TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks if the audience had access to a document called form 10/23, which alleges that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden were involved in a bribery scheme with Ukraine. They mention that this allegation is consistent with similar situations in Romania and other countries where shell companies are used to launder money. Another speaker responds, stating that they provided a supplement to their original transcript after seeing open source information from former Attorney General Bill Barr, who mentioned the document and sent it for further investigation. However, the team in charge of investigating the Biden family for tax crimes claims they never received this FBI document. This raises questions about why such information would be withheld from investigators. Another speaker adds that the document could potentially corroborate other information and suggests turning it over to the House Ways and Means Committee.

A whistleblower claimed that a foreign individual gave $5 million to then Vice President Biden, and mentioned money being sent to LLCs. Congress subpoenaed the document, as they have oversight of the FBI. Director Ray refused to provide it initially, but after being threatened with contempt charges, he agreed to show it to the chairman and ranking member only. However, according to the speaker, all members of the committee should have the right to see the unclassified document. If Director Ray doesn't allow this, they plan to move forward with contempt charges on Thursday.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about their recent interview with the FBI and if it was a deposition. Speaker 1 claims to not know what they are referring to and suggests discussing it offline. Speaker 0 questions if Speaker 1 has had any interviews with the FBI since becoming secretary of state, to which Speaker 1 avoids giving a direct answer. Speaker 0 then brings up the State Department turning over documents related to Hunter Biden, Burisma, and Blue State Strategies Corporation, but Speaker 1 does not provide any information. Speaker 0 tries to refocus the discussion on Afghanistan, but Speaker 1 continues to avoid answering questions.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Gomer is threatening to hold the FBI in contempt of Congress if they don't provide a document that he claims could incriminate President Biden. Gomer has subpoenaed the FBI for a document that allegedly describes a criminal scheme involving Biden and a foreign national. The FBI says that releasing the document could jeopardize ongoing investigations and put lives at risk. Gomer plans to hold FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt if he doesn't receive the document. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy believes the FBI will provide the document as the investigation into the Biden family continues. Gomer and Oversight Committee staff had meetings with the FBI, during which the FBI claimed the subpoena was too broad. Gomer narrowed the search terms to help the FBI.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about investigating allegations, but Speaker 1 avoids commenting. Speaker 0 expresses concern on behalf of millions of Americans and criticizes Senate Democrats and the media for not addressing the evidence. Speaker 0 asks if the informant who accused Joe Biden of taking a bribe was previously relied upon by the FBI, but Speaker 1 evades a direct answer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of refusing to answer and calls it disgraceful.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now share an FBI document, labeled 10/23, with the American people. This document sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. The FBI needs to clarify their actions regarding this matter. It's important for the American people to have access to the same information I read three months ago. It's worth noting that this document was unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become available to the public.

Speaker 0 is demanding to know the whereabouts of Hunter Biden's laptop, expressing concern about potential national security risks. The FBI Cyber assistant director admits to not knowing the laptop's location, despite it being turned over to the FBI in 2019. Speaker 0 requests to enter the contents of the laptop into the committee's record.

Three whistleblowers have accused the FBI and Department of Justice of giving preferential treatment and delaying investigations into the Bidens. FBI Director Christopher Wray's refusal to comply with a congressional oversight subpoena regarding an unclassified document supports these claims. Despite claiming the need to protect sources and methods, there are no national security concerns. Director Wray's lack of trust and previous FBI abuses make it unlikely he will win this battle. If the document is released, it may reveal a foreign national offering a $5 million bribe to Joe Biden for foreign policy considerations. Additionally, there is a need to question former FBI Director James Comey under oath regarding inconsistencies in his testimony and his knowledge of the Hillary Clinton intelligence plan. The House Oversight Committee should not back down.

A credible whistleblower claims that the Department of Justice has evidence of President Joe Biden's involvement in a criminal scheme with a foreign national. The whistleblower alleges that Biden exchanged money for policy decisions while he was vice president. Senator Chuck Grassley supports these allegations and is issuing a subpoena to the FBI and Chris Wray to release the document. The White House denies the claims, calling them unfounded and politically motivated. Former White House staffers and IRS whistleblowers provide additional evidence of Biden's involvement in corrupt activities. Hunter Biden's finances are also under scrutiny, with potential tax and gun charges being considered. Joe Biden has been absent from the public eye recently.

Senator Hawley questions Mr. Abadi about the existence of a document that alleges the President has received bribes from a foreign nation. Initially, the FBI director denied its existence, but later acknowledged it after Senator Grassley mentioned reading it. Senator Hawley asks why the document is not being released and if it is classified. Mr. Abadi confirms that the document is unclassified but does not commit to releasing it. Senator Hawley insists that the American people have the right to see it, suggesting that the source's name can be redacted.

House oversight claims to have bank records indicating that a Chinese energy company paid three members of the Biden family through a third party. The purpose of these payments is unclear. The speaker refuses to comment on the matter, citing the history of inaccuracies and lies from House Republicans on this issue.

The speaker sends a clear message to the Department of Justice, urging them not to indict Hunter Biden until they have seen the evidence presented by the House Oversight Committee. They claim that the Biden family, including the president, has been involved in influence peddling with various adversarial countries through LLCs. The speaker believes that the IRS and DOJ are unaware of many undisclosed accounts and have not thoroughly investigated the matter. They have spent the past 100 days examining bank documents and meeting with former associates and whistleblowers to uncover the truth. The speaker suggests that the charges against Hunter Biden, such as potential money laundering and being an unregistered foreign agent, are minor compared to the crimes committed. They believe that these countries received policy decisions in return for their investments in the Biden family. Wednesday is anticipated as a significant day for the American people to learn the facts and for the Department of Justice to take appropriate action.

The House Oversight Committee is considering holding FBI Director Christopher Wray in contempt of Congress for not complying with a subpoena related to an investigation into the Biden family's finances. The FBI did not physically hand over a document connecting then Vice President Biden to a possible bribery scheme, but allowed committee members to read it. FBI officials confirmed that the document is being used in an ongoing investigation. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy supports the contempt proceedings. There are safety concerns for the FBI informant who provided information about the Biden family, with some fearing for their life if they are publicly identified. A poll shows that 63% of Americans want the FBI to face accountability for weaponizing power against the American people. 39% want Congress to reform the FBI to prevent future political involvement.

Republicans are trying to prove a connection between foreign nations benefiting from the vice president's son and Joe Biden. They seek evidence of direct payoffs during Biden's vice presidency or after. However, this link has not been established yet. People may be growing weary of the ongoing investigation.

Senator Grassley and Representative Comer are calling for an investigation into a document that allegedly describes a criminal scheme involving former Vice President Biden and a foreign national. They want to know if the Justice Department and FBI properly vetted the document and followed standard investigative procedures. The FBI has received a letter and subpoena regarding this matter but has not commented. Grassley emphasizes the importance of getting answers and ensuring that the executive branch enforces the law as required by the Constitution, regardless of political affiliation.

I will contact Director Ray today to address the issue of FBI oversight. It is concerning that foreign countries are giving large sums of money to various LLCs connected to the Biden family, including grandchildren. We need to uncover the reasons behind this hidden money and understand why foreign funds are being received while Biden is in office.

The speaker questions why the FBI paid Christopher Steele $1 million to verify a dossier on Trump and offered $3 million to Twitter to suppress a story on Hunter Biden. They express concern over the FBI's actions being politically motivated. The FBI director responds by explaining the payments to social media companies are for legal process costs. The speaker accuses the FBI of damaging its reputation and questions if the FBI requested financial institutions to provide customer data. The FBI director is unsure and the speaker presents an email from Bank of America as evidence.

House Oversight Committee chairman James Comer has been investigating Biden family business dealings for over 2 years. The probe led to an impeachment inquiry last September. The committee wants Biden to testify, but he refuses. They found $24 million from foreign sources to Biden and his family, with no evidence of legitimate services. Bank records show money from China going to Biden's account, labeled as loan repayments, but no evidence of loans. Comer sent a letter to Biden in March with these findings.

Last week, I spoke about the FBI hiding an unclassified document, known as the 10/23, from Congress and the American people. The FBI eventually agreed to show the document to Congress, but it was heavily redacted. The 10/23 allegedly involves a bribery scheme between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and a foreign national. The Justice Department then announced charges against former President Trump for mishandling classified records. This senator is committed to fighting political corruption in the Department of Justice and the FBI by promoting transparency. The 10/23 contains references to audio recordings of conversations between the foreign national and the Bidens. It is crucial for the American people to have access to the unredacted document to understand the truth and hold the FBI and Justice Department accountable. Congress must continue to fight for transparency and release the document without unnecessary redactions.

House Oversight Committee Chairman, James Comer, is calling on the National Archives to release unredacted records from Joe Biden's time as vice president. The committee specifically wants access to emails related to Hunter Biden, Burisma, and the Biden family's dealings in Ukraine. They are investigating whether there was any policy or influence involved in these deals. The committee has evidence of Joe Biden meeting with his son's business associates and Hunter Biden being informed of his father's government duties in countries where they had a financial interest. They are requesting documents that mention Hunter Biden and his associates, and are concerned about potential compromised national security. This is another move by the oversight committee to prove an alleged bribery scheme by the Biden family.

Speaker 0 asks if Joe Biden received payments from Burisma or any other foreign companies while he was vice president, president, or a private citizen. Speaker 1 mentions an ongoing investigation led by the US attorney in Delaware, appointed by President Trump. Speaker 1 suggests referring to the US attorney for any information that can be shared. Speaker 0 then asks if the president is under investigation, to which Speaker 1 refuses to confirm or deny, following department policy. The conversation ends without a clear answer regarding Biden's involvement with foreign payments or the president's investigation.

Speaker 0 asks about Hunter Biden's laptop, questioning FBI Cyber's knowledge. They mention the laptop was turned over to the FBI in 2019, but the assistant director doesn't know its current location. Speaker 0 requests to enter Hunter Biden's laptop contents into the record. Speaker 2 praises Matt Gaetz's questioning and criticizes the FBI. Translation: Speaker 0 inquires about Hunter Biden's laptop and questions the FBI Cyber's awareness. The laptop was given to the FBI in 2019, but the assistant director is unaware of its current whereabouts. Speaker 0 requests to include Hunter Biden's laptop contents in the record. Speaker 2 applauds Matt Gaetz's questioning and condemns the FBI.

Speaker 0 asks if the FD 1023 and the 17 recordings will be provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee to assess the evidence of Joe Biden taking a $5,000,000 bribe. Speaker 1 responds that they will work with the committee and provide the information within the process. Speaker 0 insists on a direct answer, but Speaker 1 repeats that they will take it back and work with them. Speaker 0 concludes that Speaker 1 is not answering the question.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.

A senator questions Deputy Director Abadi about allegations of a $5 million bribery scheme involving President Biden and his family. Abadi refuses to comment on the existence of a report or 17 voice recordings related to the allegations. The senator accuses the FBI of stonewalling and damaging its reputation. Abadi maintains that they operate within established parameters and will work with the committee to provide information. The senator criticizes the FBI for not being accountable and demands the release of the report and recordings. Abadi avoids directly answering questions about the investigation and the informant's reliability. The senator expresses concern that the evidence is being covered up by Democrats and the media. The exchange becomes heated and ends with the senator calling Abadi's behavior disgraceful.