reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The Inflation Reduction Act's $40 billion for environmental justice through the EPA warrants scrutiny. My staff investigated and found the EPA granted $50 million to the Climate Justice Alliance in December. Their website depicts a bulldozer breaching a fence during the Hamas attack on Israel, alongside the slogan "decolonize Palestine." Further research reveals their affiliation with groups advocating defunding the police and military, and holding anti-American, anti-Israel, and antisemitic views. This raises concerns about how taxpayer money is being used. Is it truly funding environmental cleanup, or is it supporting radical protests? The lack of an EPA inspector general to oversee this funding is alarming. The Biden administration's apparent disregard for this is troubling, and we, on the Environment and Public Works Committee, will continue to investigate.

The speaker expresses concern over the CCP's infiltration and funding of woke culture in US colleges and universities. They question the students' support for Hamas during pro-Palestinian rallies, despite Hamas' violent actions. Speaker 1 mentions that Harvard and other universities have provided exclusive training to CCP officials, suggesting that colleges and universities have been invaded by the CCP's ideology. They express sympathy for parents who worked hard to send their children to college, only to see them develop hatred towards the country and its people.

"The Israel On Campus Coalition is at the center of the lobby's response to BDS." "Stand With Us and the ICC have a particularly close relationship." "Canary Mission is highly, highly effective to the extent that we monitor the students for justice in Palestine and their allies." "90% of the people who pay attention to this space very closely have no idea what we're actually doing, which I like." "Adam Milkin? Milstein has become a central figure in the lobby. His foundation funds numerous pro organizations. He also sits on the boards of APAX National Council, the Israel On Campus Coalition, and Stand With Us." "You said you see the vision, and you tell us go and do it. And we took your orders, and we made it happen. And we took your money."

Hamas encampments on campuses funded by USCPR and George Soros pay activists up to $7,800. They mobilize quickly, offering snacks and water. These protests are dubbed "tense city politics" by the speaker.

The speaker, Shay Davide, addresses the audience as a concerned parent and professor at Columbia Business School. He expresses his frustration with university presidents, including Columbia's president, for not speaking out against pro-terror student organizations. He highlights the recent kidnapping of US citizens in Gaza and criticizes the support these organizations receive. Davide emphasizes that his own children are considered legitimate targets by these groups. He calls for action, urging parents to question colleges about their stance on pro-terror organizations and to contact their representatives. Davide concludes by stating that he speaks up because he is afraid and feels unsafe on his own campus.

A senator questions a witness about campus protests, specifically the slogan "long live the intifada." The senator asks if this slogan represents the "National Organic Human Rights Movement" that the witness praised. The witness states that using the term "intifada" is not effective, as most Americans don't associate it with human rights. The senator asserts the slogan calls for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews. The witness claims to not know the person or sign in question. A rabbi states it is a call for the destruction of Israel and the killing of Jews everywhere, which he does not agree with. The senator argues these protests targeted Jewish students, prevented them from attending class, and instilled fear following the October 7th attacks, and asks if the witness thinks the message is ambiguous.

A student thanks the speaker for presenting their point of view and mentions finding interesting information about the MSA organization. They ask for clarification on the connection between the MSA and Jihad terrorist networks. The speaker asks if they will condemn Hamas, to which the student expresses concern about potential consequences. The speaker insists on condemning Hamas and shares a past experience at UC Santa Barbara. The student reluctantly says they are for Hamas, and the speaker thanks them for revealing their stance. The conversation ends abruptly.

They found tent cities on college campuses are well-organized by groups like Students for Justice in Palestine, Within Our Lifetime, and Jewish Voices for Peace, funded by wealthy investors like George Soros and the Rockefeller family. The US Campaign for Palestinian Rights pays organizers well, with ties to the 2020 riots. The question remains: why now, before a presidential election? Translation: The tent cities on college campuses are organized by groups funded by wealthy investors like George Soros and the Rockefeller family. These groups have ties to the 2020 riots. The question is: why now, before a presidential election?

The speaker expresses concern over the CCP's infiltration and funding of woke culture in US colleges and universities. They question the students' support for Hamas during pro-Palestinian rallies, despite Hamas' violent actions. Speaker 1 mentions that Harvard and other universities have provided exclusive training to CCP officials, and believes that all colleges and universities have been invaded by the CCP's ideology. They express sympathy for parents who worked hard to send their children to college, only to see them develop hatred towards their own country and its people.

As someone who faced the angry mob at Columbia, I can tell you that the pro-Palestinian protests were dangerous. Jewish students were even told to stay off campus for their safety. University administrations must maintain control and ensure student safety above all else. If you're a student here on a visa and you're threatening violence against Jewish classmates and spreading antisemitism, you will be arrested and deported. This isn't about free speech; it's about stopping hatred and violence. I'm glad we have a president who is willing to lay down the law and get control of this situation on college campuses.

I need your help. Take out your phone and put it on video. I want to address every parent who sent their kids to prestigious universities like Columbia, NYU, Harvard, Stanford, and Berkeley. As a professor at Columbia Business School and a father, I want you to know that we are not protecting your children from pro-terror student organizations. The presidents of these universities refuse to speak out against them. Recently, 14 US citizens, along with others from different nationalities, were kidnapped in Gaza. Despite this, the university president continues to support these pro-terror student organizations.

American universities have become dangerous for Jewish students, with harassment, threats, and violence. Groups like Students Justice in Palestine (SJP) are responsible, supported by individuals linked to terrorist organizations. They manipulate young, well-meaning students with buzzwords like justice and freedom, but their true goal is to destroy Israel. Universities have allowed this brainwashing to happen for years. Action needs to be taken: these hate groups should be banned from campuses, investigated by state police and the FBI, and congressmen should not accept donations from them. This is not just a Jewish issue, but an American one that threatens American values and the future.

The speaker asks why Ivy League schools receive so much federal funding. Speaker 1 responds that the president has raised this question in discussions with Harvard, Columbia, and other Ivy League institutions. The president created an antisemitism task force with representatives from federal agencies who meet weekly to discuss this issue. Speaker 1 states that many Americans wonder why their tax dollars go to universities that are allegedly indoctrinating students and allowing egregious illegal behavior.

We are reporting from the heart of the campus that sparked a global student movement for Palestine. We’re seeing right now, Chris, we’re trapped in a dorm room. There are 10 white PDs barricading the doors, and we’re not allowed to leave. What started off as a protest against genocide at an elite Ivy League university was met with a military-style operation to suppress it. We need to find a way to get some spare medication. So when Columbia University sent the NYPD on the campus, they were willing to deploy violent militarized police to maintain their active investment in genocide. This is not about students expressing ideas. It is about a change in tactics that presents a concern and a normalization and mainstreaming of rhetoric. And I’m not just talking about language. I’m now talking about tactics, and that’s what shifted our response yesterday. But a normalization and mainstreaming of rhetoric associated with terrorism has now become pretty common on college campuses. Right? You see people wearing headbands associated with foreign terrorist organizations. This happened in October when you had a viral TikTok reissuing Osama bin Laden’s 2002 letter to America. So that’s a larger concern. It’s separate from what happened yesterday, but they’re related. Speaker 3 asks what was found: basically, NYPD changed the way it did business after the attacks of September Eleventh. It not only changed the way it did business, it created a very deep connection with the CIA. They started to build these intelligence programs that infiltrated Muslim communities in ways that, if the federal government did it, would totally go against rules designed to protect civil liberties. And they did it with an unusual partnership with the CIA. A very senior CIA officer was dispatched by CIA Director George Tenet to be his personal representative to the NYPD and help create these intelligence gathering programs, directing and supervising the intelligence gathering, and that relationship continues today. Speaker 3 notes: Recently, the CIA sent one of its most senior undercover officers to work out of 1 Police Plaza in New York as a covert officer. So we’re talking about former CIA agents now working within the New York Police Department. Well, they’re current CIA; they’re on CIA payroll. They’re on the CIA payroll, working with the NYPD, traveling abroad, and using intelligence in conjunction with the NYPD. Speaker 2 describes one element: there is a program called the demographics program. Officers described it as mapping the human terrain of the city. They placed undercover officers, ethnic officers inside Middle Eastern neighborhoods to blend in and look for things that are suspicious. That could be something as simple as who’s looking at radical books in a bookstore or who’s watching Al Jazeera and perhaps applauds at a report about an IED in Iraq, and that could be enough to get you into a report at the NYPD. They also have informants called mosque crawlers who go to the mosque as the eyes and ears for the NYPD. The FBI places informants in mosques with a criterion of specific information related to criminal activity, while the NYPD reportedly does not have that bar and says they follow leads; but those involved with the mosque crawler program say they’re there as eyes and ears.

The speaker expresses concern over the infiltration and funding of woke culture in US colleges and universities by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). They question the students' support for Hamas during pro-Palestinian rallies, despite Hamas' violent actions. Speaker 1 mentions that Harvard and other universities have provided training to CCP officials, suggesting that colleges and universities have been invaded by the CCP's ideology. The speaker sympathizes with parents who worked hard to send their children to college, only to see them develop hatred towards their own country.

The speaker describes meeting with prime minister Netanyahu as part of a Christian conservative Gen Z focus group, noting that Netanyahu listened attentively and heard their concerns. "APAC is not an Israeli organization. It has no ties whatsoever to the government of Israel. It's not foreign lobbying." "APAC, like, makes up less than 5% of the lobbying." "Israel is not offering to fund anybody. They're not trying to get involved in American political advocacy groups. That has never happened." "If you're about this, who you should be concerned about is Qatar because they are doing this." "Many of these protests slash riots that you see destroying our cities, a lot of that has foreign funding from Qatar." "Netanyahu's first address to congress was to say that they didn't want aid."

That incident happened on the Capitol Steps in front of a Capitol police officer. He was engaged in sexually threatening aggressive behavior in front on the Capitol Steps, and he wasn't even asked to step back. This officer was just cool with it. There was footage of Capitol Police officers helping and being sympathetic to the insurrectionists on January 6, and everyone decided it was too politically difficult to deal with, brushing it under the rug. To this day, there has never been an investigation into that. Never. As a result, we have no idea which officers are safe around, and whether those with massive weapons were with that crowd or not. If you raise questions about that, it's construed as attacking the entire institution of public safety. Riddle me that. We saw that in the State of the Union too, with both parties shoveling money in without accountability.

Last night at Columbia University, there was open support for Hamas, with signs threatening Jewish students. The administration is not taking action, allowing terrorists in while keeping the NYPD out. The speaker calls on Mayor Eric Adams to act, warning of potential consequences if he doesn't. They also urge Governor Kathy Hochul to bring in the National Guard to address the situation. Enough is enough. Translation: The speaker expresses concern about support for Hamas at Columbia University and calls on Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul to take action.

The speaker discusses what they call "little Gazas" that have risen up on campuses across America. They criticize liberal college administrators and politicians for not restoring law and order and protecting other students. The speaker describes these "little Gazas" as "disgusting cesspools of anti-Semitic hate" full of pro-Hamas sympathizers, fanatics, and freaks. They claim that the terrorist sympathizers in these "little Gazas" are violently and illegally demanding death for Israel, just like the Ayatollahs in Iran.

A journalist asks if there’s someone who can be spoken to about hearing, and is directed to the other side of the park. The exchange turns into a broader set of allegations about a man named Naftali Aaron Kranz and the organization Get Free. The speaker claims Naftali Kranz is a paid protester through Get Free. They present LinkedIn posts recruiting for paid protesters for the company, described as Get Free’s “part time mobilization support contractor.” The speaker asserts Get Free bills itself as a grassroots organization while Naftali and others are allegedly paid to protest. They claim Get Free aims to “undo white supremacy” and that one of the best ways to do that, in Naftali’s view, is to celebrate vandalism, citing Crown Heights, where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. The speaker contends Naftali attended an abolish the police rally but was not the leader, instead blending in among other recruits, and that he works with the DSA, explaining why the speaker met him at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, the speaker says Naftali frequently posts about paid protester roles, urging people to join to “help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country,” with recruitment across Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. They describe a nine-week contract, part-time, paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation who will recruit people and train them to drive turnout at events. The speaker also says Naftali is part of Jews Against Trump and urges donations to bail funds to “bail immigrants out of concentration camps,” adding a claim that a Jewish person who calls an immigration detention center a concentration camp has a serious mental illness, and criticizing colleges like NYU, the Democrat party, and mainstream media as brainwashing. The speaker asserts Nicole Cardi is at the top of the Get Free Movement and claims she says the George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the 2020 election. They argue that protest NGO groups are about getting Democrats elected, and that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which the speaker says is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. The speaker alleges ActBlue has funneled billions to activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which is said to be orchestrating resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible is claimed to have paid protesters and received over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.

From the outset, one of the speakers says there was a sense that the official narrative about the day didn’t add up, expressing that many Americans feel they were being lied to. The major problem they identify with the assassination narrative includes inconsistencies and unanswered questions rather than acceptance of the official story. Speaker 1 recalls being told Charlie Kirk was shot and initially in critical condition, but notes that the video shows an exit wound and movement of Kirk’s shirt that suggests an impact nearby. With extensive experience around gunshot wounds, they say what they saw didn’t make sense. They reference the FBI’s announcement of a shooter and describe a separate incident involving a person on the roof who allegedly disassembled and reassembled a firearm, aligned a scope, fired a cold bore shot, moved to the roof, and then wrapped the rifle up. They mention texts from the shooter that didn’t sound like a typical 22-year-old and state that these observations raise questions. They say asking questions leads to being torn down or accused of holding conspiracy views, and they specify they aren’t claiming “Israel did it,” but insisting the questions about the event “don’t look good.” They raise specific questions: did the security team remove Charlie Kirk’s lapel mic after the incident and give it to someone else; what happened to the SIM card; did someone take the camera behind him; why was the crime scene contaminated and rebuilt. They admit they don’t know what is true but insist the questions deserve answers. They note that once they question, they’re labeled antisemitic, and they say they didn’t even bring up Israel. They emphasize the personal and national significance of the incident. Speaker 0 mentions a claim that Charlie Kirk was portrayed as Superman, with his body supposedly stopping the 30-odd-six bullet, and asks what would have happened if a 30-06 round hit him. Speaker 1 says it would likely blow his head off and leave remnants of the bullet, arguing that they don’t think such remnants have been found yet. They question why the chair and desk were moved and contend that a forensic expert could determine the shot’s origin, insisting they are simply asking questions. If those questions can be refuted, they would stop asking; but they claim they’re not getting any answers beyond “this is what happened” and being told to “shut up.” Speaker 0 adds that telling someone to be quiet amounts to labeling them antisemitic, and that when the trial comes, they will look like a fool. Speaker 1 says that’s a tactic of the left—when you call them out, they label you a name—and that the right is now doing the same to them.

Yesterday, I got the honor of meeting with prime minister Netanyahu as part of a special focus group for Christian conservative Gen Zers, and we were essentially addressing the concerns that we had. There's clearly been a growing divide. He wanted to know why. He wanted to understand where we were coming from. And to his credit, he did listen to us extremely attentively and took in a lot of what we were saying. APAC is not an Israeli organization. It has no ties whatsoever to the government of Israel. It's not foreign lobbying. It's a lobbyist group that happens to be lobbying for a certain group of people. I'm against APAC because I'm against lobbying. Israel is not offering to fund anybody. That has never happened. If you're concerned about this, who you should be concerned about is Qatar because they are doing this. They are going out and funding these universities and these political organizations. Many of these protests slash riots that you see destroying our cities, a lot of that has foreign funding from Qatar. I really hope some positive change comes out of it, and some people will do some more research rather than believing everything they see.

I did not say that reducing the federal budget would increase antisemitism. I said that constant threats to cut money to the Office for Civil Rights in the Department of Education prevent the federal government from adequately investigating antisemitism and other hate crimes on college campuses. One way to stop antisemitism is to actually fund those designed to investigate it. I saw protesters against the war in Gaza using some antisemitic slogans. It is difficult for the federal government to adequately address antisemitism. It is possible to feel compassion for the Palestinian people without hating Jews. What I've seen on college campuses is a pushing of a Marxist framing. We're allowing ideology to drive violence, which erodes society. What has to happen on college campuses is deradicalization. Until you admit that there's a radical ideology, you cannot fight it.

The Law Fair Project provides pro bono legal support to Jewish students facing hostility on campus. It aims to combat Islamist Nazi-like Jew hatred, emphasizing that this issue is not about politics or a Palestinian state. The speaker urges the Biden administration to stand with the Jewish population in the US and take action against terror-affiliated groups like Students for Justice in Palestine and Woah Palestine. The conversation highlights the influence of foreign funding, particularly from states like Qatar, which is the second-largest state sponsor of terrorism. Jewish students share their experiences of feeling unsafe and persecuted on campuses, emphasizing the need for support and action from the administration and the wider community. The audience is encouraged to be vocal and demand change from universities to create a safe environment for Jewish students.