reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We must destroy Hamas and raze Gaza according to the divine plan. The Torah does not permit mercy in war, even towards children. In the future, these children will attack us. We follow the rules of the Torah, which includes smashing infants on rocks as revenge. We bless Hashem for the food we eat after killing innocent infants. We kill all men, women, and even breastfeeding babies.

There is a terrorist in the building who will harm Jews. The Torah allows for preemptive action, even if it means harming innocent children, as they may become terrorists in the future. It is advised not to show mercy towards children of terrorists, as they may pose a threat later on. This approach is based on the belief that there is no distinction between terrorists and their offspring. Translation: The Torah permits preemptive action against a terrorist, even if it means harming innocent children who may become threats in the future.

We take children, drain their blood, mix it with Passover blood, and grind bodies into sausage and hamburger. We sell meat to slaughterhouses. People unknowingly eat their children for breakfast and lunch. This practice has been ongoing for thousands of years. Despite being open about it, people refuse to believe. It is claimed that the blood of enemies is consumed during Passover. This shocking revelation is met with disbelief by the public.

The Talmud is a central text in Judaism, second only to the Hebrew Bible. It serves as the main source for Jewish law and theology. Here are some rules from the Talmud that Jews are taught to follow. Remember that "Goyim" means non-Jew. Even the best of the Goyim should be killed. All children of Goyim are animals. Gentiles are not humans, but beasts. A Jew may violate, but not marry, a non-Jewish girl. A Jew may have sex with a child younger than nine years old. Eating with a Goy is like eating with a dog. If a Jew finds something lost by a Goy, it doesn't have to be returned.

On October 7th, many Israelis were killed by the IDF, not Hamas. The Hannibal doctrine involves killing Israelis to prevent them from being captured by terrorists. This is done to avoid paying a high price for hostages. Evidence suggests this doctrine is used in Israel, which some consider murder.

There have been accusations of Jewish ritual murder throughout history, with claims that Jews have engaged in the cruel act of sacrificing children for occult rituals. While many people dismiss these claims as lies, there is evidence to suggest that such practices have occurred. Reports describe children being tortured and killed in the most brutal ways, with their blood used for various occult rites. While it is important to note that not all Jews are involved in these acts, there have been instances where Jews have admitted to and been found guilty of ritual murder. These crimes have often been covered up by Jewish communities, making it difficult to uncover the truth.

There have been accusations of Jewish ritual murder throughout history, with reports of children being sacrificed in cruel and heartless ways. While many people deny these claims, there is evidence to suggest that these crimes have occurred. Jewish ritual murder is often associated with certain holidays such as Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah. The media and Jewish organizations have worked to suppress discussion of these crimes, and Jews have been able to avoid punishment through bribery and manipulation. It is difficult to determine the exact frequency of these murders, but the number of missing children each year raises concerns.

Under specific circumstances, it may be permissible for people to do certain things, as stated by various sources.

The Talmud teaches that Gentiles are considered inferior to Jews, not even classified as men. Gentiles have no legal rights, and if a Jew is sued by a Gentile, the verdict favors the Jew. Sharing Talmudic teachings with Gentiles was punishable by death. Jews are praised as exalted beings, while Gentiles are viewed as vile. The Talmud promotes the idea that the best Gentile deserves to be killed.

The family of Hassan Katanani celebrated and praised their son for killing a Jewish woman and her two daughters during their car ride to meet relatives for Passover. They expressed their desire for the terrorist's young children to follow in their father's footsteps and become holy in their own way.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of not showing mercy, arguing that being merciful to a child is actually harmful because they will grow up to become a dangerous individual. They mention a verse from the Torah, specifically Deuteronomy chapter 20 verse 16, which discusses rules of war and advises against allowing anyone to survive. Additionally, they mention another verse from Deuteronomy chapter 25 verse 19, which instructs the complete eradication of the Amalek people, including men, women, and children, stating that they have no right to exist.

The speaker revisits the notion of Jewish involvement in human sacrifice, challenging the common assumption that the Abraham-and-Isaac episode ended all such practices for Jews. The argument presented is that evidence suggests human sacrifice was sometimes practiced by Jews in ancient and medieval times, including children burned in pits called toffet, with drums used to muffle cries, particularly among Jews in Carthage around three hundred years before Christ who worshipped Baal. The speaker notes that similar reports persist in various periods and places, including assertions that during a battle in Syracuse nearly five hundred children were thrown into a burning toffet as an offering to Baal, and that children were placed in the arms of a bronze bull with a furnace below and then burned. The term holocaust is invoked as describing the act, with the speaker claiming that, in older dictionaries, holocaust referred to the burning of children as sacrifice to deities, though modern usage has shifted. Ancient historians such as Apion, Democritus, and Poseidonius are cited as describing Jewish ritual murder. Appian allegedly reported in 168 BCE that an intended victim, an adult, was found at a Jewish temple and that a ritual was enacted annually involving kidnapping a Greek foreigner, slaying him, consuming his flesh, and swearing hostility against the Greeks, with remains cast into a pit. Flavius Josephus is contrasted with Appian; Thackeray’s translation of Josephus recounts a Greek man abducted and brought to the temple, who explains a “one unutterable law of the Jews” involving kidnapping, ritual slaughter, and blood use. The account claims numerous later authorities described ritual murder of Christians during Purim, including Socrates Scholasticus and Baronius. It mentions a Gentile child crucified or slain by Jews in various chronicles (Imistar, Kiev, Treviso, Magdeburg, and England), with specific cases: a boy named William in England (documented by Thomas of Monmouth), whose blood supposedly produced miraculous effects; the boy’s murder was cited as a crusading cause against Jewish communities, culminating in William’s canonization as a saint. The speaker cites Thomas’s Latin account, later translated, of abduction, torture, and the bribes given to sheriffs, and claims William’s case helped alert English parents. The narrative continues with the notion that a converted Jew, Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that Jews took blood annually from Christians to obtain freedom and return to Palestine, with lots drawn to determine the blood source. Other cases cited include a December incident in Kissingen, Bavaria; Hugh in London; Isaac de Pouley in Oxford; Trent in 1475 (Simon), where children were punctured with marks, circumcision mentioned, and a saintly martyrdom recorded by Beatus Andreas. Luther’s remarks on “the Jews and their lies” are cited, noting accusations of poisoning wells and mutilation. Additional episodes include Christopher in 1492 Spain and Isabella I’s edict expelling Jews (with later reconsideration in 1967), Prague in 1502, Pona in Lithuania 1574, Lublin and Kutnia in 1598, and broader counts by Montague Summers and others of hundreds of alleged historic ritual murders and the use of blood for magical purposes. The speaker ties these anecdotes to a pattern of medieval and early modern allegations of ritual murder against Jews, asserted across multiple cities and centuries.

According to the speaker, showing mercy to a child is not actually merciful, but rather cruel to the child's future victims. The speaker refers to an ideology that the child will grow up with, which is supposedly worse than their father's ideology. The Torah, specifically in the book of Deuteronomy, emphasizes the rules of war and states that no one should be allowed to survive. Additionally, the speaker mentions a verse that instructs the complete eradication of the Amalek people, including men, women, and children, as they are deemed unworthy of existence.

There have been accusations of Jewish ritual murder throughout history, with claims that Jews have engaged in human sacrifice. While some people dismiss these claims as anti-Semitic propaganda, there is evidence to suggest that ritual murder has occurred among certain Jewish sects. Many historical records describe instances of Jewish ritual murder, and there have been cases where Jews were convicted of such crimes. However, it is important to note that these cases do not represent the entire Jewish population, and many Jews vehemently deny any knowledge or involvement in ritual murder. The truth of these accusations remains a contentious and debated topic.

The speaker expresses concern about the occupiers killing children and questions if it is illegal. They find it hard to believe that such actions are happening.

The transcript presents a highly charged panorama of allegations about Jewish ritual murder, arguing that the accusation is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda but a recurring alleged reality with deep historical roots. It frames ritual murder as a long-standing practice attributed to some extremist Jews, despite frequent Jewish denial, and it asserts that “blood libel” has persisted through centuries as a response to perceived Jewish malfeasance. Key claims and sequence of events cited: - The video contends that Jewish ritual sacrifice is an ancient practice accused of by various observers, and that some researchers faced labels of anti-Semitism even when reporting what they found. It suggests that, for many, the blood libel persists because the crimes are said to involve extreme cruelty and covert concealment by Jews worldwide. - It notes that many historians acknowledge that human sacrifice occurred in various cultures, such as the Aztecs, India’s sati, and other groups, but argues that the focus here is on Jews and “Jewish ritual murder,” or blood libel, as a distinctive phenomenon with global reach. - The narrative recounts a series of historical incidents and alleged cases across Europe and elsewhere, presenting them as evidence of a pattern of ritual murder by Jews: - Carthaginian practices around 300 BCE involving tophet pits, child sacrifice to Baal, and the term holocaust historically used by Jews for such sacrifices. - Medieval and early modern episodes in various countries (e.g., England, Prague, Kiev, Magdeburg, Munich, Venice, Trent, Rin, Moristica, Oxford, and others) where children were allegedly ritually murdered, their blood consumed or used in occult rites, and where church or state authorities purportedly punished or condemned the perpetrators. - The Damascus Affair (mid-19th century) and subsequent allegations about the extraction and use of Christian blood in ritual contexts, including debates over the interpretation of Talmudic practices and the controversy surrounding blood in Passover rituals. - The Mary Fagan case in Atlanta, the Leo Frank case (early 20th century United States), and other European episodes (e.g., Andrei Yushinsky in Kiev, 1911) described as ritual murder or occult killings, with claims of biased or compromised investigations and trials. - The transcript also recounts later allegations connected to the 20th century, including supposed multi-generational testimonies (e.g., Oprah’s 1989 show featuring a Jewish survivor, Rachel, who claimed a family lineage of ritual murder) and other international rumors and supposed investigations. - It references a body of literature and figures to support the claim that ritual murder is real or historically documented, including works by Arnold Lees, Thackeray’s Josephus translations, Montague Summers, Vladimir Dahl, and various jurists, church figures, and historians who are said to have described or endorsed these acts. - The narrative asserts that some Jews allegedly used funds and legal maneuvers to suppress or dismiss accusations, including the existence of a “slush fund” to defend against blood libel charges, and claims that media control and political influence were used to stifle discussion or investigations. - It makes a provocative claim about the nomenclature and symbolism of ritual acts, including alleged associations with Sephirothic imagery, the Hebrew letter shin, and other Kabbalistic interpretations, tying these to alleged ritual wounds and occult meanings. - The transcript provocatively juxtaposes episodes tied to Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah with alleged killings, presenting these holidays as contexts for criminal acts and asserting that “the crimes” often occurred around Jewish holy days. - It concludes with warnings and statistics about missing children in the United States (quoting FBI figures) and urges vigilance regarding children during Jewish holidays, presenting a narrative of ongoing danger and conspiratorial guardianship by Jews over public discourse and law enforcement. - Throughout, it asserts that while some deny these claims or label them as antisemitic, there are numerous citations, historical episodes, and purported testimonies that supposedly corroborate ritual murder as a real, ongoing phenomenon, and it treats such accusations as frequently covered up or dismissed by Jewish interests. The overall thrust is to portray Jewish ritual murder as a historically documented, globally pervasive crime that has been concealed or minimized by Jewish communities and sympathetic institutions, while leveraging various historical episodes, scholarly names, and sensational anecdotes to argue for the continued relevance and reality of the claim. It closes with cautions to monitor children during Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah.

On October 7th, a number of Israelis were killed by the IDF, not Hamas. This is not surprising considering the difficulty of distinguishing between fighters in such situations. The Hannibal doctrine is different. It claims that if an Israeli soldier or citizen is at risk of being captured by Hamas or another terrorist group, the IDF will kill them to prevent hostage situations. The rationale behind this is that Israel values human life so highly that they would pay a high price to secure the release of hostages. There is evidence supporting the existence of this doctrine in Israel. Some may consider it murder.

There is a dark matter still in the world today: human ritual sacrifice, an ancient practice, and it has been something for which Jewish extremists have often been accused throughout time. Understandably, many people are skeptical of this bizarre accusation that has the Jewish people for at least two thousand years. After all, why would fanatical Jews in the past and perhaps even to this very day commit human sacrifice? Many people do not like to even think about the topic, believing it to be pure anti-Jewish propaganda. Likewise, the Jews themselves are quick to say that such claims are lies handed down through the centuries. However, there are two sides to this issue. One side believes Jewish ritual murder is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda, but a fact that has had a terrible impact on society since it began. Perhaps some viewers may doubt what is uncovered in this video, but an honest glimpse into this matter may make you think. Likewise, an in-depth and fair examination will make most skeptics into true believers. It is true that many of the people who conducted research into these matters were branded by Jews with the epithet of anti-Semite. A term used by Jews to stifle discussion on any topic that criticizes them. Certainly, however, if someone who is branded an anti-Semite by Jews says the sky appears blue on a sunny day, is it any less blue just because the so-called anti-Semite said it was? This is usually the case with respect to these matters. While some people who investigated these matters were really anti-Semites, it was the fact that human sacrifice was practiced by Jews that caused many of these people to become anti-Semites. After uncovering the secret among the Jewish cult in times past, how could a Gentile feel otherwise? After all it is not the anti-Semite who commits the foul act of human sacrifice, now commonly referred to as Jewish ritual murder. Yet Jews sought to make the Gentiles who reported these crimes appear worse than the Jews who committed them. Most historians know and admit that human sacrifice has occurred in the past amongst various sects. The Aztecs’ blood-stained temples attest to this. Many innocents met their fate that way with their hearts plucked from their bodies. The practice called in India where women would sacrifice themselves in flames is still practiced today in obscure parts where some of India's 1,000,000,000 mostly Hindus live. In Mexico, even just a few years ago, a strange cult was uncovered that had sacrificed many people, including American college student Mark Kilroy. The same is true of Africa and various parts of South America today. If you merely comb the Internet, you’ll realize that, yes, there are some groups who still engage in barbaric practices such as human sacrifice. So what are the facts about the Jews? Have they also engaged in such terrible acts in the past? And could there be some proven sect amongst Jews, extremists no doubt, who to this very day still commit the wicked crime of ritual murder. Most Jews have asked about ritual murder will vehemently deny any knowledge of it, of course. And they’re probably telling you the truth. If there are Jewish hate mongers who engage in these acts and there is strong evidence to indicate such, it is probably only a small number of them. So if this is indeed the case, one question still remains. What makes these crimes stand apart from other cruel acts committed by man against man in the past? The answer to this question is not a pretty one. Based on numerous reports from the past to modern times, the main difference is the degree of cruelty. Reports say children sacrificed in Jewish occult rights were tortured to death in the most cruel and heartless ways imaginable. After the ceremony, Jews reportedly dried the child’s blood, often absorbing it into paper, for their various occult rights. Aside from claims of Jewish ritual murder being carried out in an extremely vicious manner, there’s one other difference that sets this crime apart from others. When such crimes are uncovered, not only the local Jewish groups, but Jews from all over the entire world seek to conceal it. In the past, Jews have even set aside a special fund to cover up such acts. However, by doing this they become as a police might say, an accessory after the fact. From time to time, there have been brave and honest Jews who would deviate from their kinsfolk and admit to the truth of these crimes. While such honesty was not common amongst Jews, it still occurred on occasions. For this reason alone, indictment against all Jews cannot be made. Indeed, some Jews, young and old, have admitted these crimes in front of court, written about them in books, discussed them in debates, and so forth. For the most part, however, Jews typically deny such accusations. They have even developed a phrase for this type of accusation, blood libel. This term is often used as a rallying cry amongst Jewish groups.

According to the speaker, showing mercy to a child is not actually merciful, but rather cruel to the child's future victims. They argue that the ideology a child grows up with can be even worse than their father's. The speaker references the Torah, specifically Deuteronomy chapter 20 verse 16, which discusses rules of war and advises against allowing anyone to remain alive. They also mention Deuteronomy chapter 25 verse 19, which instructs the complete eradication of the Amalek people, including men, women, and children, stating that they have no right to exist.

Question: If a Jew converts to another religion, are they still Jewish? A Jew is a Jew forever and cannot convert. It is simply impossible. The Jew will always remain Jewish. Remember that.

Jewish law allows enslavement of non-Jews, regardless of race, to potentially bring them to Torah. This is not about racism, but a permission to enslave non-Jewish populations for religious purposes.

Leading Israeli rabbis gathered to defend a publication that judged all non-Jewish people, including children and families. The rabbis referenced the Passover Haggadah, which calls for pouring out wrath upon nations that do not know God. One speaker questioned whether anyone would uproot statements from the Bible or Torah. Another speaker stated that most people killed led the book, and defended the independence of the Torah, asserting that no one should criticize someone who writes about it, especially if he is of service. It was claimed that the obligation of self-sacrifice regarding coercion against Torah observance applies not only to non-Jews but also to Jews. There is a concept in the Israeli Talmud of killing all children in very specific cases according to different rabbinical opinions.

In the video, the speaker raises a question about a passage in the Jewish Talmud, specifically Sanhedrin 54b. The passage suggests that a Jewish person may engage in sexual activity with a child under the age of 9. The speaker seeks clarification on whether this passage truly exists in the Talmud.

I apologize, Nelly, but it's not audible. Excuse me, but it's not justifiable to say that killing children who have...

On August 18th, Israeli rabbis met at the Ramada Hotel in Jerusalem to support a controversial book by a fellow rabbi that justifies the killing of non-Jews, including innocent children. Critics argue this represents a desecration of the Torah, emphasizing that many attendees had not read the book. They highlighted that the book promotes violent and racist ideas without distinction. However, some defend that Jewish law, under specific circumstances, may permit such actions according to certain rabbinic interpretations.