the necessary course to remove the danger, with Saddam described as a student of Stalin who uses murder as a tool of terror and control. The regime is accused of arming, training, and funding terrorist militias, and of harboring terrorists and using instruments of terror. The goal is to ensure that the world’s number one sponsor of terror can never obtain a nuclear weapon. In addition to dismantling weapons of mass destruction, Iraq is urged to end its support for terrorism, and Iran is described as the world’s number one state sponsor of terror, responsible for killing tens of thousands of its own citizens and for backing Hamas in attacks on Israel. The attacks of September 11 are invoked to illustrate why vast oceans no longer protect the United States from danger, and the threat of an Iranian regime armed with long-range missiles and nuclear weapons is described as an intolerable threat to the Middle East and to the American people. The speakers state that if Saddam has dangerous weapons today, it makes no sense to wait to confront him as he grows stronger; this is described as the last best chance to eliminate the threats posed by the regime. Finally, the rhetoric shifts to offering support for the Iraqi people, with assurances that America is a friend to the people of Iraq, backing them with overwhelming strength and devastating force. They express belief that all people deserve hope and human rights, and urge the Iraqi people to seize control of their destiny, promising freedom and a prosperous future once the demands are met. The moment for action is urged, warning not to let it pass.

I want to talk about peace, not imposed by force, but real peace that allows nations to thrive and build a better future. Peace for all, not just for Americans. Peace that brings hope and prosperity for everyone. Peace that is essential for a meaningful life.

The discussion begins with the speakers commenting on timing and then shifting to updates on ongoing U.S. strikes against Iran and the regional spillover. Multiple reports are cited (CNN, PBS) saying the strikes are expected to continue for a while, described as punishment and not proportionate retaliation. The speakers also mention reported strikes on locations including Bandar Abbas, “Sirik as always,” and Kashim, and say there have been two rounds of strikes so far. They reference unconfirmed reports of power outages in Kuwait and Bahrain and note conflicting claims about whether outages are occurring. They connect the strikes to a broader maritime confrontation, describing Iran’s earlier attacks on three ships (a Qatari LNG tanker that was “empty,” the Saudi one, and another ship today with unknown details) and discuss whether U.S. attacks could affect Israel’s actions against Hezbollah. Alongside the Iran strikes, the speakers say there was an airstrike in South Lebanon. One speaker suggests flares and shelling on the Ali al-Tahrir Hill in Lebanon, saying it is a strategic position contested between Israel and Hezbollah. A major theme is escalation and retaliation. One speaker predicts Iran will “take out” Muwaffak al-Saudi Air Base, repeatedly strike air bases if planes launched from Prince Saud Air Base or if sorties came from Qatar’s Al Udeid Air Force Base, and also attack air bases in Israel. They further discuss the possibility of escalation beyond bases, including sinking a ship in the Strait of Hormuz instead of only striking military assets. They emphasize Iran’s stated maritime protocols, saying vessels must file requests to Iranian authorities to transit in designated lanes, and they argue the U.S. has encouraged noncompliance and then struck. The conversation addresses strategic rationale from the American side, with one speaker saying there is “no thinking” and framing the action as a show of strength rather than a strategic plan. They also discuss how the timing coincides with funeral celebrations and argue this could make Iranian responses less limited. They state that Israel appears to be escalating strikes in Lebanon on multiple fronts, including air activity over Beirut and suburbs, and that renewed shelling on Ali al-Tahrir Hill coincides with U.S. strikes on Iran. Iran’s domestic and diplomatic messaging is also covered. The speakers say Iran’s foreign ministry condemned Washington’s move to reimpose a ban on Iranian oil sales, calling it a clear breach of Article 10 of the “war-ending MOU,” holding the U.S. responsible for consequences, and warning it will take measures to protect its interests and national security. They also state that the U.S. is being accused of repeatedly violating the June 18 MOU over the past 20 days directly and via Israeli actions in Lebanon. Power outages are revisited. Kuwait’s statement is summarized as involving several electricity transmission lines going out of service, with emergency teams activated to restore electricity and determine the cause. The speakers connect the timing of outages in Kuwait and Bahrain to the Iran strikes, suggesting possibilities including cyber sabotage, while noting the Iran side reportedly said there were no reports of missiles flying out of Iran and no alerts in Bahrain. The transcript then shifts to Turkey and NATO-related developments and their intersection with U.S.-Israel relations. The speakers discuss Trump’s meeting with Erdogan and Netanyahu’s activity in Haifa, including Netanyahu’s remarks opposing the sale of F-35 aircraft to Turkey and framing it as affecting regional power balance. They mention Trump praising Erdogan, removing CAATSA sanctions tied to Turkey’s S-400 purchase, and discussing a possible reversal of a ban on Turkey’s ability to purchase F-35s. They cite a New York Times account that Trump is expected to tell Erdogan about restoring conditions for Turkey to buy F-35 stealth fighter jets, reversing the ban imposed in 2019 after Turkey was thrown out of the program for buying S-400 systems. They say the concern is that S-400 systems could collect data on F-35s, compromising stealth capabilities, and that Congress could oppose the change. Later, the speakers discuss Syria and the new Syrian leader Al-Shara. The debate centers on whether Al-Shara is integrating factions and bringing peace versus allowing or failing to stop atrocities, with one speaker arguing that leaders must punish those responsible and asking why commanders were not hauled in for atrocities. The other speaker argues there is “no alternative,” warns the alternatives could be worse (fragmentation resembling Libya or Yemen), and highlights claims about Al-Shara’s acceptance of Kurds into the Syrian government and an attempt to prevent attacks that could give Israel justification to strike Syria. They also mention explosions in Syria (including around the hotel of President Macron) and concerns about threats to Al-Shara from multiple external and internal actors. The conversation returns to U.S. actions and oil strategy. It includes figures about U.S. strategic petroleum reserve stocks falling by 6.2 million barrels to 319 million barrels (lowest ever, per the discussion) and argues this relates to the Strait of Hormuz dispute. They discuss whether either side will fold, and they reiterate that they believe the U.S. is violating parts of the MOU rather than offering concessions. Finally, the transcript mentions reports about a U.S. strike that hit a school in Iran, described as Minab School, with CNN reporting senior U.S. commanders approved the strike despite warnings that intelligence on targets was outdated (over 10 years old). The speakers describe it as one of the worst civilian casualty incidents in recent U.S. military history and say an investigation is ongoing. The session concludes with ongoing expectations of further retaliation, including predictions about whether strikes will stay limited to Bahrain and Kuwait or broaden, and a closing acknowledgment that the U.S. strikes are being described as ended while discussing the likelihood of further responses.

Today marks a historic moment in the Middle East as nations come together to forge a new path. These agreements signify a shift towards comprehensive peace, defying past conflicts and divisions. The world witnesses a choice for cooperation, friendship, prosperity, and hope over conflict and despair. Arabs, Israelis, Muslims, Jews, and Christians can now envision a future of unity, harmony, and peace, living, praying, and dreaming together. Congratulations to the people of Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and the kingdom of Bahrain. This day holds immense significance for the entire world.

The speaker discusses an upcoming trip and the actions needed to sustain progress, emphasizing that the audience should not turn away any friends and should mobilize all possible support. The central message is that the era of “Black Hawk Down” is over, and Somalia is on the upswing. Several reasons are highlighted for optimism: Somalia has a fully thinking progressive president; a parliament that is working hard to construct a system of laws for the Somali people; and, for the first time in twenty-two years, the United States government is so confident in this government in Somalia that we recognize this government. In addition, it is noted that two days after the speaker left Mogadishu, Rod Shaw, who is the head of The United States in international development, landed in Mogadishu himself, underscoring visible engagement from the U.S. At the same time, the speaker emphasizes that the bottom line is that steady progress will require the help of everyone present. There is a clear admonition that no one in the room can assume that other people will do the work, implying that personal responsibility is essential for continued progress. The speaker calls for broad participation: “We need your help.” Addressing the audience directly, the speaker says, “Yes, you. You understand what I mean? Every single individual needs to take personal responsibility for the continued progress of Somalia and the continued strengthening of the United States–Somali relationship.” This framing reinforces the expectation of individual contribution to collective advancement and the deepening of ties with the United States. Finally, the speaker articulates a hopeful vision for Somalia’s future: “My dream, God willing, is to see Somalia in the eyes of the world move from being a security threat to a security partner.” The vision includes transforming Somalia’s role on the global stage and domestic economy: moving from a recipient of emergency food aid to a commercial and trading partner. The overarching theme is the necessity of active, individual commitment to sustain political stability, legal development, and stronger U.S.–Somali relations in order to realize this favorable trajectory.

The speaker wants to honor the crown prince of Saudi Arabia because he believes the crown prince is the key person leading the Muslim world to support the state of Israel. The speaker claims that no other leader in the Muslim world has influenced decisions to move the Muslim world to support Israel more than the crown prince. The speaker states that he met with the crown prince and saw the country under his leadership.

The United States will collaborate with partners in Syria to manage risks following the recent decline of support for Assad from Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia. This shift stems from Iran's miscalculations after the October 7 attacks on Israel and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which has weakened Russia's ability to assist Assad. The U.S. has maintained sanctions on Assad, supported military operations against ISIS, and backed Israel's actions against Iranian networks. Moving forward, the U.S. will support Syria's neighbors, ensure stability in Eastern Syria, engage with Syrian groups for a political transition, and remain vigilant regarding the actions of rebel groups. Humanitarian relief efforts will also be prioritized to aid Syria's recovery from years of conflict.

Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways.

President Trump is congratulated for targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, an action described as unsurpassed and historically significant. It is claimed that Trump's action denies the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons. This is said to create a pivot of history that can lead the Middle East to a future of prosperity and peace. Strength is presented as preceding peace. Gratitude is expressed on behalf of the people of Israel and the forces of civilization. Blessings are invoked for America, Israel, and their alliance.