reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It's important narratives to this point, to our research, in my opinion. We have the Pontificate College, Josephinum, where Joseph comes over to The USA from Germany in 1867. Three years later, he becomes a priest and has his own church within a few months. And he gets to buy the house next door, of course, to support 12 orphans. And do we all know about the orphans at this point? Possibly a repopulation tactic that was going on in the eighteen hundreds. It's very interesting. Was it only 12 orphans, or was this one of the places that they would send the orphans through to get them into society? Because who would ever question Joseph the priest from the eighteen hundreds? You know, the guy that just randomly shows up from Germany, has all the money ready to buy houses somehow to support orphans. It all checks out, of course. Simple stuff for Joseph. This was known as the Saint Joseph Orphan Asylum. It grew so rapidly for some weird and, of course, very random reason that five years after it began, Joseph moved road. That going a little that going to this operation the worked. It would go through churches. They would bring a manager type over from Europe. Call them a priest. Give them a house. Give them the resources to run these operations, purchasing new buildings with ease to run the program. So not only do you new facility Joseph was just finding and saying was his. I wanna wasn't building anything. He was given these buildings. They were already there from the previous civilization. So the new building gave the orphans a training in the trades. So this Joseph guy was obviously sent with a purpose, to repopulate repopulate and teach to a brand new society, one that didn't have any skills. This right here is how you reset a society's technology level. The teacher is never in charge of what the students learn. This Joseph character is a teacher of a class. He is not the principal of the school. There are many schools. He is clearly taking direction as to what the students of the new society will learn. There were many classes like this one all over the country happening simultaneously. This was an operation. This went on for twelve years with zero backstory, finds the Collegium, Josephinum. This massive college is just found and ready to roll. No clue where the money came from. No mention of how many men were needed to build this place. Just found it. And its first class of 23 men began. It's unbelievable. This is one of the most important stories to our research in my opinion because it shows exactly how the operation took place. It's actually laying it all out there and shows us exactly how they repopulated these regions in The USA. It shows us the operation with the orphans, the teaching programs, and this was our base for our technological knowledge. Whoever controlled this operation from the top has all of the technology from the previous civilization and is controlling what technology we get to have, and they've clearly been doing this for a very long time. And for anyone that's on the fence, we have the Saint Vincent's Infant Asylum located in Baltimore where we have tunnels under the ground. This infant asylum was in use in the mid eighteen hundreds during the same time period as German transferred Joseph. And what do you know? In the early nineteen hundreds, the operation was done, and they declined new orphans. 1941, they changed us to apartments. And in 2015, they light it up and try to destroy it with a It gets more and more obvious if you're still on the fence. Let's go even deeper. We have the Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum located in Galveston, Texas, where they tell us that this one is haunted. Now I've talked about hauntings before briefly. I'm not gonna say that there aren't any hauntings, but when it comes to these old world buildings, I think it was a tactic to keep people away from them. So we have yet again another orphan operation going on in the mid eighteen hundreds, and I'm just gonna let you know that this is going on and on and on. There were so many orphan operations going on in the mid eighteen hundreds because this was how they were repopulating these cities. So where were all these kids' parents? Is this where a lot of our families originated from? Is this why the family trees in The USA almost all end around the same time period? We are told hundreds of fire stories through the first 52 episodes. We know that that is the key and the nod that it's a building that was constructed by the previous civilization. The Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum. For anyone wondering where the parents of these orphans were, you might wanna check the other asylum, the insane asylum, because they were not going along with the reset. Here's a graph showing that the insane asylums are disappearing over time, and I wonder why. Good thing they cared so much about us in 1955 and 1965 because surely that was the fix. Oh. Oh, it wasn't? And then a fire had devastated the Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum in 1875. If anyone is still on the fence, there is room over here to get off the fence. And honestly, who would wanna sit on top of a fence anyway? So we have Ohio, Baltimore, Texas. We have all these towns and cities being repopulated. Brand new people, brand new social structures, brand new mindsets, and resetting what people are taught. This all happened around a hundred and fifty years ago. So this is all very new. This isn't thousands of years ago. Then we have another very interesting aspect of this in Germany. During the same exact time period, and remember, we also have good old Joseph of their family's home and tell them what to think, and then test them on it. Failing the test will then lower your self esteem, putting a social pressure on children to agree with this new way of taught, or they will be called dumb and get an f. This is an operation. It's all connected, and it's designed to enslave the world's population. Year after year, we are all taught a false narrative. We've all been brainwashed in the thinking that you are either smart or dumb based on a curriculum that holds zero value in the real world. Now who knows if this Frederick Froebel was even a real character, but they do admit that kindergarten starts in Germany around the exact same time period that we're talking about, the mid eighteen hundreds. So I wanted to tie it all in with the rest of the world. This is a worldwide operation. This is not just The USA. We have a lot of things in The USA being controlled through Germany during this time period, especially the education aspect of it. And I wanna point out that, yes, we have borders and division now. We have so many countries in the world, and everyone is separated. And you're unable to travel to other lands unless you have a piece of paper that is registered and checked at the checkpoints. But who's to say that there even was a border in the previous civilization? Were there so called elected leaders controlling everyone, deciding what we can and cannot do? Could they have had a truly free life where they were able to travel wherever they want freely and not feel like they're invading someone else's territory? I would say, in my opinion, this was the world that was here before the reset. And something happened where this past civilization was wiped out, and their technology was stolen by a group, and some of it

The speaker shares their experience of being falsely accused and arrested for speaking out against COVID-19 restrictions in Switzerland. They were not armed and had no psychiatric history, but were still forced into closed psychiatry. The authorities gave them a choice: stay in the psychiatric hospital for 6 weeks or go home and continue working while taking medication. They were monitored through blood checks to ensure compliance. The speaker criticizes these methods as reminiscent of Soviet and GDR practices. They clarify that while the authorities considered them "corona insane," they disagreed. This incident occurred in Switzerland in April 2020.

Speaker 0: We have just exposed that the United States National Archives, NARA's cartographic branch, is missing the documents, the blueprints and the rest, to hundreds of federally funded structures, and the records are completely missing. Speaker 1: NARA gave us the master list, granting behind-the-scenes access to their internal documentation and the official records of the US government's construction records. The master list shows every single federally held architectural record, including whether they have the original blueprints, construction drawings, ledgers, and documentation for buildings funded, commissioned, or maintained by the US government. Out of 21,400 structures in the master list, the new custom house in New Orleans, built in 1849, appears; there were reportedly two earlier ones—the first customs house designed in 1809 and replaced around 1819. Around 1819, they say, this worked for decades. Speaker 0: Can you Speaker 1: believe this? This is the mainstream narrative for you. Around 1819. That doesn’t work anymore. They try to tell us all about the thirteen hundreds, but they can't figure out what happened in the eighteenth hundreds from a supposed federally funded project. I’ve had enough of their stories. And then a third structure arrives on the scene. It’s a palace—the current US customs house in New Orleans—which the master list identifies as one of the oldest and most important federally funded buildings, a major work of architecture commissioned by the US federal government in the 1800s. This is a granite building with a grand marble hall. Yet the National Archives holds zero documents on its construction—zero. Not one document. This is 1849. This is not 1492. This is only, like, four or five people ago. Only 177 years. And the Marble Hall, a Greek revival style room, is described in that master list as a centerpiece, yet the National Archives does not hold a single construction document. Let’s go further. A federally commissioned building tied to record group 77, the US Army Corps of Engineers, falls under strict federal record-keeping laws requiring preservation of original blueprints, engineering drawings, specifications, inspection reports, and construction ledgers. The master list classifies it under CWMF (centralized waterway management file) and consolidated file 35, signaling that detailed blueprints and primary documentation are missing or no longer exist as standalone records. All of this proves that the documentation was expected to exist, yet there is not a single original construction record. This undermines their claim that the structure was actually constructed in 1849 as described. Zero documentation. No ledgers, no blueprints, no logs. Where are these receipts to their story? Remember from episode 160, NARA told us that if it is missing from the master list, they do not have it in their holdings. NARA is the legal custodian of all permanent federal records; permanent records are required to be preserved in NARA holdings. If the records are not within the master list, they were destroyed, never transferred, misplaced, or never existed. And that last option would make verification of construction history impossible. I’ve begun asking for FOIAs. I sent one on 12/01/2025 for the Alexander Hamilton US Custom House at 1 Bowling Green, New York. They have twenty business days under FOIA law to reply after status received; they’ve responded, and I’ll keep you updated. This structure was not within the master list, so it is publicly funded. We’re just getting started today. Welcome to episode 162 of my lunch break. If you’re new, welcome. Thanks to sponsors on Patreon. The master list is provided, and the episode can be purchased with a USB containing the master list. The list shows that in New York, New York, the master list contains only nine structures in its catalog at the National Archives, which is insane given New York’s hundreds of federally funded buildings. We have exposed that NARA’s cartographic branch is missing documents, blueprints, and the rest for hundreds of federally funded structures, to the point that they don’t even name the buildings in the master list. This is a massive exposure. Why hasn’t any mainstream scholar challenged these narratives? A systematic documentation failure is suggested: not having the Alexander Custom House listed, and other structures like Federal Hall, Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, and James A. Farley Post Office are also not on the master list. Nothing from these structures has survived, or, as I believe, they never existed. We’ve shown emails where archivists need to reconsider their job. There is something massive going on, and the history we’re told is unverified. The master list goes back to 1705 (Fort Plans in Costco Bay, Maine). The first thing we find is a fortress in the middle of the water with no documentation proving construction in 1705. A map from 1720 shows an old world palace off the coast of Maine, contradicting the notion that materials could be shipped a mile offshore in the 1700s. The master list may reveal incredible structures in North America as we continue from the bottom up.

The speaker presents a narrative linking mid-19th to early-20th century orphanage operations in the United States with a broader “reset” of society and a transfer of technology from a prior civilization, routed through German origins and networks. Columbus, Ohio: Saint Joseph Orphan Asylum - Joseph comes to the USA from Germany in 1867, becomes a priest three years later, and acquires a house next to support 12 orphans. The orphans are described as a repopulation mechanism, with Joseph and the operation expanding rapidly as “the Saint Joseph Orphan Asylum.” - Five years after it began, Joseph moved the operation closer to the railroad to facilitate dispersal of orphans across the country. The operation is said to function through churches, bringing a manager type from Europe, called a priest, with a house and “the resources society.” - The facility is claimed not to have been built anew but to have been given to Joseph; it provided training in trades for the orphans and served as a base for a larger technology transfer. The first class is said to be 23 men, beginning after a twelve-year operation with “zero backstory,” and no explanation of funding or manpower for the college (colligium) named Josephinum. The narration asserts it reveals “exactly how the operation took place” and “how they repopulated these regions in The USA,” with control of technology retained by the top of the operation. Baltimore: Saint Vincent’s Infant Asylum - Mentioned as having tunnels beneath the ground, alongside the Saint Joseph orphan operation. The mid-19th century timing is echoed with early-20th-century changes (decline of new orphans, 1941 transition to apartments, a 2015 fire that failed to destroy it, and a 2018 illegal demolition). Texas: Saint Mary’s Orphan Asylum, Galveston - Described as haunted, part of ongoing mid-19th-century operations with a continuing chain of repopulation and social reorganization. Other notes - The speaker connects multiple orphan operations across Ohio, Baltimore, Texas, and Vermont (Saint Joseph’s Orphanage in Vermont) as part of a coordinated effort to repopulate cities, train a new social order, and determine what future generations learn. - The mid-1800s saw a vast number of orphan operations as a mechanism to repopulate cities; the question is raised about the parents of these orphans and whether they opposed the reset. - The speaker ties German-origin influences to global educational strategies, referencing Kinderbewahrenstalt (Kinder kindergarten) and Friedrich Froebel (named as possibly real or not) to argue that kindergarten-like education was a tactic to shape new social structures, test children, and impose social conformity, with a broader claim of worldwide control. - The Vermont orphanage is linked to horror-film tropes as a source of “narratives,” suggesting a broader pattern of fear used to deter investigation. - Overall, the episode culminates in asserting that more than 5,000,000 American children passed through the orphanage system in the 1900s, with more than 1,600 institutions, partly publicly funded and usually run by religious orders, describing this as evidence of a planned repopulation and technological reset. The speaker asserts this provides factual evidence of when the “reset” happened and strengthens the overarching history across episodes.

The transcript presents a continuous argument that links mid-19th to early-20th-century orphanage operations in the United States and Europe with a larger “reset” of human society by a prior civilization, controlled by a powerful lineage described as Nephilim or giant beings. The core claims are organized around a network of orphanages, educational reforms, and archaeological findings that, taken together, are alleged to reveal a hidden history and deliberate manipulation of civilization. Key points and narrative thread: - Columbus, Ohio, Saint Joseph Orphan Asylum (Saint Joseph College, Pontifical College Josephinum) is described as a pivotal node. Joseph, originally from Germany who arrived in 1867, reportedly became a priest and acquired a house next to support 12 orphans, expanding rapidly. The operation allegedly used the house as a base to train orphans and repopulate society, moving closer to the railroad five years after beginning to facilitate dispersion. - The narrative asserts that these operations were part of a broader repopulation tactic: orphans were funneled through churches, with manager-type figures from Europe (priestly roles) given housing and resources to run programs, acquiring new buildings with ease to support the operation. - The Saint Joseph operation is said to be one example of many similar “orphan trains” and hubs across the country, used to repopulate cities and reset society’s technology level by controlling what the new population learned. The speaker emphasizes that Joseph did not build new facilities but was given existing buildings by a previous civilization, which were then used to train the orphans. - Saint Vincent’s Infant Asylum in Baltimore is cited as another part of the system, with tunnels mentioned under the asylum. The claim is that the operation persisted into the early 20th century, with changes in the use of facilities (e.g., apartments by 1941, a 2015 fire, and an alleged 2018 illegal demolition) used to illustrate a pattern of concealment and erasure. - Saint Mary’s Orphan Asylum in Galveston, Texas is described as another instance of ongoing orphan operations; hauntings are invoked as a tactic to deter investigation. The speaker notes a large number of children passing through the 19th and early 20th-century American orphanage system (over 5 million nationally in the 1900s, peaking early 1900s) and claims the system was religiously run, with hundreds of institutions (over 1,600) partly publicly funded. - The German connection is extended with mention of Kinderbewahrung (kindergarten) and Friedrich Froebel, tying the mid-1800s spread of kindergarten to a broader plan to instill a new social structure in children, implying that education served as a tool for social resetting. - The argument broadens worldwide, noting German influence on education and suggesting borders and travel restrictions were a modern imposition on a world that once had freer movement. The speaker argues that a past civilization’s leaders used these mechanisms to control technology and population, with Joseph’s role as an educator who followed top-down directives. - Archaeological and mythic evidence is invoked to correlate polydactyly (six fingers and six toes) with Nephilim/Giant leaders. Examples include: - Ancient biblical references to giants with six fingers and six toes (Ishbi-Benob) and the Nephilim. - Egyptian mummies and high-status tombs with extra digits; Cahokia Mounds in Illinois with skeletons showing hexadactyly found under a ceremonial/mound context; Adena Mounds and other mound sites with similar findings. - Cherokee, Ute, Paiute, and Choctaw lore describing a Moon People or giants who were leaders or gods, sometimes linked to Nephilim; these stories are presented as corroborating evidence of a global elite of polydactyl giants. - The speaker posits that hands, heads, and feet were removed from old-world statues as deliberate erasures, so as to obscure the leadership of these giants and their role in constructing civilizations and monumental architecture (e.g., pyramids, cathedrals). The Cahokia finds are presented as evidence that Nephilim remained in North America, possibly buried beneath mounds. - The overarching claim is that (a) a powerful Nephilim lineage once ruled globally, (b) they were responsible for technological and cultural leadership, and (c) modern history has been rewritten to erase their presence, with the evidence scattered across orphanage networks, education reform, and archaeological sites. The transcript repeatedly links these threads to claim that a hidden, controlling history has shaped modern society, with six-fingered, giant leaders at the center of a world-spanning reset.

The speaker discusses the similarities between the reactions of citizens living under totalitarianism and those of schizophrenic individuals. They argue that totalitarian societies are built upon delusions, where people regress to a childlike state and surrender control to politicians and bureaucrats. The ruling class, driven by delusions of power, believes they can control society from the top down. The speaker explains that the mass psychosis of totalitarianism begins with the ruling class, who infect the population with this mindset. This is achieved through a method called menticide, which involves manipulating and reorganizing people's emotions. Menticide is described as an old crime against the human mind and spirit, but now systematized.

The speaker argues that government plans to augment or control citizens through bioengineering cannot be done without asking people first, and that the authorities have stated they will not ask. They claim a plan to induce a novel virus and to use weather warfare for manipulation, and they describe a hidden core in secret systems—secret communications and microfluidics for routing blockchain—as sources to ignore or erase. The speaker asserts that the new economy will be a bioeconomy built around cognitive cities, and that people will be compelled to augment in order to get a job or to live in a city, effectively forcing participation. They warn that the same coercive dynamic will be used to push augmentation as was seen with earlier acts of coerced compliance, comparing it to those who took a doughnut or a COVID-19 shot. They reflect on historical oppression, noting that those who resisted in the past were “mowed under” or placed in asylums, and tie this to fear that wireless updates trigger new diseases, linking disease frequency to cellular voltage and individual cell state. The speaker invites listeners to join in, appealing to empathy and humane treatment of fellow humans who are breathing, and states that if others refuse to accept the invitation, it will be because they prioritize their paycheck over the survival of the species. They declare that there will be some who are brave enough to speak out, and that those who do not join are part of a “cult,” insisting there are far fewer of them than of the speakers. They express a personal stance: they do not want to be a cyborg or have insectoid DNA inserted into their body without knowledge, consent, or permission, and say many people have already been convinced by “cute little tattoo and their new bio cyber interface” to feel differently about it. The speaker accuses certain individuals of being eugenicists who will not stop until their mission is achieved, and identifies their primary system for communication and for eliminating others as the core of their operation. They urge others to figure out why this topic isn’t being discussed and to determine if there is a reason that prevents wider understanding. Finally, they condemn the idea of humans tethered to a remote system controlled by the same military entities responsible for widespread harm, and they note that even military personnel have criticized those in power for years.

There's something fishy about the great fires of the 1800s. The official story claims that in Chicago, 17,500 buildings burned, yet almost everyone survived. How is that possible when one theater fire killed 600? It seems more likely that either the death tolls were higher than reported, or the cities were nearly empty, part of a planned demolition of the old world civilization. Looking at other great fires, like London in 1666, New York in 1776, and even more in Canada, the number of deaths is ridiculously low compared to the buildings destroyed. In Toronto, not a single person died while over 100 buildings were lost. The population numbers don't add up either. How could a small population need so many buildings? It's clear we're being lied to.

Speaker 0: They use them for to amplify fear, to boost compliance, and, of course, push those vaccines. Well, joining me now is primary care physician and author of unavoidably unsafe childhood Reconsidered. Doctor Jeff Barky is with us. Doc, it's great to have you back on. Speaker 1: Hey, Grant. Thanks for having me. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: Alright. I know this comes as no surprise, this number, that only fourteen percent of the PCR positive turned out to be COVID in Germany. I would imagine it translates to The United States. But your reaction and now seeing this done by real scientists, real doctors in a real journal of medicine. Speaker 1: Well, there's no surprise by this study. We knew it all along. The PCR test was never designed to detect infection. What it detects is miniscule particles of the RNA virus, and then they would crank up the cycle threshold. They would amplify the test to create positivity. And so the problem is that you could test the side of a table and get a positive result, let alone that we were actually going to treat based on a test result. I was always taught in medical school, we don't treat test results, we treat patients. And that's what I tried to do. And then the government went out of its way to suppress effective repurposed medication, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This was a money game. This was a scam. This was all based on fear. No surprise out of Germany. Speaker 0: You know, I I believe it. And let's not forget because we always talk about the money and the vaccines and big pharma and their ties to government, and I know that was a lot. But let's not forget too. This was weaponized to keep people home so they wouldn't vote for president Trump during during that twenty twenty election. It was all part of the big steal. Speaker 1: These positives, they wanted lots of positives. They didn't want negatives. They wanted positives. Didn't they, doc? Speaker 0: They absolutely did for a variety of reasons. The more you can keep people in fear, the more likely it is they're gonna follow your directive. We've never seen anything like this before. The government imposing its will upon free citizens. They closed churches. They closed mom and pop stores. They forced healthy people to stay indoors, and they closed down hospitals and told sick people to stay away. I've never seen anything like that happen before. The sad part here, Grant, is I'm not clear that the American people learned their lesson. And when the government comes around and does this again, I just hope enough of us will stand up this time and say, hell no. Well

The speaker describes over forty years of work with psychiatrists and notes that the voices schizophrenics hear are not true hallucinations. He argues that these voices follow very specific, predictable patterns—about 23 of them—and that frontline clinicians can observe them without advanced lab equipment. He contends that psychiatry did not originate the idea of a chemical imbalance as the cause of schizophrenia; rather, it was devised by Eli Lilly in the 1970s when there was no clear explanation for the voices. According to him, the chemical imbalance theory was created to provide a cause and to avoid looking foolish, and it required labs and extensive disproving to challenge. He claims that those who first proposed the chemical imbalance theory could not support it with solid evidence, and that only a few university researchers outside the so-called psychiatric establishment began to question it, finding no chemical imbalance and admitting they did not even know what the brain’s chemical balance should be. He asserts that there have been no studies confirming a chemical imbalance as the cause of schizophrenia and that the theory was fabricated to appear explanatory. The speaker then shifts to the nature of the voices themselves, describing them as consistently negative: they are insulting, abusive, destructive, anti-religious, and hostile toward religion and spirituality, including a dislike of the Bible and preachers, and they reject the Twenty-Third Psalm. He claims the voices foster and create negative emotion, which is the reason they produce rotten statements to the person hearing them—suggesting that the voices aim to undermine self-worth and provoke despair. According to the speaker, when people hear these voices and are attacked by them, their energy level drops to nothing after the voices leave, and they do not notice the decline in energy. They observe that energy was not used during the attack and wonder where it went. The speaker posits a one-to-one correspondence between the appearance of the voices and the vanishing of energy, concluding that the voices “take” emotional energy in this way. He asserts that the voices survive on negative emotional energy, turning emotional state negative before they can be sustained by it.

When treatment was being suppressed, it should have been recognized as a "racket." Johns Hopkins University, named for Johns Hopkins who popularized hydroxychloroquine for malaria, ironically turned on its namesake by saying hydroxychloroquine is dangerous. The CDC used to be the US Malaria Suppression Program, which advocated for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. The speaker finds the audacity of the "criminals" shocking, as well as the public's blindness to information. Society has been conditioned to accept a fear-based narrative without question, like hiding under school desks during nuclear attacks. This instilled fear, allowing people to respond to authoritative impulses. People have been habituated to believe that if authorities architect the fear and tell you what to do, you do it. If society stopped living in fear, the signal couldn't transmit.

The speaker questions the mainstream narrative of great fires worldwide, suggesting they were demolition projects of pre-1776 buildings in sparsely populated cities. The 1871 Chicago fire, which supposedly destroyed 17,500 buildings with few casualties, is compared to 9/11, where far fewer buildings resulted in thousands of deaths. This discrepancy suggests either a massive underreporting of deaths or a low initial population. The speaker highlights other fires, including the Great Fire of London (1666) and the Great Fire of New York (1776), noting the low death tolls despite widespread destruction. Fires in Paris, Texas (1916), Toronto (1904), and Montreal (1852) are cited as further examples of this pattern. The speaker contrasts these historical fires with the 2023 Maui fire, where the death toll was significantly higher relative to the number of buildings destroyed. The speaker believes the world population in the early 1800s was near zero, and these fires were deliberate attacks to hide the past. The Great Fire of Detroit (1805), Phoenix (1916), Miami (1901), and Houston (1912) are mentioned as further examples of fires with few or no deaths.

Many massive, perfectly constructed palaces and cathedrals worldwide, such as Milan Cathedral and Windsor Castle, lack toilets, suggesting mainstream history omits crucial information. The speaker claims these structures were repurposed by a later civilization that didn't understand their original function. They argue that if the original builders could construct such complex buildings, they could have also designed sewer systems. The speaker suggests that ancient civilizations like Rome and Greece had advanced plumbing that disappeared, indicating a reset in the timeline. Basic inventions and discoveries resurfaced in the 1700s and 1800s, implying old-world technology was being reintroduced. The speaker believes these structures were not designed for long-term habitation but as energy machines, built with sacred geometry and materials like granite and quartz for resonance and healing. Organs were removed or altered, and stained glass windows provided color therapy. The speaker compares cathedral floor plans to circuit boards, with features like central nodes, capacitors, and corridors. The Chartres Cathedral's floor resembles a resonator, suggesting these structures generated bioelectric responses. The speaker believes the destruction of organs in the 1800s was intended to shut down these machines. The speaker argues that modern toilets are unhygienic due to still water harboring bacteria and causing diseases like Legionnaire's. They recommend closing the lid before flushing, flushing daily, cleaning with vinegar and baking soda, and keeping toothbrushes away from toilets. The speaker concludes that the absence of toilets in old palaces was intentional, as the previous civilization prioritized cleanliness and health.

The transcript presents a wide-ranging discussion surrounding alleged global control schemes, pandemic responses, and political voices that challenge mainstream narratives. Key points repeatedly asserted across speakers include: - Quarantine camps and mandatory isolation: Several speakers describe unvaccinated people being quarantined in regional facilities or camps, with police enforcing removal from homes and controlling movement. Quoted moments include claims of being told “from higher up where to take you” and references to being sent to Howard Springs, with entries about bracelets, police checkpoints, and long-term confinement in small cells. One account describes the experience as “inhumane,” like being imprisoned. - Legal authority for quarantine: Speakers contend there are laws and public health powers allowing mandatory quarantine in noncompliant populations, and note that states or authorities could isolate people against their will, sometimes with penalties for noncompliance. - FEMA camps and the “new world order” (NWO): There are persistent claims that FEMA camps exist or were planned as part of a broader agenda to detain large numbers of healthy people, with rhetoric about a “new world order” that would be permanent and tyrannical. The dialogue connects these ideas to a coordinated global power structure. - The “new world order” narrative and global elites: Multiple speakers describe a group of wealthy elites who allegedly seek to depopulate the world and establish a top-down authoritarian regime. References are made to depopulation schemes, the Georgia Guidestones, and statements by Rockefeller and Gates-adjacent figures. The idea that the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, and the World Bank are part of a coordinated effort to impose a new global order recurs. - Warp speed vaccines and public health policy: A central claim is that the vaccine rollout was rushed (warp speed) to enable a broader economic reset and to justify lockdowns; vaccines are described as instruments used to control populations, with assertions that they would be administered under emergency use authorization unless fully FDA-approved. The defense of vaccine mandates is rejected by some speakers, who instead celebrate Trump for opposing mandates and for providing an option to refuse vaccination without being forced into quarantine camps. - Trump’s role and political realignments: Trump is portrayed as opposing mandates, opposing the military–industrial complex, and opposing censorship. Speakers credit him with halting or slowing the NWO’s preferred timeline and with defunding or challenging global institutions seen as part of the plan. Trump’s promotion of hydroxychloroquine and other early treatment considerations is discussed as part of his resistance to a mandated, centralized approach. - Media control and “fake news”: The transcript alleges that mainstream media are a propaganda arm (“mockingbird” operations) used to push state narratives, suppress dissent, and manipulate public opinion. Trump’s confrontations with the press are framed as part of dismantling this control. - COVID-19 lockdowns, surveillance, and social control: The dialogue claims lockdowns created a controlled, surveilled society, with contact tracing, restricted movement, and the normalization of authoritarian measures. The supposed transition to a “new normal” is described as a gradual, incremental shift toward permanent restrictions and biometric tracking systems. - Public activism and awakening: Speakers claim that the pandemic and related policies awakened large portions of the population—particularly conservative, Christian, and Republican sectors—to the alleged conspiracy. They suggest that open discussion, social media, and political action have expanded, reducing fear and encouraging resistance to mandates and censorship. - References to sources and figures: The conversation cites a range of sources and personalities, including Chad Vivas (an artist whose work is presented as revealing or countering the NWO narrative), General Michael Flynn, and Donald Trump. It also mentions broader associations with organizations like the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and the World Economic Forum as part of the alleged framework of control. - Historical and hypothetical mechanisms: Several speakers compare contemporary events to past episodes (e.g., Patriot Act, surveillance state) and to imagined blueprints (e.g., “lockstep” scenarios, digital IDs, vaccine passports, biometric tattoos). They discuss potential future crises as opportunities to solidify control, while asserting that public awareness and resistance have disrupted or weakened those plans. - Closing notes and visuals: The transcript closes with references to art and media promoting the narrative, including paintings and social media posts linked to the movement, and emphasizes ongoing themes of awakening, resistance, and civic engagement against what is portrayed as an ongoing global plan.

In the early 1800s, insane asylums were used to silence those who didn't follow the narrative or spoke about the old world reset. Massive structures like the Central Lunatic Asylum in Ohio and Columbia State Hospital in Ohio were repurposed as detention centers for truth-speakers. St. Vincent Hospital in St. Louis, supposedly built in one year, was likely repurposed too. These asylums were used to suppress anyone who talked about the reset.

The speaker discusses a narrative centered on orphanages and institutional networks in mid-19th to early-20th century America, tying them to a broader theory of societal repopulation and technological control. In Columbus, Ohio, he highlights the Pontificial College, Josephinum, noting that Joseph came from Germany in 1867, became a priest three years later, and quickly established a church and purchased a house next door to support 12 orphans. He questions whether these were truly "12 orphans" or part of a repopulation tactic designed to place orphans into society, suggesting Joseph, as a priest, was instrumental in directing operations that would seed a new social order. The narrative framework describes the Saint Joseph orphan asylum as growing rapidly, then relocating five years after it began to be closer to the railroad to aid distribution of recipients nationwide. The speaker asserts this paragraph of admission reveals how the operation functioned: through churches, with a manager-type from Europe referred to as a priest, given housing and resources to run the program, and with the ability to purchase new buildings easily. He ties this to a larger pattern of orphan trains and hubs where children were dropped off and integrated into society, implying a deliberate and ongoing repopulation program with Joseph at the center. The speaker emphasizes that Joseph did not build new facilities but was given existing structures, which were then used to provide training in trades to orphans. He characterizes Joseph as a teacher in a class rather than a principal, suggesting that higher-level directives determined what the students would learn. He mentions other similar operations across the country, describing a twelve-year span of activity with “zero backstory” and the sudden appearance of the collegium, Josephinum, a sizable college whose funding source and manpower are not detailed. The implication is that those at the top controlled both technology and education, preserving technology from a "previous civilization." Further evidence is cited: Saint Vincent’s infant asylum in Baltimore, with tunnels beneath the ground, active in the mid-1800s alongside German-linked operations. By the early 1900s, the pattern shifts to decline new orphans, and in 1941 the operation allegedly changes to apartments; in 2015 a building was lit up and destroyed by a fire, which failed, and in 2018 the building was allegedly illegally demolished without a permit. Additional locations are mentioned, including Saint Mary’s Orphan Asylum in Galveston, Texas, presented as haunted and part of the broader network. The speaker notes that thousands of children passed through these orphanages in the 19th and early 20th centuries, with over 5,000,000 American children passing through the system in the 1900s, culminating in a claim that there were more than 1,600 such institutions nationwide. The discussion then shifts to Germany, referencing the Kinderbewahrenstalt (kindergarten) and Frederick Froebel, proposing that kindergarten beginnings align with the same mid-19th-century period and suggesting a worldwide operation influencing education. The speaker connects these threads to a broader thesis about a past civilization and a reset of technology and borders. He mentions a fundraiser for medical debt, and asserts that the Chicago Tunnel Company (sold in 1959) and a network of underground tunnels under Chicago connect to earlier eras, implying hidden histories tied to tunnels and past civilizations. He concludes by urging readers to consider whether tunnels and past technologies were repurposed or erased by those who control current narratives.

The speaker traces a pattern of hidden messages and “reoccurring fire themes” linking names, towns, and buildings through an overarching AI narrative, arguing that ancient and hidden knowledge from a previous civilization translates into today’s world. They point to airports, claiming big ones were preexisting and extended, with coded messages in addresses, such as at O’Hare (10000 Bessie Coleman Drive, Chicago, IL 60666) and references to the Denver Airport. The discussion then shifts to “giants” and a specific site, Cohokia (Cahokia) Mounds, near Saint Louis, describing skeletal evidence from the 1880s of very large individuals—seven to eight feet tall—with six fingers, six toes, and double rows of teeth, sometimes hair still present and red or blonde in color. The narrator questions who controls the narrative and identifies a front group allegedly hiding information, citing John Wesley Powell’s account that Indians were responsible for the Cohokia Mounds. They claim Columbus may be a fictional character designed to fit a timeline. They allege Smithsonian Institute personnel traveled in the 1800s to Middle America to obtain large skeletons, with Patricia Mason of Ohio contacting the Smithsonian for such giants, only to be told the Smithsonian never received any items. The implication is an operation to conceal past giants and advanced prehistory, asserting that “100% giants” existed and that the doors and buildings from the previous civilization were far larger than contemporary humans. The narrative then moves to the Pontificial College, Josephinum in Columbus, Ohio, where Joseph from Germany arrived in 1867, became a priest, and soon acquired a house next to Saint Joseph’s Orphan Asylum to support 12 orphans, growing the institution rapidly. The speaker interprets this as part of a repopulation tactic, where orphan trains and hubs were used to seed the population with a new social structure, with buildings “already there from the previous civilization.” They describe the Josephinum as a base for teaching a new technological knowledge, with Joseph directing what the new society would learn. The claim is that the operation ran for twelve years, supplying a class of 23 men, and that those in control preserved technology from the prior civilization for their benefit. Other examples include Saint Vincent’s infant asylum in Baltimore, with tunnels beneath the ground; alterations in 19th/early 20th century to transform orphans into apartments in 1941, and a 2015 fire and a 2018 demolition without a permit. Saint Mary’s Orphan Asylum in Galveston, Texas is cited as haunted, with mid-1800s activity and a fire in 1875. The speaker links these orphan operations across Ohio, Baltimore, Texas, and Vermont to a broader nationwide repopulation effort in the mid-1600s through the early 1900s, arguing that millions of children passed through the system and that the mid-19th to early-20th century period marks the reset of society. They reference the Kinderbewahranstalt (kindergarten) in Germany as part of this global operation, tying education reforms to the same repopulation agenda and suggesting that borders and national divisions are modern constructs masking a past world without such restrictions. The presenter concludes that this episode, along with prior episodes, provides strong evidence of when this reset occurred and claims the operation was ongoing for a long time, with control of technology and social structures centralized in those who managed the orphan system.

The speaker questions the rapid obsolescence and demolition of elaborate 19th-century structures in Chicago, such as a castle built in three years and destroyed after 65, and a 55-room mansion demolished after 56 years. Construction timelines are scrutinized, particularly for the Levi Leiter mansion, alleging permits were obtained shortly before its supposed completion in 18 months. The speaker highlights architect Theo Chandler, associated with old-world buildings that were quickly destroyed, including a courthouse in New Castle County that stood for only 40 years. This pattern suggests intentional destruction projects of pre-existing, advanced structures. The speaker believes these demolitions were concealed due to limited communication in the 1800s. The Symphony Center in Chicago, supposedly built in seven months in 1904, is presented as another example. Architect Daniel Burnham, whose name evokes "burn," is linked to the Montauk Building, allegedly built in a year and demolished after 19. Burnham also built the Masonic Temple building, which was later demolished. The new Masonic Temple location was the site of a deadly theater fire that killed 600 people, a number that the speaker claims exceeds the death toll of the Great Chicago Fire, suggesting a cover-up.

The speaker proposes an alternative theory about the origins of palaces and infrastructure worldwide, suggesting they were built by a technologically advanced civilization predating current society. Photos from 1861 of Saint Petersburg, Russia, show advanced construction with no people present, implying a hidden history. The speaker suggests two groups: one that created the palaces for humanity's benefit and another corrupt group that hijacked them for control, changing their purpose and rewriting history. The speaker questions the accepted historical narrative, citing population lies and architectural impossibilities. They highlight anomalies like repeated church constructions on the same sites and the destruction of original artwork. The speaker also discusses underground tunnel systems in cities like Oshkosh, Wisconsin, dismissing the common explanation of alcohol smuggling during prohibition. These tunnels, along with griffins on buildings and military contracts, suggest a hidden infrastructure and purpose. The speaker also discusses airships, presenting evidence that they were a common mode of transportation, powered by free energy, and intentionally removed from the timeline. The speaker also mentions Tartaria and Barbaria, lands not taught in mainstream history. The speaker also questions the purpose of world's fairs, suggesting they were used to populate cities. The speaker concludes that the previous civilization was not that far in the past and that current structures hold more technology than understood.

Did major inventions truly originate in the last 300 years? The mainstream narrative says so, but what if we're being deceived? Consider the incredible buildings from the 1800s, their advanced tech, and the convenient timeline of events like the creation of the USA and the stock market, followed by a rush of inventions. These buildings and technologies may have existed long before we were told, hidden from us by a controlling group. This group profits by releasing old-world technology and rewriting history. Buildings from previous civilizations are being destroyed and rebranded and narratives are fabricated using AI to control us by manipulating what is thought of as real and what is crazy. We need to wake up, question everything, and reclaim our common sense.

The speaker believes the lack of knowledge about the "reset" stems from a deliberate erasure of history. They connect Cabbage Patch Kids to a "great repopulation effort" after the reset, suggesting they represent old world cloning technology and the origin of NPCs, or people with no internal monologue. The speaker claims that survivors of the reset were sent on orphan trains as foundlings, separated from their families and roots, and placed in orphan asylums, particularly in America. There, they were indoctrinated with a new narrative, making them easier to control. Adults who resisted this narrative were allegedly placed in mental asylums. The speaker suggests this strategy, combined with great fires, effectively erased the true past, leaving only fragments.

The speaker claims that mainstream history is a lie, particularly regarding the "Great Fires" of the 1800s. They argue that the reported death tolls are impossibly low considering the number of buildings destroyed. Specifically, the speaker cites the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, where 17,500 buildings burned but only a tiny percentage of the population supposedly died. They suggest the city was either empty or the death toll was suppressed, and that the fires were actually planned demolitions of old-world buildings using bombs and explosives. The speaker highlights other fires, including the Iroquois Theater fire (600 deaths), the Great Fire of London (6 deaths, 13,200 houses destroyed), the Great Fire of New York (2 deaths, 700 buildings), and fires in Paris, Texas; Toronto, Canada; and Montreal, Canada, all with suspiciously low death counts despite widespread destruction. They suggest the population worldwide was near zero in the early 1800s and that a previous advanced civilization existed before 1776. The speaker believes these fires were deliberate attacks to hide our true history. They cite the Great Fire of Detroit, Phoenix, Miami, and Houston as further examples of this pattern.

In Columbus, Ohio, the Pontificial College Josephinum reveals a repopulation tactic involving orphan asylums in the 1800s. Joseph, arriving from Germany in 1867, established the Saint Joseph Orphan Asylum, which rapidly expanded and relocated near a railroad for dispersing orphans. These orphanages and orphan trains were a means of repopulating society, with managers from Europe, often priests, overseeing operations. The new facilities provided orphans with trade skills, suggesting a deliberate effort to reset society's technology level. Simultaneously, colleges like Josephinum were established, raising questions about their funding and purpose. Saint Vincent's Infant Asylum in Baltimore, with underground tunnels, and Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum in Galveston, Texas, exemplify this trend. Fires and demolitions targeted these sites. Kindergarten, originating in Germany around the same time, is presented as another tactic for instilling new social structures. The speaker suggests a pre-reset world lacked borders and controlled education. The Saint Joseph's Orphanage in Vermont, along with the broader American orphanage system, which included over 1,600 institutions, highlights the scale of this operation, peaking in the early 1900s. The speaker concludes that this evidence reveals how the USA was repopulated and when the reset occurred.

The transcript argues that multiple widely circulated “construction” and “completion” photos from the Louisiana Purchase Exposition (1904 World’s Fair era) actually show much older buildings, repeatedly dated “18o3” rather than “19o3,” and that the buildings were later “cleaned” and repainted rather than constructed at the stated times. The speaker claims the Palace of Machinery entrance photo shows construction-date inconsistencies (fair in St. Louis in 1904, photo dated 1903) and uses “foundation” absence as an “incredible flaw,” presenting it as proof the building was constructed about one hundred years earlier than the “1903” date. They also claim the interior was damaged by a “mud flood” that came after construction, pointing to visible bottom damage and describing it as a cleanup project. The transcript further claims the World’s Fair buildings were knocked down after the fair because they held dates and architecture styles that “don’t fit” mainstream history. A recurring theme is that scaffolding photos are miscaptioned: the speaker says “construction photos” show completed buildings with only painters working, including instances where photo text is said to label “painters and decorators” rather than builders. They claim the buildings were painted white to appear new while the structures were old. The transcript asserts that “construction” is separate from painting, and that ladders/scaffolding do not prove construction activity. It also claims the lumber used is only for scaffolding, while main pillars are described as marble (with the Field Museum cited as an example). Additional “completion” imagery is used to argue the buildings feature advanced details and technology, including references to airships used as “charging docks” on rooftops, and repeated emphasis on dated inconsistencies. The speaker transitions to courthouses in Texas, alleging a pattern of implausible timelines and repeated “fire narratives.” They describe the Grimes County Courthouse (Anderson, Texas) as supposedly designed by Glover and Company and completed in 1894, incorporating foundations of an earlier courthouse destroyed by fire, which they claim is a fabrication. They assert brick buildings cannot burn from house fires, framing fires as demolition and as convenient insurance events. They also discuss multiple courthouses on the same sites, claiming recurring names indicate automation or copying, including architects Charles Henry Page and Lewis Charles Page described as “twin” brothers, with “AI” as an implied source for repeated naming patterns. They claim one courthouse built 1913–1914 conflicts with narratives of destruction and rapid rebuilds. They further allege Ben County Courthouse histories involve recurring dates, repeated fire stories, and consistency errors across sources such as texascourthouses.com, including “blown away” clock tower narratives and repeated cost figures. Next, the transcript proposes a broader alternate conclusion: that there were earlier massive civilizations that built the palaces and monumental architecture, and that later groups “infiltrated” narratives and repurposed or destroyed structures. The speaker claims panoramic city photos of St. Petersburg, Russia, show “perfect dirt roads” and no people (from 1861) with grand palaces already present, arguing the cities appear “prepared,” cleaned, and ready for later arrival. They repeat a global pattern: palaces and churches replaced or reset multiple times on the same sites (e.g., “four consecutive churches” at the same location). The discussion returns to St. Isaac’s Cathedral (St. Petersburg), claiming repeating stories of replacement churches, large bronze doors, preserved and repainted interior works, and specific timing claims. The speaker highlights that interior artworks were allegedly painted over under World War II to “avoid attention,” and frames this as further evidence of narrative inconsistency. They claim a painting artist (Karl) died before “construction” completed, and question how painting timing fits. They also claim the cathedral has a basement containing hidden museum exhibits/valuables and reference claims about “ten thousand tree trunks” under marshy ground. The transcript then broadens to “reset” and repopulation through institutional systems. It argues that orphan and asylum operations functioned as population and technology resets, including Josephinum (Columbus, Ohio), described as a priest-led orphan and training system with church and house acquisition, moving closer to the railroad to distribute orphans. The speaker claims these institutions were staffed and operated over years without clear origin stories for funding or building manpower, and that the system taught trades to “reset” what people learned. They also cite Saint Vincent’s Infant Asylum (Baltimore) with tunnels, a decline in orphans, later conversions to apartments, a fire attempt, and an illegal demolition. Saint Mary’s Orphan Asylum (Galveston, Texas) is cited as “haunted,” described as a tactic to deter investigation, with additional claims about an 1875 fire. In Germany, the transcript asserts kindergarten/kindergarten education (Kinderbewährungsstall) functioned as an additional control mechanism: children are separated from families, tested, graded, and socially pressured to conform. The speaker connects this to broader global “education” control. Overall, the transcript claims a worldwide pattern ties together misdated construction/completion photos, repetitive replacement/destroyed-by-fire narratives, recurring name patterns, repurposed monumental buildings, and institutional “orphan” systems in the mid- to late-1800s, culminating in a claim that these events reset society within roughly the last 150 years.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a pattern of alleged hoaxes surrounding so-called ancient or “old world” buildings in the United States, arguing that documented records do not exist to support the histories commonly taught. - The conversation centers on the Hoffman Tower in Lyons, Illinois, described as a tower that supposedly belongs to a park and was built in 1908 by a named construction company. The speakers claim there should be construction documents proving this, but they contacted the Village of Lyons and were told there are no blueprints or receipts for the building or the later staircase destruction in the 1990s. The village reportedly has “nothing on the building, period. Case closed. Nothing at all.” This is presented as evidence that the Wikipedia account is false and that no historical records exist to back up the claimed construction. - They assert a broader claim that “the history that we’ve all been told” since childhood is a lie, and they repeatedly state that multiple buildings in the area were not built as described. They reference years of researching and receiving the same response from officials: no documents, ledgers, or load-bearing calculations exist for these structures. - The discussion then moves to Lamont, Illinois, noting that a school in Lamont replaced an earlier one and again lacks supporting documents in the speakers’ view. They posit that the story about the 1836 school and subsequent building is likely AI-generated history and argue that the replacement school shows modern architectural features incongruent with the eighteenth- or nineteenth-century period. - They discuss a nearby historic Limestone Village Hall in Lamont, pointing to a stark contrast between a 1900s photo and the renovated present-day building, including the removal of the bell tower and bells. They claim bells were removed and melted into coins and cannons, referencing the Liberty Bell as an example of “cracked from overuse,” though they say historians are uncertain when the initial bell split occurred. They show sadness or outrage at what they view as erasing historic features during restoration. - The Altgeld Hall Chimes Tower at the University of Illinois is brought up, with a 2023 exploration referenced. They claim a restoration involved removing the bells and that this building’s historical state was captured in Episode 36 of their channel, but that the current project completely changes the building’s appearance. They describe 2024 renovations starting with a 3,000-pound bell and show before-and-after photos to illustrate perceived destruction of the “old world” building. - The speakers conclude by returning to Lamont, noting a nearby palace-style church (Bethany Lutheran Church, built in 1895) and contrasting it with the local housing, implying the church represents an architectural anomaly. They insist such “palace” constructions and “old world” features did not take place as claimed, arguing that the narrative of buildings being erected rapidly in a single year (multiple times referenced) is false. - They reference a recurring question about the authenticity of the architects and suggest that the supposed architect TJ McCarthy, who allegedly built these structures in a single year with self-taught expertise, might not be a real person. They propose that these towns contain interconnected tunnels or connections to other old world buildings, and question whether the architects were real individuals, given the lack of verifiable records. - Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes a view that “these stories … lied,” pointing to England’s Big Ben as another case where records are missing, and contends that many historic buildings worldwide from the 17th and 18th centuries were found without proper documentation.