reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Moses Hess, a friend of Marx and Engels, helped with the Communist Manifesto. Socialism, Marxism, communism, and Zionism have common roots aiming for world domination. Karl Marx, born Moses Mordechai Levi, came from a line of rabbis, including Mordecai, related to the Rothschilds. Rothschild partly funded Marx, seen as a Jewish founder of communism. Communism was called "the mother of Marxism" in 1936.

Marx openly advocated genocide against Slavs, referring to them as "racial trash" who must perish in a revolutionary holocaust. This fact is not widely known, but it is shocking when mentioned. Engels also supported this idea, stating that primitive societies in Europe, such as the Bosques, Bretons, Scottish Highlanders, and Serbs, would need to be destroyed because they were two stages behind in the historical struggle. Marx believed that Slavic people were vulgar and dirty, and he even questioned the existence of Poland. In summary, Marx and Engels believed that classes and races too weak to adapt to new conditions of life should perish in a revolutionary holocaust.

Zionism, a political philosophy behind Israel, is distinct from Judaism. The founder, Theodor Herzl, was an atheist seeking a state for Jews. Zionism is labeled as satanic, imperialistic, and racist for displacing Palestinians through terrorism. The speaker urges the US to stop funding Israel and instead support the homeless domestically.

Marx and Engels advocated for the destruction of certain groups in a socialist revolution, labeling them as "racial trash" who must perish. They believed that some societies were too primitive to be brought up to revolutionary standards and needed to be eliminated. This mindset extended to Slavic people, with Marx viewing them as vulgar and unworthy of existence. The idea of a "revolutionary holocaust" to eliminate weaker classes and races was promoted by Marx.

In a 1920 article, Winston Churchill expressed his belief that some international Jews aimed to establish a global communist state under Jewish control. He suggested that these individuals would utilize both communism and Zionism to achieve their goals.

The Rothschilds purchased Jerusalem in 1829, establishing Israel with their support. The first Zionist Congress in 1897, chaired by Theodor Herzl, saw Jewish delegates from Europe agreeing that Palestine should be given to them. Herzl predicted that a world body would grant Palestine to the Jews, making him the father of the Jewish state. Manipulating European military powers, Palestine would be taken from the Ottomans by force. Herzl also claimed that wealthy Jews controlled the world, influencing governments and starting wars. In 1907, Dr. Wolfson echoed this sentiment in a New York Times article.

In 1829, the Rothschilds purchased Jerusalem, a key step in establishing Israel. The First Zionist Congress in 1897, led by Theodor Herzl, aimed to secure Palestine for Jews. Herzl predicted a world body would grant Palestine to Jews, manipulating European powers to take it from the Ottomans. He believed wealthy Jews controlled governments, starting wars and making peace at will. In 1907, Doctor Wolfson echoed this sentiment in the New York Times.

Karl Marx, born Moses Mordechai Levi, came from a line of rabbis and had ties to the Rothschild family. He is known as the Jewish founder of communism. The Communist Manifesto outlines communist ideology, including central banking, abolition of countries, families, private property, heavy taxation, and control of media. Marx promoted dictatorship of the proletariat, violence, and genocide against Slavs. Winston Churchill believed international Jews aimed for a global communist state under Jewish control.

Richard Nicholas Kudenhove-Kallergi envisioned Jewish dominance in Europe and beyond, starting in the 1920s. Kallergi's plan involved transforming European peoples into a mixed race to facilitate control, believing a future Euro-Afro-Asian race would replace diverse peoples. He claimed crossbreeding would create unique individuals. Kallergi advocated for mass migration to eliminate national self-determination, aiming for a mixed-race Europe to be governed by Jews. He believed the mixed race individual would combine traits essential for Jewish control. Kallergi's movement received financial backing, including 60,000 gold marks from Max Warburg. Some argue Kallergi's vision is becoming reality with mass immigration and declining native birth rates. Kallergi also aimed to protect Jewish political activities through laws that shield minorities from criticism while allowing the majority to be vilified.

The speaker addresses Germans who are already used to being called “monsters,” saying it is considered especially monstrous that they are at the forefront of the “question” of opposing the Jews. He argues that most Germans do not actually know the situation regarding this question and instead judge emotionally, claiming that few use objective observation. He then connects the concept of “work” to the question. He defines work as an activity done for one’s fellow men, grounded in the recognition of necessity rather than only instinct. He describes what he calls a slow revolution that turned “the lazy man of primeval times” into the man of work, occurring in three stages: self-preservation; work for selfish reasons; and finally work from a sense of moral duty that is performed even without constant compulsion. He points to examples of millions working without being driven and people staying occupied in daily life and after work. He claims the cause of this revolution was “the goddess of hardship,” tracing hardship to northern ice deserts where existence depended on work, clothing, building dwellings, and planned activity to survive winters. He asserts that hardship also produced “racial purification” by eliminating weak and sickly individuals, and that external limitation leads to deeper inward life. He states that the result for “Nordic races” is work as duty, physical and mental health, and inner spiritual life, enabling expansion and state formation, especially when the “ice shackles” fell away and people moved south. He says these peoples shared the sign of the sun and created cults of light, connecting the “sun cross” to the swastika. He then turns to the Jew and state-building, claiming the key is the Jew’s attitude to work. Citing a book he calls the Bible, he quotes “By the sweat of thy brow shalt thou earn thy bread,” interpreting it as punishment for the fall. He says Germans cannot view work as punishment and claims they would seek activity even in circumstances of ease, including violence if necessary. He argues that, in his account, the Jewish conception differs: work is not a self-evident moral duty but only a means for preserving oneself, and therefore resembles plunder. He says the principle is the same even as the forms change, claiming it is called work by others but “robbery” in his view. He adds that the northern hardship purified Nordic races, while he claims Jews “did not become purified but inbred,” producing a race with defects of inbreeding. He further claims Jews lack a third trait: inner spiritual experience, describing what he presents as restlessness, calculating behavior, lack of original artistry, and reliance on foreign builders and copying in music. He states that because of these supposed traits, he says Jews cannot build states and are historically nomadic “even on the grandest scale,” and that “Jerusalem” was not an early Jewish nation-state capital. He argues that even when Jews gained upper hand later, they lived primarily as a parasite on other peoples and would not form a state themselves, preferring to function as middlemen and merchants in other states where others do the labor of mining, factories, and construction. He describes “Zionist” state-building as a “comedy,” claiming it would mainly function as a “spiritual center” and as a means to dominate other states financially, economically, and politically. He claims that Jews would receive immunity as citizens of the Palestinian state and replace German citizenship after being caught. He argues that individuals cannot escape “racial” determination and that Jews act to represent their race’s interests “whether consciously or unconsciously.” He then frames two “racial differences”: “Aryanism” is said to mean a moral conception of work and socialism/community spirit, while Jews are said to embody an egoistic conception of work and “mammonism and materialism,” allegedly acting in a state-destroying manner. He claims neither goodness nor evil in individuals matters if the race determines behavior. Shifting to economics, he argues against targeting “industrial capital” and claims what is fought is “stock exchange and finance capital.” He distinguishes industrial capital from loan/stock exchange capital, describing industrial capital as tools/workshops whose value depends on work, while loan/finance capital is multiplied through interest independent of ordinary life. He provides an example involving bonds and railways, describing continuing interest even after ownership changes. He claims international capital becomes so large it requires destroying states and cultures, then throws them into the jaws of international capital. He asserts that this “international” capital is dominated by the Jews, because their global spread allegedly makes them “international.” He argues that the ordinary man bears the burden of interest payments while others allegedly dominate without equivalent work, degrading “honest work.” He connects this to a “moral conception of labor” and references Karl Marx as an idea to change that conception by organizing masses for destruction of national economy and protection of international stock exchange and loan capital. He claims that resisting loan capital requires politically organized mass struggle against oppressors, and that systematic knowledge alone is not enough without organization. He then argues for political action built from mass organization rather than small circles, claiming “salvation” must come “from the broad masses, the bottom up.” He outlines “three principles”: socialism defined as moral duty of work for fellow men and common good over individual good; struggle against parasitism and unearned income; and an assertion that socialism in his sense can only exist among Aryan nations, making socialism inseparable from nationalism and anti-Semitism. He states that their program is “National Socialists.” He concludes that radical social reforms are necessary alongside struggle against the opponent of every social institution, while he also insists on removal of Jews from “our people” as part of action. He calls systematic antisemitism a guide and says broader masses will perceive the danger emotionally. He describes a plan to awaken instinctive resistance against the “Jews” until people join the movement and accept its consequences. He argues that even if money seems powerful, truth will ultimately rule, and he calls for persistent action and speech until action begins.

In the 19th century, Moses Hess introduced communist principles and laid the groundwork for Zionism in his book "Rome and Jerusalem." He advocated for a Jewish ethno state in Palestine, despite its Arab majority. Hess believed Jews would triumph in a race struggle against Europeans, promoting eugenics and racial purity. He foresaw a future war in Europe involving Germany, Italy, and Austria.

Zionism originated from evangelical Christianity's desire for the return of Jews to Palestine, driven by their belief in the end of times and the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This idea conveniently aligned with the anti-Semitic agenda of getting rid of Jews from Europe and the United States. Lord Barfoot, a prominent British anti-Semite, feared an influx of Russian Jews into Britain and thus supported the Zionist movement as a solution. Additionally, British imperialist strategies saw a Jewish Palestine as a means to justify incorporating Palestine into the British empire.

Moses Hess, a close friend of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, played a significant role in their work on the Communist Manifesto. This connection suggests that socialism, Marxism, communism, and Zionism share common roots. Despite following different paths, they all aimed for global domination. It is worth noting that Karl Marx, originally named Moses Mordechai Levi, came from a lineage of renowned rabbis, which influenced his philosophy. Additionally, Marx's grandparents were related to the Jewish Rothschild family, who partially funded him. This association led to Marx being referred to as the Jewish father of communism.

In the 19th century, Moses Hess, known as the communist rabbi, outlined communist principles and laid the groundwork for Zionism in his book "Rome and Jerusalem." He advocated for a Jewish ethno state in Palestine, despite it being mostly Arab. Hess believed in a race and class struggle between Aryans and Semites, with Jews emerging as superior. He promoted eugenics, racial purity, and a future Jewish ethno state, while criticizing Christianity. He also predicted a war in Europe involving Germany, Italy, and Austria.

Richard Kudenhova Kalerghi, considered the father of the European Union and funded by Jewish bankers Rothschild and Warburg, wrote in his 1925 book that Jews are a master race. He claimed Jews can only rule the world by weakening the European race. Kalerghi allegedly proposed dissolving European nations, destroying their cultures and traditions, and replacing them with the European Union. He purportedly advocated inviting Africans, Middle Easterners, and Asians to dilute European blood through miscegenation, allegedly to create a degenerate mixed race lacking national identity. This, it is claimed, would fulfill Jewish messianic prophecies of world rule from Jerusalem, with Jews maintaining their nationhood. This is allegedly manifesting through immigration into Europe, America, and Australia, with the goal of genociding the white race and destroying national heritage.

In 1920, Winston Churchill wrote that international Jews were using communism and Zionism to establish a global Jewish dominion.

Marx openly advocated for the genocide of Slavs, labeling them as racial trash who should be eliminated in a revolutionary holocaust. This fact is not widely known, but it shocks people when they hear about it. Engels also supported this idea, stating that primitive societies in Europe, like the Bosques, Bretons, Scottish Highlanders, and Serbs, should be destroyed because they are two stages behind in the class war. Marx also expressed disdain for Slavic people, particularly Poland, believing they had no reason to exist. In summary, Marx's views on genocide and racial superiority laid the foundation for these ideas.

In the 19th century, Moses Hess, known as the communist rabbi, outlined communist principles and laid the groundwork for Zionism in his book "Rome and Jerusalem." He advocated for a Jewish ethno state in Palestine, despite it being mostly Arab. Hess believed in a race struggle between Aryans and Semites, with Jews emerging as superior. He promoted eugenics, racial purity, and a future Jewish ethno state, while criticizing Christianity. He also predicted a war in Europe involving Germany, Italy, and Austria.

The transcript argues against a “modern historical consensus” portrayal of Adolf Hitler as anti-Christian and instead claims National Socialism’s official stance was “positive Christianity” while describing anti-Christian work as coming from a “pagan and anti-Christian minority” and other internal factions. It begins by recounting that *The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion* was first published in 1903, spread across Europe and the United States, and was popularized by Henry Ford. It claims the Protocols incited anti-Semitism worldwide and “predicted” that Jews would control global finance and manipulate markets to create economic crises, control the press, ferment revolutions, and weaken Christianity through secular or liberal ideologies. Two Protocols excerpts are quoted: one linking alleged Jewish influence to Darwinism, Marxism, and Nietzscheism as materialist over spiritual alternatives; another describing Jews as controlling a “King of the Jews” and the patriarch of an “International Church,” while promising to “re-educat[e] youth in new traditional religions” and fight existing churches “by criticism calculated to produce schism.” The transcript then traces “new traditional religions” to occultist Guido von List, who formed the Liszt Society in 1908 and allegedly taught that ancient Armanists’ secret teachings were imparted to Jewish rabbis in Cologne and became Kabbalah—framing it as “ancient German and not Jewish innovation.” It claims similar ideas appeared in Rudolf John Gorsleben’s Edda Society and in Mathilde von Chemnitz, whose beliefs are described as accusing the Dalai Lama of controlling Jews and attempts to destroy Germany through Marxism, Roman Catholicism, capitalism, and freemasonry. The transcript describes her husband Erich Ludendorff joining a later organization (Tannenberg Bund), being acquitted after the Beer Hall Putsch, and later becoming a critic of Hitler. It claims Hitler later banned party members from joining Ludendorff’s organization, and that Ludendorff’s ideas failed to gain mass support. It then shifts to Hitler’s party and writings. On August 31, 1927, Hitler is quoted saying the party program is fixed and he will never change its principles. In the NSDAP party program (Hitler is said to quote from it), the transcript claims sections include attacks on religion and the clergy while also explicitly stating: “The NSDAP is not dreaming of attacking the Christian religion and its worthy servants,” and demanding liberty for all religious denominations “so far as they are not a danger” to the German race’s moral feelings. It asserts the party “stands for positive Christianity,” does not bind itself to a particular confession, and “combats the Jewish materialist spirit.” It highlights additional program themes such as opposition to Mammonism (citing Matthew 6:24), and language arguing that stupid attacks on Christianity show a lack of intelligence, while distinguishing Christianity’s “inner spiritual kernel” from “excrescence.” The transcript then claims that in *Mein Kampf* Hitler criticizes “Völkisch theorists” and “religious reformers” whose creed is grounded in “ancient Germanic customs,” describing them as disruptive to unity and as likely having ulterior purposes. It presents Hitler as arguing for strong centralized leadership to counter “fatal elements.” The transcript also claims Hitler does not criticize Christianity but criticizes “Christian Socialism,” and quotes a passage from *Mein Kampf* arguing that religions require intolerance to grow and that Christianity had to destroy pagan altars; it includes claims about “spiritual terror” and coercion, while asserting that “violence is broken only by violence.” Examples of Hitler’s speeches are included portraying him as identifying as a Christian, calling for Christian unity, and stating the movement would not allow religious quarrels in its ranks while preserving the Christian foundations of morality and family. The transcript also says Hitler emphasized “positive Christianity” as the Christianity of the evangelical and Roman Catholic churches, while rejecting “neo-pagan cult experiments.” Next, the transcript claims beliefs about Jesus as an Aryan anti-Jewish fighter existed in German philosophy and theology before National Socialism, citing figures such as Fichte, Hegel, Bruno Bauer, Paul de La Garde, Richard Wagner, and Houston Stewart Chamberlain, along with Protestant pastor Friedrich Naumann and chaplain Adolf Stöcker. It claims Rudolf Jung’s 1919 work describes Naumann as a forerunner of National Socialism and argues that rejecting Christianity in favor of “German believing” would only multiply sectarian church turmoil. The transcript further claims Theodor Fritsch influenced Hitler’s anti-Semitism, and that Fritsch believed Jesus was “Arian.” It states that Hitler and mentors like Chamberlain and Dietrich Eckart agreed Jesus was an Aryan warrior, while Hitler allegedly disagreed with Chamberlain on the Apostle Paul. Eckart’s book *Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin* is described as depicting Jesus as an Aryan warrior and condemning the Old Testament and Paul. To address accusations of anti-Christian policy, the transcript introduces theologian Dr. Caius Fabricius, described as a party member and proponent of Point 24. Fabricius is said to have published *Positive Christianity in the Third Reich* (1935) “with the blessing of Adolf Hitler” to refute rumors that National Socialism was anti-Christian, arguing that after Hitler took power Christianity flourished and the party still affirmed “positive Christianity.” It also claims Fabricius argued neo-pagan factions were forming within the party, promoting an anti-Christian free-thinking leadership class, and attempting to infiltrate top leadership. The transcript describes mechanisms of church conflict as political and administrative rather than removal of Christianity: it claims priests persecuted as “warmongers” or “clerical” enemies of the state were dealt with, while many priests were said to attend duties without conflict. It details attempts to restructure Protestant churches through the “Reich Church” and a set of “28 Theses,” including an “Aryan Paragraph.” It claims resistance formed into the “Confessing Church,” led by Martin Niemöller, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and Karl Barth, and it references the Barmen Declaration asserting Christ alone as the church’s authority. It then says Hitler grew less interested in church affairs late in the 1930s, with matters increasingly handled by more radical officials such as Martin Bormann, who is portrayed as being “staunch anti-cleric” and as intervened against by Hitler on specific issues like removing crucifixes from Bavarian schools. The transcript then discusses post-war published “Hitler Table Talk” (attributed to Bormann’s notes) and claims the recording process involved multiple steps and edits by Heim and Bormann, emphasizing the materials were not straightforward stenographic records. It includes quotes attributed to Hitler about Christianity dying naturally and churches being prevented from spreading teachings conflicting with state interests. It also includes claims about Heinrich Himmler, portraying him as ordering restrictions on attacks against Christ and insisting Jesus was not a Jew, while describing him as mixing ancestor worship, Christian elements, and study of various religious texts. Finally, the transcript ends with a long framing argument that Hitler and National Socialists sought “a true Christianity without what they felt was Jewish corruption or church doctrine,” and that Hitler did not intend to form a new pagan religion or worship himself. It concludes by asserting ongoing vigilance against a “miniscule but loud minority” allegedly trying to tear Europeans away from Christianity, and it ends with an NSDAP program-style closing invoking “Hail Christ” and “Heil Hitler,” concluding with “For blood, soil, and heaven.”

In the 19th century, Moses Hess wrote a book called Rome and Jerusalem, which laid the foundations for Zionism. He called for Jewish separatism and the creation of a Jewish ethno state in Palestine. However, Palestine was mostly Arab at the time. Hess believed that international Jewish bankers would help steal the land from the Palestinians. He predicted a race and class struggle between Aryans and Semites, with Jews coming out as winners. He promoted eugenics and racial purity for Jews, referring to Christianity as the "Religion of death." He also predicted a future war in Europe involving Germany, Italy, and Austria.

Richard Kudenhova Pilarghi, the father of the European Union funded by Jewish bankers, wrote in 1925 that Jews are a master race who can only rule the world by weakening the European race. This would be achieved by dissolving European nations, destroying their cultures and traditions, and replacing them with the European Union. Africans, Middle Easterners, and Asians would be invited to mix with Europeans, diluting their blood and creating a degenerate mixed race without national identity. This aligns with Nikolai's writings from 1917 and is evident in the recent immigration into Europe, America, and Australia. The goal is to genocide the white race and destroy nationhood, fulfilling ancient Jewish prophecies of world rule from Jerusalem, with Jews maintaining their national status.

In the mid-19th century, Moses Hess introduced communist principles and later advocated for Zionism in his book "Rome and Jerusalem." He proposed a Jewish nationalist movement to establish a Jewish ethno state in Palestine, despite its Arab majority. Hess believed in a race and class struggle between Aryans and Semites, predicting Jews would emerge victorious. He promoted eugenics and racial purity for Jews, foreseeing a future war involving Germany, Italy, and Austria. Hess viewed Christianity negatively as the "religion of death."

The speaker asserts that Israel is not Israel and that the Zionists steal everything, including property and food. The Zionist occupation of Palestine, which calls itself Israel, is described as built on lies and theft and evil, with the name Israel stolen and misappropriated to deceive the world. The name supposedly originates from the Old Testament: Jacob, renamed Israel, had twelve tribes, and over time covenants with God defined who was in the House of God or Israel, later associated with the Church of the Desert. Crystallizing through Jesus, those who accepted the New Covenant were grafted into this House of God, becoming the Christian church established by Jesus and his apostles at Pentecost, before the New Testament was written, completed, and canonized. Those who rejected the covenant were deprived of salvation, and most outspoken rejecters of Jesus were Jews, though some Jews accepted Christ and entered the New Covenant, becoming Christians. The speaker denies the existence of a Messianic Jew, asserting it is fraudulent, a Jew who wants to retain privileges while posing as a Christian. In the New Testament, “ Jew ” is presented as a pejorative term for those who rejected Christ in favor of Barabbas, with Romans presenting Jesus’ crucifixion after Judeans chose Barabbas. Some prefer the term Pharisee to avoid antisemitism accusations. Through Christ, God opened up Israel to everyone, while Israel itself remained the same, though evangelism was not initially part of God’s plan; Jesus later instructed his apostles to spread the Word to all humanity. Gentiles were grafted into the house of Israel, i.e., the Christian Church, and the true Israel is the Church. Salvation is not a birthright; bloodline does not grant spiritual privilege, and entering Heaven requires effort amid temptation. A covenant has terms and conditions that must be adhered to, and if not, the contract is void. This is criticized as a mistake by Christian Zionists, who allegedly ignore this. The speaker questions whether today’s Jews are actual descendants of Abraham, noting that behavior matters and a contract requires mutual respect; God keeps his promises, but man does not. The discussion moves to Jesus as Messiah and the Logos Incarnate, denying that Jews today are God’s chosen people or that there is divine DNA or a birthright. Calvinist predestination is condemned as biological determinism, implying questions about free will and the relevance of behavior. The Enlightenment and Darwinian theory are cited as developments following Reformation-driven shifts toward determinism and new denominations, implying a lack of verifiable genetic continuity between modern Jews and ancient Israelites and stressing that behavior remains irrelevant to such claims. Fast forward to 1948, when Zionists established a state under the name Israel, described as stolen to mislead evangelicals and religious Jews within the Zionist movement. The claim is made that Zionism arose from Judaism, with early Jewish advocates like Moses Hess and his work Rome and Jerusalem supporting a Jewish state as an alliance between secular and religious Jews. The speaker contends that Christians who supported Zionism were not truly Christian, and that Protestant splintering led to divisions, Judaization of many groups, and efforts to witness the arrival of messiahs. A spiritual conflict is described where evangelicals, not true Christians, support a “chosen people” and a regime calling itself Israel. The true Israel, the speaker concludes, is not a territory or physical location but a spiritual fellowship of people who follow Jesus. The Zionist occupation of Palestine, named Israel since 1948, is described as a Jewish military dictatorship masquerading as a country, fooling both religious and secular audiences, with control of media and Hollywood obscuring the truth. The claim ends with an analogy: a name does not make something real, just as a person can call himself Jesus but not be the Messiah. A counterfeit dollar is used as a comparison.

Zionism, a political philosophy, is often confused with Judaism, but they are not the same. The founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, was an atheist who aimed to establish a state for the Jews. Zionism is seen as a satanic, imperialistic, and racist movement that has taken Palestinian lands through terrorism. The United States supports Israel with billions of dollars, while there are millions of homeless and unemployed Americans. Zionism is believed to be the cause of war and aims to make Americans aware of its true nature.

In 1897, the First Zionist Congress took place in Basel, Switzerland, led by Theodor Herzl. Jewish delegates from Europe agreed on the need for Palestine. Before his death in 1904, Herzl envisioned that a global authority would grant Palestine to the Jews and believed he would be remembered as the father of the Jewish state. He suggested that European powers would need to be influenced to take Palestine from the Ottomans. In a German newspaper, Herzl claimed that wealthy Jews controlled global affairs, instigating wars and orchestrating peace, all while increasing their wealth. Dr. Wolfson commented on this in a New York Times article in 1907.