reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video discusses the concept of mind control and its potential use by the CIA, Russians, and Chinese. It highlights the research of Dr. Michael Persinger, who believes that electromagnetic frequencies can be used to influence people's emotions and thoughts. The video also mentions a patent for a silent subliminal presentation system that claims to transmit information to the subconscious mind through audio frequencies. The speaker asks for viewers' opinions on whether they believe this technology is widespread and utilized in various forms of media. The transcript ends with a thank you to the viewers.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, resulting in uncontrollable rage among the Hutu crowd. It is revealed that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions in the 1950s. The challenge at that time was transmitting these brainwaves accurately. With advancements in technology like transistors and microprocessors, the practical application of precise control brainwaves became possible.

Speaker 0 discusses the defense department's active denial system as a nonlethal weapon to control crowds, secure perimeters, and deter pirates. He notes it can be used to “shoot first and ask questions later,” a claim attributed to the military stance on its use. The system is described by Speaker 0 as not radioactive, not a microwave, and not a laser beam. It is a man-sized beam of millimeter waves that can be fired from up to a thousand meters away and is designed to make the target feel extremely hot so they move. He recounts his personal experience: at about fifty degrees outside, the sensation felt like it was “about a thousand,” and after about 1.5 seconds, one sixty-fourth of an inch of skin reached 130 degrees. He says the effect is temporary and that as soon as he steps away, it’s over; the DOD claims there are no lingering effects, no cancer risk, and no risk to a fetus or reproductive capability—“it’s just heat.” The system’s drawback is acknowledged: it propagates through the air and requires line of sight to targets. Speaker 0 states a prototype costs $10,000,000 and that there are no plans to deploy one anytime soon. Speaker 2 introduces the active denial system with a visual of a dish emitting a beam toward people who might do harm, claiming it will “make you stop in your tracks,” feel like you have a vomit, feel like you’re on fire, and even “put voices in your head.” He asserts the technology can affect people in dramatic ways. The speaker references the Emerald Tabas and a scene with Thos, describing a moment when a staff is raised and a ray of vibration stops a group of people, suggesting that this is the active denial system in use. He adds a broader claim: “Same technology just a different year. What’s we’re doing now, we’re just simply rediscovering everything that already exist.”

Speaker 0 begins with a provocative assertion that everything is a deception, potentially including our entire reality. He brings Neuralink into the discussion as an example, describing it as the chip that “they’re gonna put in everybody’s brain,” noting the media-friendly image but also the unsettling implications. The conversation then turns to the notion that, if such a chip exists and is widely adopted, people might be compelled to get one, with Speaker 0 expressing a willingness to get it himself and Speaker 1 noting a lack of enthusiasm for electricity. Speaker 0 acknowledges a fascination with the subject and expresses interest in interviewing someone with insider knowledge, mentioning that Neuralink’s promise initially centers on practical breakthroughs—specifically to help paralyzed people move again and to enable the blind to see. He concedes that these are positive-sounding aims and seems to acknowledge their validity, but his reaction shifts when he considers the broader implications. Upon learning that the chip’s capabilities could extend beyond restoring sensory functions, Speaker 0 questions whether it could also be used to project an entire false reality inside a person’s mind. He explains that he had conversations with doctors about the technology and cites interviews with notable figures to illustrate his point. He mentions Andrew Huberman and Ben Carson as people he spoke with, and indicates that they arrived at a similar conclusion: the technology would not only influence vision but could also affect emotion, touch, smell, and taste. This leads to his overarching concern that, if the chip can manipulate these experiences, humanity could be on the cusp of a total false reality. The core claim emphasized throughout is that Neuralink, while potentially capable of restoring certain sensory and motor functions, could ultimately enable the construction or projection of a comprehensive, artificial reality within a person’s mind. Speaker 0 reiterates the idea that one’s entire life could become a false reality due to the capabilities of such neural interfacing, highlighting the unsettling possibility that the boundary between genuine perception and manufactured experience might vanish. The discussion remains focused on the speculative, but provocative, implications of brain-implant technology extending far beyond its initial therapeutic promises.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, resulting in uncontrollable rage among the Hutu crowd. It is revealed that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions in the 1950s. The challenge at the time was transmitting these brainwaves accurately. With advancements in technology like transistors and microprocessors, the practical application of precise control brainwaves became possible.

Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates. Speaker 0: I recorded an edition of a show for iconic.com called Legacy, relating the content of my books to today. A central concept is what I labeled in the 1990s as problem reaction solution, also known as a false flag. The idea is to create a situation—war, terrorist attack, banking collapse, or something similar—then present the version of the problem you want the public to believe to provoke outrage and urgency. Then you covertly create the problem, evoke a public reaction, and openly offer the solutions you’ve already prepared. Speaker 0: Nine-Eleven is given as a classic example: attack on New York and Washington, blame Arab terrorists, claim Osama bin Laden and the Taliban orchestrated it. The reaction is “do something,” followed by the invasions of Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern countries. In response to Bondi Beach, the point is made that representatives may not truly represent the people, and a global network I call the global cult drives dystopia through digital AI means, operating through governments, intelligence agencies, and militaries worldwide. Even leaders such as presidents or prime ministers may not serve their nations’ people but the global cult’s interests. Speaker 0: One center of this global cult’s operations is Israel, established in 1948 for that purpose. The claim is that leadership claiming to represent Jewish people operates for the global cult rather than Jewish communities, and may even sacrifice Jewish lives to advance its aims through problem reaction solution. The Gaza crisis since October 7 is described as the world’s large-scale trauma, with statements about the Israeli government’s psychopathy and a super psychopathology characterized by a complete lack of empathy and deletion of compassion. The question is whether such leaders can truly have compassion for fellow Jews if they are driven by a broader agenda. Speaker 0: Regarding October 7, the Gaza border fence is described as the world’s most defended border, with sensors so sensitive that even a small animal would be detected. Yet Hamas breached the fence in multiple places, and there were reports of a stand-down by the Israeli defense forces, allowing the cross-border assault and hostage-taking. The outcome, it’s claimed, was used by Netanyahu to justify mass slaughter and destruction in Gaza, with talk of plans to take over land and expel Palestinians. The narrative then shifts to global perception, with some Christian Zionists wavering in support due to Gaza atrocities, and Israel allegedly funding influence campaigns to restore its global image, including money to American politicians and media interests. Speaker 0: When a new attack—Bondi Beach in Australia—occurs, Netanyahu publicly notes a Jewish man disarmed one of the attackers (though a Muslim did so), before retracting. This is presented as part of a pattern: calls to crack down on anti-Semitism, equating anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. The claim is that the only beneficiary is those who use such events to justify censorship and control of information, while the victims, including Jewish people who died or were injured, gain nothing. Speaker 0: The discussion reiterates that mind-control techniques exist and could drive individuals to commit mass violence without full awareness, referencing mind-control concepts like Manchurian candidates. The speaker urges asking “who benefits?” and considering elements of problem reaction solution and false flags in analyzing events, recognizing that appearances of representation do not guarantee genuine representation. For readers interested in more, the speaker directs to their books and content.

Now when you go up to the high frequencies, the neurons can't follow that high frequency. So there's something special about low frequency sound that actually changes the emotional tone of the people that hear that low frequency sound. This is wild, right? I mean, of course the content of the words matters too, but anyway, there's real neuroscience to support the voice that you were endowed with and that you that you employed for your work. Well, and then also the point then too is it's not the other side is not making a choice. It's an involuntary reaction.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, leading to uncontrollable rage and violence. The speaker reveals that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions, such as rage, fear, and lethargy. In the past, transmitting these brainwaves accurately was challenging, but with advancements in technology, like transistors and microprocessors, it became feasible to apply precise control brainwaves practically.

They discuss how fear and trauma are used to manipulate populations, mentioning CIA programs like MK Ultra. They touch on the origins of the CIA from OSS after WWII, incorporating Nazi techniques. The CIA's initial purpose was espionage, not domestic operations. Operation Paperclip brought Nazi scientists to the US for missile and biological weapons programs. The CIA's actions were against its original charter.

Neurolinguistic programming and occult symbolism are used in music to influence listeners. Harmonics are added to songs to manipulate brain pathways and convey messages. Traumatic experiences are used to create dissociated memories, allowing for hidden programming. Electric shock and harmonics are used to control the mind undetected.

Under the Silver Lake follows Sam, a disillusioned Los Angeles man obsessed with finding meaning in pop culture, looking for messages in song lyrics, movies, and old magazines. When his mysterious neighbor Sarah vanishes, Sam’s investigation reveals that this isn't a standard missing persons case, but a trail of hidden codes and symbols embedded from cereal boxes to Hollywood landmarks. The film presents three discoveries that apparently explain why it was buried. First, the songwriter. Sam meets a man who claims to have written every major hit, not for art but to plant specific frequencies into the public consciousness. The songwriter explains that he has hidden messages in the music and that “codes” exist in songs, movies, and television shows, suggesting that pop culture carries subliminal programming. The songwriter says he created many of the things people care about, noting that when the audience was 15 and rebelling, the real message was not meant for them, and that it’s better to smile, dance, and enjoy the melody because the voice of a generation and its elders is effectively guiding what people hear. Second, the elite’s exit. Sam uncovers proof that powerful industry figures are preparing for a global transition, constructing massive bunkers to wait out what’s coming. The dialogue references a shelter underground and tombs for kings, implying that only the richest people can participate in a ceremonial survival and ascent. Third, the pop culture map. Sam realizes the entertainment industry forms a vast, interconnected map designed to distract the public and keep attention away from a hidden system moving in another direction. The codes he uncovers are real, not fictional. By the film’s end, Sam finds his missing neighbor in an underground bunker with members of a secret society, told that they hide while attempting to ascend like gods. The movie asserts that Hollywood’s glamour is a carefully constructed mirage masking something darker, with landmarks like the Griffith Observatory serving as navigational markers for an elite infrastructure. An owl mascot represents the secret group that controls the industry—the owl as the silent guardian of its secrets. The film connects this owl symbolism to real-life organizations and alleged Hollywood celebrity involvement cited by sources like the New York Post’s claimed members list. It argues that films are tools of influence used to maintain elite status while the public remains distracted by screens, and that revealing these truths would undermine the industry’s power. The most guarded secret is the underground bunkers where the missing neighbor has chosen to reside with the secret society, who believe they are part of a quiet ascension plan, awaiting a global transition while the rest of the world remains distracted by entertainment. The speaker then draws a parallel to Eyes Wide Shut, suggesting Stanley Kubrick’s film was altered after his death to suppress its exposé, and claims that Eyes Wide Shut was a warning the industry did not want the public to see.

The transcript describes a supposed classified project named Operation Spectrum. According to the speaker, the project employed ultrasonic and electromagnetic frequencies to subtly influence people's thoughts, emotions, and actions, all without their realization. The core claim is that certain frequencies have been found to produce a spectrum of psychological and physiological responses, ranging from mild anxiety and discomfort to calmness and even compliance. By adjusting the frequency output, the system could render a crowd restless, focused, or subdued, all without the need for spoken words or overt commands. The description emphasizes that these effects could be harnessed to modulate group behavior in real time, shaping collective moods and reactions without the individuals involved being aware that they are being influenced. The speaker notes that the technique operates by manipulating the acoustic and electromagnetic environment to steer crowd dynamics, rather than by direct messaging or visible intervention. A range of potential deployment scenarios is outlined for this capability. It is suggested that the technology could be used on mobile emitters or devices embedded in infrastructure, including streetlights, traffic cameras, and even cell towers. The implication is that these emitters would be capable of influencing entire neighborhoods simultaneously, creating broad-scale psychological and behavioral shifts without notice. The claimed applications involve using these frequencies to calm crowds or disperse them, depending on the desired outcome, and to do so without any force or overt coercion. The speaker frames the concept as a theoretical possibility, indicating that the mechanism could operate covertly to produce the intended crowd-level effects through environmental modulation rather than through direct speech or visible persuasion. Toward the end, the speaker interrupts the hypothetical discussion with a qualifying remark: “Let's just go ahead and say this is a joke for entertainment. If, you know,” signaling that the preceding description is being presented in a hypothetical or performative context rather than as a factual assertion. The phrase serves to acknowledge the speculative framing of the material while preserving the stated content of the described capabilities.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, resulting in uncontrollable rage among the Hutu crowd. This was made possible by the discovery of specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions. In the past, transmitting these brainwaves accurately was a challenge, but with advancements in technology, such as transistors and microprocessors, it became feasible to apply precise control brainwaves in practical situations.

In this video, the concept of subliminal advertising and its impact on people's behavior is explored. The speakers discuss various examples and opinions on the subject, highlighting how subliminal messages can manipulate and influence consumers by targeting their unconscious desires and fears. The controversy surrounding subliminal advertising and its effectiveness is also touched upon. Additionally, the video delves into topics such as media manipulation, mind control, and the use of video news releases as propaganda. It discusses the impact of media consolidation on the diversity of opinions and the manipulation of public opinion through fear tactics. The role of technology, including HAARP, in influencing behavior is also mentioned. The video concludes by emphasizing the importance of individual freedom of thought and the necessity for critical thinking in today's media-saturated world.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, it spiraled out of control, leading to uncontrollable rage and violence. The speaker reveals that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions in the 1950s. The challenge at the time was transmitting these brainwaves accurately. However, with advancements in technology such as transistors and microprocessors, the practical application of precise control brainwaves became possible.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, resulting in uncontrollable rage among the Hutu crowd. This was made possible by the discovery of specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions. In the past, transmitting these brainwaves accurately was a challenge, but with advancements in technology, such as transistors and microprocessors, it became feasible to apply precise control brainwaves effectively.

The speaker asserts that all computer screens are blue-lit because the original technology emerged from a government program associated with Operation Paperclip. He says this program originated at Tulane Neurology and Tulane Neurosurgery in the mid-20th century, where the CIA conducted experiments on monkeys involving drilling into the skull, placing wires into the thalamus, and applying electricity to observe behavioral changes. One participant, Professor Delgado, reportedly proposed wireless control after seeing that wired devices could alter behavior. Delgado allegedly demonstrated wireless control in monkeys and bulls using RFID chips and semiconductors. The speaker claims the CIA then expanded the concept to light and screens, suggesting that electromagnetic radiation through screens can influence behavior, and asserts that this is why computer screens operate at certain frequencies. He connects this idea to a meeting arranged by a patent attorney who allegedly safeguarded the interests of Google and Meta to enable control over people’s activities. In a broader backstory, the speaker asserts that the original idea behind this development began with the CIA and traces it back to the Mafia in Las Vegas. He contends the Mafia wanted to build a new city in a desert, enclosed it, blacked out windows, and invented blue-lit slot machines. They supposedly discovered that money could be extracted more efficiently by offering free alcohol, which then inspired the CIA to initiate the program. The speaker emphasizes that this chain of events links Operation Paperclip, the CIA’s research, and modern tech platforms. He references Bobby Kennedy in connection with the topic, and notes his medical school background at LSU.

The speaker discusses an operation that aimed to incite conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi groups. However, things escalated quickly, leading to uncontrollable rage among the Hutu crowd. It is revealed that researchers discovered specific brainwaves that control our actions and emotions, such as rage, fear, and lethargy, back in the 1950s. The challenge at that time was transmitting these brainwaves accurately. With advancements in technology like transistors and microprocessors, the practical application of precise control brainwaves became possible.

- Five years ago, I stopped watching TV. - I felt really brainwashed at that time. - Now I still have cable TV. - And whenever I accidentally switch on a TV channel, it's like an instant wave of disgust rolling over me. - You know, the human eye recognizes 24 pts as a flawless movement. - That's why most movies are shot in 24 frames. - And they replaced some of the frames with different pictures, text, information. - And they found out the human eye doesn't notice it at all, but the human brain recognizes it. - Nowadays, TVs have a refresh rate of 100, 200, 300 frames per second. - Can you imagine how much additional information you can put into that without you even noticing?

The speaker discusses the moon landing and presents a theory linking it to Stanley Kubrick. They reference a photograph of Kubrick during the filming of 2001: A Space Odyssey in England at what they call “the studios NASA East,” noting that Kubrick is walking with a group of people who are identified, except for one man in the row behind them. The speaker identifies this unidentified man as Louis Jolyon West and asserts that West is “west of MK Ultra,” a claim about West’s involvement in mind control. The speaker states that West was a specialist in mind control and in creating cults, and that a large portion of his information has not reached the public. They claim West worked extensively with UFO people, witches, and Satanists in order to create subcultures. They assert that Jolyon West ran one of the free clinics in a counterculture area of San Francisco, clandestinely, and that Charles Manson was receiving treatment there with the Manson family. The speaker further asserts that Jolyon West was involved with Jack Ruby and Sirhan Sirhan. They also claim West was involved with Whitley Strieber, the author associated with UFO topics. Additionally, the speaker says Jolyon West was involved with the Stanford Research Institute’s remote viewing experiments and connected to numerous other activities. Finally, the speaker ties these claims together by suggesting that if the unidentified man behind Kubrick in that photograph is indeed Jolyon West, West’s involvement extends to “creating the belief system around” the moon landing. The overarching claim is that Jolyon West’s extensive network and activities—ranging from MKUltra-associated mind control to connections with notable figures and counterculture phenomena—played a role in shaping public belief about the moon landing.

Stanley Kubrick's last movie, Eyes Wide Shut, allegedly led to his assassination because it exposed the secret lives of wealthy elites. The film depicts their involvement in blood sacrifices, murder, rape, pornography, and killing, all hidden behind a facade of respectability. These elites appear as important figures in nice suits, but are murderous behind the scenes. The title, Eyes Wide Shut, refers to the American public's ignorance towards the true nature of politicians and religious leaders, who are essentially the same. The speaker urges viewers to watch the movie.

Doctor Shiva Yadurig presents an architecture for looking at adrenochrome, promising to arm the audience with chemistry. He defines adrenochrome as a stable oxidation product of adrenaline, noting that this is different from adrenaline's original structure. He contrasts adrenaline with adrenochrome, highlighting that adrenaline has a benzene ring, while adrenochrome’s benzene ring is folded on itself. He focuses on the question of understanding adrenochrome in the context of reports that people are taking a child, frightening it, and then torturing it to create adrenochrome. He states that, to his understanding, and based on those who know more about this than he does, adrenochrome is being created by taking these kids, under fight-or-flight stress, and then torturing them. He claims to have likely the first explanation of how this is going on at the molecular systems level, and he notes that this explanation would not come from certain public figures. He explains that adrenaline is released in response to a stressful, exciting, dangerous, or threatening situation, giving an example of a bobcat chasing a mouse, where adrenaline is produced. Yadurig highlights that oxidative stress, which is different from the initial stress, is highly correlated with anxiety. He cites a paper linking oxidative stress and anxiety, stating that anxiety causes the accumulation of reactive oxygen species such as O2-. He asserts that one needs stress and anxiety to create an adrenochrome, and that just stress alone will not suffice; you have to have both. He describes this as extreme torture and asks listeners to follow along: with just stress you don’t get adrenochrome, you need the stress and the anxiety. To illustrate, he uses a predator-prey scenario: the lion chasing the zebra represents adrenaline release; the torture or anxious phase represents the anxiety. He posits that this combination releases a superoxide, a reactive oxygen species, and that both components are required to produce adrenochrome. He suggests that longer or more severe torture would yield more of this species and more adrenochrome. The overarching claim is that he has a basis for understanding adrenochrome synthesis that aligns with the described torture narratives. He frames this as a basis for a molecular systems biology and biochemistry explanation for what people have said about fear and stress. He concludes by promising to continue taking a systems approach to explain such phenomena, emphasizing that this is beyond left or right and is a molecular systems biology approach. He signs off thanking the audience and wishing well.

The speaker questions why people believe what they believe, suggesting that trusted sources may be deceiving them. He focuses on Hollywood, where he worked as a stunt performer and coordinator, and how the entertainment industry influences people. He recounts a catastrophic injury that led him to a pelvic floor therapist who claimed to treat victims of satanic rituals, which sparked his "awakening" and questioning of his reality. He researched online, finding that a small group of people control the narratives in media companies like Disney. He learned about the CIA's involvement in Hollywood, referencing a FOIA document stating motion pictures were used for psychological warfare. He cites Operation Paperclip, MK Ultra, and the CIA's Entertainment Liaison Office as examples. Another stuntman shares his disillusionment with Hollywood, seeing an agenda in every movie and finding reality more interesting. He mentions the CIA's involvement with Disney buying swampland in Florida. The discussion touches on mind control, desensitization to violence, and occult topics in media. Liz Crokin, a journalist, is referenced for her reporting on Pizzagate and alleged code words in John Podesta's emails. The speakers urge critical thinking and questioning the messages in media to discern the truth. They express hope for a future media landscape that promotes compassion and truth.