TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 describes a genetic bioweapon as a “biological bull in a China shop” that causes extensive damage, noting he has discussed mechanisms of injury and that there are “28 mechanisms” by which it causes cancer alone. He says it was shocking from the moment of inspection of its ingredients before injection, leading him to halt his life’s work to try to stop it. He asserts that people are being genetically modified under the claim of vaccination, causing them to produce a variety of poisons, primarily the spike protein of a man-made-designed SARS-CoV-2 virus, which he says is the most toxic part of it. He claims the body would normally not produce this protein and that a random array of protein junk is triggered, potentially causing autoimmune diseases in many directions. He alleges that what was claimed to be in the vaccine—modified messenger RNA—was modified so it would both disrupt the production of proteins and persist longer, causing the body to produce foreign proteins and attack itself, but with unknown duration because the approach is “completely experimental” using a new 1-methylpseudouridinated version of mRNA. He references Doctor Kernan and others, stating that 30% of the genetic material there is DNA, including plasma DNA, and claims Pfizer hid that it could be present. He accuses the companies of inserting genetic sequences derived from the simian virus, calling these sequences genetic hacking tools. He explains that delivering foreign DNA with a pigylated nanoparticle and SV40 promoter enhancer sequences can move DNA into the nucleus and permanently modify and damage the human genetic code, asserting that there is now evidence of this. He emphasizes that this is not only an attack on people’s health now but also on future fertility and human reproduction. He cites tests on male sperm showing sperm DNA containing the spike protein genetic code, suggesting men’s sperm could pass this genetic flaw to offspring if reproduction occurs, and notes uncertainty about the extent but asserts “many” sperm cells are affected. He claims that about 30% of a woman’s eggs die shortly after injections due to the assault on the ovaries, and that cancers have had their DNA modified by these injections. He characterizes the situation as permanent genetic modification of humans without consent, based on a lie about a safe and effective vaccine for a disease with alleged available treatments, alleging a broader scheme linked to the same individuals. He ends by naming Fauci, Gates, Tedros, and Dashic as responsible for bringing together the virus, the bioweapon, and the “death shot.”

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

Currently, there is too much convergence between the government, the National Assembly, and the general press, which is unhealthy. There needs to be checks and balances, debates, and many decisions being made are authoritarian and lack scientific substance. For example, forcing people to take an experimental vaccine without giving them a choice is unethical and goes against the principles of medical experimentation. In the future, we will look back and question how such things were allowed to happen. The communication world is starting to collide with reality, whether it's about vaccines or other issues. The vaccines were rushed and not properly evaluated, and there have been adverse effects reported. The number of complaints against the vaccines will continue to rise. It's important to understand the risks and benefits and not exaggerate the severity of the disease.

The speaker expresses concern about the lack of checks and balances in the government, national assembly, and media, leading to authoritarian decisions without scientific substance. They discuss the ethical issues surrounding the experimental COVID-19 vaccine, emphasizing the importance of informed consent and the potential violation of ethical principles. The speaker mentions a study on hydroxychloroquine and criticizes the lack of transparency in reporting adverse effects. They also mention a case of a person losing an eye after vaccination and highlight the need for thorough evaluation before vaccine distribution. The interviewer challenges some of the speaker's claims, but the speaker defends their position based on their knowledge and experience.

Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted to providing misleading information to the public, and the lack of evidence for transmission control makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that this is for the benefit of vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

We are facing a soft coup where new laws are being created under the guise of pandemic preparedness, stripping away human rights protections. The WHO is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would enforce surveillance, censorship, and limit freedom of speech. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days. These changes would give the WHO power to dictate which drugs countries can use during a pandemic. The concept of One Health would allow the WHO to control everything globally, with a belief that humans are no more valuable than animals.

This impromptu session of the International Crimes Investigative Committee features Pascal Najadi, who has filed a criminal complaint against several individuals, including the president of Switzerland. Najadi explains that he has filed charges in Switzerland and the United States, alleging violations of laws and rights related to the Pfizer vaccine. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and criticizes the World Health Organization. The case could have implications for others who have suffered similar damages. The conversation also touches on allegations of a population reduction program and the lack of testing for vaccine efficacy and safety.

The Supreme Court ruled that vaccinated individuals are considered patented goods, not human, due to modified DNA/RNA vaccines. This means they lose all human rights and are classified as transhuman, a category without human rights. This applies globally since 2013, with no religious exemptions. The speaker urges people to take action to reclaim their rights.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The DOD vaccines are seen as DOD weapons, and the term "killbox" is used to describe their strategy. The goal is to set up the entire world as their target population and use informational, psychological, and chemical weapons. Financial coercion is used to ensure compliance, and legal frameworks have been established to transfer sovereign government to the World Health Organization. The US government has passed laws and executive orders to reinforce this structure. The COVID vaccines are seen as DOD prototypes, and clinical trials were not deemed necessary. The goal is to shield the products and people involved from liability. The project is a joint effort between the US Department of Defense, the Federal Reserve, the World Health Organization, and the Bank for International Settlements. The globalists oppose laws protecting informed consent and consumer safety. The hope is for a tipping point and criminal prosecutions to occur.

Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted that the information provided to the public was not for informed consent. The lack of evidence for transmission control from the start makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that it is a disservice to vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.

My father taught me that people in authority lie, and if we want to live in a democracy, we must understand this. Currently, we are giving authorities the power to control every aspect of our lives, including knowing our whereabouts, monitoring our finances, and even having access to our children. This is concerning because it gives them the right to force medical interventions on us without our consent, similar to what the Nazis did during World War 2. Despite the Nuremberg Charter, which promised to never impose unwanted medical interventions without informed consent, people are blindly following orders without understanding the science behind it. This is not democratic but rather driven by a pharmaceutical agenda that will enslave humanity and lead us into a dystopian nightmare. Our dreams, dignity, and the future of our children are at stake.

In 2018, the World Health Organization changed the definition of vaccine adverse events, only considering those already established in published clinical literature. This conveniently allows Pfizer and Moderna to claim no adverse events from genetically modified injections. The definition change occurred just before the pandemic, suggesting a plan. This information is not widely known, as it is censored by mainstream media. Most people avoid asking the question of whether we want to be a submissive and tyrannized population or live in freedom. The reality is that we are currently a docile and compliant humanity. Pharmaceutical companies are responsible for more deaths than the military-industrial complex, and they will control and limit our freedoms.

Last month, Joachim Küs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding concerns about the vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only authorized for individual immunization and not for infection control, prevention, or reduction. In fact, the EMA highlighted a lack of data on contagion and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The massive vaccination campaigns aimed at protecting others were not authorized and lacked factual basis. The EMA emphasized that vaccinations were solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual, and safety information should be carefully considered before administering or recommending a vaccine. The government's vaccination policies disregarded this information, putting lives at risk. Vaccination campaigns should be halted immediately, and those responsible for the lies and deception held accountable.

Elected officials are not acting in the people's best interest, serving pharmaceutical companies with the mRNA shot. They all use the same script, talking about safety without considering the risks of the injection. The vaccination campaign will be remembered as the biggest medical scandal and crime against humanity.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. The speaker refers to vaccines as weapons and describes the goal of setting up the entire world as a target population. The weapons used are informational, psychological, and chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear. Financial coercion mechanisms are used to enforce compliance. The speaker traces the history of this project back to the early 1900s and highlights the role of globalist central bankers. The World Health Organization is seen as a military arm of the one world government. The speaker discusses legal frameworks, international regulations, and the transfer of sovereign government to the World Health Organization. The speaker believes that criminal prosecutions will eventually occur.

Robin Monotti Gracie questions the UNESCO Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights, specifically article 6, which emphasizes the need for informed consent in medical interventions. He argues that measures like wearing face masks and vaccine passports create disadvantages and prejudice, violating our fundamental human rights. Monotti Gracie urges UNESCO to address whether these actions constitute a violation of universal human rights and, if organized by parliament, a crime against humanity.

There have been repeated attempts to mandate coercion without accepting natural immunity, which is claimed to be equally effective at preventing infection and more effective at preventing severe disease and death. There was no real questioning of an emergency use authorized product, and informed consent was not prioritized. When doctors make mistakes, they should acknowledge the mistake and harm, apologize, and institute measures to prevent recurrence. This hasn't happened at a public health scale, and the medical establishment needs to acknowledge the problem. The speaker believes the product in question should never have been approved for a single human. At the very least, there should be acknowledgement of unintended harms, apologies, efforts to help the vaccine-injured, and structures for greater transparency in medicine. Regulators should not receive 86% of their funding from big pharma and then claim to be independent.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

Public health has been militarized, with the military using public health laws for a global campaign. The DOD and WHO aim to control the world using propaganda, fear, and toxic vaccines. Financial coercion is used to enforce compliance. Legal frameworks from the 1960s onwards support this agenda. The World Health Organization plays a key role in transferring power to a one-world government. The US government endorses the use of bio weapons disguised as vaccines. The goal is to shield those involved from liability and criminal prosecution. Resistance through state laws protecting informed consent is crucial. Criminal prosecutions are predicted as evidence mounts against these actions.

This is a human experiment in violation of the Nuremberg Code. The speaker points out that people have not been informed about this experiment. They compare it to a previous failed vaccine experiment called Pandemrix, which had far fewer side effects. The speaker questions how many more people need to die or get injured before action is taken. They urge the audience to save the nation and accuse those who mislead citizens about the safety of the vaccines of being involved in crimes, possibly even genocide. The speaker emphasizes that a crime becomes intentional when it is committed.

The Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated individuals are considered patented goods, no longer human, due to modified DNA or RNA. Those who receive mRNA vaccines lose human rights and become transhuman, a category not recognized in human rights. This applies globally since 2013, stripping individuals of rights, freedoms, and religious exemptions. Vaccinated individuals are legally identified as transhuman and do not have any human or state rights. The speaker urges people to wake up and take action to reclaim their rights.

Our government is out of control on this, and they are lawless. They completely disregard bioethics. They completely disregard the federal common rule. They have broken all the rules that I know of, that I've been trained on for years and years and years. These mandates of an experimental vaccine are explicitly illegal. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Nuremberg Code. They're explicitly inconsistent with the Belmont Report. They are flat out illegal, and they don't care. And the only

I, along with six colleagues, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on contagiousness and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection, even for the unvaccinated. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on false information. The EMA also highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The EMA expected reports of side effects, but the government failed to report them, endangering lives. The vaccination campaign should be halted immediately.

I warned about the risks of the swine flu vaccination and now face arrest in Austria. The government wants to silence me because they plan to launch more vaccination campaigns and artificial pandemics. I previously filed charges against Baxter for attempting to trigger a bird flu pandemic. The World Health Organization supplied the virus and is responsible for global vaccination campaigns. We are currently under a pandemic level alert 6, which means forced vaccination and quarantine are possible. Legislation in the US and Europe aims to pressure people into taking vaccines. These vaccines can destroy our ability to feel emotions like anger and fear, which are necessary for responding to danger and injustice.