TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Biden's administration has reversed the FCC's decision on a $885 million Starlink program intended to provide internet to over 642,000 homes and businesses. Following Biden's comments about Elon Musk, the FCC withdrew the funding, leading to increased spending on penalties instead of connecting people. A recent report indicated that the current administration is spending up to $100,000 per home for broadband, compared to the $1,300 per home under the Starlink deal. Despite $42 billion allocated for internet access, there has been no progress in connecting Americans. Instead, the focus has shifted to advancing progressive policy goals, such as DEI requirements and climate initiatives, rather than prioritizing connectivity.

NBC News reported that if Joe Biden declares a national climate emergency, he could have COVID-like powers similar to 9/11 emergency powers. The Center For Biological Diversity estimated he could have around 130 wartime-like powers to implement the Green New Deal without Congress. The Biden White House is considering this move, potentially giving Biden dictatorial powers to push through the Green New Deal without democratic approval. This has sparked concerns and is widely covered in the media.

President Biden and his administration are being accused of politicizing the Department of Justice for personal and political gain. They are allegedly targeting political opponents, such as Donald Trump and his supporters, while also protecting themselves and their allies. This undermines the foundation of our democracy, the rule of law. If this continues, it sets a dangerous precedent where the party in power can use law enforcement to go after their opponents. The FBI and DOJ are being criticized for being weaponized and politicized, leading to unequal justice and application of laws. Additionally, Biden's previous denials about his involvement in his son's foreign business deals are being contradicted by evidence. The actions of the administration are deeply concerning and do not reflect the values of the American people.

Christopher Krebs, the former head of CISA, is described as having weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in relation to a presidential memorandum involving the Department of Justice and other areas of government to investigate some “malign acts” he participated in while at CISA. The other speaker responds, saying he does not know Krebs well, but notes Krebs appeared after the election and characterizes the election as rigged. He asserts the country’s problems followed from that election, including open borders with millions entering the country, and references broader geopolitical and security events such as Russia and Ukraine, the October 7 incident, and Afghanistan, describing the withdrawal as resulting in 13 dead and many others killed and injured. He contends Krebs claimed the election was great, but he argues it was not, citing lawsuits and lawyers signing hundreds of millions of dollars in support, and claims that legislative processes and various schemes demonstrated a corrupt election where COVID was used to cheat. The speaker claims that Krebs asserted the election was the most secure in history, which he calls a disaster. He advocates for paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and a citizen certificate or piece of paper proving citizenship prior to voting. He argues for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting, and claims that delays in ballot boxes and air-conditioning changes affected election processes. The speaker asserts that the election was not safe and that the press has been dishonest, describing the press as not free. The speaker adds that Krebs sat back as a member who appeared to be a Republican and claimed the election was safe from the start, but the speaker believes daily papers report increasing fraud. He states that Krebs is a fraud and a disgrace and asserts there will be an investigation into whether Krebs was right, with Krebs facing consequences if the election was not safe. He concludes that Krebs is a bad guy. The final remark notes that the last two points are very important for the country, emphasizing the questions around Krebs’s role and the integrity of the election, and indicating a determination to determine whether Krebs was correct about the election’s safety.

The Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), a relatively unknown agency, has been involved in a censorship operation. However, a court order froze its powers of mass censorship, with the 5th Circuit ruling that CISA likely violated the First Amendment by coercing social media companies to censor free speech. This case is part of a larger issue tied to the Missouri v Biden case, where attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration, arguing that government contact with social media companies for content removal violates the First Amendment. The court rulings have brought attention to the government's involvement in censorship through private companies. The battle over censorship is likely to continue to the Supreme Court.

In a hearing addressing the Biden-Harris administration's policy failures, a congresswoman highlighted Vice President Kamala Harris's 2021 assignment to close the digital divide. Despite a $42 billion broadband program, it was claimed that not one household has been connected to the internet. This was contrasted with Harris's plan to help 80% of Africa gain internet access. Commissioner Carr confirmed that no homes have been connected through the program, even though $42 billion should have been enough to end the digital divide. He described the implementation as chaotic and dysfunctional. The congresswoman noted that many of the unconnected homes and businesses are in her district. She questioned how Harris could seek the presidency, having failed to deliver on her assigned task. Carr stated that in 2020, the FCC awarded Starlink $885 million to serve 642,925 homes and businesses, but the award was later revoked after President Biden suggested Elon Musk should be investigated. He added that the administration is spending excessive amounts per home in other broadband programs, while pursuing progressive policy goals like DEI and climate change, instead of focusing on connecting people.

Speaker 0 argues Canada introduced a bill allowing the minister to 'kick any Canadian citizen off the Internet to cut off their phone line, to turn off their phone.' 'If there is reasonable grounds to believe that it is necessary to do so to secure the Canadian telecommunication system against any threat, the minister may prohibit a telecommunication service provider from providing any service to the specified person.' He warns 15.2 clause five makes the decision 'secret.' He says this signals 'Chinese Communist Party levels of government overreach.' He links the bill to the digital ID agenda and World Economic Forum's claim that digital identity is crucial for 'civic participation' and to UN 'Real ID' plans, noting Rand Paul tweets. He argues it could isolate people from paying bills, banking, or organizing politics, describing a potential 'digital gulag.' He advocates repeal in the US and hopes Canada defeats the agenda.

Having served as an FCC commissioner for over 7 years, the speaker has focused on ensuring Americans have next-generation connectivity, visiting communities and seeing firsthand the challenges ahead. A bipartisan consensus emerged to provide support to end the digital divide, resulting in a $42 billion initiative known as BEED. After 1039 days since the program was enacted, led by Vice President Harris, no one has been connected to the internet. No infrastructure builds will start until sometime next year at the earliest, and in many cases, not until 2026, making it the slowest moving federal broadband deployment program in recent history. The administration is advancing a wish list of progressive policy goals, including a climate change agenda, DEI requirements, price controls, preferences for government-run networks, and rules that will lead to wasteful overbuilding. The government revoked Starlink's commitment to provide internet to 640,000 homes and businesses for about $1300 per location in Federal support. The administration is now spending over $100,000 per location for internet. Absent major reforms, Vice President Harris's $42 billion program is wired to fail.

As a former FCC commissioner and general counsel, the speaker focused on ensuring Americans have next-generation connectivity, visiting communities and seeing the opportunities high-speed connections bring. A bipartisan consensus emerged, resulting in the $42 billion BEAD initiative. However, the speaker claims that BEAD has gone off the rails; after 1,039 days, not one person has been connected to the Internet, and no infrastructure builds will start until next year at the earliest, or even 2026 in many cases. The speaker asserts that this makes the initiative the slowest-moving federal broadband deployment program in recent history. The speaker claims that instead of connecting Americans, the administration is advancing a wish list of progressive policy goals, including a climate change agenda, DEI requirements, price controls, preferences for government-run networks, and rules that will lead to wasteful overbuilding. The speaker also claims that the administration revoked an FCC commitment from Starlink to provide internet to 640,000 homes and businesses and is now spending over $100,000 per location for internet through its own initiatives. The speaker concludes that, absent major reforms, the $42 billion program is wired to fail.

The Biden administration has proposed a plan for digital equity, which FCC commissioner Carr believes gives the government unprecedented control over internet services and infrastructure. This level of control has never been seen before in the history of the public internet. The plan includes extensive government regulations that have not been applied to any other technology. The Biden administration's broadband policies are failing, leading to high costs for internet infrastructure. The FCC wants to implement new 5G broadband services, but they are being hindered by regulatory red tape. The government is blocking the private sector and using this as a reason to justify complete control over information. The suggested rules would give the federal government the power to micromanage almost every aspect of internet functioning.

The Biden administration's plan to regulate internet service providers and take control of internet infrastructure in the US is being criticized as a power grab. Brennan Carr, head of the FCC, opposes the plan, stating that it gives the administrative state control over all internet services and infrastructure. The plan allows the FCC to regulate the entire internet sector for the first time ever and impose unfunded build mandates and monetary fines on ISPs. The final vote on the plan is scheduled for November 15. Without Commissioner Brandon Carr, this major story may have gone unnoticed.

Chris Wray informed Congress that he guarantees the election security of the United States. However, there are concerns about the FBI's involvement with social media giants like Twitter and Facebook. In the past, the FBI's election security task force would advise these companies on what content to restrict, which is not their role. The media should be outraged that a law enforcement agency is dictating their content. It seems that the focus is on preventing pro-Trump information from being shared. This raises questions about the integrity of the upcoming election, as these contracts are still in place.

Jack Smith, granted a subpoena to investigate Donald Trump's Twitter account. The subpoena requested information on users who liked, followed, and retweeted Trump. The scope of the subpoena is concerning, as it includes the names and user account information of everyone associated with Trump on Twitter. Twitter initially didn't challenge the subpoena's scope but fought against the restriction on disclosing the request. The Justice Department, led by Biden, is involved in this operation, which raises questions about potential targeting of Facebook users as well. This politicized investigation by the federal level Justice Department and FBI is seen as a form of political policing under Biden's administration. Trump has vowed to protect his followers from such intrusion.

The White House is considering declaring a national climate emergency, referred to as a climate crisis. If President Biden does so, he could gain extensive emergency powers similar to those during 9/11. This could allow him to implement a Green New Deal without congressional approval, raising concerns about bypassing democracy. Reports suggest Biden might take this step, potentially giving him dictatorial powers to push through his agenda.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows the government to spy on foreigners without a warrant, is up for reauthorization. Speaker Mike Johnson has been pushing for this reauthorization, despite the law's misuse against American citizens. A failed attempt to pass this reauthorization reflects a temporary victory for those opposing warrantless surveillance. Many Congress members, influenced by intelligence agencies, prioritize maintaining this power, often misleading the public about its implications. Johnson's focus on FISA and Ukraine funding aligns with Biden's priorities, raising concerns among voters about the Republican Party's direction. Citizens may soon question why they should support a party that appears to endorse the same agenda as the opposing party. The ongoing struggle for free speech and accountability remains crucial.

Big tech and social media are accused of censoring news critical of Joe Biden, potentially influencing the election. Professor Epstein warns that companies like Google and Facebook could sway up to 15 million votes without detection. Silicon Valley's immense power and bias towards Biden pose a threat to democracy. Urgent action is needed to prevent further manipulation.

Big tech companies like Twitter and Facebook are censoring a damaging story about Joe Biden and his family reported by the New York Post. According to the speaker, these companies are blocking the president's campaign, cabinet members, and Republicans in Congress from sharing the story. The speaker claims that Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg intend to decide the election's outcome by silencing anyone or any media outlet that threatens Joe Biden. The speaker notes that executives from Facebook and Twitter recently joined the Biden transition team, including Twitter's public policy director, Carlos Manier, and former Facebook executive, Jessica Hertz. The speaker presents a photo from 2011 of President Obama dining with Silicon Valley executives, including Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Reed Hastings, Dick Costello, and Larry Ellison, as evidence of big tech's relationship with the left.

Emergency crews are deploying Starlink terminals in the Carolinas after a hurricane hampered rescue efforts. The FCC previously revoked a billion-dollar grant for Starlink to provide broadband to 19,522 sites in North Carolina. In 2021, the Biden administration allocated $42.5 billion for rural broadband, but no connections have been made, and none are expected before 2026. Fiber optics providers lobbied to exclude Starlink, which quoted $120 per connection, while fiber could cost $4,000. The FCC rejected Starlink, citing responsible use of public funds, and accused it of being a monopoly for undercutting prices. Republicans on the FCC supported Starlink, accusing the Biden-Harris administration of prioritizing ideological goals. The Communications Workers of America, a major donor to Democrats, represents fiber installers. While rural Americans can purchase Starlink, taxpayers will still pay $42.5 billion.

Biden's actions, like denying Secret Service protection and using federal agencies to silence dissent, are concerning. He pressured social media companies to censor by threatening antitrust action and giving access to agencies like the CIA and FBI. This undermines democracy and free speech.

Elon Musk has targeted the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), removing two top leaders who resisted him. Employees were abruptly told not to come to the office and many were locked out of their accounts. Similar actions are occurring in the Treasury Department, where Musk and his associates now have access to sensitive federal payment systems and personal information of federal employees. There's been a lack of a clear and united response from leading Democrats to these developments, with some voices emerging during confirmation hearings but overall responses being slow and often vague. It's unclear what actions are being taken to counter this takeover.

Elon Musk is facing criticism for not removing a stabbing video from his platform globally. An Australian senator called for Musk to be jailed, sparking a debate on global internet censorship. Australia's top internet censor, Julie Inman Grant, boasts of her censorship powers and leads a global online safety regulators network with other countries. Grant aims to crack down on VPNs and privacy to control online content. European Union's Vera Jurova supports censorship to prevent events like January 6th. These actions raise concerns about government control over the internet worldwide.

The Twitter files reveal significant government coordination with social media companies to suppress dissent, undermining First Amendment rights. During a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett criticized journalists Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger, accusing them of promoting a biased narrative. Shellenberger responded, highlighting the emergence of a censorship industrial complex involving government agencies like the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI, which is using taxpayer funds to censor information under the guise of combating disinformation. He emphasized that this practice is illegal and a violation of free speech rights. Shellenberger called for dismantling this censorship system to protect democracy.

Millions of people are being purged from the Internet as big tech titans have the power to control and censor. It's time to recognize social media companies as public utilities, just like electricity and telephone services. Social media is essential for businesses, nonprofits, and political campaigns. The establishment has been censoring those who question them, using any excuse to consolidate power. We must unite as Americans and demand an Internet bill of rights that protects our freedom of speech in cyberspace. This is the United States, where our right to free speech is not optional.

Ten years ago, this sounded crazy. Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, telling an American company, we can do this the easy way or the hard way, and that these companies can find ways to change conduct and take action on Kimmel, or there's going to be additional work for the FCC ahead, in addition to being a direct violation of the First Amendment, is not a particularly intelligent threat to make in public. Ted Cruz said he sounded like a mafioso. Although, I don't know. If you wanna hear a mob boss make a threat like that, you have to hide a microphone in a deli and park outside in a van with a tape recorder all night long. This genius said it on a podcast. Brendan Carr is the most embarrassing car Republicans have embraced since this one, and that's saying something. The FCC