reSee.it - Related Video Feed

After a congresswoman made a statement about Elon Musk, three explosive devices were found in Austin, Texas. She must denounce the violence and apologize to Texans, the country, and Tesla shareholders because she is promoting violence. The congresswoman also made a statement about Senator Cruz. She will likely be censured by Congress for her statements. She is using her public platform to increase her followers and significance, but she is threatening lives and safety. Her words are endangering lives. She is encouraging violence in the country. She must apologize immediately and denounce the violence.

It's obvious this council isn't listening. I want to clarify what MAGA represents, which is the erasure of trans people, resegregation, and racism. It stands for censorship, book bans, and dangerously firing essential personnel like air traffic controllers and those overseeing our nuclear arsenal. MAGA is firing military veterans and canceling veteran suicide research, cutting education funds, including for disabled children. This movement is corrupt, anti-democracy, and explicitly mirrors Nazi ideology. You might have swapped the swastika for a red hat, but the meaning is the same. Now, I will engage in peaceful civil disobedience.

The speaker discusses holding people accountable and the negative responses they receive. They mention an individual named Lorna who frequently uses the word "private" when it comes to public safety. The speaker also mentions a person named Sherry who questioned their request for a statement regarding a burglary. They express concern over Mary Faye dropping the ball and promise to help with an incident. The speaker shares a text message from Mary Faye, which includes offensive language. They mention filing a complaint with the ethics board, where Mary Faye is a member. The speaker expresses frustration that their concerns are being ignored. The transcript ends with a mention of a town council member with mental health issues.

The speaker directs a message to Dr. Boden, calling her a "dumb fucking quack cunt" and an "ignorant bitch." The speaker claims Dr. Boden should have her medical license revoked because she is an "anti vaxxer." The speaker accuses her of costing people lives instead of saving them, and violating her oath to protect people. The speaker tells her to "go fuck yourself" and "drop dead."

This message is directed at Congresswoman Nancy Mace, expressing a desire to confront her violently in a women's bathroom, with graphic details of the intended attack. The speaker concludes with a hope that she receives the message positively.

Senator Tillis Fox is addressed with hostile and threatening statements. One speaker asserts that veterans view him negatively, using derogatory terms. Another speaker questions Tillis's integrity, accusing him of taking money and disregarding his "employers." They express a desire to confront him about perceived betrayal and suggest his employers could retaliate. A separate individual warns Tillis to be cautious in public, claiming that "actual Americans" hate him. Finally, one speaker states that, were it not for a physical ailment, they would risk imprisonment to harm him.

The exchange centers on content posted online to the Department of State of Canada and the implications of that content. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about what she posted and asks for a screenshot to verify the online statements. Speaker 1 asserts that she referred to someone as “a Zionist scumbag” and says “he's not my prime minister,” adding, “But really, you're gonna come to my door and you're worried that I'm going to do something.” Speaker 0 notes that there were “threats” and explains the purpose of the visit: to address such threats, which could lead to consequences if continued. Speaker 1 responds that the focus should be on “actual real crime” rather than harassing her over online remarks, and argues that the visit is a waste of tax dollars. Speaker 0 warns that if the behavior continues, there could be an arrest and charge, stating, “if you made some threats that are concerning… you could be arrested and charged.” Speaker 1 demands to see what she allegedly said, asking, “Show me what I said,” and accuses the interaction of harassment and harassment for expressing dissent about the prime minister. The dialogue touches on the nature of the statements. Speaker 1 repeats hostility toward the prime minister and labels the act as “harassing people for what they say online because I don't like our stupid prime minister, and he's a Zionist sunbag,” while Speaker 0 reiterates the right to express opinion but cautions against threats. The conversation escalates with Speaker 1 calling the environment “Communist Canada” and questioning the officers’ pride in their work, challenging, “How do you like working for that?… Do you go back home and look at your family in the mirror and say, this is what you do for a living?” Speaker 0 emphasizes the possibility of documenting the behavior and filing a report if the conduct continues, with a vague reference to “the Trump Blah blah blah blah blah.” Speaker 1 maintains, “I will say whatever the fuck I want about our prime minister. You can't stop my speech. Sorry. Opinion. Yeah. Exactly.” The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 stating, “Okay. Have a nice day. Goodbye now,” and Speaker 0 reiterating the threat assessment: “Be threatening. That's all I'm asking you.”

I don't want to be like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has filled her spirit with hate towards me. As a leader in my state, she should have reached out to me, even if she disagrees with what I'm doing. Threatening my life and my family is wrong and intolerable. I can't understand how she thinks it's normal to be so cruel to another woman. I wouldn't wish the threats, name-calling, and derogatory experiences I've faced on her.

He's labeled me venomous and disgraceful, criticizing the Supreme Court situation and calling me radical. Yes, we recognize his erratic behavior and lack of sound judgment. His time is limited, and we will unite against him. He's also called me a racist. We must confront an administration that is too male, too pale, and too stale. Thank you.

I'm done with this nonsense. If you voted for Trump, I think you're a loser and a moron. You’re evil and deserve to suffer. I feel so strongly that I want to harm you. You're a horrible person who doesn't deserve to live. Do the world a favor and end your life before I get to you. Show me proof if you do.

The Democratic brand is defined by two words: weak and woke. Democrats are associated with violence, with one person stating Trump deserves to die. There are reports of attacks on Tesla vehicles and dealerships. One person admitted to not having facts when asked to explain what makes Trump a fascist. A person identifying as undocumented and queer accused others of hate, racism, stupidity, and greed. Another expressed being tired of white tears and white men failing up. Some view actions as "kicking the shit out of fascism." Others say "shut down the city" and criticize Elon Musk. The Democratic party brand is considered problematic.

It's clear this council doesn't listen, so I'll explain what MAGA has represented these past three weeks. MAGA aims to erase trans people, promote resegregation and racism, and enforce censorship through book bans. MAGA is about firing air traffic controllers during crises, dismissing those overseeing our nuclear arsenal, and terminating military veterans and VA staff, even canceling veteran suicide research. MAGA cuts education funding, including for disabled children. MAGA is deeply corrupt, anti-democracy, and explicitly a Nazi movement. You might have swapped the swastika for a red hat, but the essence remains. I will now engage in peaceful civil disobedience. Get out. Get out.

Fascists in our city. 'Motherfucker.' 'Oh.' 'Fascists?' 'You see these fascists right here in our Fascists?' 'Fuck you. Fuck you, fascists.' 'Shame. Shame. Shame. Shame.' 'Y'all laughing, but that's the truth. We really talking real shit.' 'Shut.' 'Y'all need to do some background studying about the federal mass objection.' 'They fooled a man.' 'No. No. No. You don't, baby.' 'Super bad.' 'No. No. No. No. No. No.' 'He cooked up. He cooked up.'

Speaker 0 describes Candace Owens with highly inflammatory language, calling her an evil scumbag and a degenerate cunt. He accuses her of burning everything down and gloating while she does it, and claims she has security, though not the same level as others. He asserts that she lies about security and that her actions harm others, while conservatives who criticize her lack “balls” to call her out. He acknowledges that others have begun messaging him in support of criticizing Owens, but he dismisses credit for any such actions he didn’t claim. Speaker 0 asserts that Owens is hypocritical and hypocritically claims she loves Charlie Kirk while allegedly destroying what he built. He states he has bullets fired at his property and has to live in the middle of nowhere, with strangers approaching his Maryland home and residents being beaten when attempting to live there. He contends that Owens does not live the way she portrays, and that she is “burning everything down” and is evil. He claims the conservative movement is fractured and suggests Republicans are on track to lose the midterms, asserting that they were trending in a different direction until Charlie Kirk was murdered, calling it “the most effective political assassination in history.” Speaker 0 further asserts that Owens has turned Turning Point into “the perpetrators of the crime that was against them” and says he is not paid by any of these groups, has no special ties to Turning Point USA, and was not invited to their event. He contends that he does not want to participate with them and feels that conservative media are cowardly for not standing up to Owens. He mentions Megyn Kelly, appreciating her kind words but calling the situation pathetic bullshit. He emphasizes that no one is paying him, there is no Russia or Israel involvement, and he is simply risking his life by speaking out. Speaker 0 reiterates his frustration at Owens being placed in a thumbnail on her piece and calls her a “fucking cunt.” He insists that Owens benefited from the situation, and that she “killed Charlie” with her actions, claiming, “No one benefited more than her.” The exchange includes Speaker 1 confirming disbelief that Owens included him in the thumbnail and echoing the sentiment that she didn’t fly or act consistently with her claimed security.

A business owner states she is being harassed for supporting Trump, including having her car scratched. She accuses a woman of wanting her to remove Trump flags and suspects the woman is sleeping with Mayor Ernie. She believes half the country hates her for her political views. The business owner requests a trespass form for the woman. She claims she is in a peaceful space and doesn't understand why people are acting like girls. She feels the harassment is due to election season and her Trump displays. She expresses disbelief at Kamala being on the ballot. She believes police time is being wasted on "Karens" crying over a sign. She wants to go viral with a video of the harassment and is concerned about what the woman has in her bag.

The courts will take care of things, and "we're gonna elect ourselves" in November. References are made to "Tuna in a can" and "Tampon Tim." Kamala Harris is repeatedly referred to as "Comrade Kamala Harris." "They are stupid." There is no guarantee to free speech, and one should not shy away from progressive values. There are "so many hands of truth." References are made to "being a bitch." "One person's socialism is another person's neighborliness." "How dare we speak merry Christmas? Some merry Christmas, everybody."

I am Darcy Waldron. Yes, from Cayuga. You believe the shooter should have been a better shot, as per your Facebook post? I am working. Yes. I find that disrespectful and un-American. As a veteran, I am appalled. What have you done for this country? This is absurd. You are absurd, and I will make you well-known. Translation: I am Darcy Waldron from Cayuga. You think the shooter should have been more accurate based on your Facebook post? I am working. Yes. I find that disrespectful and un-American. As a veteran, I am appalled. What have you done for this country? This is absurd. You are absurd, and I will make you well-known.

Speaker 0 states, “J 6 Insurrection is right over there. What? I'm at this fucking scene. This” as they indicate being at a scene related to January 6. The conversation shows they are physically present at the location and reacting to the surroundings. Speaker 1 describes the situation as “harassment. Stalking and harassment,” and expresses a desire to file a police report, saying, “I’d like to file a police report for stalking and harassment.” They repeat the request, asking, “Can I file a police report for stalking and harassment?” They claim, “She won’t leave leave me alone,” and state they’d like to file a police report for stalking and harassment, adding, “I’d like to follow a police report.” They ask for guidance about the legality of the behavior: “If she follows me, will she be arrested for stalking?” They further describe the immediate scenario as occurring “Across the street.” Speaker 0 interjects with further location detail, saying, “the street,” and then adds a string of hostile remarks including, “Bug pussy bitch,” and “There you go. My Rolly Pole. Back to blue. White is right. Get the fuck out of my country, Patricia.” These lines convey aggression and attempts to assert identity or affiliation. Speaker 1 continues with a distressed tone, muttering, “Oh my god. Take that stress,” before being told, “Shut up, cunt” by Speaker 0, indicating continued hostility and verbal abuse. Overall, the transcript captures a confrontation at a scene that centers on concerns about stalking and harassment, with Speaker 1 seeking a police report to document the alleged stalking; Speaker 0 responds with aggressive commentary and insults, including politically charged and profane statements. The exchange conveys an urgent emotional confrontation regarding harassment, with explicit requests to file formal complaints and questions about potential arrest for stalking.

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

There is a small fringe element in this country that is angry, doesn't believe in science, and is lashing out with racist, misogynistic attacks. They are anti-vaxxer mobs, and I won't give them the satisfaction of calling them protesters.

I demand their firing. I demand their immediate firing because your lack of action, when this has been brought to your attention, that some would wish the death upon others. And you're okay with this. Dude, that's what this says to people. This LGBTQAI plus nonsense and people wishing death on us, the Christians. And you're pumping that shit into kids' heads. Your teachers are pumping that shit into kids' heads. I demand counseling for the kids that were hurt by Charlie Kirk's death that he dissed. This is he can't can have free speech. He just can't have a job on taxpayer money. Mhmm. He needs to accept himself and correct himself and get rid of him. It is the will of the people, and we are done with you with your rules. You're a foul and evil woman. You're a coward. Why don't you look at me? When did you know? Friday. We're taking it. We're doing the best we can. We're too slow. The world is moving on way too fast for you, old man. I'm serious. Are in recess. Can I have three or four more public comments slots? All of those in favor of adjournment, please.

The speaker claims that "lunatic liberals" and Democrats are destroying and vandalizing Tesla dealerships, harassing Tesla drivers, and inciting violence, but the media is not asking Democrats to denounce these actions, unlike how Republicans were questioned about January 6th. The speaker demands arrests and examples be made of these "radical lunatic terrorists," including Pam Bundy, Cash Patel, Brandon Johnson, and Pritzker, for inciting violence. They contrast the media's portrayal of Trump supporters with the alleged lack of coverage of these actions. The speaker insists that these individuals must be held accountable for their "terrorist attacks" on American companies and citizens, warning that someone will get hurt. They thank Elon Musk and Donald Trump for their work.

The speaker claims AOC said the Democrats are weak and that next time they must hurt working people more to get them to fold, asserting she literally said, "we didn't hurt working class Americans enough to get them to fold." They enumerate grievances: COVID, the interest rates, illegal migrants, taxes on taxes on taxes, fraud, waste, and abuse, and all the bull. The speaker asks how these people are in office, expressing a desire to be in office to "get ready to rumble" and saying, "I would fuck these people up so hard" for the audacity on camera to say you didn't hurt working people enough. They note they are trying to stop cussing.

I believe calling Elon Musk a "dick" is effective messaging in our fight against the potentially irreversible transformation of the U.S. government. The American public wants us to bring real weapons to this bar fight for democracy and the country's future. It's crucial to push back on figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who frequently preach about decorum and bipartisanship, despite being one of the biggest liars in Congress. If she's going to mock these hearings, Democrats need to match that energy. Following those comments, we delved into Elon Musk's actions, like dismantling the Department of Labor and Education, as well as consumer protection agencies. It's vital to grab the public's attention by calling out Musk for who he is and making it clear that Greene isn't a serious legislator.

The speaker expresses dislike for police and suggests calling a crackhead for help instead. They also question why money is given to countries that hate the US. They make a crude comment about engaging in a sexual act. They mention the difficulty of life and insult those who enjoy trendy food and drinks. The speaker denies calling Senator Sanders an ignorant slut. They make nonsensical statements about stars, President Xi Jinping, and their car not running on fairy dust or unicorn power.