reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In August 2021, I discovered documents on the database revealing Graphene oxide in Pfizer vaccines. A lab in Spain found it in one vial, resembling 100% Graphene oxide. They requested more samples for further analysis. Out of 100 vials, 28 contained Graphene oxide. When I shared this on Facebook, a Pfizer lawyer contacted me to remove the post as it was company property. This led me to realize I had access to the internal Pfizer database, where I continued to search for information. Translation: In August 2021, I found documents on the database showing Graphene oxide in Pfizer vaccines. A lab in Spain discovered it in one vial, which looked similar to 100% Graphene oxide. They asked for more samples for a detailed analysis. Out of 100 vials, 28 had Graphene oxide. When I posted this on Facebook, a Pfizer lawyer asked me to take it down as it was their property. This made me realize I could access the internal Pfizer database, where I kept searching for information.

I have an internal Pfizer document from a source who reverse-engineered the BioNTech Pfizer SARS COVID-2 vaccine. This document reveals the precise chemical and biological processes used to create an mRNA that contains graphene oxide, a dangerous toxin. Each vaccine contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles within the mRNA sequence. Once injected, the spike protein binds to blood cells, and graphene oxide begins building a structure, leading to blood clots and heart failure. Patent databases and recovered, deleted Wuhan databases prove that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

The speaker claims Pfizer documents reveal the COVID vaccines didn't work to stop the virus a month after rollout in November 2020. They allege Pfizer knew the third most common side effect was COVID. Within months, Pfizer supposedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker asserts Pfizer and the FDA knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this wasn't disclosed to parents until August 2021. The speaker states the CDC initially claimed the injection materials stayed at the injection site, but Pfizer knew they biodistributed throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. Pathologist Dr. Robert Chandler allegedly found no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

Every day, just the 1% of the cells of your DNA that gets replicated stretches from here to the sun four times. If you're to line it up end by end, that's very hard to conceptualize. But it should give you a little bit of humility before you go and start monkeying with it with these vaccines that can actually alter your DNA. And that's what I'm gonna show you. Is that the vaccines had a DNA contamination in them that didn't tell you about that could in fact alter your genome. Alright? These people are vibe coding your genome. And this is a major attack surface to the human gene pool because if this thing starts to alter the lifespan of people, it's going to part you with your Bitcoin. You're gonna end up spending money in a fiat system that has no controls, has no liability, and ends up oftentimes inducing mandates to get what it wants done. Many people had have peer have gone and replicated this work. It happened on Twitter. It did not happen very quickly in the peer review system. The peer review system kinda kicked it out. Some of these papers have now been peer reviewed, but it took years for them to come to this conclusion. Now, the FDA, the EMA and the TGA have all admitted that this mistake has happened. How did it happen? There's a big bait and switch. Pfizer actually ran the trial of 22,000 people on the process on the left and after they got to the trial, they then switched to the process on the right and didn't retrial the drug. And in doing so, they left a tremendous amount of excess DNA behind in the product. So all of the vaccine efficiency numbers you've heard in the news are flawed. They're not real because that's not what actually went into the trial. What went to the public was actually something that came out of this process too. It's published now in the BMJ that this fraud happened and no one has yet been prosecuted for it. So what did they leave in there? What they left in there was something we know from the polio scandal. If you're not familiar with the polio scandal, that polio vaccines were also contaminated with something known as SV40 and it created a massive cancer wave. Now the whole virus isn't in these vaccines, but there is a very curious part of this called the SV40 region that Pfizer intentionally removed from the disclosure that they gave to the FDA. So the FDA has admitted that this SV40 material is in there. They did not spell this out to the regulators. The regulators did not find them and they're actually running cover for them saying this DNA is too little consequence to matter, it's too small, and it's not functional. But we know it's functional because Dean et al has published that this piece of DNA drives DNA straight to the nucleus. It gets used in gene therapy vectors.

Under a darkfield microscope, the speaker examined the Pfizer vaccine liquid and observed circular and square particles floating around, which they did not see in older vaccines like measles and flu shots. After the liquid sat overnight, long wires appeared to form. Later, the speaker observed what looked like the image of a circuit board. The speaker was freaked out by this and worried about potential repercussions, given prior death threats. They questioned what these microscopic observations might imply and what potential problems could arise.

A discussion compares the current state of humanity to “the days of Noah,” claiming that humanity is back to a time when the Nephilim were changing humanity, and that Noah and his family were the only ones “pure left on the planet.” The speakers define “pure” as human DNA as made originally by God, unaltered by man’s science, and assert that the only pure humans still remaining on earth are the unvaccinated, stating that vaccinated people “have allowed these new Nimrods to change your DNA” and that “your body will never be the same.” Another speaker describes observing blood changes after recreating a process on people, saying they see bubbles and formations they associate with liver congestion and breaking down blood, and that anomalies become more noticeable once the body starts to decompose. They claim red blood cells form masses that can evolve or morph into something else, while asserting it “hasn’t started yet” but “it could happen while we’re sitting here.” A further participant presents claims from photographs of cells before and after “the injection,” describing “chains” of “white nanoparticles” and blood cells becoming “covered with lumps and protrusions” rather than being smooth and symmetrical. They call it an “intentional world war on human blood,” and mention names including Dr. Sherry, Tim Penny, and Luke Montagner. Legal claims are also discussed: the U.S. Supreme Court is referenced as ruling that vaccinated people worldwide are “products, patented goods,” and that through modified DNA or RNA vaccination, “the mRNA vaccination… ceases to be human forever,” becoming “the owner of the holder of the modified gen vaccination patent.” The claim includes loss of “human rights” and “no religious exemptions,” and states that this applies worldwide and that patents are subject to U.S. law since 2013. Another speaker quotes a Supreme Court holding about synthetically creating DNA from an mRNA molecule and concludes that synthetic genomes can be patentable as intellectual property, asking whether vaccines create a new genome within people, and answering that they do. Nanotechnology and ingredients are discussed through claims about “self-assembling nanotech” in Pfizer mRNA vaccines, based on optical microscopy analysis. The conclusions described include using nanotechnology to form networks capable of controlling nanomachines, and that graphene oxide is a key component. The discussion further ties graphene’s activation to microwave signals in gigahertz ranges, boosted to terahertz, and links the cited “optimal frequency” to 26 gigahertz, described as the frequency put out by 5G. Wireless monitoring and consent are emphasized with claims that 2020 was not about a virus and that swabs are “nanosensor[s]” embedded in cartilage for life, describing “WBAN wireless body area network” nodes and frequencies “up to 60 gigahertz.” Another speaker predicts a “second wave” caused by vaccine-induced injury compounded by fear and by “new technology,” described as 5G, alleging disruption of voltage-gated calcium channels and increased permeability to pathogens. One speaker claims an internal Pfizer document reveals mRNA production processes manipulated to include a “very dangerous toxin,” naming graphene oxide, and asserts each 30-milligram shot contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles. They claim graphene oxide builds structures after spike binding and cite outcomes such as blood clots and heart failure. The same speaker asserts the patent databases accessed prove COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines are “a bioweapon,” referencing “mysteriously deleted Wuhan databases.” Environmental exposure is discussed via water testing: aluminum in rain and snow is claimed to be extremely high compared to expected zero, with figures including 13,100 micrograms per liter in rain in 2013 and 61,000 micrograms per liter in snow on Mount Shasta. The transcript ends with a reiteration that the only “pure humans” are unvaccinated and that vaccinated people have allowed changes to DNA that will not leave the body “the same.”

Pfizer's internal document reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the BioNTech Pfizer SARS CoV-2 vaccine. It discloses the presence of Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, in each 30 milligram shot, containing 15 billion nanoparticles. Graphene Oxide causes the formation of structures in the body, leading to blood clots and sudden heart failure. Access to deleted Wuhan databases supports the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

Concerns have been raised about particles found in Pfizer's vaccine that were not disclosed. Using an electron microscope, various undeclared chemical elements were detected, including silicon, cesium, titanium, fluorine, bromine, and notably, astracinium, which is linked to adverse effects. These particles share similarities with graphene oxide, composed of carbon and oxygen, but also contain significant amounts of copper. This raises questions about their functionalization, as graphene oxide is often enhanced with nanocrystals or oxides for improved properties. However, the vaccine only officially lists messenger RNA related to the spike protein, leaving these additional components unaccounted for.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Laboratories that reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the BioNTech Pfizer SARS CoV-2 vaccine. It contains Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, with 15 billion nanoparticles in each 30mg shot. Graphene Oxide causes the spike protein to bind to blood cells, leading to blood clots and heart failure. The patent databases and a copy of the deleted Wuhan databases support the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

According to the speaker, Pfizer documents reveal that one month after the vaccine rollout in November 2020, Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't stop COVID and identified vaccine failure. Within months, the company allegedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker claims Pfizer knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this information wasn't shared with parents until August 2021. The speaker alleges that the CDC initially stated the injection materials stayed in the injection site, but Pfizer knew these materials biodistribute throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. The speaker asserts that there is no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

We began investigating these vials because our complaint about crimes against humanity was ignored by the prosecutor and the judge. We decided to analyze the substances to uncover their true contents, as previous declarations were false. Doctor Pablo Compra in Spain found Graphene Oxide and hydrogel in these vials, while studies in Germany and Argentina confirmed these findings. This analysis was conducted secretly due to threats against those involved. The lack of transparency and violation of regulations in the pharmaceutical industry is unprecedented and astonishing, especially considering my background in the field.

A discussion claims humanity is back “at the time of Noah,” when the Nephilim were changing humanity, and that Noah’s family were the only “pure” humans left. The speakers define “pure” as humanity’s original DNA “unaltered by man’s science,” claiming the only pure humans remaining are the unvaccinated, and that vaccinated people have allowed others to “change your DNA” and “your body will never be the same.” Several participants describe microscopy observations and blood-cell changes. One speaker says they recreated slides for “every single person” and claims anomalies appear in everyone, including themselves, when their blood “starts to decompose,” with red blood cells forming structures that “build chains” and later “morph into something else.” Another speaker shows a sequence of images, saying a “normal cell” changes after an injection, including “white nanoparticles” and cells no longer being “round and normal,” with blood cells described as developing “lumps and protrusions,” presented as evidence of an “intentional world war on human blood.” Another speaker adds that the anomalies “don’t decompose” in the expected way and instead “morph into something else.” A U.S. Supreme Court topic is raised. One speaker says the Supreme Court ruled that vaccinated people worldwide are “products” and “patented goods” under U.S. law, and that modified DNA/RNA changes a person into “transhuman,” a category not covered by human rights. Another speaker explains the legal reasoning they cite: synthetic DNA can be created from mRNA, and while natural DNA cannot be patented, synthetic DNA “is in fact, patentable,” described as creating “chattel property” rights in a new genome. A question is asked whether vaccines create a “new genome,” and the response states that it “does” and that the Supreme Court case supports that, noting the shots go throughout the body and do not stay in one location. Further claims focus on nanotechnology. One speaker cites “the fifth column” publishing findings using optical microscopy, alleging self-assembling nanotech in Pfizer mRNA vaccines, with a goal of networked nanomachines used to “control” multiple nanomachines. They claim graphene oxide is key, and describe graphene’s properties and frequencies, including 26 gigahertz linked to 5G, asserting microwave activation boosts graphene to terahertz to power self-assembling machinery in the body. Additional speakers argue the purpose of 2020 testing was not a virus, but to deploy wireless body area network (WBAN) sensors, including claims that a nasal swab embeds a nano sensor in cartilage “for life,” and that it runs on frequencies “up to 60 gigahertz.” Another speaker says a second wave would be driven by “vaccine-induced injury,” compounded by fear and 5G, claiming disruption of voltage-gated calcium channels and increased permeability to pathogens. One speaker presents an “internal document” claim from Pfizer/BioNTech as “Reverse Engineering the Source Code,” alleging mRNA manufacturing included a “dangerous toxin” identified as graphene oxide and stating each 30-milligram shot contains “15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles.” They attribute blood clots and heart failure to graphene oxide structure-building after spike protein binding and claim patent database access supports a bioweapon claim. Finally, speakers discuss aluminum in precipitation, claiming rain and snow contain high aluminum concentrations (including “13,100 micrograms per liter” in rain in 2013 and “61,000 micrograms per liter” in snow near Mount Shasta), asserting aluminum should be zero in rain and presenting this as evidence of broader geoengineering and metal exposure.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Laboratories that reveals the manipulation of chemical and biological processes in the development of the Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The document states that the vaccine contains Graphene Oxide, a dangerous toxin, with 15 billion nanoparticles in a 30 milligram shot. When Graphene Oxide enters the body, it forms structures that lead to blood clots and heart failure. Additionally, we have accessed patent databases and a copy of the deleted Wuhan databases, which support the claim that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

The speaker, a quality auditor at Pfizer, shares their concerns about the company's COVID-19 vaccine. They discovered that the vaccine vials were glowing and raised the issue with corporate, but received an unsatisfactory response. They also found documents in the company's database that mentioned the use of aborted fetal cell lines in the vaccine's development and the possibility of graphene oxide being present. The speaker noticed unusual security measures and a lack of proper quality control procedures. They also stumbled upon documents referencing depopulation and Satanism. Additionally, they discovered a Pfizer research and development lab in Wuhan with the address 666. The speaker believes that Pfizer, along with other organizations like the FDA and CDC, are aware of these issues. They express their distrust in vaccines and pharmaceutical companies in general.

I have an internal document from Pfizer Labs detailing the BioNTech Pfizer SARS COVID 2 vaccine, revealing it contains Graphene Oxide. Each shot has 15 billion nanoparticles causing blood clots and heart failure. The vaccine is considered a bioweapon, supported by deleted Wuhan databases.

After obtaining unrefrigerated samples of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, an honors graduate with a Bachelor's of Science degree from McGill University analyzed them. The speaker notes that refrigeration temperatures are supposed to be minus 40 for Moderna and minus 70 for Pfizer. The Moderna sample revealed chip-like shapes with a grid pattern on top of crystal structures. The most prevalent element in the square was carbon, followed by oxygen. The Pfizer sample contained thousands of small squares made of carbon, oxygen, and possibly hydrogen, with no signs of biologic material. Fiber-like structures were also observed in the Pfizer sample, composed purely of carbon. The speaker questions the presence and purpose of these structures, suggesting they may be related to graphene. They raise concerns about the potential for these structures to self-assemble inside people's bodies using available carbon and oxygen, and the potential long-term effects of these structures forming in the blood.

Hi, I’m Melissa McAtee, the Pfizer whistleblower. I worked at Pfizer for nearly 10 years, including 5 years as a quality auditor. I want to clarify some points from my interviews. I have evidence of my employment, including my work badge and photos of products I tested. I noticed something unusual about the vaccine solution; it glows under certain conditions, unlike other products that appear clear. The labeling on the vaccine vials was also placed low, obscuring the solution. Additionally, Pfizer manufactures remdesivir, which also had an unusual appearance when reconstituted. I encourage everyone to do their own research on these topics.

"Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA." "This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA." "I sequenced it in my own lab." "The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy." "And for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial." "So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials." "And I checked these two batches, and I checked them by sequencing." "It's surprising that there's any DNA in there." "This DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest."

Speaker 0 describes finding vaccine insert materials with no printed content and says this is disheartening and “disgusting,” then adds that it “gets better” and that “more” continues to happen. Speaker 0 claims the CDC redacted every word of a 148-page study on myocarditis after COVID vaccination, and that when they asked to have the study printed, the entire document was redacted. They question what the study could have contained that required redaction and say this is “even scarier.” Speaker 1 says they are witnessing “an active cover up” of a “colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved, and that similar actions occur in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each of these regulators requires product companies to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after a product comes out, describing this as a regulatory dossier. They say that if problems arise and are reported to a company (such as Pfizer), the company must report, compile, and produce a report that is made publicly available. Speaker 1 claims that for Pfizer, whose first vaccine was approved 12/10/2020, Pfizer did not produce a report after the ninety days. They add that when people asked what was happening, Pfizer allegedly did not disclose what occurred, leading to court proceedings. Speaker 1 states that the FDA’s lawyer allegedly said the dossier should not be released for fifty-five years, and that after pressure, the Pfizer dossier was eventually released. They then claim Pfizer recorded 1,223 deaths with their product within ninety days of release and recorded over 1,200 new adverse events. Speaker 1 also says the FDA worked to cover this up, and that FDA should have regulated Pfizer with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about “novel vaccines,” which they describe as a “genetic transfer technology platform,” the first time human beings had been injected with foreign genetic material in world history. Speaker 1 ends by stating that two thirds of the world’s population took these.

In my first interview with Stu Peters, I revealed that manufacturing facilities in China were producing excipients for COVID-19 injections worldwide, including Pfizer's ALC 0135 and ALC 159, which contained graphene oxide. Despite gaining millions of views, the mainstream media immediately dismissed the presence of graphene oxide in the injections. False reports claimed that some vaccines were 99% graphene oxide, but this has not been verified or peer-reviewed. However, Pfizer's internal documents and peer-reviewed publication confirm the use of graphene oxide in their nanoparticle technologies and spike proteins. The process involves infecting human embryonic kidney cells, which produce multi-species proteins with genetic sequences from non-human DNA. These proteins are then combined with a thin layer of graphene oxide.

Former Pfizer employee and analyst Karen Kingston discusses the presence of graphene oxide in mRNA vaccines. She explains that while the patent does not list graphene oxide as it is a trade secret, evidence from China and other sources confirms its inclusion. Kingston suggests that graphene oxide may not be listed due to its toxicity to humans and its role as the main ingredient in hydrogel. The conversation highlights the difficulty in finding this information and the need for individuals to conduct their own research due to alleged misinformation from mainstream media and social media platforms.

In this analysis, we observe graphene oxide particles under various filters, revealing their characteristic fluorescence: blue in filter 2, green in filters 3 and 4, red in filter 5, and orange in filter 6. This unique photoluminescence is a fundamental property of graphene oxide. We examined a specific particle from a Pfizer batch linked to serious health issues, identified as FN1672. This particle's size is concerning and indicates it should not be present in injectables, warranting the removal of these vaccines from the market. Despite submitting this information to health authorities in Argentina, no action has been taken to investigate the defect in this pharmaceutical product.

Speaker 13 says humanity is “right back” to the days of Noah, when the Nephilim were changing humanity, and claims Noah’s family was the only pure humans left. He defines “pure” as DNA made originally by God, unaltered by man’s science, and asserts the only pure humans remaining are the unvaccinated. He further says vaccinated people have allowed “new Nimrods” to change their DNA and that “your body will never be the same.” Speaker 7 describes recreating a process on slides and inspecting blood, claiming “anomalies” appear in everyone and may begin to evolve or morph into something else, especially once decomposition starts. He states the elements include red blood cells forming into masses and changing structure, while also claiming the anomalies do not decompose like expected but instead morph. Speaker 9 tells people who claim to love science that they should be shown “science.” Speaker 12 says a normal cell photo changes after an injection, then shows “drastic” chains of “white nanoparticles,” with cells no longer round and normal, covered with lumps and protrusions. He frames this as an intentional “world war on human blood,” citing named individuals and “the Nobel Prize.” Speaker 8 reads a U.S. Supreme Court-related passage, asserting the Supreme Court ruled that vaccinated people are products/patented goods under U.S. law and “ceases to be human forever,” becoming subject to modified DNA/RNA vaccination patent ownership, with loss of “human rights,” “religious exemptions,” and no rights or liberties. He claims this applies worldwide and that patents are subject to U.S. law since 2013, identifying vaccinated people as “transhuman” without human or state rights. Speaker 14 discusses chimeras and argues genome differentiation is irrelevant for how lab animals are used. Speaker 4 asks what the courts ruled, and Speaker 14 responds that the Supreme Court decision is already in effect. He points to a part stating synthetic DNA can be created using methods that begin with an mRNA molecule and create synthetic DNA via nucleotide bonding, claiming synthetic genomes can be patented and described as “chattel property.” Speaker 4 asks whether this relates to mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna and whether a new genome is created within people. Speaker 14 answers that it does, and disputes separating “synthetic DNA” as the intellectual property from the broader creation process. He argues if shots go throughout the body and genetically modify billions of cells, separating effects is not possible. Speaker 2 says the “fifth column” reported self-assembling nanotech in Pfizer mRNA vaccines seen via optical microscopy. He claims objects correspond to known scientific items and alleges nanotechnology is used to form networks controlling nanomachines in COVID-19 vaccines. He states official ingredients are unknown but says graphene oxide is a key component, describing graphene’s electrical/thermal properties and a frequency activation model: externally powering graphene at 26 gigahertz (matching 5G), boosting to terahertz to power nanotech self-assembly. Speaker 1 claims 2020 was “never about a virus,” stating tests and swabs were for “nanosensors” embedded in cartilage for life, and says the technology runs on frequencies “up to 60 gigahertz.” Speaker 10 says there will be a “second wave” not from the virus but from vaccine-induced injury compounded by fear and new technology, including 5G. He alleges 5G disrupts voltage-gated calcium channels, increasing permeability to pathogens, especially enveloped viruses. Speaker 11 cites an “internal document” from Pfizer Laboratories and says it shows processes manipulated to produce mRNA containing a dangerous toxin called graphene oxide. He claims a 30-milligram shot contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles and says graphene oxide builds structures after spike protein binding, linking it to blood clots and heart failure. He also asserts accessed patent databases prove COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines are a bioweapon, citing “mysteriously deleted Wuhan databases.” Speaker 6 and Speaker 3 discuss aluminum levels in rain and snow, claiming rain had 13,100 micrograms per liter of aluminum in 2013 and that snow on Mount Shasta had 61,000 micrograms per liter, questioning why snow would have more aluminum than mud. Speaker 5 says every breath they take is laden with these metals and concludes geoengineering programs are an immediate threat short of nuclear catastrophe.

These people were left without a place to listen to the scientists' presentation. Lorena de Blassey and Marcela Sangorin, long postponed in Congress about the real content of COVID vaccines imported into Argentina. Where we verify that all COVID-nineteen vaccines contain graphene oxide in the form of particulate material nano- and microparticles, yes, which in turn contain chemical elements such as yttrium, ruthenium, palladium, chromium, which are not declared in the formulas. We found 62 chemical elements, including bismuth, chromium, bromine, boron, europium. Many are elements used in electronics. That is to say, they may be there for other functions surely, because it is no coincidence that they are found. An investigation that involves each and every one of the pharmaceutical corporations that had vaccines authorized during the process known as the pandemic in The Argentine Republic and which are the same ones that financed the World Health Organization. Why is there so much talk about neuro rights these days? Is it because Chile has already passed laws on neuro rights, and Argentina already has a draft law on neuro rights? Because there will then be a differentiation between human and transhuman people. They will discriminate, human rights will cease to exist, or they will promote this whole digital thing of hybridizing ourselves with computers to become more intelligent. Well, they will always sell that as something good. In this way, Millet himself announced it. During his presidential campaign, the situation will arise in which, let's say, we have a USB drive, we plug into each other and transmit knowledge, You're going to have what is, let's say, a next stage, for all those who want to apply improvements, and who are called trained humans, right? And that, what it's going to do is multiply your intelligence thousands of times. The female scientists who are part of the National Scientific and Technical Research Council presented their research, and now Conasit threatens to fire them. We submitted this information to Conesit through an online procedure, and they opened a file on us, which is still unclear. A legal basis is still missing. We already had a hearing where they really asked us leading questions, directed questions, aimed at dismissing our work. SEBASTIAN SALGATO, Hispan TV, Buenos Aires Speaker 3: Empower Translations Translations for all humanity.

Speaker 0 says they found “information like this,” such as vaccine insert paper, with “nothing printed on it,” which they call disheartening and disgusting. They add that it “just keeps happening” and claim the CDC redacts “every single word” of a 148-page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. Speaker 0 says they asked someone to print the study, and that the entire 148 pages are redacted. They ask what a study does if “there’s nothing there,” and they ask what might have been there that required redaction. Speaker 1 says they are “witnessing an active cover up” involving “a colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States, the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved in a cover up, and that similar cover ups are occurring in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each company that puts out a product has an obligation to produce “ninety days of safety monitoring” after the product comes out, describing it as a regulatory dossier. They claim that if someone has a problem and reports it to a company like Pfizer, Pfizer must report, write down what happened, collate it into a report, and make it publicly available. Speaker 1 says that when the ninety days elapsed for Pfizer’s first vaccine approved on 12/10/2020, Pfizer “didn’t produce a report.” They add that people asked what was happening with the vaccine, and Pfizer allegedly would not disclose what happened, leading to a court case. Speaker 1 says the lawyer for the FDA stepped in to say they did not want to release Pfizer’s dossier for fifty-five years. Speaker 1 then says that after the plaintiff pushed, the Pfizer dossier “slowly” came out. They claim Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty-three deaths with their product within ninety days of release, and they say people called Pfizer in desperation watching family members die after taking the vaccine. Speaker 1 also claims Pfizer recorded “over twelve hundred” new adverse events and refers to “doctor Boden” discussing problems they say they have been grappling with. They conclude by claiming the FDA worked to cover this up and should have been regulating the company with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about novel vaccines, described by Speaker 1 as a genetic transfer technology platform and as the first time human beings were injected with foreign genetic material in world history, after which “they were getting it full on.” Speaker 1 ends by saying “Two thirds of the world’s population took”