reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Zelensky is described as a manufactured political figure created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who owns One Plus One Media. Kolomoisky financed and produced the TV show "Servant of the People," hiring Zelensky, an actor with no political experience, to play the president. The show was popular and Kolomoisky created a political party with the same name, running Zelensky as its candidate. Kolomoisky also financed Hunter Biden, paying him $50,000 a month to be on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company. It is claimed that Zelensky and Hunter Biden are both bankrolled by Kolomoisky and have drug addictions. The speaker suggests the U.S. establishment is "freaking out" over Ukraine because the country has been used as a "private piggy bank," financially exploiting it and contributing to its poverty. The speaker claims Hunter Biden received $50,000 a month, with a possible 10% kickback to his father. The speaker asserts Kolomoisky financed both Zelensky and Biden, and that Westerners are terrified the truth will come out in Ukraine.

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

The speaker claims the U.S. has given close to $5 billion to the Taliban via NGOs, and this continues. They allege this money cycles back to Washington, with a paper trail that Elon Musk has alluded to. The speaker believes USAID money goes "almost a %" right back to Democrat campaign coffers, with some Republicans also possibly benefiting. They state that Republican leadership is upset about these claims but acknowledges their truth. The speaker also questions how Joe Biden could have reviewed 8,000 pardon files, suggesting "payola" and shadiness in Washington D.C., particularly across various departments.

Speaker 0 describes Zelensky as an American hero and contrasts his public image with the underlying narrative. He explains Zelensky was totally apolitical, an outsider with no government experience, a comedian, and the star of a planned TV show called Servant of the People. In the show, the main character creates a YouTube video that calls out oligarchs and corruption, becomes popular, and is drafted as a protest candidate who eventually becomes president. In real life, the TV show is supported by oligarch Kolomoisky, who owned the channel and did a large, nonstop promotional push to make it the number one show, including primetime slots, ads, and crossovers with the news. In 2018, a year before the show ended, Zelensky formed a political party named Servant of the People, the same title as the show, and secretly produced another season of the show. In April 2019, he announced his candidacy on Instagram, with no campaign, no rallies, no real platform, and he skipped presidential debates; his few early press conferences were poor. Kolomoisky’s channel provided Zelensky with endless airtime and favorable polls while attacking his enemies. Speaker 0 continues that US intelligence agencies, CIA and NSA, helped by funding democracy campaigns in Ukraine—reportedly around $5 billion—funneled through NGOs, with USAID embedding advisers in Zelensky’s organization to assist the campaign. On election day, Zelensky wins with 73% of the vote. Afterward, the war with Russia occurs, he declares martial law, and elections are ended. An election in 2024 is anticipated as the result of democracy money. He asserts Zelensky is an actor in a carefully designed television show—“a construct,” akin to Epstein—an created entity that works, and asks what Americans think about his popularity. Speaker 1 responds that Americans are disappointed by the ongoing war and deaths, noting that the war’s human cost is a major failure of promises from the Trump administration, who claimed he would resolve it in 24 hours. He adds that conscripting 60-year-old men and Americans and others going to fight are part of the situation. He states that the Ukraine narrative, and wars in general, are not organic: wars like this are driven by demands for primacy, control, and wealth, rather than being spontaneous. He reflects that Putin didn’t suddenly decide to invade; similarly, the broader pattern of power is not organic. He notes the Russian soldiers were told they would be welcomed and that they had dress uniforms, and compares to expectations in Iraq, where it was promised that Iraqis would welcome forces. He asks what the Ukraine situation is really about, and comments that human war reduces to a few centers of power like NATO, China, the Soviet bloc, and oil-producing countries, ultimately converging to two leaders in a room who must kill each other, as part of the decay of empire, with the U.S. maintaining about 760 overseas military bases.

This is a story about a politician, Hunter Biden, who joins the board of Burisma and gets paid a lot of money despite being unqualified. The executives at Burisma ask Hunter Biden for help with the pressure they face from a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden then goes to Ukraine and gives a speech attacking the prosecutor, leading to his firing. The Justice Department didn't want this committee to see the facts, but information from whistleblowers confirms the story. Hunter Biden's communication reveals that he put Burisma in touch with Blue Star Strategies to gain support from US officials. The plan was successful, and the charges against Burisma were dropped. The Biden Justice Department tried to cover it up by slowing down the investigation. However, two whistleblowers and a judge in Delaware prevented them from getting away with it. This inquiry is crucial to uncovering the truth.

Biden and the media claimed that Shokin was corrupt and had to be dismissed, but no charges of corruption have been proven against him. Shokin believes the truth lies in the transcripts of Biden's conversations with Poroshenko. He alleges that Biden illegally influenced foreign officials to protect his son and engage in illegal money laundering. One American News verified Shokin's claims with a sworn affidavit to an Austrian court, accusing Biden of interfering with ongoing investigations. To learn more, watch part 3 of One America News investigates debunking the Adam Schiff case for impeachment. I'm Chanel Bian reporting from Washington.

A new report alleges that the House and Senate are investigating whether foreign adversaries illegally funneled money into Democratic campaigns. Letters were sent to the Treasury Department, FBI, and the Director of National Intelligence, claiming China, Iran, Venezuela, and Russia funneled money through ActBlue. According to one speaker, 19 state attorneys general, Senator Ron Johnson, and House Administration Committee Chairman Brian Pfau are also investigating. Congressional officials are requesting Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). Congress suspects foreign money is being routed to Democratic coffers. The speaker claims that obtaining SARs was key to substantiating the Hunter Biden story by tracing foreign funds. If Trump wins the election, the speaker predicts the Justice Department will launch a major criminal investigation in 2025.

Politician Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was appointed to the board of Burisma and received a large sum of money despite lacking qualifications. Hunter Biden admitted that he got the position because of his name. Burisma executives sought his help with pressure from a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden visited Ukraine and criticized the prosecutor, leading to his firing. These facts align with information provided by a confidential source to the FBI. Hunter Biden connected Burisma with Blue Star Strategies to gain support from US officials. The case against Burisma's owner was dropped, as desired. The Biden Justice Department attempted to cover up the situation, but two whistleblowers and a Delaware judge prevented it. This inquiry is crucial to expose this recurring pattern.

Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, is described as a “cokehead” and a manufactured political figure. He is said to have been manufactured by Igor Kolomoyski, described as a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch who owns OnePlusOne Media in Ukraine. OnePlusOne Media is claimed to have financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People, which hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even political interest, to play the role of President in the show. The show ran from 2015 to 2018 and achieved huge ratings, with claims that there was disproportionate propaganda and PR for the show, some saying it was completely astroturf. Viewers who know Ukrainian and watched the show described it as mildly enjoyable but not a big deal. It is asserted that Kolomoisky created a political party called Servant of the People, mirroring the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky. The claim is that Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. The speaker notes that not many actors are billionaires, implying Zelensky’s wealth is unusually high for an actor, and contends that Zelensky is the “finger puppet” of Kolomoisky. The narrative continues that Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden, to the tune of $50,000 a month plus additional benefits, in 2014, when Burisma, the Ukrainian oil and gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors at $50,000 a month. It questions who controls Burisma, asserting Kolomovsky is the same person who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. The speaker asserts that Zelensky and Hunter Biden are “spiritual cousins,” both bankrolled by the same man, Kolomovsky. It is claimed that both have serious drug addictions and both are intimately involved in Ukraine, with a contrast that Zelensky does not have a father who is President of the United States. There is a claim that the White House is freaking out over Ukraine, and that in Ukraine there are many secrets. The assertion is that “the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment” have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, financially exploiting it and stripping it of monies and assets needed by the Ukrainian people. This is linked to Ukraine being one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption and Western exploitation. Hunter Biden’s $50,000 a month is highlighted, with a remark that $50,000 a year would solve the problems of four or five families in Ukraine, illustrating the disparity given Ukraine’s poverty. The laptop is invoked to mention a possible 10% kickback to the old man, Joe Biden. The speaker asserts that Kolomovsky financed Zelensky and Joe Biden, and suggests there are many others who financed Ukraine’s leaders to carry out “evil deeds,” asserting that the West is terrified the truth will come out in Ukraine.

A new report alleges that the House and Senate are investigating whether foreign adversaries illegally funneled money into Democratic campaigns. Letters were sent to the Treasury Department, FBI, and Director of National Intelligence alleging that China, Iran, Venezuela, and Russia funneled money through the ActBlue online donation portal. According to one speaker, 19 state attorneys general, Senator Ron Johnson, and House Administration Committee Chairman Brian Pfau are also investigating. Congressional officials are seeking Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). Private briefings from financial institutions have led Congress to believe that foreign money is being routed to Democratic coffers. The speaker claims that obtaining SARs allowed the Hunter Biden story to go from fiction to fact. If Trump wins the election, the speaker predicts the Justice Department will conduct a major criminal investigation in 2025.

Joe Biden, while at the Council on Foreign Relations, allegedly bragged that he got the top prosecutor in Ukraine fired. He conditioned Ukraine receiving a billion dollars in US financial assistance on the firing of Victor Shokin, who was investigating Burisma. This financial assistance was a US aid grant. The speaker suggests finding the video of this event, calling it shocking and highlighting Biden's hubris and ego in speaking about it publicly, especially with the Council on Foreign Relations backdrop.

The speaker discusses an INTERPOL treaty with European states and Ukraine that involves investigating and prosecuting criminal elements. They claim that Joe Biden admitted to extortion in a tape from January 2019, where he allegedly threatened to withhold $85 billion in loan guarantees if Ukraine didn't remove a prosecutor investigating a corporation that Biden's son was affiliated with. The speaker suggests that Biden's actions implicate Obama in a felony. The conversation then shifts to the speaker's opinion on Trump and the Democratic Party. They mention connections between George H.W. Bush, Barack Obama's stepfather, and the CIA. The speaker also discusses Obama's education and wealth, attributing it to his stepfather's trust fund.

I've asked Congress to investigate where the money sent to Ukraine has gone. The American people deserve to know, as it's our taxpayer money. There's reason to be concerned because Ukraine has been known for corruption and money laundering. It's not just a billion dollars; it's a hundred times that amount sent to one country. Zelenskyy claimed Russia fired a rocket into Poland, which would be an act of war, but it turned out the rocket came from Ukraine. If Zelenskyy is going to beg the world for more money and demand more from the US, he needs to be more careful about making global statements that could bring us to the brink of war. We can't have full faith and trust by giving a leader a hundred billion dollars when he says, "I'm not telling you where the money went."

We're spending $350 billion, and Europe gets their money back as a loan, while we're just giving it away. Why didn't Biden demand equalization? Zelensky, a dictator without elections, better move fast or he won't have a country left. If he asks Biden for money, Biden says yes. What about the foreign bank accounts and the woman the FBI didn't interview? What if we started opening those bank accounts? He's compromised. I'm not saying that's happening, but it could happen.

Speaker 1 claims that most past presidents for the last 20 years have been aware of corruption within USAID but chose not to act, alleging that many were complicit. Joe Biden, as head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, oversaw USAID, which allegedly funded Burisma. Barack Obama's mother worked for USAID, and the Bush family also has connections. Speaker 1 suggests the Trump revolution challenged this system, which is why there was such a strong reaction against him. Speaker 1 further alleges that USAID funded the OCCRP, providing $20 million to journalists who then found damaging information on Rudy Giuliani. This information was purportedly used as the basis for the impeachment of President Donald Trump in 2019.

A Substack piece alleges USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment. According to the speaker, a CIA analyst leftover from the Obama White House wrote the memo that led to the impeachment based on hearsay. This memo relied heavily on a report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an organization funded by USAID. The OCCRP was allegedly created as an extension of the State Department and USAID. The speaker claims USAID was about regime change abroad, a public-facing version of covert CIA operations. The speaker suggests that, similar to censorship tools used abroad being brought home, the predicate for Trump's impeachment was created abroad. The speaker believes this is one of many revelations to come.

Since 2018, the narrative surrounding the Bidens' foreign deals has evolved. Initially, they denied any foreign deals, then admitted there might have been deals but no money was made. It then shifted to Joe Biden not knowing about or participating in the deals. The latest claim is that he was not in business with his son. The implications are significant, as a document released by the FBI suggests that someone present at meetings discussing bribing the Bidens worked for President Zelensky. If true, this raises questions about whether Zelensky was aware and used it as leverage in negotiations. Additionally, a Democrat donor and friend of the Bidens, Elizabeth Naftali, paid for Hunter's artwork and was later appointed to a government post. The Biden's business seems to revolve around Joe Biden himself, with questionable financial dealings. Democrats denying any wrongdoing may be a strategic mistake.

One participant observes that the matter is sophisticated and implies a coordinated effort beyond a single email, noting that it involves a multi-hundred-million-dollar transaction processed through complex steps and asking how the money can be traced. The other participant explains what is known: the NSA identified senior Ukrainian government officials who were having the conversation and reportedly have some of their emails. The intercepts do not name USAID workers directly; they only mention that they are “working for USAID in Kev.” Because of that, tracing who was in contact with those officials about a clean energy grant during a war with Russia should be possible by narrowing down who was connected to those USAID-related emails. They indicate progress has been made since the story was published the previous week, suggesting early movement in identifying the involved parties. They describe the NSA intercepts as a summary of intercepts noting that the operation was designed to be so complicated that it would be hard to figure out after the fact, with money laundered multiple times until it was eventually diverted and sent to the DNC and Joe Biden. At the time this was happening, a famous person was leading USAID: Samantha Power, who is described as very close to Obama, Clinton, and Biden. The statement emphasizes that, while this does not imply involvement, it suggests examining USAID from the top down to determine who knew what and when. In summary, the discussion frames the situation as a highly sophisticated, large-scale financial operation with a chain of communication involving senior Ukrainian officials and USAID personnel. The NSA’s intercepts point to a deliberate design to obscure the trail, with potential implications involving political figures connected to USAID’s leadership. The speakers highlight ongoing progress in identifying who was in touch with the Ukrainian officials and stress the importance of tracing the funding flow, including hints about laundering patterns and the ultimate destination of funds.

Russia released evidence linking Hunter Biden's investment fund to funding Ukrainian biolabs, where untested drugs were allegedly used on soldiers. The US is said to conduct such activities abroad due to legal restrictions at home. Ukraine's labs receive US funding for research on pathogens, but they are owned and operated by Ukraine and are part of a program to prevent deadly outbreaks. (Translation: Russia claims Hunter Biden's fund financed Ukrainian biolabs where untested drugs were used on soldiers. US conducts such activities abroad due to legal restrictions. Ukrainian labs receive US funding for pathogen research as part of outbreak prevention program.)

Putin was dealing with Biden, and he knew Ukraine was stealing money we sent. Under Trump, that stops, ending the fighting and our wasted money in a war we shouldn't be in. Ukraine's president admitted not knowing where half the money went, which has been widely reported. The money sent to Ukraine is paying off "war pimps" at the Pentagon, prolonging the war for profit while young men die. We were on both sides at the start of the war with gas contracts with Russia and giving money to Ukraine. Missile defense systems went to Ukraine and members of Congress had stock in the missile defense company. Putin is responsible, but why isn't there outrage about China? Because everything is made there and it's all about the dollars.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.

The transcript reports that overnight the United States government, specifically the National Security Agency, intercepted conversations of Zelenskyy’s government in Ukraine in late 2022. The conversations allegedly involved conspi­ring with federal workers at USAID to devise a plan to take $200,000,000 of USAID money, route it through a series of transactions, move it into the United States, and launder it into Joe Biden’s 2024 campaign and the Democratic National Committee. The presenter says there are intercepts for the first time and that Chelsea Gabbard’s team was willing to declassify them. An investigation is underway beginning with USAID to determine who was involved and whether any crimes were committed, with referrals to the FBI anticipated in the next few days. The documents are said to be declassified and available at justthenews.com, and members of Congress have been clamoring to access them. The presenter expects Tulsi Gabbard to make a statement later tonight on the investigation’s evolution. The discussion shifts to a framing of a transition from the era of weaponization, where prosecutors and FBI agents were used to target Donald Trump and his supporters, to a potential situation where there is conspiring with foreign powers to influence elections. The Ukraine matter is cited as the latest development. The speaker recalls a claim made three weeks earlier about FBI proof that China sent thousands of driver’s licenses to the United States with fake names to obtain fake ballots to vote for Joe Biden in the 2020 election, labeling these as words of the FBI informant in FBI documents that were made public. The presenter then notes that China may be conspiring with Joe Biden and the Democrats, and now possibly Ukraine, with two investigations underway. The speaker promises to keep listeners apprised of developments.

I established a foundation in Ukraine prior to its independence in 1990. Figures like George Soros were unfortunately everywhere in these events. This team consisting of people like Newland, Soros, and Biden, acted in favor of Hillary Clinton's interests and tried to prevent Mr. Trump from being elected. We can look at the Arab Spring in North African countries such as Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt, as well as the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, and the Orange Revolution in 2004. The Revolution of Dignity in 2013 and 2014, all of this is related to his activities. He continued his operations in 2015 and 2016. Hunter Biden had deals in Ukraine, being on the board of directors of an oil and gas company in Ukraine. This explains the economic interests of the Biden family. Then there's the matter of supposed Russian election interference.

The speaker claims that USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment. According to the speaker, the House of Representatives impeached President Trump in December 2019 based on a memo written by a CIA analyst held over from the Obama administration. The memo relied heavily on a report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an organization initially funded by USAID. The speaker alleges that USAID was involved in regime change abroad and, like censorship tools used abroad, helped create a predicate for Trump's impeachment. The speaker suggests this is one of many revelations to come.

Speaker 0: By a member of the Ukrainian parliament. Let's talk about the tape recording evidence. Speaker 1: We don't know. Yeah. We don't know much about it because it's floating around Ukraine, but we do know the general prosecutor of Ukraine, our equivalent of the attorney general, came on our show this morning and said the following. There's enough evidence for me to open up a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a Ukrainian to try to influence the United States election in favor of Hillary Clinton. That's a profound statement coming from the top law enforcement official of Ukraine. Why is it important? There's a court in Ukraine that's already concluded that, Ukrainian officials leaked Paul Manafort's financial records to try to sway the US election. You haven't heard anything about that in the American press, but that ruling occurred recently. Then a parliamentary member comes out and says, I have a tape of these law enforcement officials saying they did it specifically to help Hillary Clinton. That becomes the foundation of the Ukrainian investigation. Speaker 0: You have talked to people that have heard this tape. Correct? Speaker 1: Well, the, the prosecutor himself has heard the tape and said it was important enough, good enough evidence to warrant opening the investigation. So the tape, the court ruling, the top prosecutor in Ukraine says there was a foreign power Speaker 0: Two separate issues here. Number one Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Did Ukrainian officials offered us evidence that, in fact, they were involved in election interference in 2016 to help Hillary Clinton's campaign? But why didn't anybody in in the media pursue the interference story? And I thought they cared about interference, but, obviously, only if it's Russian interference and Trump because we know they don't care about the dirty Russian dossier. Speaker 1: That's right. Keep in mind that just a few months ago, Sean, we reported on your on your show and inside the hill that Ukraine's embassy in Washington confirmed on the record that back in 2016, the Democratic National Committee trying to help Hillary Clinton get elected asked the Ukraine Embassy to help interfere in the election by doing two things, dig up dirt on Paul Manafort and have Ukraine's president make a kerfuffle here in Washington about Manafort and Trump when he came to visit. Now the Ukrainians say they they rebuffed that attempt, but Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, made that request according to the, Ukraine embassy in