TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi at the White House disclosed "the existence of tens of thousands of videos featuring little children." "There are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn." This was described as brand new information and the first public acknowledgment that videos of Epstein and his victims exist. Nine days earlier, Bondi had a similar conversation with a total stranger in a restaurant: "Do you know when the Epstein files are gonna get released? We hope soon after." "There are tens of thousands of videos. Yeah." "And it's all but little kids, so they have to go through every one." The report notes officials spoke of a "mountain of evidence" but not this, and asks why the detail was shared with a self-described nanny at brunch rather than the American people, and why it was held back. The public wants answers and accountability.

The speaker states that they are not saying the organization lost 85,000 children, but that contact was lost with them and their whereabouts are unknown. The speaker asks if that is a fair statement. The speaker asks if, after making three calls on average to check on 85,000 children placed by the organization, there was no response. The speaker then asks if it is fair to say that contact was lost with over 85,000 kids. The speaker asks for a yes or no answer. The speaker states that the organization does not know where 85,000 of the children are. The speaker then says they will move on after receiving no answer.

Parents seek guidance from health leaders regarding vaccine decisions. I want to address a serious matter about character. You were accused of sexual harassment and assault by Eliza Cooney, who was initially hired as a babysitter. When confronted, you mentioned you weren't a "church boy" and acknowledged having "skeletons in your closet." You later texted Ms. Cooney an apology but claimed no memory of her account. Can you respond to these accusations in front of this committee? Did you make unwanted sexual advances toward Ms. Cooney? No, I did not, and that story has been debunked. Why did you apologize then? I apologized for something else. That’s not my understanding. You can read the text she published; it was not for that.

You testified that every child receives a know your rights presentation, but they are still being exploited by labor traffickers. You do not require sponsors to document their relationship with the child or conduct background checks on all adults in the household. The safety and well-being of children is claimed to be a top priority, but the reality suggests otherwise. The director is questioned about warning the secretary of children being at risk and the alarming number of unaccompanied children in the system. The director's lack of knowledge and failure to address these issues are highlighted, emphasizing the need for better protection of vulnerable children.

Senator Hawley questions Miss Marcos about the treatment of children in the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). He highlights reports of children being exploited for labor and sex trafficking, and criticizes the lack of proper vetting and background checks for sponsors. Senator Hawley also questions Miss Marcos about her communication with the secretary and accuses her of not doing her job effectively. He concludes by expressing concern about the large number of unaccompanied children and the lack of oversight in their care.

I've attended another briefing where a witness suggested that people living off-grid, whom ORR can't contact, are fine and simply prefer not to engage with authorities. I find this perspective astonishing. If American citizens are not trusted regarding their children's well-being, why would we trust the word of sponsors with questionable backgrounds, especially if they are undocumented? We risk placing children in the care of known criminals, including MS-13 members and pedophiles. It's unacceptable to assume these children are safe without proper checks. This attitude reflects a shocking indifference to the potential abuse and suffering of these individuals. I completely agree.

How can someone with allegations of child trafficking and having sex with a 17-year-old be nominated? It's noted that he claims to have stopped once he learned her age. Matt Gaetz has consistently denied these allegations, calling them invented. He stated that this false smear follows a three-year criminal investigation, which concluded without any charges.

The speaker questions the ACLU's stance on 85,000 missing children and suggests that the sponsors of these children are not real. They claim that the sponsors are involved in a racket and are not answering the phone. The speaker believes that a large number of these sponsors are involved in sex trafficking and accuses the current administration of supporting this through their policies. They also mention a partnership with cartels for human trafficking.

Did you coach a parent on how their biological son could spend the night in hotel rooms with girls during field trips? No, that did not happen.

Children were sent to addresses flagged for sexual abuse without proper vetting. A whistleblower revealed that the Office of Refugee Resettlement repeatedly placed a child identified as a victim of sex trafficking with abusers. During a recent hearing, the secretary admitted they do not verify the legal status of these children, stating that extensive vetting slows down the process. The priority seems to be moving a large number of children quickly, rather than ensuring their safety.

Speaker 0, Jeffrey Edward Epstein and my residence address is 6100 Red Hook Boulevard in Virgin Islands. Speaker 1: Is it true that you forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with numerous friends of yours? Speaker 0: Wouldn't love my fifth amendment right. Speaker 2: You had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, who, when you met him ten years ago, he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors. Speaker 3: And, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners regretted having those dinners. We did what we did because we wanted to see Epstein go to jail. He needed to go to jail. Were there young women in another part of the house giving massages, when I wasn't around? I have no idea of that. Speaker 1: Sent him three 12 year old girls from France who spoke no English for defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to France the next day. Speaker 0: Please, they never saw a young underage woman. Speaker 3: You know, those meetings were were a mistake. They didn't result in what he purported, and I cut them off. You know, that goes back a long time ago now. There's you know, so there's nothing new on that. Speaker 2: We now know that he was and had been procuring young girls for sex trafficking. Speaker 0: We now know that. At the time, there was no indication to me or anybody else. I kept my underwear on during the massage. I don't like massages particularly. Speaker 3: If we had had more transparency, perhaps this case would have gone differently. Speaker 2: It was reported that you continued to meet with him over several years. Speaker 3: You know, I had dinners with him. I regret doing that. Speaker 0: You have what's been described as an egg shaped penis. Speaker 3: Well, he's dead. So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.

Attorney General Pam Bondi disclosed the existence of tens of thousands of videos featuring little children in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. This was the first time an official publicly acknowledged videos of Epstein and his victims. Nine days prior, the attorney general had a similar conversation with a stranger in a restaurant, stating there are tens of thousands of videos, all with little kids. A reporter sent the AG's office the text of the recording, questioning why this detail was not disclosed to the public but was instead told to a random stranger. The attorney general used almost the exact same language as she did with the stranger. Questions are raised as to why the information was shared with a stranger before the American people, and why this information was held back in the first place. It is questioned whether a government apparatus is still working behind the scenes to protect.

The transcript presents two contrasting points. First, it states that there is no credible information that he trafficked them to anyone else. Second, it notes that, according to victims who cooperated with the FBI in that investigation, documents in FBI possession, your possession, detail at least 20 men to whom Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims. Among those named is mister Jess Staley, CEO of Barclays Bank, indicating that Epstein trafficked victims to him. The list also includes at least 19 other individuals, spanning a range of professions and high-profile positions. The described categories of people named in the documents include a Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, a royal prince, a high-profile individual in the music industry, a very prominent banker, a high-profile government official, a high-profile former politician, an owner of a car company in Italy, a rock star, and a magician. The enumeration further specifies that at least six billionaires are among those listed, including a billionaire from Canada. In summary, the transcript claims that while there is no credible information of trafficking to other parties, FBI-linked documents enumerate a network of at least 20 men connected to Epstein’s trafficking of victims, with Jess Staley explicitly identified as one of the recipients. The rest of the named individuals span diverse and prestigious sectors—entertainment, royalty, finance, government, politics, automotive business, music, magic, and extreme wealth—highlighting a broad and varied set of possible associations. The allegations are presented as claims from victims who cooperated with the FBI, and the list is described as detailing those individuals to whom Epstein trafficked victims.

We just received a batch of documents, and there's a lot to unpack. We're seeing logs, evidence, contact lists, and even a blank list of masseuses. Alan Dershowitz's name appears multiple times, and Bill Clinton is listed with four Secret Service personnel. Disturbingly, we're seeing references to nude and semi-nude images and videos, what we call CSAM, or child pornography. There are also some interesting contacts, including more Secret Service and some Hollywood A-listers. What's particularly striking is the evidence of CSAM. This is the issue that the FBI and the US Attorney's office completely missed. It could have put him away for life years ago. My client, Maria Farmer, and many others are upset that they've been ignored. I called for an investigation a year and a half ago and received no response.

HHS employees are tasked with reuniting children with sponsors, but they often encounter fake documents and inadequate verification processes. Instead of thorough checks, they rely on Google searches to validate IDs, which are often just photocopies. There’s no formal training on how to assess these documents. In one instance, a team discovered that an address they were sending children to was a strip club, revealing a serious oversight in the vetting process. Reports indicate that many children were placed in potentially dangerous situations, with alarming numbers sent to locations linked to trafficking activities. This raises concerns about the effectiveness of child welfare practices under the current system.

Every child in our care receives a know your rights presentation. I have read The New York Times reports on children working illegally in various industries. Despite the presentations, children are still being exploited by labor and sex traffickers. Releasing them to these traffickers is not helping them.

What the Biden administration did with respect to child trafficking is one of the great crimes in human history. Over 500,000 children were illegally trafficked into the country under the previous administration. When we've gone and looked for these children, Martha, the addresses that the US government provided, in other words, the records that the government kept under Joe Biden, are all fake. Nobody ever checked if the addresses were real. Nobody ever checked if the sponsors were real. Nobody ever checked if they were really even relatives or parents or relations or safe. We we recently recovered a a young illegal alien, for example, who had been raped repeatedly by the adult male that the Biden administration handed to her. She was under constant video surveillance and was coached exactly what to say if an officer ever knocked on her door so that she would never be rescued.

Why would these girls falsely claim that you raped and trafficked them? They provided specific locations, including your sister's house and a nearby mosque, where the incidents allegedly occurred. We know about the gang members involved and that you made one girl hide in the car when she was just 12 years old. What do you say to that? Why would she fabricate such a story? Before they arrived, the passenger seat was pushed all the way back so they could lie down. Do you remember who was in the car? There was a blind man in the car.

The speaker claims their soon-to-be-released research shows 35,000 "tender age kids" have been rescued. They allege that 70% of documentation from sponsors, arranged by NGOs through HHS, is fraudulent. This created a pipeline of children into sex trafficking and slave labor. Criminal case files are being built by interviewing these children to find out what happened to them. The speaker states they are identifying, locating, and rescuing more children, and building criminal files based on testimony and fraudulent vetting documentation. They predict many NGO employees will be arrested.

Are you aware that a report revealed children were exploited by someone posing as their aunt, who wasn't actually related? There are several incidents in that Florida report. Some I can recall, while others I might dispute, but I don't remember that specific case. Do you recall the teenage girl living in a house with unknown men, lacking a private bedroom? Are you aware that sponsors used a strip club in Jacksonville as the address for where a child should be placed? I don't have the Florida grand jury report in front of me, but I can review it and follow up with you later.

Thank you for the briefing. I have a follow-up question. You mentioned survivors seeking specialized treatment due to trauma. How do you know this? I'm unable to disclose that information. I feel more confused after reading the report. I noticed you met with Yossi Landau, a Zaka volunteer involved in a controversial New York Times investigation. Your report references a disturbing story about a pregnant woman, which also came from Landau. This raises questions about the credibility of your findings. How does this differ from the New York Times story if you're just collecting evidence? I understand your concerns, but my report outlines our visits to four locations. You met with Landau, who is central to this issue. I acknowledge your point.

Why would these girls falsely claim that you raped and trafficked them? They provided specific locations, including your sister's house and a nearby mosque, where the incidents allegedly occurred. We know the gang members involved and that you made one girl hide in the car when she was just 12 years old. What do you say to that? Why would she fabricate such a story? Before they arrived, the passenger seat was pushed all the way back, allowing them to lie down. Do you remember which men were in the car? There was a blind man in the car.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the whereabouts of unaccompanied children who crossed the border during President Biden's term. Speaker 1 doesn't have the exact figures but promises to provide them later. Speaker 0 then mentions that these children are being trafficked for sex, with estimates suggesting that at least 30% of young women and children are sexually abused during their journey. Speaker 1 doesn't have specific numbers but emphasizes that even one case is too many. They mention that any flagged cases are referred to appropriate authorities within 24 hours. Speaker 0 concludes by expressing concern about the volume of trafficking and the need to end this process that benefits drug cartels at the expense of child sex trafficking.

Senator Hawley questions Miss Marcos about the treatment of children in the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). He highlights reports of children being forced into labor and sex trafficking, and criticizes the lack of proper background checks and home visits for sponsors. Miss Marcos acknowledges these issues but emphasizes the thorough vetting process and the organization's commitment to child safety. The senator accuses ORR of facilitating child trafficking and criticizes their lack of knowledge about the number of children they are in contact with. The conversation becomes heated, with the senator expressing his frustration and disbelief at the situation. The video then transitions to a news report about Chicago police officers accused of having relationships with migrants living at a police station. Finally, a whistleblower testifies about witnessing child trafficking and exploitation within ORR and calls for increased oversight, transparency, and accountability to protect vulnerable children.

I joined HHS ORR to help reunite children with their families but found they were being trafficked due to contractor negligence. Despite reporting cases, children were sent to unsafe places with fake sponsors. Leadership ignored concerns and prioritized speed over safety. Calls to check on children were stopped, and a "strike team" was created to expedite removals, disregarding trafficking warnings. My offers to ensure contract compliance were rejected. This program is a failure, allowing taxpayer-funded child slavery. I urge senators to investigate and demand action to save these exploited children.