reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Most of us feel uncomfortable about pedophiles, but we must separate feelings from actions. We should treat them with respect, acknowledging they did not choose their sexuality. Pedophilia is a sexual preference, not a choice. Trying to eliminate them from society is impractical and unfair, as it is a biological aspect that cannot be changed. New individuals are born with this orientation daily, and they have not committed any wrongdoing.

The video features an interview with two individuals, Scott and Speaker 3. Scott openly admits to being attracted to children and discusses his past actions, including exchanging explicit messages and images with underage individuals online. He expresses a desire to change but acknowledges the difficulty. Scott also mentions his own history of abuse and its potential impact on his behavior. Speaker 3 discusses their gender identity and acceptance from their roommates. They express relief that a potential meeting with someone named Brian hasn't happened yet. The conversation then shifts to their sexual preferences, experiences, college plans, and family background. Speaker 2 questions Speaker 3 about their intentions and potential meetings with minors, and Speaker 3 admits to viewing inappropriate content involving children. The video concludes with Speaker 2 confronting Speaker 3 about their actions and involving the police. Scott's Instagram account is mentioned as being under review.

Josiah claims to be a god-like figure and promotes relationships between humans and animals, as well as sexual interactions with children. He justifies this by saying it's harm-free and natural. When questioned about the morality of his actions, he admits to being a pedophile and having engaged in sexual activities with minors. He even suggests that his own infant son could consent to sex. Josiah's disturbing beliefs are challenged by the interviewer, who ultimately expresses concern for Josiah's son and hopes that authorities intervene.

Josiah Mizukami claims to be a god in human form, advocating for sexual relationships with children. He justifies this by saying it's natural and harm-free. When questioned about the morality of his actions, he defends them, even admitting to engaging in sex with minors. He believes that as long as both parties consent, any sexual activity is acceptable, even with children. Despite the disturbing nature of his beliefs, he remains steadfast in his convictions.

I've never taken a child to my bed; they come to me, and I don't push them away. If they engage in sexual play, I reciprocate. Many boys, aged 8 to 12, have jumped into my bed and asked for sex without me initiating it. All boys seek a lover. Dr. Daniel Ghazducek, a former NIH researcher and Nobel Peace Prize winner, lived at Boston Children's Hospital for nine years, adopting 57 children. He served only one year in prison after admitting to abusing 300-400 boys aged 8 to 12. Now, Boston Children's Hospital is involved in gender-affirming surgeries, including hysterectomies, which involve removing the uterus, cervix, and sometimes ovaries. Boston Children's Hospital has transitioned from harboring a predator to performing surgeries on children.

Speaker 0 presents a disturbing set of preferences expressed as a personal viewpoint. The speaker rejects any idea of waiting or gradual enjoyment, insisting, “No, bitch. I wanna drink it straight from the tap. I want it raw. I don't wanna wait a moment. Right when the milk is good, I wanna start drinking the milk.” This metaphor is used to describe a desire for immediacy and immediacy in relationships. The speaker then extends the metaphor to women, arguing against aging in a traditional, patient way. They state, “Same thing goes with women. I don't wanna turn 30 and find some 20 year old, 29 year old woman that I have something in common with and it's like, hey, properly aged like wine. Women don't age like wine, they age like milk. They don't age like wine. That's not how their hormones work.” The claim asserts that women do not age gracefully like wine, but rather age like milk, contradicting the notion of aging well. Continuing, the speaker proposes a specific, controversial timeline for marriage and reproduction. They say, “I gotta find my 16 year old wife. Probably when I turn 30 or something.” They justify this with calculations about age differences: “Here's the thing, I don't wanna be like, let's say I get married to an 18 year old now. Six year age difference. When I turn 40, she's gonna be 34. Ew. Well, if I'm 30 and she's 16, fourteen year age difference. When I'm 50, she'll be 36. When I'm 40, she'll be 26.” The speaker draws a progressive, increasingly favorable age difference for themselves as they age. The speaker amplifies their stance with an explicit age preference, saying, “Now we're talking here. Now we're cooking with gas. Now you can see an alternative vision for how things could be. I want a 16 year old who's untouched. Untouched, pristine. Untouched, uncorrupted, innocent.” They further claim, “That's what we all want. And all 16 year olds want an older guy who's like capable and strong and everything to sweep them off their feet. That's what everybody wants. That's what everybody wants.” Overall, the transcript centers on a provocative, highly problematic set of beliefs about age, consent, and the supposed desirability of a 16-year-old partner, framed through aggressive metaphors and explicit preferences.

Speaker 0 admits to engaging in sexual activities with children who willingly came to his bed. Speaker 1 expresses concern about the harm caused by adults forcing sexuality on children. Speaker 2 shares their experience of being groomed by an adult and manipulated into liking the abuse. Speaker 3 questions how someone as intelligent as Speaker 0 could justify their actions. Speaker 0 defends their behavior, claiming not to know why they engaged in pedophilia. The video ends with Speaker 0 expressing disgust at the idea of acting in their own biography and advocating for intergenerational sex for stronger family bonds.

Speaker 0 discusses the experience of children being sexually abused. They mention that at a young age, children may not have a name for the act but still find it pleasurable. The speaker emphasizes that if the abuser is skilled, the child may not even realize the abuse has occurred. The transcript ends with the speaker asking if they can refer to the listener as "1."

The speaker, Chris, admits to engaging in inappropriate conversations with a 13-year-old girl online. He claims that he never had any intention of meeting her or engaging in any illegal activities. He acknowledges that he made mistakes and played into her fantasies but insists that he never acted on them. The person he is speaking to, Gordon, questions his actions and highlights the seriousness of the situation. They discuss the need for accountability and honesty. Chris agrees to let Gordon and one other person into his home to further discuss the issue. The conversation touches on various topics, including the girl's age, potential meetups, and explicit messages exchanged.

In this video transcript, Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 engage in a conversation about their interactions with a person named Emily on Facebook. Speaker 1 questions Speaker 2 about explicit content and potential plans to meet up, while Speaker 2 denies any intention of engaging in sexual activities and claims their phone was hacked. Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of honesty and offers assistance. The conversation continues with Speaker 2 expressing fear and Speaker 1 reassuring them. Speaker 2 reiterates their innocence, and Speaker 1 emphasizes their willingness to help. They discuss Speaker 2's past, including his daughter being in foster care, and Speaker 1 reassures Speaker 2 that they are there to help and not judge. They talk about the possibility of consensual actions between Speaker 2 and Emily, with Speaker 2 denying any intention of forcing himself on her. Speaker 1 stresses the need for honesty to provide necessary help. Speaker 2 acknowledges the need for help and expresses gratitude for support. They discuss Poncho's lies, potential sexual activities with a minor, and the need for help. Poncho admits to having a sex addiction and discusses interactions with underage girls and older men interested in young girls. The speaker suggests that Poncho may have received explicit pictures of minors from others online. Poncho expresses a desire for help and mentions seeing a psychiatrist. The conversation ends with a discussion about Poncho's sexual preferences and habits. The speakers also discuss instances where videos of underage girls engaging in sexual activities were sent to them, mentioning platforms like Facebook, Telegram, and Signal. They mention being added to groups where such videos were shared but leaving those groups. The conversation then shifts to the speaker's personal life, including a custody battle and accusations made by his daughter. They discuss the speaker's ban from Facebook and interactions with law enforcement, as well as the speaker's age and occupation. The video ends with a discussion about not inviting a 12-year-old named Emily over again, mentioning sending inappropriate pictures and potential legal action. The speaker hopes for prosecution and mentions police interest in pursuing the case, but no immediate arrest will occur. The video concludes with a request for likes and an invitation to join a group.

In a recent interview, the speaker discusses how he has arrested over 100,000 people before they could commit child rape, potentially saving 700,000 children. However, the other speaker finds this reasoning strange, as these people haven't actually done anything yet. The speaker argues that those who have intentions to commit crimes should be arrested. The conversation then shifts to the normalization of pedophilia, with the speaker claiming that it is becoming more prevalent and even present in school books. The other speaker expresses shock at this revelation.

Most of us feel discomfort towards pedophiles, but we must separate feelings from actions. We should treat them with respect, understanding they did not choose their sexuality. Some individuals struggle with pedophilic feelings in silence due to fear of hatred. It is crucial to recognize that pedophilia is a sexual orientation that cannot be changed. Trying to eliminate these individuals from society is impractical and unjust, as they have not committed any wrongdoing.

Pedophiles should be treated with respect and understanding, as they do not choose their feelings or sexual orientation. It is our responsibility to overcome our negative emotions towards them and acknowledge that they cannot freely act on their desires. Statistics show that there are individuals struggling with pedophilic interests who fear being hated if they speak up. While it may be emotionally challenging to accept, pedophilia is a biological aspect that cannot be changed. Trying to eliminate these individuals from society is impractical, especially considering that new people are born with the same difficulty every day. It is important to note that pedophiles have not committed any wrongdoing.

A man with many contacts was well-liked by children and mothers, never facing any charges or arrests. However, there were two instances where a young child, possibly a girl, agreed to sexual contact but experienced pain due to their young age and small genitalia compared to the man's large genitalia. This created a problem.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire to protect someone from experiencing hardships they've faced. Speaker 0 then states feeling violated. Speaker 1 compliments Speaker 0's scent and asks their age. Speaker 0 is 16, turning 17 in two weeks. Speaker 1 says they never smelled that good at 16. Speaker 0 asks if the other would rather be naked on stage during a song or drink blended worms. Speaker 0 says they have young fans and can't give a sex talk, noting they never received one. Speaker 0 asks why a 15-year-old boy would want a sex talk from them, expressing discomfort. Speaker 0 suggests discussing the album, noting the other person hasn't been calling or hanging out like before, and has tried contacting them through partners.

The speaker discusses a conversation with someone who has a large following on Instagram. They mention that the person is a cheerleader and show them their Instagram photos, which they describe as sexy. The other speaker expresses disgust and warns against discussing such topics, as it could lead to arrest. The first speaker then tries to justify pedophilia by comparing it to other fetishes and questioning why it is illegal. They mention searching for explicit content on Google and describe a young girl's Instagram photos. The conversation ends with a comment about the girl being skinny and sexualized.

In a chat among offenders, one asked what the others were into. One responded he was mainly into 5 to 9 year olds. Another said he was 60, violent, and doesn't take no for an answer. One offender claimed to have 20 terabytes of baby rape videos for sale via DM. Another offered to show others how to abuse their own kids and get away with it. Another said he has a daughter he would love to share. When asked if his wife knew about his abuse, one man said no, it's their little secret, and that he is looking for others as she is getting old, specifying she is 8. This highlights the urgency needed to protect children.

The speaker is addressing Geoffrey Marsh, stating that Marsh should stop telling trans people that they're inspirational and stop telling kids to go on Marsh's Patreon to chat privately without their parents knowing. The speaker says that they have been called transphobic and attacked for their religion. The speaker presents videos of Marsh addressing kids and a video where Marsh says kids whose parents have screwed up should join Marsh's Patreon to connect privately about topics they wouldn't share in the comments. The speaker questions why Marsh wants to talk about these topics privately with kids, suggesting it might be to avoid being flagged or to encourage kids to go no contact with their parents. The speaker claims that Marsh's actions align with signs of grooming: gaining access, isolating the victim, showing trust and love, and keeping secrets. The speaker also references a video where Marsh says, "If you do not have a family that loves you, I'm going to be your family," which the speaker strongly objects to. The speaker states that age restrictions can be turned off on Patreon.

An individual discusses the connection between anarchism and pedophilia, specifically in relation to queer theory. They mention key figures in queer theory who have expressed support for or defended pedophilia. The speaker also criticizes the comparison of pedophilia to personal preferences, such as liking spicy food. They highlight quotes from Pat Califia's books that suggest a belief in children's ability to make decisions about sexual activities with adults. The speaker concludes by stating that no prominent queer theorist has spoken out against pedophilia, as the ideology is rooted in transgression.

The speakers engage in a conversation about various topics. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about her husband's involvement in the MDD. Speaker 1 mentions their work in catching online child predators and their goal to increase the number of arrests and convictions. Speaker 0 expresses belief in their cause. Speaker 1 discusses a disturbing incident involving a pedophile in Wyoming. Speaker 0 admits to coming to meet an 11-year-old for sex. Speaker 1 confronts Speaker 0 about illegal content on his phone, including nude pictures of children. They discuss their methods of catching predators and turning evidence over to law enforcement. Speaker 0 admits to struggling with his fantasies. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 asking about vaccine injuries and Speaker 0 questioning the necessity of the conversation.

I work with IPCE, aiming to destigmatize pedophilia and support emotional well-being. I don't condone illegal acts, but believe in accepting those with different romantic interests. Love should be supported regardless of age norms. Different countries have varying age of consent laws. I suggest adding "P" to LGBTQ+ for pedophiles.

Dotorg means virtuous pedophiles, virtuous as in having moral standards despite their sexual orientation. Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to children and is a paraphilia. Molestation and rape are different and are abusive actions that often have nothing to do with attraction. Many child abusers are actually sexually attracted to adults, but they act out on children. The speaker tries not to judge either pedophiles or child molesters/rapists.

This video transcript covers a range of topics related to pedophilia and child exploitation. It includes interviews with individuals involved in this behavior, such as non-offending pedophiles seeking help and those who claim to have overcome their desires through therapy. The existence of online communities and websites where pedophiles share explicit content and discuss their preferences is also explored. The video discusses the importance of awareness and action to protect children from abuse. It covers debates on age restrictions and online child protection, as well as the controversial Pizzagate scandal and allegations against the Podesta brothers. The use of Snapchat filters for creating deepfake child pornography and the efforts of vigilante groups to expose online predators are also discussed. The video includes audio clips from predator conversations and highlights the dangers of online grooming. It concludes by discussing the actions taken by Lieutenant Lickme to confront and scare predators, as well as the potential consequences of vigilante confrontations, including suicides and the impact on families involved. The video also features personal stories from survivors, discussions about the prevalence of pedophiles on YouTube, and theories about a global pedophile ring involving elites and celebrities. The speakers emphasize the need to raise awareness, protect children, support survivors, and seek justice. The video aims to shed light on these issues and inspire positive action.

I did some bad things to kids, and if anyone finds out, I'm in big trouble. I'm currently stationed in Hawaii. I remember this one time, Eddie was 15, and I brought him into a bar with a mask. We all hooked up with him. I was also raped by my brother when I was seven and he was 20. I think that had a lot to do with me being gay. I was told I wanted every man I could get because I wanted to get back at someone. The youngest guy I ever got with was 12, but I won't tell you how old I was because I would go to jail.