TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker questions whether Chairman Comer has proven Joe Biden committed high crimes. He believes Biden should be impeached but is unsure why the vote has not been called yet. The discussion revolves around the lack of evidence for impeachment and the delay in taking action. The speaker accuses the hearings of being a show and states that the vote will never happen due to insufficient evidence. The conversation ends with frustration over the ongoing hearings without a clear resolution in sight.

Speaker 0: President Biden lied to the American people, his family profited through shell companies, and his Federal agencies are obstructing the congressional inquiry. There are numerous scandals and corruption cases that have been uncovered. President Biden claimed he never discussed his son's business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. He had dinner with Russian and Kazakhstani oligarchs, spoke with Hunter's associates over 20 times, and met with a Chinese energy company while Hunter worked for them. A text message from Hunter implies a commitment not fulfilled. A confidential source alleged a $5 million bribe to President Biden. The House Oversight Committee investigation found that Hunter flew on air force 2 at least 15 times to enrich the Biden family. This impeachment inquiry will give House Investigators more subpoena authority to gather evidence from uncooperative federal agencies. The New York Post's report on Hunter Biden's laptop was falsely labeled as Russian disinformation. Social media banned the story, but it was later revealed to be legitimate. A court opinion confirmed that the White House and federal agencies were censoring conservative speech on social media platforms.

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about investigating allegations, but Speaker 1 avoids commenting. Speaker 0 expresses concern on behalf of millions of Americans and criticizes Senate Democrats and the media for not addressing the evidence. Speaker 0 asks if the informant who accused Joe Biden of taking a bribe was previously relied upon by the FBI, but Speaker 1 evades a direct answer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of refusing to answer and calls it disgraceful.

The speaker discusses a letter from Lev Parnas, a former associate of Rudy Giuliani and President Trump, detailing their efforts to smear Joe Biden before the 2020 election. Parnas states that there is no evidence of any crimes committed by Hunter or Joe Biden in relation to Ukrainian politics. He calls for an end to the committee's investigation and offers to testify. The speaker suggests bringing Parnas in as a witness to shed light on their campaign. The hearing will focus on Hunter Biden's legal issues, but there is no evidence of wrongdoing by President Joe Biden or his administration.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

Hunter Biden's testimony during the deposition is described as defiant and dishonest, with conflicting statements compared to other witnesses. He repeatedly claims not to recall certain details. The transcripts will reveal more, but it is not surprising. Despite not pleading the judge, his testimony contradicts previous witness accounts. Specific conflicts are not disclosed to maintain confidentiality during the ongoing deposition.

The January 6th committee's hearings lack cross-examination and anonymity for witnesses, resembling a show trial rather than legitimate hearings. For instance, Cassidy Hutchinson made outrageous claims about Donald Trump attempting to carjack his limo, yet there was no opportunity for cross-examination to challenge her testimony. The Secret Service denied her account, but this information was not presented to the committee or the public. The committee's failure to contact relevant witnesses raises questions about their commitment to uncovering the truth. Instead, the process appears to serve as propaganda, with major news outlets promoting it without scrutiny. This has been an ongoing issue for months.

House oversight claims to have bank records indicating that a Chinese energy company paid three members of the Biden family through a third party. The purpose of these payments is unclear. The speaker refuses to comment on the matter, citing the history of inaccuracies and lies from House Republicans on this issue.

There is no evidence of a link between Hunter Biden and the president regarding business dealings. The hearing did not provide any proof of wrongdoing by the president. The speaker wanted to address a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski. Translation: There is no evidence connecting Hunter Biden and the president in terms of business dealings. The hearing failed to show any wrongdoing by the president. The speaker tried to respond to a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

Miss Green from Georgia accuses Hunter Biden of being afraid of her words and labels him a coward for not facing her. She claims that it is clear and obvious to everyone watching the hearing that Hunter Biden is terrified of strong conservative Republican women.

Republicans are trying to prove a connection between foreign nations benefiting from the vice president's son and Joe Biden. They seek evidence of direct payoffs during Biden's vice presidency or after. However, this link has not been established yet. People may be growing weary of the ongoing investigation.

I have never discussed my business or my family's businesses with my son, including anything related to Ukraine or his overseas ventures. There is photographic evidence showing that President Joe Biden met with Hunter's business partners and high-ranking Chinese officials without any legitimate government purpose. This evidence was hidden from the American public before the election. The permanent bureaucracy in Washington has attempted to prevent President Trump from returning to office, yet he won a significant victory. The American people are frustrated with a government that has neglected and betrayed them.

I have been on this investigating committee for over 20 years and as an attorney, I can confidently say that there is more evidence to impeach Donald Trump for a third time than to implicate President Biden. The focus on the Biden family is a way to deflect from the lack of evidence against President Biden. The shifting arguments have only served to exonerate President Biden.

The speaker claims that the biggest scandal was when their campaign was spied on, but the other person disagrees, saying there is no evidence. The speaker insists that it is all over the place and that it was bad for Biden. The other person explains that they can't put on things they can't verify. The speaker continues to assert that it has been verified and that they got caught. The other person denies knowing about it.

The speaker criticizes the Biden family, stating that they have no business experience except for politics. They claim that the oversight committee, along with other committees, has uncovered evidence of public corruption and a pay-for-play scheme involving foreign nations, resulting in millions of dollars. The speaker mentions that Hunter Biden ignored a congressional subpoena as a private citizen, which would typically result in contempt and punishment. They argue that private citizens have a responsibility to answer congressional subpoenas and suggest that Hunter Biden should be held in contempt by the full House of Representatives. The speaker concludes by yielding back their time.

Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, claimed that the Intelligence Community believes Hunter Biden's laptop and its emails are part of a Russian disinformation campaign. However, the Director of National Intelligence stated that there is no intelligence supporting this claim and no evidence has been shared with Schiff or any other member of Congress. The Director emphasized that using the intelligence community to push a political narrative is unacceptable. He made it clear that Hunter Biden's laptop is not involved in any Russian disinformation campaign, and he believes the American people are aware of this.

I'm still waiting for proof of Joe Biden enriching himself, especially regarding his son and brother. Despite four years of investigation during Trump's presidency, no charges have been made. If there was evidence of wrongdoing, charges should have followed. A Chinese company did transfer money to Hunter and Jim Biden's shell companies, which then funneled money to their personal accounts, including a $40,000 check to Joe Biden. However, the lack of charges raises questions about the validity of these claims. Until there are actual charges, this discussion remains open. Thank you for joining us; stay tuned for more.

The president's statements contradict the fact that he has spoken to Hunter Biden's business associates. However, Speaker 1 argues that the president never claimed to have never spoken to anyone. He simply stated that he had no involvement in Hunter Biden's business dealings. Speaker 1 finds it unreasonable to expect a father not to greet people his son is dining with. This is the only evidence presented. Additionally, it is mentioned that Hunter Biden used this as a party trick to impress others.

The impeachment inquiry is based on lies, warned by Pompeo and Lev Parnas, with no specific charges against the president. The committee proceeded despite knowing the evidence was falsified. The focus should be on why the inquiry continues.

There is no evidence to support the claim that President Joe Biden has done anything wrong or broken the law. Republicans have not provided any proof of wrongdoing or impeachable offenses. President Biden is a good, decent, and hardworking man who has dedicated his life to public service.

Joe Biden initially claimed he never discussed Hunter's overseas business deals, but it's now clear that was a lie. There were numerous phone calls between Joe and corrupt individuals involved in Hunter's multimillion-dollar deals. The first talking point is no longer valid. The second talking point, that Joe wasn't actively in business with Hunter, has also been abandoned. The third talking point, pushed by Democrats and the media, is that there's no direct evidence of Joe's involvement in Hunter's corruption. However, this is also false.

The speaker claims the biggest scandal was spying on their campaign, insisting it's verified despite lack of evidence. They urge to air it for Biden's detriment. The interviewer refuses, citing the need for verification. The speaker insists they were spied on and caught, challenging the interviewer to check the papers. The interviewer remains skeptical.

In my year of global interviews, I found no evidence of Biden corruption in Ukraine. No credible source, including FBI, CIA, NSA, or Ukrainian officials, has proven any illegal activity. Even when offered a deal, CEO of Burisma provided no information. The only accusations against the Bidens in Ukraine come from Russia. The impeachment proceedings are based on false Kremlin information. Stay tuned for a heated hearing. Jesse Waters joins us now.