TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Andrew Marino, a physicist and a lawyer, was the physicist and lawyer for Dr. Robert In fact, he was the guy that made good on Albert St. Georgie’s prediction that proteins were semiconductors. He worked for the military and did studies on the sanguine antenna built in Wisconsin to track submarines and found out that they caused problems. Information was delivered to the military in 1973, and Becker found that there was a lot more problems with electromagnetic pollution that’d be uncovered between Niagara Falls and New York City with power lines. When the military wouldn’t listen to him, he went on TV with Wallace on sixty Minutes, polled the nation, and literally a couple weeks after that, his lab was completely defunded. And remember, this guy was three times nominated for the Nobel Prize. The reason it never made waves, because remember, nobody back then had a salt on and nobody had a microwave oven, only the red. K? And just so you know, this was on the front page of the Boston Globe in 1977. So Marino was the guy, the physicist in his lab, who actually in congressional testimony in the early seventies, actually told the government, leading the congress, this is published in the archives. You can go read it yourself, satellites above the earth affected the magnetosphere, 80,000 kilometers from base stations on the surface of the earth. So the proof is there, my friend, but they've ignored it. So if you read his book, it's called Going Somewhere written by Andrew Marino. When I hear scientists tell me that non ADVMF can affect us because it's not ionizing radiation, that book alleviates all of them. The other thing I would say, his Roland Van Wyck’s book is beautiful to lay out all the stuff about biophotons and the stuff that the Russians have found and the biophoton research done by the Japanese and the Europeans. It's well researched. All the stuff about quantum mechanically has happened in biology from 2007 to current. We know that it's operational in photosynthesis. You now have books out written by Jim L. Callely and John Joy McFadden. The Life at the End where you'll learn about the Klitschko's experiment with European robins to figure out how birds navigate utilizing libido reception and free radical signaling in their eyes through cryptochromes. In other words, this science is well laid out. The problem is, it's not well known. And in your podcast, I'm laying out the reason why it's not well known because if you really knew what's really published, you probably wouldn't put he Jobs iPhone up to the side of your head and then you'll read Isaacson's biography and realize why Jobs didn't let his own kids use it. Why? Remember, every time Steve Jobs went to an iMac conference, everybody remembers his worn out popular Levi's. Remember that he died from a retroperitoneal camp. Don't ever forget that. Don't ever forget the story of the iPad that had an infrared detector based into it that Apple never marketed. Do you know why that was in there? Because when a child got an iPad and it touched its leg, you would turn off RF and microwave emission. So that tells you that Apple knew exactly what was going on. But they never marketed it because you would ask the question, why do you have an infrared turn on? The reason is simple, my friend. All the people listening to this, most of the young people, their digital babysitter is their iPhone and their iPad that they hand kids. And they're causing brain damage in every single child because that blue light is ruining the melanopsin sickling everywhere in their body. But the reason why that's good is because you're creating obedient idiots to make TikTok videos in the future.

Well, yeah. He kinda toughed through it and he had all these aches and pains, refused to go see the doctor. And one of his fellow wrestlers, he used to have him come over every day, and this was in Hawaii. He goes, I need you to pound on my back. He would just pound on his back just constantly thinking, like, just that old school, probably barbaric head in the sand Yeah. Kind of mentality. He was 45 when he died. Cancer. Yeah. And he refused it for months and months and months. And then it had metastasized to a point where there was just no going back. And that was it. By the time they caught it, reached a point where I I gotta go see a doctor and see what's happening. Yeah.

Partner and mom cried as doctors revealed stage 4 cancer. Given 8 weeks to live, decided to go off chemo and try alternative methods. Biopsies showed no cancer, PET scan clear. Doctors amazed at recovery. Credits daily supplements and mushrooms for immune system support and anti-cancer properties.

Speaker discusses glioblastoma and related pediatric pineoblastomas, stating they are devastating and among the worst cancers. He notes that, based on long-term research and Otto Warburg’s observations, neoplastic cells inside a glioblastoma predominantly use a fermentation metabolism to generate energy, meaning they generate energy without the use of oxygen. He says glioblastoma multiforme was a term used because the cells are highly dysmorphic, but according to his metabolic hypothesis, the origin of the disease arises from damage to cellular respiration, causing all cells to ferment regardless of appearance. All neoplastic cells in glioblastoma are said to use energy without oxygen, derived from two fuels: glucose and glutamine. The speaker highlights stalled survival statistics for glioblastoma, remarking that despite modern scientific advances, there has been no major improvement in keeping people alive. He argues that cancer is not a genetic disease but a metabolic one, and criticizes continued irradiation of the brain in patients with these tumors. He claims published evidence shows that irradiating the brain frees up metabolic fuels glucose and glutamine, driving tumor growth, and that treating glioblastoma with radiation worsens outcomes. He asserts that the brain’s radiation raises blood sugar, stimulates the head to warm, and, along with high-dose steroids that further raise sugar, disrupts neural-glial connections and frees glutamine, leading to rapid demise of many patients. He says the death from glioblastoma is highly reproducible across major medical schools worldwide, and questions why such treatment is used. The speaker cites Pablo Kelly in England, who chose no radiation, no chemotherapy, and no conventional treatment after surgery, suggesting surgery is an essential tool for debulking. He emphasizes that surgical debulking combined with metabolic therapy can shrink the tumor and that metabolic therapy restricts the availability of glucose and glutamine without disturbing the tumor microenvironment. He claims this approach allows patients to live far longer with better quality of life, proposing a shift away from targeting mutations toward a metabolic theory. he outlines a management strategy: surgery to remove much of the tumor, then metabolic therapy to reduce glucose and glutamine, followed by drugs and procedures to further target these fuels. He argues for transitioning patients to nutritional ketosis, lowering blood sugar, elevating ketone bodies (which tumor cells cannot use), thereby marginalizing the tumor, and using additional interventions to target glucose and glutamine. The speaker concludes by asking why such an approach is not implemented, inviting readers to review survival statistics and cancer metabolism to understand why current treatments fail.

Cancer is not a disease but a survival mechanism to house toxins. The tumor is created to protect the body by containing toxins. Biopsies are unnecessary as treatment remains the same whether the tumor is cancerous or not. People often die from cancer treatment rather than cancer itself. The healthcare system profits from sick individuals, leading to unnecessary procedures like biopsies that can worsen the situation.

Partner and mother cried as doctors delivered a stage 4 cancer diagnosis. Given 8 weeks to live, the speaker chose alternative treatments after seeing improvement off chemotherapy. Despite medical skepticism, biopsies showed no cancer cells, surprising doctors. Two years later, scans revealed no active disease. Doctors praised the speaker's miraculous recovery, attributing it to alternative treatments like mesima mushrooms and IP 6 Gold supplements.

It is claimed that tumor cells can be killed by starving them of fermentable fuels. The reason this approach isn't widely used is because cancer is believed to be a genetic disease, and the focus is not on what fuels the cells.

I was diagnosed with stage 4 cancer in 2021 and researched natural remedies like soursop tea and apricot kernels. I changed my diet, took black seed oil, and focused on positivity. By February 2023, scans showed no cancer cells. Advocating for your health is crucial, as doctors may not emphasize nutrition. Speak life, eat well, and believe in healing. Always consult medical professionals before trying new treatments.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the focus shifted to chemotherapy and radiation instead of finding a cure. The current approach to cancer involves managing the disease and maintaining symptoms, which is where the money lies. The profit is not in healthy or deceased individuals, but in those who can be convinced they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

Cancer is a widespread problem today, but there are cures for certain types like breast cancer, leukemia, and prostate cancer. The speaker has personally witnessed many people curing themselves of brain tumors. If someone is diagnosed with prostate cancer, the speaker claims to have helped hundreds of people who have all been cured. Otto Warburg, a Nobel Prize winner, discovered that cancer is caused by a lack of oxygen. By increasing oxygen intake and raising the red cell blood count, Warburg was able to successfully treat and cure thousands of people with cancer.

Cancer thrives in an acidic environment and loves glucose while hating alkaline conditions and oxygen. Dr. Tullio Simoncini used sodium bicarbonate, an alkalizing substance, to counteract cancer's acidity. Cancer consumes 15 times more glucose than other cells. To conquer cancer, it is important to create an alkaline environment, reduce glucose levels, and ensure the body is oxygenated. These three factors are common denominators in successful approaches to fighting cancer.

Oncologist Dr. Tullio Simancini wrote the book "Cancer is a Fungus" and discovered that all his tested patients had Candida in their bodies. He achieved a 90% success rate by injecting sodium bicarbonate, an alkaline mix, directly into the cancerous area. Cancer cannot survive in an alkaline environment. A friend of mine, Dr. Emma Fields, took a patient to him in Italy, but he was under investigation and later jailed for manslaughter. My husband believes that if he had used chemotherapy instead, he wouldn't be in jail. Is it possible that some patients came to him in advanced stages and would have passed away regardless?

The mitochondria, not the nucleus, is the center of cancer. Cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease. Realizing this will massively drop death rates in just a few years. We may never completely get rid of cancer, but we can learn to live with it and keep it at bay. If we restrict the fuels that cancer needs through diet and lifestyle, and keep our mitochondria healthy, we can manage it. If we don't focus on the mitochondria, then almost 50% of people will continue to get cancer.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the medical community shifted towards chemotherapy and radiation treatments instead of focusing on sugar's role in cancer. As a result, there is no cure for cancer, only disease management and symptom maintenance. This approach is financially beneficial as it targets individuals with chronic conditions who require ongoing treatment. The money lies in this middle ground, not in dead or healthy individuals.

The speaker recounts a conversation where Steve advised against alternative treatments, urging a direct approach to Western medicine. Steve cautioned against trying herbs or other methods. The speaker believes Steve's advice stemmed from his own experience attempting to cure his pancreatic cancer through alternative means. The speaker recalls becoming close to Steve when they both had cancer simultaneously.

Steve Jobs reportedly ate only one type of food for weeks, such as apples or carrots. He once ate so many carrots that his skin turned orange. According to Walter Isaacson's biography, Jobs believed his restrictive diet eliminated body odor, leading him to bathe only once a week.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss access to treatment protocols and the scope of their metabolic approach to cancer. Speaker 1 notes they recently published a comprehensive, open-access protocol for glioblastoma in Biomedical Central, co-authored with Doctor Thomas Durai and over 20 scientists, physicians, nutritionists, and dietitians. The paper also marks the launch of the new Society for Metabolic Oncology. The protocol targets glioblastoma, a deadly brain cancer; Speaker 1 highlights that the same metabolic issues—cancers’ need for glucose and glutamine and their inability to burn ketones or fatty acids—apply across cancers such as lung, colon, breast, and bladder. He asserts that glioblastoma has seen no major advancement in management for a hundred years and attributes part of the problem to how brain irradiation can increase glucose and glutamine in the tumor microenvironment, potentially hastening decline. Speaker 1 emphasizes that the protocol for glioblastoma could be used for other cancers and centers on “pulling the plug on the fermentable fuels.” The regimen involves a phase of mild exercise, monitoring the glucose ketone index (GKI), and transitioning patients from dangerous metabolic states to more manageable ones to reassess treatment strategies and progressively reduce tumor activity. He stresses they are not claiming a cure; instead, they aim to “manage cancer effectively,” enabling patients to maintain a high quality of life whether or not the tumor regresses. Speaker 1 shares a clinical example: Pablo Kelly, who died last year, lived ten years with glioblastoma; he married and had three children. Although never cured, his tumor was put into an indolent state. Pablo died after a fourth surgical debulking; the tumor had been reduced and became operable after metabolic therapy, though it was never completely eradicated. The discussion notes that initial diagnosis described his tumor as inoperable, with a prognosis of death within twelve months if treated with large doses of chemo and radiation; he avoided radiation and chemotherapy and pursued metabolic therapy. The tumor then shrank enough to allow subsequent surgery over years, illustrating a shift from an aggressive to a more indolent disease course. Speaker 0 clarifies that “debulking” means removal of tissue. Speaker 1 reiterates their stance: cancer can be managed, changing its diagnosis from extremely aggressive to indolent, but they avoid using the word cure. They acknowledge uncertainty about long-term cures and note that standard care does not guarantee cure, while suggesting their approach can achieve substantially better outcomes.

Pablo Kelly was from Devon, England, and had a glioblastoma, the worst of the worst. He was all over the Devon press and constantly sent me articles from England—Man rejects standard of care. He had the tumor removed, but it was said to be inoperable; even with radiation and chemo, they warned he might live nine, maybe twelve months at most. Pablo came from a family that doesn’t dabble in conventional medicine and was more holistic. He emailed me in 2014 saying he wanted to try this metabolic thing. He rejected chemo and radiation. They said it wasn't surgically capable of being completely removed anyway. He did this metabolic therapy, alongside a very low-carbohydrate paleo diet with avocados and fish oil. Two and three years go by, he emails me. I said, jeez, Pablo, I thought you would have been dead.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the medical field has shifted towards chemotherapy and radiation, which we know do not cure cancer. Instead, we have disease management and symptom maintenance, as that is where the money lies. The focus is on the people in the middle who can be convinced that they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer because it operates on fermentation. Despite this, the medical community has shifted focus away from this knowledge and towards chemotherapy and radiation, which are not effective in curing cancer. Instead, they focus on managing the disease and maintaining symptoms. This approach is financially beneficial as it targets those who can be convinced they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

Cancer is preventable, but diet and lifestyle choices induce it. Cancer isn't solely genetic; tumor growth is linked to blood sugar levels. High blood sugar accelerates tumor growth, while low blood sugar slows it. Cancer cells grow rapidly and are hard to kill because of dysfunctional mitochondria. A solution to manage cancer without toxicity is to restrict glucose and glutamine, the fuels for cancer cells. Water-only fasting and low-carbohydrate diets induce nutritional ketosis, replacing glucose and glutamine with ketone bodies. This selectively marginalizes tumor cells, causing them to die, blood vessels to disappear, and the body to dissolve them. Maintaining healthy mitochondria through vigorous exercise, water-only fasting, and reduced consumption of processed carbohydrates is crucial.