reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. The UN has significant potential but has not been effectively managed, failing to resolve many ongoing conflicts. The primary purpose of the UN should be to assist in settling these disputes, and there is a need for improvement in its operations to fulfill this potential.

The Israeli parliament is advancing legislation to prevent the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA) from operating in the occupied Palestinian territory. UNRWA, established in 1949, is crucial for providing shelter, health, and education services to Palestinians in Gaza and other regions. Despite allegations against some staff related to the October 7 attacks, a UN investigation found minimal merit in these claims. Since last October, at least 231 UNRWA staff have been killed in Gaza, where 90% of the population has been displaced and faces severe shortages of food, water, and safety. Human Rights Watch has reported that Israel’s actions amount to war crimes, including using starvation as a weapon. Governments concerned about the humanitarian crisis should support UNRWA and oppose Israel's legislation against it.

Speaker 0 mentioned a report by UNWatch on UNRWA and asked Human Rights Watch for their opinion. Human Rights Watch dismissed the report, stating that it lacked evidence. Speaker 1 acknowledged that any allegations are investigated and mentioned that UNWatch has a track record, but did not provide further details.

The House passed a bill to fund a regime to harm Palestinians and cut aid until 2025. Funding will be further cut if an investigation is initiated against Israel for crimes. The US is stopping aid to starving Palestinians. The government ignores constituents and human rights, condemning other countries for war crimes while supporting them. This is evil and hypocritical. Gaza suffers from a famine we finance, causing deaths daily.

UNRWA students, including those as young as elementary school age, are being lured into summer camps for armed guerrilla warfare. Tens of thousands of children, aged 10 to 17, were recruited by Hamas and Islamic Jihad for these camps, where they received military training and indoctrination to fight and destroy Israel. They learned to use various weapons, including mortars and tanks, and practiced tactics like kidnapping Israeli soldiers. The camps also emphasized the so-called right of return to Israeli cities. Girls affiliated with Islamic Jihad were encouraged to participate, and the camps featured photos of female suicide bombers. UNRWA's education system, along with its teachers and textbooks, supports this ideology. It is time for the world to demand oversight of UNRWA schools and for donor nations to take action.

Francesca Albanese, the UN Rapporteur on Palestine, is described as having said that America is controlled by the Jewish lobby. The speaker claims that on October 7 she defended Hamas, stating there was a context, and that she has been repeatedly echoing “the worst blood libels against Israel” on Twitter. The speaker further alleges that Albanese is “the leading purveyor of the genocide libel,” and says they are “fighting back” by exposing her and her hateful remarks. The speaker claims Albanese has become the first UN rapporteur in history to have been condemned by multiple countries, including France, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, Argentina, Hungary, the US, Latvia, Estonia, and other countries, and argues that “each condemnation matters.” The speaker says they led a campaign that collected 120,000 signatures, including people at the event, for a petition asking Secretary Rubio to take action after the United Nations failed to act. The speaker states that Secretary Rubio announced, for the first time in history, that the United States would sanction a UN official on July 9. The speaker says Albanese was sanctioned by the United States as a result. The speaker describes the sanctions as including a ban on Albanese’s entry into the United States. The speaker also claims that Albanese cannot use a bank card or a debit card, and cannot receive a payment. The speaker reports that Albanese said the sanctions are devastating, and quotes the speaker’s response as “very good, very good,” describing the sanctions as sending a message of deterrence. After the sanctions, the speaker claims additional consequences occurred. The speaker says they got Albanese’s husband, who works for the World Bank, who “shares in her incitement.” The speaker states that he was demoted from his position at the World Bank for incitement to hate. The speaker also claims that after Albanese was sanctioned, Navi Pillay, the head of the Commission of Inquiry against Israel, resigned. The speaker adds that they heard Albanese has family in the United States and that she was afraid the sanctions would prevent her from entering, leading her to resign. Overall, the speaker presents the sanctions against Albanese as unprecedented and connected to international condemnations and the petition campaign, and portrays the follow-on actions involving her husband and Navi Pillay as linked to her remarks and the consequences that followed.

Former UN ambassador John Bolton discusses the allegations of the United Nations Relief Agency (UNRWA) having ties to Hamas and potentially participating in attacks. Bolton suggests that the relationship between UNRWA and Hamas is extensive, given the large Palestinian presence within the agency. He raises questions about how many UNRWA employees were aware of and aided the attack, including the use of UNRWA vehicles and facilities. Bolton also highlights the need to investigate the depth of Hamas cooperation with UNRWA. The discussion emphasizes the shocking nature of UNRWA workers participating in attacks, knowing the consequences for civilians in Gaza. The credibility of UNRWA and the United Nations as a whole is called into question.

The United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council and UNRWA due to perceived anti-American bias. An executive order will also review U.S. involvement in UNESCO and overall funding in the UN, highlighting unfair disparities among countries. While the UN has great potential, it is currently not meeting expectations and is poorly managed. Many conflicts remain unresolved, and the UN should be more effective in helping to settle these issues. The organization needs to improve its operations to fulfill its primary purpose.

We are here today to support all the decent people in our country and across Europe who demand an end to the planned genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people by the State of Israel. We believe that European leaders, including our own, are not taking the gravity of the situation seriously. We refuse to be complicit in this planned genocide and believe that Europe must act urgently. The hypocrisy of preaching human rights while doing nothing when it matters is unacceptable. The citizens are shocked to see how the EU aligns itself with the interests of the United States and Israel. We can take action today by suspending diplomatic relations with Israel, imposing economic sanctions on Netanyahu and his political leaders, implementing an arms embargo, and bringing Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court to be judged as a war criminal. We need the European Union to take action.

I've found some questionable expenditures by USAID, like the $3,000,000 given to a rap artist in Gaza who was producing anti-Israel, anti-Semitic songs. Is that really the best way to use American taxpayer money? I don't think so. During tomorrow's hearing, we will be addressing this issue, as well as the fact that the woke ideology that USAID is pushing in various parts of the world is not welcomed.

Dismounting UNWA will worsen Gaza's crisis and hinder education for traumatized children. UNWA is vital for humanitarian aid in Gaza and beyond. Israel is trying to stop UNWA's work, leading to attacks on staff and facilities. We demand an investigation into these violations of international law to protect humanitarian workers globally. Translation: Stopping UNWA's work will harm Gaza and education for children. UNWA is crucial for aid in Gaza and beyond. Israel is trying to stop UNWA's work, leading to attacks on staff and facilities. We demand an investigation into these violations of international law to protect humanitarian workers globally.

Israel's actions have placed it outside the civilized community of nations, necessitating decisive international action to address its ongoing violence against the Palestinian people. The targeting of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency has severely impacted humanitarian efforts in Gaza. Immediate measures, such as an arms embargo against Israel, are essential, and further steps should be considered, including potential suspension from the United Nations. Israel's aggression has already affected neighboring countries, threatening broader regional stability. It is crucial to prioritize the victims and expedite rebuilding efforts in Gaza. We must unite in our humanity to strive for a safer, kinder world for future generations.

Netanyahu has declared the United Nations in Israel unwelcome, resulting from the lack of opposition to Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian territory. European states can take immediate action by suspending diplomatic relations, imposing economic sanctions, and implementing an arms embargo. Additionally, they should bring Netanyahu and other responsible politicians who are bombing civilian populations to the International Criminal Court. It is crucial to act now to prevent further genocide.

The speaker criticizes the UN and its organizations for relaying false information about the situation on the ground. They claim that the UN relies on Hamas for facts, despite Hamas being a genocidal terror organization that controls Gaza. The speaker calls for the myth of UN-supplied facts to be debunked, stating that many UNRWA workers and media contributors in Gaza are Hamas members. They also mention how photojournalists from Reuters and the New York Times documented Hamas's actions and crossed into Israel with the terrorists.

The discussion centers on the fragile peace deal and the ongoing conflict with Hamas, with emphasis on Hamas’ true nature, disarmament, hostage issues, humanitarian aid, and regional dynamics including Lebanon and Iran. - Hamas remains a terrorist organization. The interlocutor states that Hamas has not changed its stripe and is using the ceasefire to reassert control in Gaza through mass executions of those opposed or suspected of working with Israel, while attempting to rebuild its strength. The plan, in partnership with Netanyahu, is to disarm Hamas, dismantle its terror infrastructure, and build Gaza into something different, a top priority under the Trump plan. - The peace deal is a work in progress. Neither Israel, the United States, nor other actors expect Hamas to act in good faith. The discussion emphasizes that if Hamas does not disarm, it will be eradicated, a statement framed as a serious US commitment reflecting the nature of the war and regional determination to end Hamas as a threat. - The 20-stage plan and pathway forward. The plan provides a pathway to end Hamas as a regime and terror army in Gaza and to prevent Gaza from threatening Israel going forward. The goal is to disarm Hamas, dismantle its infrastructure, and transform Gaza into a stable, peaceful entity, though it remains a “work in progress.” - Hostages and displaced persons. A central issue is the status of hostages: Hamas holds 13 of the 28 people Hamas allegedly murdered and held, with 18 returned so far, and 25 originally cited in discussions (the transcript mentions 28 total murdered and 18 returned, with 13 still in Hamas control). The speaker argues that Hamas knows the whereabouts of several more hostages and should deliver them; the claim is that some hostages who were said to be unlocated could be found even if debris removal is slow. The Red Cross and humanitarian organizations say recovering bodies will be a massive, decades-long challenge, but the speakers argue that locating hostages does not require full debris removal. Aid and humanitarian access are discussed, including a suspension of aid after the killing of Israeli soldiers that was brief and then reinstated; aid trucks are allowed through to humanitarian zones controlled by Israel in Gaza, with concerns about Hamas siphoning aid for its own purposes. - Aid leakage and Hamas control of aid. The speakers contend that Hamas stole or redirected up to 95% of aid in Gaza prior to the ceasefire, using it to fund its war against Israel. They argue that UN agencies operating in Gaza are often under Hamas influence, whether willingly or unwillingly, and thus aid distribution has been compromised when Hamas governs. - Hamas’ current behavior in Gaza and security concerns. Hamas is described as reasserting control by mass executions and intimidation; there is concern about how much control they exert over the areas they govern and the potential for continued war if they disarm remains unactioned. The discussion stresses that the longer Hamas can control areas, the more they can pursue their war. - Trump–Kushner–Witkoff diplomatic leverage. The discussion credits President Trump’s diplomacy with changing Hamas’s calculus. The Qatar strike that nearly targeted Hamas negotiators is acknowledged as a turning point; Kushner and Witkoff claimed that Hamas wanted peace when engaged directly in Egypt, and that the strike on Qatar frightened Hamas into reconsidering its position. The interlocutor suggests that palace diplomacy, allied pressure in the Arab and Islamic world, and the military pressure on Gaza City converged to push Hamas toward releasing hostages and engaging with the peace process. - Israel’s regional strategy and deterrence. The speaker emphasizes that Israel must be able to defend itself and maintain power in the region. The Abraham Accords are cited as a success, with normalization continuing because partners recognize Israel’s stability and the advantages of cooperation. The Palestinian statehood question is reframed as a broader test of Palestinian willingness to accept Israel’s existence; the speaker notes parliamentary support in Israel opposing a Palestinian state and argues that Palestinian society must change its stance toward recognizing a Jewish state. - Lebanon and Hezbollah. Optimism is tempered by caution. In Lebanon, there is some movement toward demilitarization, with the Lebanese army involved and Hezbollah’s power being re-evaluated. The speaker stresses that even if conflict ends, Israel will remain vigilant and prepared to prevent a rebuilt Hezbollah threat along the border, citing past upheavals and the need to protect border towns like Kiryat Shmona. - Iran and the wider threat. Iran’s missile program and its nuclear ambitions are described as two cancers threatening Israel: missiles capable of delivering heavy payloads and a nuclear program. The strategic aim is to prevent Iran from creating a “ring of fire” around Israel (Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, Yemen, Iraq) and to prevent metastasis of Iran’s influence from spreading. - Global sentiment and demonization. The speaker acknowledges growing global antisemitism and demonization of Israel post-October 7, but argues that Israel’s demonstrated ability to defend itself strengthens its position and that support should endure as the conflict recedes from prominence. The Palestinian leadership’s stance and the broader regional dynamics remain central to whether a two-state solution can emerge, with a tempered expectation that the peace plan will proceed step by step.

The speaker believes that suspending funding to UNRWA is disproportionate and punitive, as it will harm the poorest and most disadvantaged individuals who rely on their humanitarian assistance. They criticize Rishi Sunak and the UK government for cutting aid at a time when regional stability is desired. This decision puts UNRWA's work in Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and the West Bank at risk, jeopardizing their efforts to help those affected by war. The speaker concludes by comparing it to suspending funding to the NHS because of an individual's actions.

Canada and Sweden will resume aid to Anurag after pausing due to evidence. The United States is waiting for the UN investigation results before making a decision. Other countries have access to the same evidence and investigation. The investigation is the same for all countries. Each country will decide independently. There are reports of Israel falsely accusing agency employees of Hamas links, but the speaker cannot assess them. Translation: Canada and Sweden will resume aid to Anurag after pausing due to evidence. The United States is waiting for the UN investigation results before making a decision. Other countries have access to the same evidence and investigation. The investigation is the same for all countries. Each country will decide independently. There are reports of Israel falsely accusing agency employees of Hamas links, but the speaker cannot assess them.

The speaker downplays the severity of the actions committed by 12 UNRA staff members, who participated in a massacre resulting in the death of 1200 people. They argue that such incidents happen in every organization and emphasize the positive work UNRA does, like providing supplies to Hamas. The speaker dismisses the significance of UNRA schools distributing textbooks promoting anti-Semitism and violence against Israel. They challenge the audience to name a single organization without 12 individuals involved in similar atrocities. The speaker urges leniency towards UNRA and questions the potential consequences if they continue their operations unaffected.

"Goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world." "The house oversight committee demanded Wikipedia turnover identifying info for users who may be spreading anti Israel content based on a report from who else? Our friends at the ADL." "one recent report raised troubling questions about potentially systematic efforts to advance anti Semitic and anti Israel information in Wikipedia articles related to conflicts with the state of Israel." "the Israeli regime regime's propaganda complex has dedicated courses and entire teams focused on editing Wikipedia so that it reflects their genocidal worldview." "Go to Wikipedia right now. Look up October 7 and see if there is any mention of the literal thousands of Palestinians who have been held hostage."

Discussion centers on alleged leakage of U.S. foreign aid to terrorist groups. 'we are sending $40,000,000 a week to the Taliban,' 'We have assisted Al Shabaab in Somalia' with 'Hamzee network in Sudan, Hamas, Islamic Jihad Hezbollah' and 'Dozens of terror organizations have received indirect assistance from US foreign aid.' In Gaza, '$2,100,000,000 in American taxpayers money to Gaza since October 7 when Hamas invaded Southern Israel.' USAID money was used under an 'emergency use authorization' to reach parties 'USAID formerly had a relationship with in the Gaza Strip,' with waivers; '90% of aid ... ended up in Hamas controlled areas' and there was 'no strategic thought' or screening; 'Samantha Powers ... was intent on having Israel not be able to defend itself.' NGOs/UN agencies lobby against vetting; USAID funds its own private lobby; HR 160 would increase transparency. A regulation naming terrorists in databases was 'overturned by Biden.'

There are concerns about possible violence outside an embassy, reminiscent of past incidents like Benghazi and Tehran in 1979. Additionally, there are reports that over $1 billion of US taxpayer money may have been used to support Hamas under President Biden. A report suggests that the United Nations Relief and Work Agency received this funding, which was cut off by former President Trump due to its links to Hamas. Senator Marsha Blackburn plans to introduce legislation to halt funding until Iran is expelled from the UN and investigated for violations. The State Department denies these claims, stating that the UNRWA has measures in place to prevent funds from benefiting terrorists. However, evidence suggests that Hamas weapons were found at relief group schools, and teachers employed by the aid group in Gaza and the West Bank promoted hatred and terrorism. The Biden administration is seeking an additional $260 million for this group.

Speaker 0 argues that “they’re making hundreds of billions of dollars a year more,” and that this funding emboldens them to give their proxies “weapons, money, and the vigor to attack the Jewish state,” which he says is unacceptable in the international community. He sets the stage for a connection between large flows of money and aggressive action by those proxies. Speaker 1 responds by asserting that “the only reason that Hamas attacked Israel, the only reason they’ll able to is because of increased Iranian funding,” and adds that Hamas is funded “in part” by Iran but that Hamas also receives funding from various other sources. He names possible funders such as Iran and Qatar and questions who funds Iran, suggesting multiple sponsors. Speaker 0 presses the point with a direct question, “Who funds Iran?” prompting Speaker 1 to identify Qatar as a potential funder. Speaker 0 repeats and confirms, expressing uncertainty about specifics by saying, “Buffans? Okay. Who from Hamasi? Of course they do. Right?” Speaker 1 continues with uncertainty, noting that “they were transferring a whole lot of money to the Gaza Strip” and references the Gaza funding issue as a major scandal associated with Netanyahu, described as “one of the big scandals that Netanyahu was involved in,” tied to letting that money pass through to the Gaza Strip, though he adds “I don’t know this is supervision.” In the dialogue’s core, Speaker 0 posits a logical implication: “If Iran gets more money, that’s good for Hamas. Right? You agree on that? Come on.” Speaker 1 responds with a cautious “Broadly speaking,” and Speaker 0 presses further, urging Speaker 1 to concede one point, addressing him by name, Steven. Overall, the exchange centers on the linkage between international funding, particularly Iranian and Gulf-state money, to Hamas and its activities, with attention to the claim that large monetary flows empower proxies to threaten Israel, and with references to past allegations about the transfer of funds to Gaza and the political fallout surrounding those funds.

Netanyahu's claim that UNRWA is a Hamas proxy is false. The head of UNRWA in Gaza is a US army veteran, not affiliated with Hamas. Netanyahu has aimed to eliminate UNRWA since 2017, which would harm aid distribution in Gaza, leading to starvation and lack of medical help. Cutting off UNRWA funding would be a significant mistake. Translation: The claim that UNRWA is linked to Hamas is untrue. The leader in Gaza is a US army veteran, not connected to Hamas. Netanyahu has sought to remove UNRWA since 2017, jeopardizing aid distribution and causing suffering. Ceasing UNRWA funding would be a grave error.

Over 7,700 Palestinian children have been killed by Israel, while the situation in Ukraine was unfolding. Some people now defend Israel, but I won't respond because our difference is not political, it's about humanity. Those who support Israel either don't hear what Israeli leaders themselves say, that this is a war against the entire population in Gaza, or they simply applaud the expulsion of two million Gazans. The European Union is also complicit, as it continues to provide weapons to Israel, which will inevitably kill innocent people in Gaza. We must put an end to this complicity. (French to English translation)

The UN Rapporteur on Palestine, Francesca Albanese, is described as having said that America is controlled by the Jewish lobby. The speaker claims that on October 7 she defended Hamas by saying there is a context, and that she repeatedly echoes “the worst blood libels against Israel” on Twitter. The speaker states that Albanese is “the leading purveyor of the genocide libel,” and says their group is “fighting back” by exposing what they call hateful remarks. They claim Albanese has become the first UN rapporteur in history to have been condemned by France, Germany, Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, Argentina, Hungary, the United States, and other countries including Latvia and Estonia, and that “each condemnation matters.” They say they led a campaign that gathered 120,000 people, including attendees, who signed a petition asking Secretary Rubio to take action because the U.N. failed to act. They say Secretary Rubio announced that, for the first time in history, the United States would sanction a U.N. official on July 9. The speaker asserts that the U.S. sanctioned Albanese and adds that this results in multiple restrictions: she is banned entry from the United States; she cannot use a bank card; she cannot use a debit card; and she cannot receive a payment. They quote Albanese as describing the sanctions as “devastating,” and as saying, “very good, very good,” and that it sends a message of deterrence. The speaker then claims consequences beyond the sanctions. They say that Albanese’s husband, who works for the World Bank and is described as sharing in her incitement, was demoted from his position at the World Bank for incitement to hate. After Albanese was sanctioned, the speaker claims that the head of the Commission of Inquiry against Israel, Navi Pillay, resigned. Finally, the speaker says they heard Albanese has family in the United States and that she was afraid that if she were sanctioned she could not enter the U.S., concluding that she resigned in that context.